Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jarrah Hodge

GET UPDATES FROM Jarrah Hodge
 

Leggo My Leggings!

Posted: 04/30/2012 12:01 pm

My close childhood friends will tell you I was very attached to wearing leggings when I was growing up. They were so comfortable it took several years before I could even understand why someone would choose to wear jeans. I was definitely not trying to make a statement or attract any sort of attention by wearing them, so it was particularly surprising to me that one school in Halifax, Eastern Passage Education Centre, considers leggings "distracting" and has moved to enforce a dress code banning girls from wearing them as pants. The school sent CTV the following statement:

Tights which are being worn in an inappropriate manner are not acceptable for school. If students choose to wear tights, they should have a long shirt or sweater to cover the front and backside. Yoga pants can fall into a grey area, depending on the style and manner in which they are worn. The administration will use their discretion with these cases and have the conversation with the student."

Yoga pants a grey area, people?! Yoga pants?!

I'll note Eastern Passage isn't the first school to go this route. A few schools in the U.S. have singled out leggings and yoga pants for being "immodest" or too "form-fitting" and they were also banned by an Ottawa-region Catholic school last year.

I'm generally opposed to school dress codes anyway, but two things about this really irk me.

First, it seems to be about reading adult sexuality onto girls' clothing choices. Leggings have been around since at least the 13th century and have been worn around the world by both men and women. There is nothing inherently sexual about them. If there were, they would hardly have been suitable as a piece of military clothing, which they were throughout the First and Second World Wars.

Just because when you look up "yoga pants" on YouTube you get a bunch of videos of "hot girls" in yoga pants (as I found out) doesn't mean that's why everyone chooses to wear them. Same with leggings.

And we're talking about kids who are tweens and in their early teens. I'm not naive -- I wouldn't be surprised if some girls are getting dressed up in leggings or yoga pants partly to be attractive, but to read that intent onto every girl in the school is logically questionable and kinda creepy.

And where do you draw the line? Girls are exposed to all kinds of media messages telling them their self-worth is defined by appearance. You can't possibly ban all the things a girl could possibly do in an effort to make herself more sexually attractive. If you're concerned about the pressure on girls to be sexy, you need to deal with that culture and its ideas through media literacy, not banning individual items of clothing that may or may not be manifestations.

My second big problem with the leggings ban is it places the blame onto girls for being "distracting" instead of onto those who might be getting "distracted" spending all their time ogling the girls. The school danced around the issue, saying only it was distracting "to the learning process." Karen Green at Canadian Family writes she thinks there's a subtext to what Eastern Passage is arguing: "The real answer, I think, is distracting to the boys. Possibly even the male teachers. That seems a more likely answer to me. And a much more disturbing one."

I'm inclined to agree. The fact that no comparable rules were set out for boys shows the hallmarks of that same old attitude that "boys will be boys," that they will see girls as sex objects while it's up to girls to uphold their own honour and fend off advances.

I would love to be wrong. I would love Eastern Passage to whip out some peer-reviewed study showing that leggings and yoga pants adversely affect educational outcomes. Because if that's not the case, I think it's only a small step from "if you wear yoga pants you'll distract the boys" to "if you wear a skirt you're asking to get raped."

Now the school isn't quite there yet and it has a chance to back off. They need to think about those 30 or so girls who defied the ban and ask themselves whether it's really worth pushing them even further into a culture that tells them what they wear determines how they deserve to be treated.

 

Follow Jarrah Hodge on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jarrahpenguin

