Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Harris

GET UPDATES FROM Jim Harris
 

Finally, the Death of TV

Posted: 01/13/12 03:09 PM ET

TV as we know it is dying, but most people don't perceive yet the dramatic change that is bubbling below the surface. In a stunning report released at CES, Accenture points to a wholesale collapse of traditional TV viewing. The study found that "the percentage of consumer watching broadcast or cable TV shows, movies, or videos on TV in a typical week plummeted from 71% in 2009 to 48% in 2011."

And what are we doing instead? We're streaming content on iPads (my wife watches as much content on her iPad as she does on TV), video enabled smart phones, and PCs. YouTube, Netflix, Hulu, iTunes -- and Apple's soon to be launched iTV are all changing the way we consume video content.

On Thursday, Robert Kyncl, YouTube's Vice President of Global Content Partnerships keynoted at the at 2012 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.

He argued that the world of TV is changing profoundly: "If YouTube's top five channels were stacked against cable channels, they would be in the top 20 in terms of viewership."

2012-01-13-TV.jpg
Kyncl pointed out that in 1980 there were only four TV channels and they had 100 per cent of the audience. But the emergence of cable TV in the 1980s dramatically changed the economics of distribution and resulted in hundreds of new channels. By 2010, 75 per cent of Americans viewing was spent watching cable channels, but only 25 per cent with the original four broadcast networks.

We are going through this same revolution again, with the Internet and streaming media once again dramatically reducing the cost of distribution. It eliminates barriers to entry, enabling content developers to narrow cast highly target audiences.

For instance, Kyncl cited the fact that today there are 17 million American yoga enthusiasts (and probably double that worldwide), yet there's not a single dedicated yoga channel on traditional TV. Kyncl predicted that within 12 month there will be a very successful YouTube Yoga channel.

And the facts speak for themselves: 350 million videos are shared on Twitter every year; and more than 100,000 person years worth of YouTube videos are watched on Facebook annually.

On hundred million iPads and tablets will be sold in 2012 according to the Consumer Electronics Association and analysts from GfK. Add that to the existing installed base of 70 million (15M in 2010 and 55M in 2011) -- all of them able to stream content; add to that the 600 million video enable smartphones that will sold in 2012 (add this to the 700 million smartphones sold in the last two years: 262M in 2010 & 435M in 2011); and finally add the 1.25 billion PCs worldwide. Presto, you're looking at more than 2 billion devices that can stream content.

By comparison there are only 115.9 million TVs in the U.S. and 1.6 billion TVs worldwide.

I can hear what some people saying: What about quality? Do you agree that the quality of a cell phone conversation is less than a landline? Absolutely. Well, if the quality is poorer, why did 1.6 billion people buy mobile phones last year? (There are now 5.6 billion mobiles worldwide.)

We all think that quality matters, but convenience trumps quality. I was at an IDC breakfast briefing and the analyst presenting asked how many people had HD TVs in their homes. The majority did. And then she asked how many also subscribed to Netflix (only $8 a month for unlimited movies), again the majority did. Now this is a techie audience -- but the point is that Netflix isn't in HD but we're happy to watch it because it offers greater choice.

Kyncl in his keynote pointed to the fact that, "Today Netflix streams more than two billion hours of content a quarter and Hulu has 30 million unique users a month."

"Online video is on fire," said Kyncl -- the speed of its adoption is accelerating.

YouTube's audience of 800 million people watches over 3 billion hours of video a month - that's 30 minutes of video for every person on the planet.

Kyncl noted that by 2013, 90 per cent of Internet traffic will be video -- and so the rapid rise of internet video and streaming spells the slow death of TV as we know it now.

More later on the implications of this in future blogs . . . stay tuned


 
 
 

Follow Jim Harris on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@JimHarris

TV as we know it is dying, but most people don't perceive yet the dramatic change that is bubbling below the surface. In a stunning report released at CES, Accenture points to a wholesale collapse of ...
TV as we know it is dying, but most people don't perceive yet the dramatic change that is bubbling below the surface. In a stunning report released at CES, Accenture points to a wholesale collapse of ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:28 AM on 02/03/2012
The Death of TV reminds me of the lyrics in a Dire Straits song "57 channels and nothin on". How often do you sit down to watch television only to find nothing is interesting.

