In case you ever wondered, (and I am sure you haven't) American actors Angelina Jolie, Johnny Depp and Meryl Streep, all "speak French, very well."
I learned this while visiting the website of the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages.
So by now you are probably asking yourself two very important questions: 1) why in the world would anybody ever visit the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages website, and 2) why does the Commissioner of Official Languages think it matters that American celebrities can speak French?
To answer these questions you first need to understand Canada's often turbulent language history.
Here's a recap: In the early days of this country most people spoke French; then after the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759, most people in Canada spoke English.
And that's the way things stayed until the late 1960s when former Liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau enacted the "Official Languages Act."
This was an historic law which gave Canadians the legal right to get all huffy and indignant and threaten lawsuits, whenever a federal civil servant in places like Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan or Kippers Flippers, Newfoundland didn't start a conversation with the word: "Bonjour."
Anyway, to enforce the Languages Act, the government created the position of "Language Commissioner," a job that requires one essential skill: unhinged bureaucratic zealotry.
Former Language commissioner, Dyane Adam, for instance had this skill in spades.
Consider this: she once launched an official government investigation into CBC hockey commentator Don Cherry after he made some on-air comments about French Canadians in the NHL wearing visors.
What this had to do with "official bilingualism" is unclear, but Adam was probably also pondering possible investigations into the NHL for it's clear failure to ensure more Stanley Cup wins for the Montreal Canadiens.
And her successor, Graham Fraser, is pretty much cut from the same fanatic cloth.
Indeed, Fraser recently went to court to intervene on behalf of Michel and Lynda Thibodeau, a fluently bilingual couple who were suing Air Canada because during a flight they were not provided with services in French.
This included the nightmare scenario of ordering a 7-Up in French and instead receiving (gasp) a Sprite.
It's a wonder they survived such a dramatic ordeal.
At any rate, the court sided with the Thibodeaus and ordered Air Canada to pay them $12,000 in damages, to make up for "moral prejudice, pain and suffering."
After the ruling, a gleeful and excited Fraser declared how happy he was that the court had strengthened "the importance of the Official Languages Act."
By which he probably meant it strengthened its importance in the mind of litigation lawyers.
For his next trick, Fraser will soon dispatch an army of "secret shoppers," otherwise known as spies, across Ottawa to see how French-speaking tourists fare when doing business in the nation's capital.
In other words, Fraser wants to know if private companies and businesses are displaying the proper "linguistic values" when dealing with their customers.
I suspect the Official Language Commissioner, for instance, would take an extremely dim view of any shopkeeper who didn't accept a customer's payment with a bilingual "Merci/Thank you," especially if that shopkeeper was Don Cherry.
All this is necessary, Fraser recently wrote, because the Official Languages Act calls for his office to encourage Ottawa's "business community, labour organizations and voluntary organizations in Canada to foster the recognition and use of English and French."
Of course, it's also necessary for Fraser to try and foster the recognition that his crazy linguistic social engineering job actually has some relevance.
At any rate, I think it's long past time for a new Language Commissioner, one, perhaps, who isn't so fanatical.
In fact, as a public service I have even come up with a great candidate for the job: Angelina Jolie!
Mark Dubowitz: My Dual Loyalties Problem
Language watchdog's shoppers fanning out
He claims that Trudeau just invented official bilingualism for no reason, as if there was no problem and Trudeau just created one. This is completely ignorant and false.
Canada was founded by two nations, a French-speaking one and an English-speaking one (I don't count First Nations, Canada happened to them). In order to preserve peace between the communities, and to respect their rights to exist, rights often violated in the past, official bilingualism was established.
This article is pure ignorant, absurd demagogy. Just meant to rile up anglos against French-speakers.
However there is a large french minority in Canada, with an history of oppression. Positive discrimination was used to improve the situation. And interestingly, the same arguments are made against this policy. But French can be learned more easily than skin color or sex can be modified. Yet I am sure that criticizing law positively discriminating would not be accepted as easily here.
The point is then: could the Official Language Act be improved, certainly. But is it an evil that need to be done with. Probably not.
BTW, in Home Depot, even on the West Island where the majority of customers are English, how many English Magazines or books? None, Zero, Zip
That said it is much easier to learn English in Que, than French anywhere else in Canada because of US music, movies, holdidays, etc etc. Even on pure French radio stations they play, what 50% English songs?, probably more...
I just dont like these oppressive laws against a minority, I live in Quebec and there are laws that are unfair, the only minority in NA that has laws to minimize them. French Quebecsers should be ashamed IMO. In Ontario, the French minority are activitely pushing laws that FORCE retailers to put French up, how about some laws in Quebec that dont FORCE retailers to take English signs down or better yet put them up???
The laws exist because the anglo community was historically influential and powerful, and used that power to force the francos to learn English or be marginalized in a society in which they were a majority. If the anglos had always respected the francos and agreed voluntarily to offer services or jobs in French, there would have been no need for such laws, but they didn't, so there you go.
The problem is that anglos think they are justified in coming to French-speaking communities and demanding of the francos that they learn English if they want to deal with them. There is an implied idea in that mentality that English is just superior and that people who don't know the language are morons. Don't be surprised when people start fighting back when you do things like that.
In the Govt and Military bilingualism is a bonus, that is why the Govt and Military senior ranks are dominated by the french.
It would be similar, but exagerated if the US were made bilingual, English/Hawaiian, and a requirement to speak the language, people who were born in Hawaii would dominate.
Since the banks and corporations left Montreal, Quebec has changed enormously but since many who knew Quebec back in those glory days are now in their 70s, the young Montrealers will not know what they lost from their city. But at least they have French.
If they can get away from the separatism bogey man there is hope, but will take 10+ years just to get to where Toronto was 10 yrs ago IMO.
An official Federal policy designed to ensure French Canadians are over-represented in the civil service? No Thanks, it's officially sanctioned discrimination.
Whether someone is able to speak Mandarin or Russian has no bearing on their rightful indignation over a policy designed to preserve a particular Language. The point is that in Ontario, Alberta or B.C. demographics would be better served by the civil service speaking Urdu, Pashtun, Mandarin, Canton, Polish, Spanish, etc. than French. Instead we waste money on a Bureaucracy to protect the French Canadian Heritage. As if somehow the French contribution to a now totally Multicultural Canada (save for Quebec ironically) should carry more significance than any of the other more recent cultural influxes.
Great article!
Thus Canada's language policies are principally seen as a way to ensure that westerners are rarely qualified to fill senior federal posts. And you can imagine how pleased westerners are that some federal politicians now want only bilingual supreme court justices.
It's difficult to exaggerate how preposterous and divisive our language policies are to western Canadians.
I bet your city web sites, tax bills etc etc are 50% French, in Montreal where I live most of the website is french only and it is extremely ackward to get my bills in English.
Road construction signs 100% french, very dangerous if you dont read it
Nearly 100% of road signs outside Québec (and New Brunswick) are in English only. I've seen pictures of drivers' licenses from other provinces, and most of these are English-only. That's not a problem and not forbidden.
Federal road signs are bilingual, including those in Québec. You whine about things you do not know.
I dont believe this, to the first person who posts credible information regarding english only driver licence in any province in canada, set up an email and I will give you a bank transfers for $20.
I will even post an apology. There is only one province with 1 language on their drivers licence and that is Quebec.
FWIW I could not rent a car in Austrailia with the french only license without a notarized translation.