Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jenna Em

GET UPDATES FROM Jenna Em
 

Do We Need Paper Books Any More?

Posted: 01/02/2013 8:56 am

I recently cleared out 2,000 books from my home and donated them to various organizations. There were just so many books that my family had read and would never read again. It was a difficult mindset to get into, but I finally concluded that my house is a home and not a library. And you wouldn't believe how much room was freed up after this large-scale purge! To this point, does society need paper books any more? After all, there's a widespread availability of e-books -- and a treasure trove of free virtual information accessible to the wired world via the Internet.

Truth be told, I like the way a book feels in my hands, as I am lounging on a hot sunny beach during winter vacation. I like the weight of the book, and that the thickness of the book diminishes as I dive deeper into the tome. And I like the reward of flipping a page to mark my progress, and the passage of time. And in terms of aesthetics, I love falling in love with the cover of the book that I am about to read for the very first time. I also like bending back pages, inserting a bookmark, cracking the spine, and the new book smell.

But does reading have to be tied into the tactile sensations that I've mentioned, even though it's meant to be a cerebral experience?

Reading on my smartphone, tablet or e-reader doesn't give me the same thrill as reading an old-fashioned paper book. I don't like that the thickness of the device never varies, or the feeling of being a hamster on a wheel, as I make unchanging progress in the book. Although I see that the page number is advancing as I read, the antiquated part of me wants to see and feel physical evidence, in respects to a thicker front half of the book, and a thinner back half! To me, these are the "perils" of an e-reader, which won't be faced by the newest generation -- born with an iPod, instead of a silver rattle.

I've concluded that despite the tactile experiences that I enjoy while reading paperbacks, I'd much rather peruse e-books and do my research online. The idea of visiting a library and treasure-hunting through stacks of books for information, just holds no appeal to me. I simply don't have the time or interest. After all, an e-reader fits an entire library of books, magazines and newspapers into the device itself -- and is just as portable as the average paper book! Why would I stop by the bookstore, or visit the local library, when I can download the latest books in seconds or minutes? And must we really chop down forests of trees in the pursuit of paper books?

So back to the original question: does society need paper books any more? Paper books are so ingrained in us and our collective unconscious, that I doubt that they'll ever fully disappear from society. As a people, we're sentimentalists and historians -- and books will live on, if only for a memory or a relic. However, in the industrialized world, virtual books are the tidal wave washing over our bookstores, libraries, workforces, schools and families. So to answer the question, no, society doesn't need paper books any more and they're quickly on their way out. And we've now arrived at their final chapter...

What do you think? Does society need paper books any more? Do you read e-books, paper books or a combination thereof? Please leave a comment below!

ebook publishers

 

Follow Jenna Em on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@SnyMed

FOLLOW CANADA LIVING
I recently cleared out 2,000 books from my home and donated them to various organizations. There were just so many books that my family had read and would never read again. It was a difficult mindset ...
I recently cleared out 2,000 books from my home and donated them to various organizations. There were just so many books that my family had read and would never read again. It was a difficult mindset ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:28 AM on 01/04/2013
I will stick with my paper books until they stop ripping people off with the e-book versions. A quick browse through Amazon's kindle section shows me e-books that are the exact same price as a paper back version of the same book. Why would that be when there is no physical media, printing costs, shipping costs etc etc etc.

Now, maybe this is unique to Canada as even though our dollar has been at par with the US for almost 5 years now, the price of a paperback is still 20% higher than the US price listed on the cover. Until publishers stop gouging, I will make them take lesser profits by having to print physical media.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
07:32 AM on 01/03/2013
I bought a Sony e- reader a few years when they first came out.The first thing I did was to get rid of all my paper books.There were hundreds.I had been reading and collecting books for years and they were taking up far too much room.Some of the boxes had gone moldy and the books had to be thrown away.I had a hard time getting rid of the rest because it seemed that no one wanted them.Even used bookstores turned me away.They said that they already had more donated books then they could deal with,so into the recycle bin they went.I fealt a little bad for the wasted trees,but vowed never to create a hoard of books again.Sure my iPad had to be manufactured in a polluting factory,but so was the paperback.The impacts of logging,of pulp and paper processing,of printing and shipping and the energy for retail spaces full of books is not an impact less situation.Not to mention that the paperback is easily ruined beyond use with a little water and the waste created from discarded books all adds up negatively.There will always be people hostile to change,even if that change makes sense.Just like there are people that prefer a hand saw,or like to write letters and send them through the mail,there will always be hold- outs.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
08:09 AM on 01/03/2013
Torontosaurous, when I donated the books, I also had a hard time finding homes for them. I donated many children's books to my child's classroom, but the local library was very stringent about what they'd accept. They wanted adults books that were a maximum 2 years old, even if the books were in brand new condition, or new for that matter. The library made clear that the books older than 2 years, would be sold at their book sale.