RMontpellier - BoomerWarrior
11:33 AM on 01/16/2012
interesting statistics - i look forward to the impact of such a monumental change - will it result in more "non watching" activities? in more fragmentation of families since it appears most of the "family" time spent in America is in front of the TV... and so on.... hurry with the next installment...
04:39 AM on 01/16/2012
The Death of TV brings some troubling issues to mind. What does the trend to watching Youtube videos as opposed to longer TV programming illustrate? Perhaps a trend towards a decline in the ability or willingness to concentrate for longer periods? Is this a beneficial trend? In making the case for convenience over quality the case for convenience over wasteful practices is ignored. I would like to ask about the Green considerations of making this switch? Has Mr. Harris explored the carbon footprint of streaming all the data to these wireless devices as opposed to the carbon footprint of sending video by cable to my computer or TV screen? Likely not. Note that in M. Berners Lee's estimation, an hour a day of cell phone chatter over 1 year ( i.e. 365 hours) has the equivalent carbon footprint of someone taking a TransAtlantic flight from New York to London economy class.... A landline uses 1/3 the carbon footprint of a cellphone for audio communication. Consider then that I heard from a telecom rep that they needed to provide 1300x more service for the new smart phone, Ipad devices than a regular cell phone...one can only imagine the carbon footprint of these new wireless devices which of course compared to my TV is only going to be viewed by one viewer due to the small screen compared to my TV that can be viewed by several all at once thereby increasing the carbon footprint further.
12:51 PM on 01/15/2012
Every new technology sounds the death knell of an old one -- falsely. When gramophones were invented, live performances were going to die. When the radio came along, no one would want to buy records anymore. Probably the latest and best example is digital cameras. I finally had to abandon my film camera b/c there are few places to develop film anymore, but serious photographers still use film for many things. Why? B/c for people who are serious about something, convenience doesn't trump quality -- heck, I still know people who swear by vinyl records played by a diamond needle. There's no way of knowing what the niche for TV will be, but there are enough things of value about it will find a niche and survive for quite some time longer.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Harris
is a journalist & international bestselling author
07:36 AM on 01/16/2012
Great points, it's not an either or. TV as we know it will be around for a long time. But as the audience shifts, so will advertising revenue. Declining revenue will put pressure on TV production to be delivered less expensively. Already that's why we have so many reality shows: they're cheap to produce. Quality dramas or comedies cost more to produce. This trend of searching for ever cheaper content to produce creates a downward spiral for TV.

Kyncl in his talk pointed out that pre 1980 the 4 networks had 100% of market share, today it's only 25% -- cable has the other 75% of traditional TV. He predicted -- and I agree with him -- that traditional TV will only have 25% market share and narrow casted, streamed content will take 75% of viewing time.
01:02 PM on 01/16/2012
Hey Jim, I have to disagree with the notion that declining revenues dictate a decrease in the quality of TV programming. Granted he's but the first to do so, but Louis CK this year produced what many critics have heralded as the best written and produced comedy on television for a mere $300,000 per episode. How? By cutting out all the suits and writers in between the artist and the audience and allowing CK to create a show that reflects his sensibility in the purest form as he writes, acts and directs himself. Is it a mainstream hit? No. Can everybody follow this path? No to that as well. But what he has shown is in the new age of TV those with talent will have opportunities to still make money and produce content that will attract advertisers and eyeballs. TV won't go away, those left will just have to be the smart ones.
06:15 PM on 01/14/2012
you are comparing apples and oranges. Like saying people watch fewer movies because they watch them on DVDs or on Netflix rather in theaters.

The only valid point you almost made is that people are device agnostic when it comes to watching TV. But that doesnt change the fact that the value proposition is defined specifically because they are on TV and the TV show still benefits when its watched. Regardless of device.

Just as movie grosses from Theatrical and VOD still determine how much Netflix pays for a movie, and popularity of a show still determines how much it gets downstream, TV shows wills still be the foundation for revenues for a long, long time.

Non TV shows will still be digital nickels vs digital dollars of traditional TV.

Youtube will do all it can to change that , but its going to be difficult. And just like traditional TV, most of the programs it invests in will fail miserably
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CreepyThinMan
More dapper than Don Draper.
12:06 PM on 01/14/2012
I stopped watching TV ten years ago in July of 1992. I don't miss sitting in front of a box and flipping channels. Now if I hear about a good TV show, I download it and buy it if I like it enough. I also prefer surfing the internet. Now I know that you can say that I'm substituting one box for another but the web is much more proactive in that I can search for exactly what I want to see or read not to mention the social networking aspects of it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
02:12 PM on 01/14/2012
That's a very long 10 years. It's 2012.

