Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jennifer A. Smith

GET UPDATES FROM Jennifer A. Smith
 

Did Trudeau Put Liberals Back in the Ring?

Posted: 04/ 4/2012 8:45 am

Voters are a fickle, shallow bunch sometimes. The least little thing can put them off. Nixon's sweaty lip during his televised debate with Kennedy. Stephane Dion's sad sack shrug. Stockwell Day's jet-ski ride to political oblivion.

Political history is littered with the corpses of promising careers brought low by such seemingly trivial incidents. Oddly, they often seem to involve sports.

In 1974, Conservative candidate Robert Stanfield was photographed tossing a football around during a campaign rest stop in North Bay. While he caught the ball perfectly most of the time, it was the shot of his one awkward fumble that hit the front page of the papers the next morning. It gave Canadians an image of Stanfield as clumsy and inept, and is generally acknowledged to have cost him the election.

Far less common are the serendipitous moments that transform the public image of a candidate or a party for the better. I can think of two offhand. One was George W. Bush's brief moment of heroism-by-proxy as he stood wielding a bullhorn amid the ruins of the World Trade Centre, in solidarity with the first responders who he would later betray.

Another was when newly crowned Liberal leader Pierre Elliott Trudeau, regarded at the time as a charming but effete intellectual, attended the St. Jean Baptiste Day Parade in Montreal the day before the 1968 election. Separatists started throwing rocks and bottles at the reviewing stand but Trudeau refused to budge, even after the other dignitaries fled. The footage was broadcast across the country, and Trudeau was suddenly perceived as not just charismatic but tough and fearless.

He won by a landslide.


We may have witnessed one of these rare moments on Saturday night, when Liberal heir apparent Justin Trudeau took on a trash-talking bruiser of a Conservative Senator in the boxing ring and, against all expectations, beat him soundly.

As a purely physical contest, the outcome really shouldn't have been as much of a surprise as it was. Brazeau may have looked like a beast from some UFC cage match, but by the time Trudeau had finished putting an extra 20 pounds on his lean frame the two men weighed in within a few pounds of each other. Brazeau might have had a black belt in karate, but that clearly couldn't help him against Trudeau's 20 years of boxing experience. Add to that the taller man's longer reach, and Trudeau's victory wasn't really all that remarkable.

As a political metaphor, it's a whole other story. Because really, who expects the Liberals to win at anything anymore?

Certainly Trudeau's own party didn't want to draw attention to the event, lest it turn into one more humiliating defeat. And it might have passed virtually unnoticed if the Conservatives themselves -- and their media surrogates at SunTV -- hadn't been so vocally and gleefully anticipating the beat-down of the son of their most hated political rival. They were the ones who invested the whole thing with profound symbolic and political importance, even to the extent of using it as a taunting non sequitor during Question Period.

If Trudeau had lost, we would never have heard the end of it. Like Dion's shrug, the image of Brazeau's glove smashing into that patrician Trudeau nose might even have inspired its own website. PunchTrudeauintheFace.ca perhaps?

Instead, we are left with a very different image. A positive image, which isn't nearly as easy to bottle and sell as a negative one. Nobody really cares enough about Patrick Brazeau to gloat over his defeat, and it would be a little ridiculous to try to deliberately craft a political narrative around the victory of brains over brawn, of quiet grace over braggadocio, of strength of character over mere muscle, of...

Ugh. See how easy it is to get carried away? Still, there's a reason why there are so many sports movies out there, and why so many of them are about boxing. Any good screenwriter will tell you, it's never really just a game, or just a fight.

If the Liberals are smart, they won't even try to manipulate this. They'll just let the image of Trudeau wiping the smirk off Brazeau's bleeding face sink in and work its magic. Images are insidious, and just like Dion's shrug or Stanfield's fumble, this one could slowly infect the national subconscious and, with any luck, subtly shift how Canadians perceive both the party and its young champion.

The biggest effect of all this might just be on the Liberals themselves. They've gotten used to thinking of themselves as losers, so nobody was more surprised than they to see Justin Trudeau triumph against such an adversary.  Somehow this unlikely victory has given Liberals a chance to do something they haven't done in a very long time.

They've started thinking of themselves as winners again. And that might make all the difference in the world.

 
Voters are a fickle, shallow bunch sometimes. The least little thing can put them off. Nixon's sweaty lip during his televised debate with Kennedy. Stephane Dion's sad sack shrug. Stockwell Day's jet-...
Voters are a fickle, shallow bunch sometimes. The least little thing can put them off. Nixon's sweaty lip during his televised debate with Kennedy. Stephane Dion's sad sack shrug. Stockwell Day's jet-...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
08:34 PM on 04/04/2012
The article is reasonable to a point.

However, the Corporate Media is engineered from that singular powerful organization housed at 58 East 68th Street, NY.

Trudeau senior was "brought" to power by that organization and the above noted event may have been staged managed.

