Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Conrad Black
Glen Pearson

GET UPDATES FROM Glen Pearson

Food Prices Rising: Here's What on the Menu

Posted: 06/03/11 09:00 AM ET

Oxfam is a difficult group to ignore. An international confederation of 14 organizations in 98 countries, it speaks on poverty issues with about as much clout as any other group on the planet, save the United Nations.

So when it tells the world that there a crisis in food prices coming, it doesn't do so from an altitude of 30,000 feet but from all the communities where it directly works.

The organization released its compelling findings on the future of food this week in a report titled, Growing A Better Future and it carries relevant data that should urge all of us -- governments and global citizens -- to action.

After reminding us that food prices have doubled in the last 20 years, Oxfam predicts that the average cost of key crops could increase between 120 per cent and 180 per cent by 2030 -- roughly 20 years away.

To complicate matters, while global population will reach nine billion by 2050, the growth rate in agricultural yields has almost halved in the last 20 years. Do the math and it's simple: hunger on a grand scale is about to move its way across the planet.

The increase in the price of food is occurring even in the most advanced countries on earth. For poorer nations, it's becoming desperate. How would you fare if you spent up to 80 per cent of income just on food? That's what people in the Philippines are paying out right now -- four times more than those in Britain.

The report reveals that the shortage of food has actually arrived at the point of a global crisis. What will the future be like for those 1.2 billion people who live on less than $1.25 a day? Just a 10 per cent rise in food prices will see another 10 million people swell their ranks.

Oxfam could have played it safe -- calling on the wealthier nations to give more aid dollars to the struggling regions -- yet the organization knew this would solve little. So their report hit us right where it needed to; in our own way of living.

Understanding that few of us in the affluent West want to hear it, Oxfam spoke truth to power and wealth, calling for nations to agree on new rules governing global food markets. For far too long the wealthy nations have controlled who eats and who doesn't by the effective use of subsidies, the proliferation of massive food producing conglomerates, and environmental degradation on such a grand scale that it threatens the entire planet's ability to produce food.

This last point -- the devastating effects of climate change -- has so far achieved limited action in international circles. The Copenhagen Climate Conference in 2009 accomplished little in addressing the food crisis. Oxfam rightly worries that we are about to witness a repeat performance at the upcoming United Nations climate summit in South Africa this coming December.

This volatile intersection between climate change and food has Oxfam Canada worried. While the Harper government in Canada has made some progress in delivering more food aid to needy regions through its partnership with the World Food Program, it has effectively undercut such measures by its embarrassing lack of substance on the climate file.

This country is still viewed as a laggard by its international partners when it comes to effective action on the devastation resulting from climate change -- a source of concern for Oxfam Canada as well as an incentive to press the government to take Growing A Better Future seriously.

As world hunger reaches alarming proportions over the next two decades, governments of both the poor and wealthier nations will have little excuse for being poorly prepared. Oxfam's report is a clarion call to action, especially to Canada, with its impressive wealth but little resolve to deal with hunger's ultimate enemy: climate change.

It might already be too late. With global hunger about to arrive on such a grand scale, coupled with this country's poor environmental record, our international reputation will only slip further.

 

Follow Glen Pearson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/glenpearson

Oxfam is a difficult group to ignore. An international confederation of 14 organizations in 98 countries, it speaks on poverty issues with about as much clout as any other group on the planet, save th...
Oxfam is a difficult group to ignore. An international confederation of 14 organizations in 98 countries, it speaks on poverty issues with about as much clout as any other group on the planet, save th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:05 PM on 06/05/2011
A Warming Planet Struggles to Feed Itself
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/05/science/earth/05harvest.html?_r=1
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 06/04/2011
It is widely agreed that the planet can feed 1 billion, maybe 2 with a lot of effort, with sustainable agriculture. Everything beyond that is through use of lots of fertilizers and pesticides. All of those are made out of oil, which will be mostly gone by the middle of the century, or at least the price will be so high as to be unaffordable for most people on the planet. Ergo, a couple billion people will have to go by then too.
Oh and 1 degree of temperature rise decreases yield for basic crops like wheat and soy by 10%.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:28 PM on 06/03/2011
Not everyone believes in global warming. The earths climate goes through cycles. We as people are so short sighted (and getting more ADD about it) that we spaz over every change. Weren't we going to freeze in an ice age in the 70's?

We need to stop being so arrogent to think that we can change the world.

If you want to "win" the global warming argument, push the other side of the "Carbon" equation. Promote being efficient. Taxing carbon dioxide will never work. Offer me subsidies or tax breaks to be efficient, don't tax me for burning gas.
03:42 AM on 06/04/2011
That's true, the Earth does change all on its own with very little we can do to change it. However, climate change is a real challenge we will need to face, that WILL affect the food supply. The best course of action is to bury our heads in the sand and not tax you? You drive an Excursion, right? The effect of this 'completely unavoidable' change, that we're all 'spazing out' about, will be global war regarding food, water and oil for a planet with a population double what it can sustain. Isn't it simply logical to do whatever we can NOW to avoid that; or at least diminish the effect of that eventuality? I hope you, and everyone else in the West, have an epiphany and come around before its too late.
photo
ABACADABRA RABBIT
VOTE GREEN PARTY 2012
12:47 AM on 06/05/2011
you are getting taxed for burning gas.

Global Climate Change is real. The earth is round. And the Earth is over 8000 years old. Find me a distinguished climatologist with a PhD that says it is not real.
12:24 PM on 06/03/2011
oxfam is a good organization to donate to.
Blaming Canada's coal power for climate change is wrong.

http://ozspeaksup.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/who-is-behind-the-massive-worldwide-buyup-of-our-forests/
Who? is behind the Massive Worldwide Buyup of our Forests?

Posted February 8, 2011 by ozspeaksup in forests, govt sell offs, investment, worldwide event. Leave a Comment

This is a bit Aussie centric, but then theres a UK and USA linkup I think may have some bearing on it all.

Today the Sth Australian news is about the buyup proposed to be approved by Private UNnamed interests of the SA forests.

Last few weeks theres been a similar event happening in the UK a huge amount of old forestry to be privatised, no names again..

now I got a CDC email toaday, aside from the political views the people behind the doings are worth some note.

its the RBS royal bank of scotland…who happen to be broke and bailed out, doing the SA advisory
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
10:47 AM on 06/03/2011
Seems to me that those in control are perfectly happy with the current situation. As far as they're concerned, it puts them into an even stronger position of power and world control, increases their wealth and takes care of that pesky problem of overpopulation without actually having the finger of blame for what is a less-than-subtle form of eugenics pointed at them.

We in the "wealthy" (a completely relative term because the distribution of wealth is rather skewed) industrialized nations won't be terribly bothered by any of this, as long as we have the creature comforts to keep us distracted. However, as the scales of wealth tip disproportionately away from the middle class, trickling up to the so-called elites as the current economic model is designed to do, food affordability will become a more pressing matter.

Until then, millions will starve and die, and most of us won't care enough to stop it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
09:59 AM on 06/03/2011
Why so many people ignore these hard realities is beyond me. Perhaps they think it won't affect them, or their kids. They couldn't be more wrong.
10:33 AM on 06/03/2011
They don't want to see them. I sometimes wish I could stick my head in the sand, too.
photo
ABACADABRA RABBIT
VOTE GREEN PARTY 2012
12:48 AM on 06/05/2011
boiling frog syndrome.