That said, the interactivity of being on the web, viewing, reading and listening becomes an interactive experience because one can share with friends items that are of common interest.
10:10 AM on 01/14/2012
People need to curtail their viewing habits. Regardless of the technology available people need
to increase their reading time, spend more time speaking with family, friends and collegues,and to start thinking for themselves, instead of repeating the common diatribe that passes for common thought.
Technology has allowed for ease of communication and industriousness, but has left most people
disconnected with one another to the point that no one is really communicating with one another.

In all things moderation. Self reliance and the ability to think for oneself is the greatest attribute
that any person can truthfully ascribe and attain in our modern world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:10 AM on 01/14/2012
This article is in the Canada Business section and all we are getting is US stats. Where are the figures for Canada? Canada tends to lead the US in embracing new communications technology and changes in that would be of vital interest to all sectors of the communications and entertainment industry in Canada.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Harris
is a journalist & international bestselling author
03:21 PM on 01/15/2012
Hey SayBlade, I was at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) this past week (just got home Sat, Jan 15) so the presentation by Robert Kyncl that I sat through and wrote about was aimed at a primarily US audience -- so the figures he quoted were US. As a rule of thumb whatever the numbers are for the US you can divide by 11 and get approximately what the Canadian numbers will be. As you point out Canada does lead the US for broadband penetration into the home, so you can probably divide by 10 instead of the usual 11. As I get more info I will post it here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RocketPower
06:10 AM on 01/14/2012
Netflix streams HD (720p and 1080p on some titles) on the PS3 and surround sound, so not sure what they're talking about... or that study is old.
11:52 PM on 01/13/2012
The study found that "the percentage of consumer watching broadcast or cable TV shows,

to narrow cast highly target audiences.

And the fact speak for themselves:

On hundred million

600 million video enable smartphones

that will sold in 2012

I can hear what some people saying:
08:08 PM on 01/13/2012
Correction: I'll hand you this. "Hell you're, being published" should read Hell, you're being published.
I figure I'd better draw attention to my own weaknesses as surely, someone else will rightly feel compelled to do so.
08:01 PM on 01/13/2012
Yes, well Jim Harris, management consultant and bestselling author, I often see articles on the HuffPost that contain an error or two, and get irritated. Hell you're, being published on a high-profile website, I think to myself, can you not check it before publishing? This article takes the cake! There are "1.25 million PCs worldwide," Jim? Come on. As far as small grammatical errors are concerned, there are too many to count. One finds oneself being forced to re-read passages to deduce and verify what the "author" must have meant to say; a thoroughly unsatisfying experience. It is precisely because it is now so easy to click submit, that one needs to exercise greater restraint than in previous times. A craftsman should take pride in his work.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Harris
is a journalist & international bestselling author
09:27 PM on 01/13/2012
Dear Strainmybrain Thanks for the catch. It's Billion not Million -- I feel like Doctor Evil. I'll see if we can get that fixed. Then both of our comments will make no sense. Thanks again for the correction
07:56 PM on 01/13/2012
I cancelled my satellite TV 15 months ago. Between netflix and what is available to stream from TV channels on the net, I'm not missing much. I am considering an antenna for local news.

I'm not sure what I like the most, saving $100 a month or paying back ma bell for all those years of poor customer service.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Harris
is a journalist & international bestselling author
06:44 PM on 01/13/2012
CES will be posting to YouTube Robert's talk. Once it is up I will post it here. It was one of the two best talks at CES this year that I saw.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jim Harris
is a journalist & international bestselling author
07:47 AM on 01/16/2012
The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) has just put up Robert Kyncl's keynote -- and in my opinion it was one of the two most provocative, interesting keynotes of the Consumer Electronics Show (CES). Here is the URL so that you can watch it in its entirety, without editorial comment and form your own opinion of his argument. See http://blog.seattlepi.com/videoblogging/2012/01/14/ces-2012-keynote-robert-kyncl-youtube-best-one-hour-one-minute-of-show/
06:28 PM on 01/13/2012
I would say this article is insightful rather than inspiring, but insightful was not offered as an option on the click buttons at the top. It will be nice in the future to have one machine that provides a phone, T.V. channels, internet, films and music. It would also be nice if said machine could monitor one's home for safety too. I agree with Jim that convenience trumps quality. I unhooked my T.V. two weeks ago and I am not missing it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SayBlade
This micro bio intentionally left blank.
09:19 AM on 01/14/2012
I remember 15 years ago technology and entertainment pundits told us that the merging of cable TV, telephone and internet would be a reality within a fairly short time frame. If you have a desktop or notebook computer you already are capable of merging your TV, internet, movies, music, phone communication, programming your home security system and making a pot of coffee in the morning. Some hardware and software add-ons will bring that to fruition.

I disconnected the cable TV four years ago and don't miss it.