In the current campaign for the American Presidency,the GOP candidate Donald Trump's proposed temporary ban on Muslims seeking entry into the United States is a big vote-getter amongst Republicans. Trump is calling "... for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."
Some six months after the December 2015 statement proposing the ban, Trump generously offered to limit the ban to specific terrorist countries, adding that there is existing knowledge as to which countries these are.
A poll taken two weeks after the minute revision to the ban revealed that 35 per cent of Americans support the idea. The CBS News/New York Times poll conducted from July 8 to 12, 2016 had 56 per cent of Republicans in agreement with "... temporarily banning Muslims from other countries from entering the United States" (note that the question doesn't refer to any limit to "terrorist countries").
The proposed Trump Muslim ban was widely denounced as unconstitutional. Indeed, perhaps the best source for this rather obvious observation is none other than Trump's running mate, Mike Pence. Back in December 2015, Pence referred to the proposed ban as "offensive" and "unconstitutional." Now, however, he believes that the revised version of the ban is just fine.
A ban that Pence and nearly all Republicans would consider unconstitutional is one that would infringe on the right of Americans to bear arms. A McClatchy-Marist poll carried out from July 5 to 9, 2016 reveals that 66 per cent of Republicans versus 23 per cent of Democrats oppose a ban on the sale of assault weapons and semi-automatic rifles.
Pence strongly supports a right to carry a firearm in public. While holding a similar view on the Constitution's right to bear arms, Trump has nonetheless expressed openness to banning people on terrorist watch lists from purchasing firearms.
The striking paradox in the Muslim ban is Trump's inference that it would be in effect until such time as "... we figure out what is going on." He declared that "... it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."
Don't Trump and the Republicans insist that they know what is going on? Trump repeatedly berates Barack Obama for not using the term radical Islam, which is to state the obvious when it comes to the source of terrorism. I highly doubt that making the ban temporary is Trump's way of looking into the root causes of the hatred that underlies terrorism.
Many American voters seemingly appreciate the fact that Trump would propose such a ban regardless of whether it can be implemented. A Gallup poll conducted from June 14 to 15, 2016 found that only 17 per cent of Americans thought that such a ban would be effective.
Many Americans likely realize that actually putting this thing into effect risks compromising a Constitution that Americans greatly value.
The idea of building a wall between Mexico and the United States, while attractive to many Republicans, is surely seen as unrealistic by members of the GOP. Getting the Mexicans to pay for it is ludicrous. Whether it's a ban on Muslims or a wall with Mexico, it's just the thought of such things rather than any action that matters for many Republicans. It's the thought that counts.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
MORE ON HUFFPOST:
The UK's very own Donald Trump is, beyond doubt, Nigel Farage. The leader of the populist UK Independence party (UKIP) relishes in his politically incorrect, beer-swilling, cigar-smoking persona. Avowedly anti-establishment and a privately-educated businessman, he knows that many compare him to The Donald. With a referendum on the UK's membership of the European Union looming, he could have more influence than ever. -- Paul Waugh
Right-wing Congressman Jair Bolsonaro has left a huge mark on Brazil’s political scene. Bolsonaro is one of Brazil's most controversial characters: Military reserve, dictatorship enthusiast, bullet caucus member and “traditional” family defender, he fights mainly against Brazil's minority groups, including gays, women and black people. In Brazil's Chamber of Deputies since 1990, Bolsonaro rails against gay marriage, believes that women's salaries should be lower than men's salaries, and is against affirmative action and the legalization of marijuana. -- Grasielle Castro, reporter, HuffPost Brazil
Like Trump, Doug Ford’s political ambitions are fuelled by a potent combination of anti-intellectual populism and seemingly delusional promises. The Ford brothers had a well-publicized fight with beloved Canadian author Margaret Atwood about cuts to the city’s libraries. He fought against a group home for developmentally-challenged children in his ward calling it a ‘nightmare’. Trump has his border wall and Doug Ford has his waterfront monorail. Trump pays for supporters to show up at his events, Doug Ford hands out $20 bills while canvassing in an affordable housing block. -- Ron Nurwisah, Social media editor, HuffPost Canada
Joachim Herrmann, Bavarian Interior Minister, is never ashamed of a populist comment. He hit a low about a week ago when, during a television talk-show, he referred to Roberto Blanco, a German pop-singer of Afro-Cuban descent, as having "always been a wonderful Negro, adored by most Germans." He insists he didn't mean to sound derogatory. Yet, the word "Negro" is still an insult for people with darker skin — and therefore, isn't a word that's easily justified in conversation. Especially among politicians. What else is Herrmann famous for? A tough policy against refugees and immigrants. That's it, actually. -- Jan David Sutthoff and Christoph Asche, HuffPost Germany
