Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Glen Pearson

GET UPDATES FROM Glen Pearson
 

CIDA's Death Leaves a Foreign Aid Skeleton

Posted: 03/22/2013 9:53 am

The young agency didn't even make it into its 20s. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) burst into public notice with the announcement of its first minister in 1995. Sadly, with yesterday's Conservative budget, CIDA suffered a premature passing.

Prior to that moment in 1995, Canada's foreign aid and development projects and policies were worked out and monitored under the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Yet under Brian Mulroney's government, and in partnership with Foreign Affairs Minister Joe Clark, government commitment to the world's needy took on a far more prominent role and Clark made it a matter of principle to ensure that the world understood that this country took its role in foreign aid seriously.

It was a time of new perspective, as donor nations like Sweden, Britain, and the United States began to put more emphasis on destitute poverty. The time seemed right for some kind of breakthrough. It occurred in the 1990s, when those governments mentioned above opted to provide their foreign aid officers with money, access, and most important of all, their own separate profiles in the forms of new agencies or full-blown departments.

Canada wasn't far behind. Building on the Mulroney/Clark foundation, Jean Chretien made CIDA its own agency and provided it with its first minister. There were growing pains, to be sure, but the decision by the G7 nations at the Kannanaskis summit, chaired by Jean Chretien, to concentrate their efforts on Africa, saw the building of a global poverty alleviation movement that ultimately resulted in the United Nations Millennial Development Goals (MDGs) and Canada's own promise, under Paul Martin, to double Canadian aid to Africa at the Gleneagles summit in 2005. Suddenly being international was cool again.

For a time following the Bush Jr., David Cameron and Stephen Harper electoral wins it appeared as though the trend might continue. It wasn't to be. Canada, Britain and the Americans maintained high levels of donations but in a boutique fashion that ultimately undermined the holistic pursuits of the MDGs and their emphasis on a coordinated approach across different sectors.

In my time as a Member of Parliament and Opposition critic for CIDA (2006-2011), it was becoming increasingly clear that the prior efforts of Mulroney/Clark and Chretien/Martin held little appeal to the new Conservative government. They lifted two of the MDGs -- child and maternal health, and food distribution -- from the more complex goals and opted to pursue them in a fashion that was skewing the growing coordination of foreign aid and development aims of previous governments. It wasn't a good time.

Through my office in West Block flooded an ongoing stream of non-government organizations and their leaders fretting that the kind of imagination and ingenuity required to deliver foreign aid effectively was badly slipping. They were right, of course, but in Ottawa everything is political, not necessarily rational, and they couldn't get a hearing from the government.

Worst of all was what was running through the minds of CIDA workers themselves. Their ship had hit an iceberg, and being the professionals they were, they comprehended that it was perhaps fatal, even if others refused to acknowledge it.

Well, they were right, too. Some CIDA workers learned of the Agency's demise in yesterday's budget through a memo released earlier that day. There was little preparation for it, and even less understanding of what this would signal to our international partners and recipient nations worldwide.

They had watched in growing alarm as Canada continued to shrink in international standings. While Canadians and their government clung to the belief that they were fine because their economy might have been doing better than other nations, their international partners could see the writing on the wall, especially when Canada was denied its seat on the UN Security Council.

Above all else, CIDA was part of an idea that was emerging in numerous countries at the same time and which introduced a new era of Canadian compassion to the world. It was smarter, keener, cooler and substantial. Yesterday, the dream ended.

Many of us knew it was coming, but its axing in the budget is a far more significant blow to this country's reputation that the Harper government realizes. Very good men and women in CIDA had built solid and progressive relationships with their partners in other countries, and though Canada's foreign aid will continue in various capacities, the dream of the kind of international interventions of compassion that made a clear and multi-dimensional difference is over.

While I mourn CIDA's passing, my ultimate grief is felt for all those qualified men and women in the Agency, who, despite all the odds, struggled to make our compassion known. They deserved better, as did the country.

Loading Slideshow...
  • 2013 BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS

    Revenues for 2013-14 forecast at $263.9 billion, spending at $282.6 billion, deficit at $18.7 billion. Deficit projected to drop to $6.6 billion in 2014-15 and become an $800-million surplus in 2015-16. With files from Althia Raj and The Canadian Press.

  • Tackling The Skills Gap

    The Tories plan to create a Canada Job Grant that will provide $15,000 or more per person -- up to $5,000 provided by the federal government, the rest matched by the province/territory and the employer. Nearly 130,000 Canadians are expected to benefit when the new grant is fully implemented in 2017-2018. Essentially, this is the government saying it is taking training out of the hands of provincial governments because it hasn’t worked and placing it in the hands of individuals. The Canada Job Grant will replace the Labour Market Agreements the feds signed with the provinces, which expire in 2014.