There seemed to be no interest in the books on Freecycle, (where the books are offered to an e-community for free). I tried offering brand new titles, even children's titles, and there was no interest.

The balance of the books went to a charity drop box, after contacting many different organizations who turned them down.

I've seen books regularly at garage sales for .10 to .25 cents and they just sit there unpurchased. The same books are often put to the end of the driveway with a big "Free" sign, at the conclusion of the garage sale. Just an observation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
08:55 AM on 01/03/2013
Thanks for your reply! This is another instance reflecting the superiority of electronic media.The fact that I can participate in the dissemination of information to the public has many positive implications.That you can write back to me with your opinion or information is remarkable.The Huffington post should be commended for democritizing the news.None of this would have happened a few years ago when the news came from the t.v. or newspaper or radio and only a select few could shape public opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
02:38 PM on 01/03/2013
And thank you for taking the time to provide your opinion!
11:18 PM on 01/02/2013
If society doesn't need books then why did you donate yours?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:55 AM on 01/03/2013
SaszeDerkach, judging from the comments so far, there definitely is a book following. If this following continues to dwindle, only time will tell.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:39 PM on 01/02/2013
While we do cut down trees to create paper. All but about 10% of the trees used by the pulp & paper industry today comes from sustainable forests. There is still the environmental impact of air & water pollution with pulp & paper.

Ebooks also suffer from their own environmental impact. Energy is required to read ebooks, batteries which power ebook readers are an environmental nightmare. Then there's the energy & raw materials required to manufacture millions of ebook readers & ship them around the world.

The ebook readers components along with the batteries, must be mined from the earth. Tailings & leeching from those mines poison lakes, streams, rivers, underground aquifers & kill wildlife.

One very real difference between paper books & ebooks, no energy is required to ever read a paper book, while energy is required 100% of the time to read an ebook.

Ebooks have their place, which is to replace newspapers, magazines & advertising flyers. Ebooks function perfectly & efficiently at replacing what is of very short term use & value. Paper books don't fall into that category of short term value or usage. That's likely why paper books have existed for thousands of years in the same basic state, paper books are the perfect medium.

One thing ebooks do well is create enormous profit margins, which explains their fast proliferation. I'll stick with paper books.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:53 AM on 01/03/2013
Lapetus, thanks for providing your view on this matter!
07:17 PM on 01/02/2013
When my children were small our bedtime ritual was to have a snack, have a bath and then cuddle up under the covers with a storybook, pouring over the pictures, talking about them and then turning the page to continue on with the story...somehow an ebook doesn't fit into that equation!
I've had a lifelong love affair with books and passed that love along to my girls. I'm almost naive enough to believe that there will always be paper books to read.
In answer to the question....YES! We need paper books!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:50 AM on 01/03/2013
BienOui, sounds like a fun bedtime ritual! We also read paper books to our kids, but also have "Family iPad Time", which includes e-story books.
04:59 PM on 01/02/2013
Of course we need paper books! Where the heck am I supposed to keep all of my bookmarks for cryin' out loud!
Love,
Sherwood
"Be Kind"
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:53 PM on 01/02/2013
Love it!
04:07 PM on 01/02/2013
Comparing the ereader to the book is like comparing a Big Mac to a real hamburger. And as for the tree issue, take a look at the resources and the type of labour used for your convenience.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:58 PM on 01/02/2013
True Jadoubleyou, but we're heading in a greener direction.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Imma Okay
12:48 AM on 01/03/2013
Big Macs do taste better than most homemade hamburgers.
03:56 PM on 01/02/2013
My 3 1/2 year old granddaughter knows how to use an Ipad and is very versed with all things digital even at her young age, but she loves nothing more than sitting in a corner with at least 20 books all around her, pouring over every page on her own. It is the only time she is truly still and engaged. She knows there are both things, but the tangible reality of the paper books she has, at home and at my house, are the bigger draw for reading.
I hope we never lose our love for them as a culture; I know I won't and I've had a lot of flack from techier friends, but after an 8 hour day spent on the computer at home, the last thing i want to do is look at another screen of any kind.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
08:01 PM on 01/02/2013
part time user: judging from the other comments too, there is a big paper book following. As long as there is demand, there will always be supply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Selene Cusping
Annoying MRM & radical feminists forever
03:44 PM on 01/02/2013
I've heard that e-books are plateauing, or at least slowing in sales, as early adopters dry up. I wasn't one of them, and I will likely buy an e-reader when I have the money or need to travel more, but for now, books are still my thing.