FOLLOW CANADA STYLE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:06 AM on 05/02/2012
What happened to jeans? Pants that had a button to close them? The way leggings are worn now is steps away from being naked. What concerns me even more is the way the school administration used as an example in the article interchanges tights (i.e. stockings) with yoga pants. Tights are stockings. Tights are sheer. They are not appropriate to be worn without something covering the butt area! A young woman should be able to wear what she wants, and it is not her fault the way her outfit is perceived by the opposite sex. However, in a school setting, a young woman is being taught appropriate attire for appropriate settings. Yoga pants were created to wear during yoga/exercise. Unless you are a yoga teacher, you should be wearing them for exercise. Leggings were created historically as a layer of protection against the cold and potential insects when on a horse or exploring the wilderness. Their fashion evolution became something to wear under long shirts, short skirts. The way they are worn is not realistic for future employment. Happy medium - wear skinny jeans. Its fitted, it compliments the "look" the wearer is going for, and they're wearing pants.
09:40 AM on 05/02/2012
While I'm not into banning things or dress codes, I've seen some girls walking around Brooklyn in leggings without backside coverage and I'm appalled they would go out of the house looking like that -- it's almost as if they are walking around without pants on and it looks vulgar. Especially the ones that are obese, choose to wear white leggings (the horror!) and everything is on display. It's like, whoa, honey, look in the mirror! Gross
06:04 PM on 05/01/2012
Our culture does sexualize women at an early age and we do ask women to walk a line between sexy and modest, then faulting women for the attention they gather. This is true, but how should administrators deal with the question, what is appropriate to wear to school and what articles of clothing not appropriate at school? There are a few issues that we are all conflating here. The first issue is what is appropriate as a standard of dress and where. The second issue is what is the response to sexual harassment or assumed sexual attention? Obviously women should be able to wear what ever they want and be treated respectfully. Abuse is abuse, and often this sexualized attention is abusive. However, I think we can agree that there is an appropriate time and place for some clothing, and because our culture seeks to sexualize women, often clothing choices for women include clothing that is more revealing than men's clothing, so while its blatantly inappropriate for anyone to wear a swimsuit to class, the clothing choices for men are less likely to resemble swim suits than for women. That being said- the admin should take a more nauanced stance, one that sets for standards of dress not necessarily based on gender but on what they expect to be worn to school. Additionally standards of conduct should be made clear as well. Within these standards excessive starring or comments should be addressed.
04:39 PM on 05/01/2012
I am the type of person who likes to dress up every day in skirts, dresses, cardigans, etc. As such, when i want to be comfortable, I choose leggings because they are capable of being slightly more dressed up with cardigans, scarves, cute tops, sandals, etc. I personally feel very uncomfortable in sweatpants because that level of casualness is not okay with me. Therefore I urge those of you who say "if she really wanted to be comfortable and wasn't trying to be sexy, she would have worn sweatpants" not to judge. Everyone has a personal taste in clothing. Everyone should be allowed to make their own decisions based on their comfort level, and it is good to remember that the comfort level you have may not be the same as those around you. I find sweatpants uncomfortable and leggings comfortable. You may disagree. But I have never worn leggings to be "sexy" and many others do not either.
04:35 PM on 05/01/2012
I am they type of young person (teenager/young adult) who generally dresses up every day in skirts, dresses, sweaters, etc. When i want to be comfortable, i feel uncomfortable and awkward in sweatpants because they cannot be made to look more formal than they are. Leggings and yoga pants, on the other hand, can be dressed up with sweaters, sandals, scarves, flowy tops, etc. I have never worn leggings to be sexual, or to attract anyone. Nor did i do this in high school. Therefore it is unfair to assume that all young girls are trying to attract people. Some people (such as myself) actually dislike sweatpants, as shocking as that may be. Yoga pants and leggings are a better option, in my opinion more comfortable. So please don't be so quick to judge by saying "if they weren't trying to be sexual, they would have worn sweatpants." Clothing is personal preference, and everyone has a different level and type of comfort.
03:02 PM on 05/01/2012
I'm okay with the ban simply because they're not appropriate to wear in a school environment. Just like with jobs there are standards that you should dress by. That's not to say you can never wear them (though I'd be fine with that simply because I abhor leggings), but do understand there are environments where certain clothes are not appropriate. If the leggings are used say, under a skirt, or with a long shirt (past your butt) then it does shift from inappropriate though. Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be the case most of the time.

This applies to wearing clothes that are too casual for places, like sweatpants at work (unless it's okay with your work, of course). I do this these standards apply to men, but as they're clothing range is limited it's not really an issue.
02:04 PM on 05/01/2012
leggins, jeggins...they are all out of hand....when we were little, we used them under a skirt...not to be worn as pants! I thinks it's too much!
05:25 PM on 04/30/2012
I'm all for leggings and Yoga pants in the workplace.

They must be comfortable for the ladies and every guy gets an objective look.