  • Helping Manufacturers

    Manufacturing and small business get tax-credits introduced in past budgets extended to help spur investment and growth. There will be $1.4 billion in tax relief for manufacturers by extending the temporary accelerated capital cost allowance for new investment in machinery and equipment. And hundreds of millions for small business owners.

  • Infrastructure Spending

    The government has pledged more than $53 billion in infrastructure spending, including $47 billion in new funding over 10 years. This includes $32.2 billion over 10 years for a “Community Improvement Fund” to build roads and public transit as well as recreational facilities and other community infrastructure projects. The Fund will consist of an index Gas Tax Fund and the incremental GST Rebate for Municipalities.

  • Military Spending

    Military spending will be re-jigged that it is modeled on the ship building strategy and aimed at creating more jobs in Canada and key domestic capabilities with an eye towards exports.

  • Foreign Affairs - Aid Agency Cancelled

    The budget has cancelled the Canadian International Development Agency, the primary agency responsible for foreign aid. Its duties will be merged into the Department of Foreign Affairs.

  • Tax Evasion Snitch Line

    The government says it is aggressively going after tax avoiders/and closing tax loopholes. They are launching a “Stop International Tax Evasion Program” where the Canada Revenue Agency will pay individuals with knowledge of “major international tax non-compliance” a percentage of the tax collected as a result of information provided. The CRA will only pay a reward if the information results in total additional assessments exceeding $100,000 in federal tax.

  • Public Service Cuts

    Two departments -- Canada Revenue Agency and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans -- will see big cuts. Departments will see a 5 per cent cut in their travel budgets. The government also says in the budget it intends to work with the public sector unions to “further align overall compensation with other public and private sector employers.”

  • Border Security

    The federal budget says new projects related to Canada's perimeter security deal with the United States will go ahead as planned, despite budget woes south of the border. The federal budget has given the green light to almost a dozen information-sharing and infrastructure projects related to the Beyond the Border initiative between the two countries. The vaunted deal was announced with fanfare by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama in December 2011 at the White House. The plan aims to speed the flow of goods and people across the 49th parallel while protecting the continent from a terrorist attack.

  • Tobacco Prices Going Up

    The government wants to reduce import tariffs on a number of goods including baby clothing, skis, snowboards and gold clubs. But it plans to offset the $76-million revenue loss from that by hiking excise taxes on chewing tobacco and other manufactured tobaccos, to bring them in line with cigarette taxes.

  • Affordable Housing

    Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's spring budget commits Ottawa to five more years of funding through the Investment in Affordable Housing program. The level of commitment is the same as in the past: $253 million a year over five years, which needs to be matched by the provinces and territories and can be spent on new construction, renovation, home ownership assistance, rent supplements, shelters and homes for battered spouses. But there's a new twist to the funding. Home construction in the program will support the use of apprentices so that newcomers to the construction trades can build up crucial experience. The budget also commits $100 million over two years to build 250 more units of affordable housing in Nunavut, where homes are so crowded that illness spreads easily and poverty abounds.

 

Follow Glen Pearson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/glenpearson

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The young agency didn't even make it into its 20s. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) burst into public notice with the announcement of its first minister in 1995. Sadly, with yester...
The young agency didn't even make it into its 20s. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) burst into public notice with the announcement of its first minister in 1995. Sadly, with yester...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:10 AM on 03/25/2013
I keep wondering who voted Mr Harper into power!? He did not use the gun to get into office or did he? A lil cheating and lying here and there and Canadians gave him a majority government but what do you expect from a society where a lot of people can not think for themselves?

Harper says hey, economy is good and I made it so, so y'all must vote for me and people like sheep went and vote him a majority despite warning from some of us, right!!?

What did y'all expect...! Deal with it, and if the economy gets any worse, Canadians themselves will be dealt a rough deck of cards by Harper - never mind the poor foreigners then!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dolly Lama
I think too much
09:04 AM on 03/24/2013
Harper, "Get rid of CIDA, we need a Ministry of Religious Freedom, the manna that comes from God shall feed the poor!"
12:26 PM on 03/23/2013
There just seems to be no end to Harper's vileness. This is a dispiriting time to be a Canadian.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Johnny LaRue
political correctness is just incorrect
08:03 AM on 03/23/2013
The CIDA was a self serving agency that failed to deliver what it was suppose to. An example of goverment inefficiency but on an international level.
03:13 PM on 03/25/2013
CIDA was used to whitewash our reputation and foreign policy. Given the large number of Canadians who think that we are a nation of humanitarians, it seems to have worked.
05:27 AM on 03/23/2013
A hostile force is dismantling what it means to be Canadian.

Even people who don’t have any capacity for human decency still reaped the benefits of our former global standing. Good will results in more security, for less money, than waving guns around and threatening people.

Our morality, civility, culture, wealth and global influence had value. We’ve been robbed of that value.

