Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Gerald McEachern

GET UPDATES FROM Gerald McEachern
 

Canada's Only Bilingual Province Is Very One-Sided

Posted: 07/06/2012 2:26 pm

Perhaps I've been out of school too long, or I'm too old and cranky. But when I read that the name of our local School District 10 had been amalgamated with others in New Brunswick and changed to Anglophone South something snapped.

With a little poking online I learned that our provincial government has cut the number of school districts in half across New Brunswick in a centralizing move that they claim will save us $5 million a year. According to NB's Education Minister Jody Carr, that means some 75 to 100 jobs will be lost, and the savings will be passed along to the classrooms, in other words, my kids and yours.

That's a happy little bit of news (unless you're one of those who lost his job). But I wasn't so amused with the voice mail message I got from our kids' school last week informing us that I could buy an $81 supplies package from a local retailer to get my child ready for the next school year. Hmm.

So, say you have three kids in school (which I do), you'd be forking out $243 in binders and paper, not to mention the $35 registration fee for each child plus a $50 locker fee for each kid in middle-high school and then the additional hits for fundraising and tickets to kids performances which would run at least $50 per child a year. And then add the cost of the annual field trips, which can go up to $300 each, and you get the picture. We're talking something like $500 per child (times three, that's $1500). And we haven't even started to talk about the extra curricular stuff like hockey.

So much for the math. But that's up to $1500 a year for "free education" to keep our three kids in school. And what are we getting for that? Classrooms wired with electronic smart boards, teachers with iPhones and iPads and, quite frankly, a generally soggy academic education relative to the one I received, given the poor grammar, memory and spelling skills my kids bring home.

I don't say any of this out of malice. I like my kids' teachers. They're caring, pleasant and diligent people who I trust. But the system has changed, ostensibly to make the school more palatable for electronically-raised kids, at some real downside expense to learning. And for all that, I would have to say my three boys are just as bored and unchallenged in school as I was.

But that's not what angers me most about this provincial system. We are living in Canada's only bilingual province. As such, in order to get a job with the province (in mine and many other fields) one must be fully bilingual, which I am not. Okay, that's just how it is.

Or is it? As I said, it was the District 10 name change that sparked a reaction. "Anglophone?" My kids are being educated as anglophones, which means when they graduate, they, too, will not be able to get the very government jobs I am not qualified to get. What's up with that?

I figure that if our province wishes to maintain its status as a fully bilingual province, it has two choices: either to educate all children in the province to be fully and functionally bilingual, so each of them has an equal opportunity for future employment in the province. Or, the government has to open its hiring policies to include people like me. And use translators to infill the difference.

Or perhaps there should be a combination of the two approaches until the entire province is fully bilingual. This would require a 20-year window (one generation) to make a full transition.
Instead we have created at least two generations of privileged bilingual insiders, administrative elites, who function in a superior capacity over unilingual anglophone and francophone New Brunswickers. I don't know about you, but I personally don't care to have my tax dollars going toward the building of a thicker layer of increasingly centralized elites.

So what are the current options? Barring any change (a highly unlikely prospect at best given that the same bilingual people are creating our provincial policies)? Well, I can arrange to bus all three of my kids 50 kilometers a day to French immersion classes in the next town. But they're now getting too old for that, and beyond easily getting caught up to their bilingual cohorts.

I can just put up and shut up, which is normal default course of action.

Or I can home school my kids. (If you're interested, you can check it out. Your kids, or mine, would be joining the other 60,000 Canadian students doing exactly that.)

The home schooling option is interesting, and seems to be a growing phenomenon with significantly less stigma attached than it used to have. But still, it seems like a lot of work, unless one is planning to live on a sailboat or in some remote location for several years.

But all of this dismisses my real regret. We are living in a bilingual province that should be offering our kids more educational advantages to us as Canadians. But we seem to be unwilling or unable, financially or creatively, to capitalize on that potential. What a shame.

 
FOLLOW CANADA BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:33 AM on 07/09/2012
I thought everything was "free" in Canada. No/Non?
11:13 PM on 07/08/2012
"Well, I can arrange to bus all three of my kids 50 kilometers a day to French immersion classes in the next town. But they're now getting too old for that, and beyond easily getting caught up to their bilingual cohorts."