If they aren't distracting the wearer is doing something wrong!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Amie Nogrady
you say witch like it's a bad thing
03:48 PM on 04/30/2012
Where does it stop? Yoga pants on one body may look one way but the same pants on another would look very different. Do you penalize someone based on their body type? And what about sweat pants? Are those appropriate? Because I have seen some very tight, low slung sweats in my area that would put the cutest pair of yoga pants to shame. And what do you do about the child that gains weight part way through the year? A pair of pants that started off moderately modest might now be tight enough to be deemed salicious by at least some. What then? These rules are insane- and they do nothing to address the real problem. And it is nothing new. My mother was called when I was in the first grade because I was wearing a sun dress. The principal told her that the little boys might untie the little straps and then see my "chest". Mom's response was "big deal- she is 6- they have the same exact thing." By the way, she added, wouldn't that be something to fault the boys for and not the girls?
02:56 PM on 04/30/2012
"I'm not naive -- I wouldn't be surprised if some girls are getting dressed up in leggings or yoga pants partly to be attractive"

Are you serious! How can you be a feminist and be so unaware of what girls are capable of. If you want to be comfortable....wear some loose sweats. If you want to look hot....pull on some form fitting tights.....of course it's not really hot if you don't have a good figure (so perhaps this is why you feel free from accusations of trying to be attractive).

Tights alone are not proper dress for school or work. As women we must take responsibility for our selves and telling girls it's OK to strut around in tights and a form fitting top is not OK. Would you wear a bikini to school? These are teenage boys after all. Why put them through the embarrassment of an unwanted erection. It is cruel. Take ownership of your sexuality.....use it responsibly!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
jarrahpenguin
Feminist blogger
10:35 AM on 05/01/2012
My point is that banning a particular item of clothing (or actually a bunch of items) doesn't deal with those messages girls are getting telling them they need to act sexy at a young age. Also that, as a feminist, I believe there should be some onus on the guys to view girls as human beings instead of implying they're guaranteed to view girls as objects.

Also that while I do think I get what girls are capable of, not all of them are wearing yoga pants to be "distracting". Some students at a US school made this mini documentary interviewing girls about the issue and I think it's worth checking out to see if we can really assume they're all willfully trying to seduce boys: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3sq3_qdJo&feature=player_embedded.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:56 PM on 04/30/2012
While I agree that rules should be applied equally across the board, the ban didn't specify that leggings were banned only for girls, did it? I assume any boy wearing leggings or yoga pants would also be considered to be in violation of the ban and considered a distraction. It is just societal conventions that currently have those items being worn by females more than males. In keeping with gender equality, all clothing items and attire should be equally allowable for both sexes. ex. uniformed schools that allow kilts should allow them for males as well as females.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
jarrahpenguin
Feminist blogger
10:28 AM on 05/01/2012
You're correct that the code didn't say the leggings ban was only for girls, but clearly it wasn't impacting many boy students. The thing is that boys and girls at this school are wearing different things, but by and large clothing popular with boys remains unaddressed by the school's dress code (they do ban muscle shirts, but the students interviewed point out the dress code doesn't address baggy pants hanging down showing boys' underwear).
02:46 PM on 04/30/2012
The only time I would support such a ban is when women (or girls I guess in this case) do wear them like regular pants and do not wear a shirt long enough to cover their bits. Fashion faux pas and honestly sometimes offensive. Camel toe isn't pretty regardless of age, or weight, or whatever....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oxygen
love is like oxygen
10:19 PM on 04/30/2012
well that's a new one on me
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
jarrahpenguin
Feminist blogger
10:30 AM on 05/01/2012
My point is not one about fashion, but rather than banning one particular item of clothing that may not be being worn deliberately to attract sexual attention will not deal with the culture that is pressuring girls to act and dress sexy from a young age. It could, in fact, become somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy where you've guaranteed those articles of clothing are going to be seen as sexualized, instead of allowing some people to choose to wear them for comfort.
08:22 PM on 05/01/2012
I used to be very unaware of the perceived sexiness of leggings and would routinely wear yoga pants and leggings to the gym. That's what all the ads have girls wearing at the gym, right? Then I got a bit older and started talking to young men about it and realized that yes, it's a couple of steps from walking around naked. I realized I don't want to put on a show for random strangers when I walk around. I started realizing that yes, you could see every nook and cranny of me in leggings, even though that is NOT what I intended. When guys wear super tight pants and you see every crevice and crease, yes it is distracting! You just don't see it very often--it isn't fashionable. To blame straight male sexuality (just don't look at women!) is to misunderstand anyone's sexuality. If the complete outline of a male student's nether regions were on display, the students around him would peek. I think many young girls are unaware, as I was, that when they wear leggings, people around them may be thinking about them sexually, and with reason.