The despot at the head of this festering boil of a 'government' admitted to what many (including me) consider to be treason, before eventually clawing his way into the PMO, only to wage war against workers’ rights, women’s rights, civil rights, human rights, equal rights, democracy, elections rules, transparency, and the right to vote.

Cons killed Rights and Democracy stone dead. Now CIDA too.

Some people are truly, and shamelessly, evil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
09:09 PM on 03/22/2013
The Grim Reaper comes to mind.

Harper has literally taken food out of the mouths of poor children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TerryLeBlancMan
12:00 PM on 03/23/2013
What about the wealthy in those countries, looking after their own?
02:13 PM on 03/23/2013
Terry are you actually saying the Harper government(TM) should look after the poor who are here? I,m for that but it would interfere with the budget. We can't have those lazy bums taking their children to government paid preschool can we. And better the poor in poor countries starve because their few rich won't feed them. Jesus would think that way. Yes he would.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
03:07 PM on 03/23/2013
They are called "developing" countries for a reason.  If there are any wealthy people, they likely are helping and looking after some of their own but why does that preclude a far more wealthy and historically caring country like ours from helping more?
06:48 PM on 03/22/2013
Why is it that the leaders of these countries are living in luxury while their people are starving? We have been giving money for the longest time and nothing has changed maybe it is time for these people to start a revolution so they can get rid of theses leaders.
03:18 PM on 03/25/2013
Because we always help those leaders stay in power. The aid we give to their countries in exchange for their allegiance simply serves as "bread and games" for the poor. We fund tokenistic feel-good projects that don't make any actual change while ignoring (and sometimes helping suppress or silence) those who are struggling for widespread social change in their countries.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Desdemonios
Liberté collective, solidarité, équité sociale
01:01 PM on 03/22/2013
Perfectly right, but you can't expect mercy from sociopathes
12:56 PM on 03/22/2013
"Fiscal conservatives" should object to foreign aid. I suspect the general purpose of foreign aid is to keep other countries under the control of "developed" countries, and has considerable negative repercussions (there is higher probability and severity that public officials in "developing" countries will seek to maintain their status to siphon off some of the money for their personal gain, including through the use of force).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
09:14 PM on 03/22/2013
That's why you fund agencies and charities that are going into these areas instead of throwing money at their government. Harper has basically removed all forms of foreign aid and opted to invest in foreign training for resource development. Forget food and shelter, just train them to work on the rigs and they'll be fine... He has brought his big-oil mentality to the international stage.
03:33 AM on 03/23/2013
They get food and shelter, and the things we enjoy in the west when they work on oil rigs. Any poor person will tell you, they want a job and their own money... Don't look at oil/resource workers as victims.
07:53 AM on 03/24/2013
Are you confident that the agencies and charities are not affiliated with governments or crowding out the private sector, which is important in any economy? For example, there was a delegation of alleged NGOs based in Sudan at the United Nations which actually were being funded by the government of Sudan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opprobrious
More speech. Less Flagging.
12:45 PM on 03/22/2013
The Con base has never understood the importance of foreign aid (even when some of their more enlightened leaders have).
12:37 PM on 03/22/2013
Very sad for a change like this to occur without any debate or discussion with Canadians.
12:31 PM on 03/22/2013
What a sad day for Canada
12:09 PM on 03/22/2013
Under Harper, Canada is will join any war effort where resources are the issue. Purchasing military hardware, rather than seeds and ploughs, is now the name of the game. Fame and glory, kid!
11:55 AM on 03/22/2013
Harper continues to destroy Canada's international reputation as he manoeuvres our great country into being nothing more than his personal little fiefdom at the service of whoever has the biggest chequebook. Canada…will we be USA Lite, or China's North American Colony (aka Chinada)? Keep voting for Harper to find out the answer! In the meantime, choose your future job from this fine assortment:
1) hewer of wood
2) drawer of water
3) cleaner of toilets
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed Tanas
11:51 AM on 03/22/2013
In regards to the "$15,000 Training Fund"...

The cons said they will contribute their $5,000 portion only if the province and private industry agrees to contribute also..if neither the province or private industry agree to provide their $5,000 portion at all then the Harper government will not provide any money at all so a person cannot get $5,000 from the federal government..feds apply pressure to private industry and province and try to make it like they are helping ..what a scam eh??

the feds did not discuss this training structure with either the provinces or private industries before announcing it or making it part of it’s budget..

and if the province or a company cannot afford to provide 5000 then they look like the bad guys and feds look like the good guys

Canadians are that gullible...and these type of tactics which are an isult to all Canadian's intelligence is just one of many reasons wht Harepr will be ousted out of office in 2015....

PM Trudeau is going to have a real mess to clean up and hopefully Canadians will be patient with him ... hoping that he will not have to butt heads and have the same type of opposition that President Obama has and still gets from the Repubs even still..