Assuming your city is anything like mine, you're no doubt aware that the CBC has recently produced a show called Arctic Air. A casual tourist to Vancouver, in fact, could be excused for thinking Canadians toil under the cruel tyranny of Adam Beach, so omnipresent are the enormous billboards bearing the leading man's world-weary mug. Certainly the red-carpet gala Beach and company received on premiere night last month, in which heaps of fawning praise and applause were thrust upon the dear leader, would have done little to dissuade that notion.
And just as the most garish propaganda seeks to mask inner weakness with over-the-top pomposity, Arctic Air's real-world support has proven to be shakier than Gaddafi's. Though the CBC and other Can-con apologists did their best to spin the numbers favourably, the show's January 10 debut yielded barely over a million viewers, a showing so poor that it failed to even crack BBM Canada's top 30 of the week. To be fair, Arctic Air did briefly sneak into the #27 slot during the last week of January (narrowly edging out a re-run of CSI New York), but has remained absent ever since.
Why Canadians aren't warming to the CBC's latest taxpayer-funded opus is hard to say. In typical Canadian fashion, no mainstream publication appears to have tasked anyone with actually watching the show, meaning most coverage has simply been of the "local boy makes good" variety. One can only presume the subject matter, which centers around a gang of moody misfits attempting to run a rural airline in the Northwest Territories, somewhat lacks mainstream appeal, despite Beach's insistence that bush flying across Yellowknife "speaks volumes about what it is to be Canadian."
In any case, it should go without saying that absolutely no lessons will be learned from the failure of Arctic Air. Fat and happy from government subsidies, mandatory broadcast quotas, and unapologetically rigged award shows, the Canadian television industry is quite content to live in its parallel universe where normal laws of success and failure do not apply. In this topsy-turvy dimension, fame and laurels are always awarded first, with trivial things like "viewership" coming much later, if at all.
When pressed, the Canadian media-industrial complex will justify their skewered standards of accomplishment with the conveniently conspiratorial fairy tale that the only reason Canadians aren't watching more Can-con is because the devil Americans wont let us. There's no shortage of violent verbiage available to describe the horror; our markets are "bombarded," "saturated," "overrun," etc. Yet in reality, thanks to the billion-dollar-a-year budget of the CBC and its not-much-less subsidized competitors, never before in history have Canadians had more readily available access to Canadian-made alternatives. It's easier than ever to watch, say, Republic of Doyle rather than Two and a Half Men -- yet we still elect not to.
If you've never done so before, I highly advise checking out Canada's TV ratings, as they offer such a stark view of the reality that Canadian officialdom does its best to deny. Canada's most beloved shows are consistently the most clichéd examples of crass Americana -- The Big Bang Theory, Dancing with the Stars, Canadian Idol, etc -- while the subsidized offerings that "speak volumes about what it is to be Canadian" languish near the bottom.
The fact that Canadian tastes in entertainment are not particularly patriotic but are largely indistinguishable from our southern neighbours is a stubborn fact no amount of central planning can seem to kill; not advertising blitzes, not prime time quotas, and certainly not a fourth season of Being Erica.
In such a climate, the Internet remains a great oasis for Canada's beleaguered audiences, and in a hopefully portentous decision last week, the Supreme Court defied the usual cartel of actors' unions and culture lobbyists in declaring that Internet Service Providers do not officially count as "broadcasters" and were thus immune from the byzantinian web of content regulations that have long shackled the cable networks.
While it's possible to read too much into this narrow ruling, it's clear from the freaked out reactions of some members of the culturati that our present era of forcing Canadians to pay for TV shows they don't want to watch so they can hog air time from those they do isn't guaranteed to survive the information age.
Culture is an undeniable part of any nation's identity, yet it must also be something which arises organically through a mass aggregate of individual tastes, of which (for better or worse) the marketplace remains the most useful measurement. So there's only one conclusion that can be drawn from the cultural climate of a nation like Canada, where a small, self-interested elite exerts so much energy limiting, controlling, and denouncing the preferences of the majority.
In other words, maybe the billboards send the right message after all.
Follow J.J. McCullough on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JJ_McCullough
Love it! The same can be said of the Monarchists.
Also, by and large the numbers show that we watch American shows. So what? It's in English. and reality TV shows have dominated all the english speaking country markets since the first season of 'survivor'. What IS exceptional is that the 2nd highest viewership in Canada is for the Big Bang theory, a 30-minute comedy about scientists. THAT'S unusual. I don't think it's really an example of 'crass Americana'.
You must be waiting for an American production company to swipe the idea and call it "AirAlaska ". No doubt that would give them access to the "real" audience in the US and it could take its place along classics like "Big Brother" and 2 and a half reruns
As for Rick Mercer? Why don't we ask everybody who's the better known comedian. Never heard of you before HP and you've never written anything funny here that I've seen. Or is this really an ethical oil dispatch in disguise.
Canadian programming can be very good, and when that happens, it doesn't really need to be subsidized. Take a look at Flash Point, its a phenomenal show, and gets multimillion ratings worldwide.
Also, US shows take the top 10 spots among Canadian audiences; having access to a "real" audience in the US doesn't come into the debate at all.
And finally, your appeal to fame is crap. Rick Mercer has more fame than JJ, but unless you've appeared on SunNews JJ has more fame than you. None of that proves which one of you three is right.
I also want to plug two shows that the Aboriginal People's Television Network (APTN) airs - Cashing In and Blackstone. If you have virgin ears, don't tune in, but if you want to see some well-made, gritty, Canadian aboriginal-focussed drama, with good acting (especially the deliciously EVIL Eric Schweig), then by all means give them a look. Too bad they're not on CBC!
What JJ has done is somehow divine failure by using as his metric the Top 30 programs, which are regularly dominated by sports, live events, programs like Idol, and yup, U.S. shows -- Canadians love em. But that's roughly like looking at the home run totals of Aaron, Babe Ruth, Sosa and declaring that Jose Bautista is a failure.
Then he twists himself into knots to concede that this "failure" DID, in fact, crack this mythical top 30 shows. It's sheer nonsense.
Cdn made shows like Arctic Air, Heartland, The Listener, Flashpoint, Rookie Blue, now regularly top a million. Cdn shows were in the top ten all summer, which is where most of the private nets burnoff their CanCon. They manage to do this without the benefit of simulcast (running on two channels at once, and on the backs of US promotional budgets 100x the size of Canadian ones.)
There's facts, and there's fantasy. JJ's fantasy of failure comes with a sponsorship:, doctrinaire conservative dogma. HuffPo doesn't pay its columists. Clearly you get what you pay for.
In case it's not clear, I say "narrative television" to differentiate between shows with scripted plots (sitcoms, dramas, etc) and shows without (such as sports, reality, and news shows).
Other than the Parliamentary appropriation, for which the CBC alone guarantees service to the ENTIRE COUNTRY....
...All the broadcasters, public and private, receive the same subsidies.
CTV, CBC, Global....all their subsidies are equally doled out, from same money pit, all of it tax money.