Yeah, you're right Gerry, too much trouble to bother to give your kids the best opportunities in life... It is totally better to sit around, moan and complain, then be surprised when things don't turn out the way that you wanted them to....
09:55 AM on 07/10/2012
It wasn't about McEachern's kids or job, it was about everyone's access to equal opportunity in the province. Perhaps you missed the point.

And yes, there will always be people who jump the line to get themselves or their kids ahead of the rest.
10:18 PM on 07/10/2012
If everyone has an opportunity (including McEachern's kids) to become bilingual in our school systems (although, to be fair, you might need to take a bus) and learn the other official language, then aren't things "equal" and isn't everyone being given equal opportunity?? Perhaps you don't understand English.
02:35 PM on 07/08/2012
Our friend Mr. McEachern wrote a very ironic article.... Out of one side of his mouth, he says he can't get a job, and his poor children will be subjected to the same tyranny. Out of the other side of his mouth, he admits that he couldn't be bothered to get these same kids on a bus to offer them a bilingual education....

I also really liked this:

"We are living in Canada's only bilingual province. As such, in order to get a job with the province (in mine and many other fields) one must be fully bilingual, which I am not. "

What's interesting about this is if you check www.gnb.ca/jobs, there are 13 jobs, 6 of which are open to English only. How many are available for French only you might ask (if you didn't hate francophones that is) and the answer is 0. That's right - 0. So who's exactly being discriminated against? We both have the opportunity to become bilingual (if we're willing to put them on the right bus that is), but only anglos and bilinguals need apply.... Let's be real Gerry, your first phrase said it all - you're just "too old and cranky" to be making any sense.
02:43 PM on 07/07/2012
The bigest trick in the so called "Biligualism Requirements" is simply that an English speaking person who is fully fluent but his parentage shows him to be of non francafone heritage has no chance of being declared bilingual unless he can recite War and Peace, however a French speaking member who can say, "Two Tubes of tooth paste," under the "Fair and impartial" Biligualism requirements will be consider fully bilingual. Call it what it is a "Racist," program against English Speaking Canadians. This is why when these rules are enforced you end up with Qualified staff leaving in mass and unqualified staff filling lots of positions they don't have a clue about. Welcome to forced Stupidity cleverly cloaked as a Bilingualism, the best part is that the province where this should be a model program, "Quebec" is the worst Actor of the bunch.
Every Canadain who has been either employed by the Military or worked for the Federal government knows this to be true so before everyone jumps on board and says this is Sour grapes or patiently untrue, simply FOI the requirements with the additional geographical Caveats and be prepared to eat a little Crow.
02:38 PM on 07/08/2012
Yet another urban legend about bilingualism in NB. Keep on saying it to yourself to justify the fact that you can't even write the word "bigest" (sic) and can't get a job, I'm sure you'll feel better soon.
01:29 PM on 07/07/2012
Mr McEachern seems to have overlooked the legal and best remedy for the employment problems in NB - "proportional representation" - 20% of our population is franco; therefore, 1 job/position out of 5 should be assigned to bilingual. 80% of the population is anglo; thus 80% or 4 of 5 positions should be designated english. Job qualifications must always be based on the population proportion of each official language - as the Charter says "where numbers exist".
02:27 PM on 07/08/2012
Wow - I don't think I've ever read comments to better demonstrate a lack of knowledge on the charter than these. Mr. McEachern is in good company with his whining....
12:29 PM on 07/07/2012
You have left out that the vast majority of English speaking students that do take French Immersion still fail the Governments Language Requirements Test.

WHY ?

This is just the tip of the discrimination being waged against the English majority in New Brunswick.
02:28 PM on 07/08/2012
Hey Tiger - working for the federal govt, you think you would complain less about all the "discrimination" you've suffered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sheria Reid
05:22 PM on 07/06/2012
Dang, you could be writing about public education in the U.S. Sad to say that what our countries have in common is the sorry state of public education. We don't have any bilingual requirements, but we should, at least in my state which has seen a massive increase in its Spanish speaking population in the last two decades. Most of the Spanish classes introduced a decade ago have fell victim to state budget cuts. I haven't the heart to begin to address the poor quality of the education offered to our children. The irony is that at the state and federal level, our elected officials continue to fervently declare that children are our most valuable natural resource and we must educate them to participate in a global economy. Yet education budgets are repeatedly cut