Clive Palmer is a Rolls Royce driving, dinosaur theme park owning, mining magnate -- and the man behind a wholly unsolicited plan to launch a Titanic 2 replica -- who twerked his way into politics in the 2013 federal election. Under the banner of the Palmer United Party, he secured the balance of power by bringing three senators with him, including a retired football legend nicknamed, "The Brick with Eyes" and a Tasmanian Army veteran who revealed her ideal man was endowed with a bulging wallet and trousers. But the PUPs are no longer "united.” Palmer has lost two senators, had a senior adviser caught up in a weird alleged kidnapping case, attracted unwanted scrutiny of his business affairs, was spotted asleep in Parliament, and became an interview talent more likely to walk out in a huff than not. Despite all this, Palmer says he is not giving up politics, and that he would take part in the next election. -- Karen Barlow, Politics editor, HuffPost Australia
As Frank Bruni wrote in the New York Times, Italy had its own Donald Trump far before the American Donald Trump: we’re talking about Silvio Berlusconi, the man who ruled Italy for about nine years – but dominated Italian politics for at least 20. Similarities between the two span from wealth, to style of communication, to Casanova-like behaviors. In 1994, when Silvio Berlusconi decided to enter the political arena, one of his main arguments was very reminiscent of Trump: “I don’t need anyone’s money. I’ve got my own money, I’m very rich, really really rich.” -- Giulia Belardelli, Editor HuffPost Italy
Now that Berlusconi has become a somewhat marginal figure in politics, the new “Italian Trump” is Beppe Grillo, leader of the populist Five Star Movement. He is also a comedian, actor, blogger and political activist. Like Trump, Grillo came into the political arena as an outsider, altering the traditional relationship between politicians and voters. His communication style is informal, vulgar at times, and very loud. He shows off his “outsider” status any chance he can. Both Grillo and Trump present themselves as alternatives to traditional politicians; and their political views are often very extreme. They share the same confidence under the spotlight, and they both bully journalists. -- Giulia Belardelli, Editor HuffPost Italy
We don’t really have a particular politician like Donald Trump in South Korea. We once had an interesting politician -- more of a comical figure -- in our presidential election back in 2007. Huh Kyung-young, leader of his own Democratic Republican Party actually ran for president, and lost. He’s a bit of an odd one who once claimed to have an IQ of 430. While campaigning he proclaimed: "I can change 23 chromosomes and 40,000 DNA in the human body. If someone is diagnosed with uterine cancer, I can treat the cancer within 0.1 seconds just by looking into the patient's eyes." His campaign pledges were also quite crazy, like granting 100 million won to every single couple getting married. He also wanted to move the UN headquarters from NYC to DMZ (Korean Demilitarized Zone), in a town between North Korea and South Korea. Yes. He is that crazy. But he was oddly popular among Korean voters during the election; the press called it ‘Huh Kyung-young syndrome’. Of course he didn’t win the election but he earned nearly 100,000 votes, which is insanely huge. The driving reason behind his popularity was simple: people wanted to express their frustration with the country's politics. Huh was jailed in 2009 for 18 months on charges of defamation, after claiming Park Geun-hye, President of South Korea, would marry him. Today he is all but forgotten in Korean politics, but people still remember his name because he once was a symbol of the public's sarcastic response to South Korean politics. -- Dohoon Kim, HuffPost Korea
Heinz-Christian Strache, Chairman of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ) says utterly absurd things, often rendering Donald Trump's statements inferior. A few examples? "Putin is, with certainty, a true Democrat, but with an authoritarian style." Or: "Do you know, what foot-and-mouth disease is? It's when East-European workers come to work in the West: they show up and gripe, and when they can't work, they steal." Strache understands populism. And he attracts a terrifying number of Austrians. If things take a bad turn, he'll soon govern in Wien as the new Mayor. And, if recent polls are any indication, the odds are he'll eject the reigning Social Democrats from city-hall. Incidentally, he refers to his political movement as the "Fight for Wien." -- Jan David Sutthoff and Christoph Asche, HuffPost Germany
The Editor-in-Chief of the right-wing conservative "Weltwoche" magazine scatters crass sound-bites on-air whenever he's given the opportunity. Köppel demands, quite openly, that the "death-channel" which the "Muslim masses" use to travel to Europe, be sealed. And: "We can't take in all of Africa." Yet, in contrast to some other right-wing populists, Köppel isn't dumb; in fact, he's highly intelligent. He is a seasoned journalist, and knows how to construct his messages in a way to best reach his target audience. He makes headlines — as a journalist — and now, as a wanna-be politician. Even in Germany, he's a highly popular guest on talk-shows. -- Jan David Sutthoff and Christoph Asche, HuffPost Germany