I DO see e-books as providing a great advantage for the smaller sales, i.e. books with a limited audience. Where it is prohibitive for traditional publishers to do a print run, an e-book publisher has a smaller investment. It may mean that more authors get to print, and more targeted subjects will expand.

I'll be watching this in more detail over the next few years.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:57 PM on 01/02/2013
Selen Cusping, thank you for your comment!
03:34 PM on 01/02/2013
Why would anyone buy a DRMd e-book that cannot be given away or resold, and will probably be unreadable after a few years? I've gone back to paper, except for free stuff.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
07:56 PM on 01/02/2013
Happy Lemming, only time will tell (unreadable after a few years).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PortlandZoo
Wait... what?
02:38 PM on 01/02/2013
interesting. a few thoughts: paper books don't run out of power but ebooks (with reader) are easier to pack for a trip; paper books look great on my shelves but ebooks are virtually invisible; when an EM pulse bomb detonates, paper books will be invaluable and ebooks will disappear entirely. Keeping my paper books, thanks. I use a reader but I prefer - and will still purchase - hard cover books.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
04:38 PM on 01/02/2013
PortlandZoo, all valid points. It's interesting that new home builds are featuring media rooms instead of libraries. After all, what would people put on the bookshelves these days?
02:03 PM on 01/02/2013
As an Ed assistant I will tell you that yes, I think we need books. Picture books would not have the same efffect for kids at all and young children love being read to- even as a group. Also, as someone who has been there when a tech savvy school introduced some version of a 'talking book', I can tell you that children hate the 'robot' voice. They like real people/actors to read to them.
I also feel that as many people are tactile, there is something to be said (sacrilege for some book lovers, I know!) for highlighting important information which is something you can't do with a tablet.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
04:51 PM on 01/02/2013
jened, thank you for providing your opinion on the issue. My kids do enjoy both kinds of books: virtual and paper books. They actually do enjoy the illustrations and animations found in e-books. I am not affiliated with the company whatsoever, but they enjoy the "Magic Town" website and regularly ask to hear the stories there: http://www.magictown.com The stories have beautiful illustrations, a non-robotic voice reading the story, and they have the option to read along.
01:52 PM on 01/02/2013
I can't tell you how much I disagree with your conclusion that we don't need books anymore. Reading online is fine for news, but for books of any & all kinds, online reading provides no where near the experience, involvement of the senses, content absorption or satisfaction. My experience with young children verifies this opinion. When given the option of reading their books online or in real book form, they choose the Book - the paper, cardboard, & glue-bound Book 99 times out of 100. As for research - I can have 35 books piled around me, each open to a relevant piece of info & easily identifiable by size, shape, colour, etc.. Online, I can't have 35 windows open, & even if I could, I wouldn't be able to find them without a whole lot of time-wasting. Nope. Books are essential and here to stay.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
04:39 PM on 01/02/2013
CanNurse, thanks for weighing in on the issue!
01:06 PM on 01/02/2013
I lost my first e-book on my first major trip. Now I've misplaced the cord for uploading.... This is where a paperback wins, if I lose it's not such a loss, no need for additional pieces to make it function, and much better for reading in the bath tub. I hope we never lose paperbacks! E-book are great, but clearly not the same thing.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
02:13 PM on 01/02/2013
UAE, that's definitely one disadvantage!
01:05 PM on 01/02/2013
I think you should write a book and publish it on eBooks and see how many you sell. In my own experience new authors stand little chance of making it big with eBooks. They are a wonderful vehicle for highly published authors and gives them a double market, but when your new eBook ranks around 597,602 in sales, and those that have sold earn you 35 cents each, well, don't quit your day job.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jenna Em
02:16 PM on 01/02/2013
profbit, I take it you have written an eBook. .35 cents definitely doesn't sound very lucrative!
09:39 PM on 01/02/2013
Yes, I have a book on Amazon eBooks. It is called "Then She Learned to Fly." I priced it @ 99 cents, (which seems about right for new authors according to what I understand) of which I get 35 cents. Amazon has a deal on just now that books can be read free and the author gets 70 cents, but on top of these massive royalties there is income tax charged!
Amazon does very well selling books by recognized authors (James Patterson, Nora Roberts etc) because it is a proven market for them. An interesting blog would be about what authors' experience has been with Amazon, Barnes & Noble etc.