Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Gillian McEachern

GET UPDATES FROM Gillian McEachern
 

The Budget's Love Affair With Big Oil

Posted: 03/30/2012 2:52 pm

Everyone knows that there are always winners and losers come federal budget time. Yesterday's budget, however, built on the emerging dynamic in federal politics where Big Oil wins big time at the expense of all Canadians -- our health, our right to open and democratic debate, and our pocketbooks.

One columnist called the oil-soaked federal budget a "declaration of war on environmentalists" and questions like "so how does it feel to be targeted?" have become commonplace for those of us working on tar sands issues. The reality is that it's Canadians' right to a healthy environment, clean air and water, and a say in big industrial projects that is under attack.

It was no surprise that the budget included measures to weaken the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA), imposing artificial deadlines for reviewing the impacts of projects and shunting responsibility to the provinces. What was surprising was the admission from Minister Flaherty that those changes will apply to Enbridge's proposed Northern Gateway pipeline and tanker project despite previous assurances from the government to the contrary.

It's unclear what exactly this means for the ongoing environmental review of the project, which is scheduled to reach a decision by the end of 2013. The worst case scenario would be that the process is shut down and a decision is made as early as May 2012 (24 months after the review technically started). But, the reality is the hearings didn't even start until this time last year, largely because it took an entire year for the panel to post a hearing order after determining that Enbridge had submitted all the information needed.

This would mean failing to do the work needed to understand the risks of the pipeline and tanker project. It would mean silencing the voices of the more than 4,000 Canadians who want to share their concerns about the project. It would mean shirking the government's constitutional responsibility to consult with First Nations.

Environmental assessments exist to prevent problems before they happen, and to protect the health of Canadians (and all other species who live here) from the harm of water and air pollution. Rolling back environmental protections puts us all at risk and gives Big Oil a free pass to do what it wants. It also means Canadians are vulnerable to the financial burden of cleaning up industry's mess.

Yesterday's budget didn't stop at weakening CEAA. The assault on charitable organizations seen in the senate and by some Members of Parliament continued. The attempts to intimidate organizations working to raise awareness of the environmental damage caused by tar sands development is yet another ploy to pave the way for reckless tar sands expansion by limiting public debate on these issues.

What wasn't in the budget? There was virtually no support for renewable energy, energy efficiency, or efforts to tackle climate change. And that $1.38 billion taxpayers hand to Big Oil every year in subsidies? That was barely touched.

 
Everyone knows that there are always winners and losers come federal budget time. Yesterday's budget, however, built on the emerging dynamic in federal politics where Big Oil wins big time at the expe...
Everyone knows that there are always winners and losers come federal budget time. Yesterday's budget, however, built on the emerging dynamic in federal politics where Big Oil wins big time at the expe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeeTadBit
03:11 PM on 04/03/2012
"virtually no support for renewable energy, energy efficiency, or efforts to tackle climate change."

Reckless and short-sighted. The consequences of this government's inaction will no doubt have a devastating longterm impact. Doesn't look like Harper is standing on guard for Canada, and it's simply shameful.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
11:06 AM on 04/02/2012
Imposing artificial deadlines on the CEAA for reviewing the impacts of projects and shunting responsibility to the provinces, but no push for deadlines on a solution for tailings ponds that have been growing for 30 + years? $1.38 billion taxpayers subsidies to foreign oil companies untouched but Canadian Environmental groups are pilloried in the Senate? This is what is called a fair and balanced budget in this bizarrely mishapen Conservative Canada that has been formed by the alliance of foreign oil money and American propaganda . We must wake up and demand better from a government that is holding its population hostage with a "we could have been a whole lot harder on you" narrative.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:12 AM on 04/02/2012
It'd be more apt we Harper changed the party name from Conservatives to Con Artists.
compro01
Conservatism : Policy-based evidence making
06:31 PM on 04/02/2012
I'd prefer convicts.
05:10 PM on 04/01/2012
This Harper government is setting Canada back decades and putting all of our economic hopes into the tar sands. Not only are the tar sands a bad idea environmentally, they are destroying our national economy by forcing us to pour billions in tax dollars into keeping them profitable at the expense of real initiatives that could diversify Canada's economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CreepyThinMan
More dapper than Don Draper.
01:00 PM on 04/01/2012
CONservatives (because only suckers vote for them) are only for corporations, the wealthy and the military. They don't care about anything else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:03 AM on 04/01/2012
From environmental perspective Canada has become a pariah state. The Harper regime has brought shame, embarrassment and humiliation for Canadians.