I would suggest the writer locate a copy of Maurice Strong's book: Where On Earth Are We Going, and go to page 99 and read of Strong's hosting a meeting in the Laurentions in the sixties attended by lawyers named Trudeau, Davis, Blakeney, Lougheed and Ryan.

All were brought to political power and Strong is a connected to that Pratt House address in NY, David Rockefeller, Chairman Emeritus.

Rockefeller hosted a dinner for Chretien in NY after that 2003 Summit of the America's armed encampment.

Here is a highly despised U.S. V/P talking to his real boss at Pratt: http://tinyurl.com/ctgofae , who backed out of Toronto speech recently due to protest. Note the gloating at the end of withholding his Pratt House directorship from the government vetting process.

Here is the "coiffed" haired Harpo doing his Pratt visit and being introduced by his Bilderberg handler, Marie-Josée Kravis: http://tinyurl.com/7tm9cs9 .

All those brought to political power in Canada go through Pratt!

So the first question for this Trudeau is "are you under the influence or control of the Bilderberg and/or Pratt!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logicanada
Blogger, radio co-host, writer, editor, voice-over
08:04 PM on 04/04/2012
What Trudeau did, charity or not, was add to the modern meme that all life is interpreted as reality TV.
Reality politics is the last thin the country needs. It lowers us.
08:03 PM on 04/04/2012
Well said. This a bold move by both men for a good cause. Their was a bigger downside for Trudeau, then Brazeau. One is elected , the other appointed. If Trudeau would have lost their was good chance this could have affected his re-election bid. As for Brazeau, win or lose he would still be a senator for life or till age 75. It's just too bad that Trudeau could not find a Conservative MP to fight.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
02:06 PM on 04/04/2012
Class always beats crass in the end.
01:55 PM on 04/04/2012
Justin Trudeau's boxing match was a tawdry sideshow. If he has an ounce of sense, he'll put away his gloves, stop his endless grandstanding and become a more serious and thoughtful politician.

Fat chance.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
02:53 PM on 04/04/2012
A tawdry sideshow? They raised $100,000. for cancer research.

Maybe you're just annoyed that the conservative lost.
03:04 PM on 04/04/2012
This "tawdry sideshow" raised an enormous amount of money for cancer research. And if you'd been paying attention, it wasn't Trudeau doing the grandstanding.

Try again.
01:49 PM on 04/04/2012
Way to go, Justin! Your dad would have been proud.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
01:07 PM on 04/04/2012
At least Justin's out there, putting himself on the line, trying to restore the Liberals' image.

I have no doubt he'll be leader and PM one day.

But for the time being, Bob Rae's doing a fine job.
photo
laymancanuck
IGNORANCE has used up its quota of TOLERANCE
12:20 PM on 04/04/2012
Liberals can day dream all they want. They can idolize Justin, hoping for a saviour. The fact is they are no longer relevant and its time let it go. Unite the left vote NDP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
06:15 PM on 04/04/2012
The NDP spent decades as irrelevant party. Don't go thinking the jig is up just because they finally made it to number 2. The 2 parties are not the same and I am not about to start voting for a party that I don't support.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
okgranny
Egalitarian by birth
11:23 AM on 04/04/2012
In my fondest dreams, I visualize Justin Trudeau and Nathan Cullen as leaders of their respective parties. I trust them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haddanuff
Progressives think 'We' while cons think "Me"
02:07 PM on 04/04/2012
Now that's a one two punch I can support!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
09:27 AM on 04/04/2012
How does winning in the squared circle translate into winning electorally? I think we have enough serious problems to deal with that we should not be wasting our time with this entertainment. Trudeau is my favourite PM of all time, but his son is a little too TV for me.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jennifer A. Smith
10:49 AM on 04/04/2012
I'm not saying it *should* have any effect on voter sentiment - I'm saying it probably will. We're not talking about which party has the best policies or can run the country most effectively - we're talking about which party people *feel* better about. Marketing 101.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
01:44 PM on 04/04/2012
I lived in the states for 14 years, and returned to Canada a couple of years ago, and I am pretty shocked at how politics in this country has changed. People used to be informed about issues, even the ones who didn't like talking politics. Now the discourse is more American-style and there is the same downward-trend in media coverage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
06:17 PM on 04/04/2012
I agree, and image is the number one problem the Liberals are facing right now. A little positive imagery can go a long way.
photo
TonyOnly
Truth matters.
01:33 PM on 04/04/2012
Most people who are old enough to have voted for his father are probably too old to understand what inspires people of Justin's generation.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
09:11 AM on 04/04/2012
The absolute visceral h8tred the Reformers seem to have for this young man has made him a hero in my eyes already.....ANYONE who gets them in this much of a tizzy is alright by me
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
09:28 AM on 04/04/2012
That is a poor reason to support a politician. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Think Taliban (formerly the Mujahadeen, whom we supported in fighting the Soviet Union).
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
canobserv
11:05 AM on 04/04/2012
yup...beccause Justin and the Taliban are a great comparison....un-huh......and I have actually read and kept up on Justin's career......and I like him.....but thanks for your "concern"