Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM John Brian Shannon
 

As China Goes Green What Is Canada Waiting for?

Posted: 12/17/11 06:35 AM ET

Could it be that the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gas is the same country that spends more on green technology than any other country?

It says everything about China that a nation of 1.5 billion people enjoying a rapidly growing economy chooses to spend unimaginably large sums of money to green-tech it's industry -- even as many competing domestic interests vie for government revenue.

Beijing residents rarely see the sky these days due to constant smog caused by coal-fired power plants, industrial pollution, transportation and construction sectors. Many cities in China are finding themselves completely blanketed by thick, particulate-laden clouds. At a certain point, smog begins to affect worker attendance and productivity rates -- which affects the corporate bottom line.

According to CLPmag.org: "It has been estimated that 410,000 Chinese die as a result of pollution each year." That's every year, folks.

It is a vicious circle. High pollution levels induce worker ailments, which lower productivity, resulting in lower profits. This causes companies to demand the government apply stricter environmental standards. Company directors are beginning to recognize the costs of inaction are much higher than the cost of environmental action.

China is now the largest producer of solar panels in the world, having surpassed the U.S. in late 2011. A smaller percentage of those panels are available for export as they are being redirected for domestic use as a way to taper the need for more coal-burning power plants.

However, on account of the staggering demand for electricity caused by rapid growth in China, completion of one coal-fired electrical power generation station per week continues and has been the case since 2008. One must also keep in mind this significant number; for each tonne of coal burned, around 2.4 tonnes of CO2 is created.

Of particular interest to the Chinese government these days is the cost of constructing 100 megawatts of electricity generation -- enough to power 62,000 homes -- using the following methods:

1) A Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) solar power plant -- which cost around $700 million in 2010, but are steadily dropping in price. Fuel cost for the sun to power those curved mirrors is zero. CSP's are noted for producing solar power 24 hours per day, storing the heat generated in vast underground pools of molten salt. After manufacture and construction, all emissions are zero. They are low maintenance.

Note: A 100 MW CSP power plant saves the environment 164,000 tons of CO2 per year!

2) A Photovoltaic (PV) solar power plant -- generally cost around $300 million with prices dropping almost monthly. Fuel cost for the sun to power those solar modules is zero. After manufacture and construction, all emissions are zero. Very low maintenance.

Note: A 100 MW PV power plant saves the environment 164,000 tons of CO2 per year!

A coal-fired power plant -- cost about $250 million and that price is rising yearly as expensive environmental technology is added to improve air quality. Constant maintenance is a factor with coal-fired power plants.

In the coal power plant scenario, the construction cost is only one factor out of many high costs to be borne by the plant operator and ultimately passed on to the consumer.

At the end of 2010, China operated 620 coal-fired power plants burning over three billion tons of coal per year. That's a lot of CO2, sulphur dioxide, nitrous oxide, airborne mercury, other toxins and particulate. After manufacture and construction, just the CO2 emissions only amount to 7.2 billion tonnes -- every year.

And, except for nitrous oxide (due to an aggressive and successful Chinese government program to drastically reduce NOx levels) all those numbers will double by 2020.

Then there is the fuel equation: in China, coal costs 815 yuan ($125) a tonne and it burns over three billion tonnes per year to total $375 billion annually. Rail and shipping costs are extra -- which represent a substantial amount of money alone. Some of China's coal supply comes all the way from western Canada and the U.S.!

Significantly, those numbers are expected to more than double by 2020. That is a lot of money to spend year in and year out, even for the world's number one economic performer.

Which brings us right back to 410,000 deaths per year in China due to the environmental degradation of the air, water, land and even food. Is it any wonder that China is more determined than any country to pursue green-tech solutions to improve it's environment?

In first-world nations, delivering on the environmental front is seen to be one step up from receiving a Cub Scout badge.

In China, delivering on the environmental front means saving tens of thousands of lives every year along with accumulating healthcare savings.

Is it any wonder that China's government has displayed such a high level of interest in promoting a green energy policy?

China's government has realized the importance of clean energy to the very survival and health of many thousands of citizens per year and the economy. Although late entering the game, China is now making huge strides to properly address it's environmental challenges.

There is nothing stopping Canada from doing the same -- except ourselves.

 

Follow John Brian Shannon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@JBSCanada

Could it be that the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gas is the same country that spends more on green technology than any other country? It says everything about China that a nation of 1.5 bil...
Could it be that the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gas is the same country that spends more on green technology than any other country? It says everything about China that a nation of 1.5 bil...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keohane
09:01 PM on 12/19/2011
I've travelled distances on trains in China and was visually awed at the extent of the envirnomental mess. It cannot be described in words; you have to see it and smell to appreciate it. I remember a day in Beijing in 2009 when I had to go back to my room and turn on the air conditioner with the windows shut because I just couldn't breathe outside. It's that bad.
08:15 PM on 12/18/2011
This chart from the bottom of the page at Natural Resources Canada show worldwide coal production. Canada is #13 of 15. We see why the top three China, US and India want nothing to do with Kyoto as they are the top producers.

http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/minerals-metals/business-market/canadian-minerals-yearbook/2009-review/3729
04:42 PM on 12/18/2011
Interesting article ! Thanks for presenting the information in a logical, easy- to- understand- the- numbers way. I think its fantastic that there can be a free exchange of info in a forum such as this for starters. I have travelled to 122 cities (many in Canada) in 22 different countries. Certainly, Canada has a very high quality of life as compared with many who do not even have clean water or vaccinations we take for granred. Each country on the globe is either part of the solution or part of the problem....which one are you ?? Whoever is working towards and whatever can be done to improve the environment and the conditions for the inhabibtants of our (limited resource) planet is forward thinking. My kid - and her kids - stand to inherit either the problem or the solution. If China is working toward a solution - it doesn't matter if it is self-serving - it's still a solution, which is more than can be said for many others,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karma2U
Blessed are the Peacemakers
03:58 PM on 12/18/2011
Get back to us if China's green project goes any better than their gigantic dam, huge amusement park, high speed rail, and their housing projects.

I believe the USA and Canada should go green as soon as possible.

But China, I don't believe much of what they say.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
02:54 PM on 12/18/2011
All the good things we read about China are simply the things China wants us to read about.
Good luck trying to tell the truth, especially if you are 'in' China.
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
02:11 AM on 12/18/2011
Well personally, I'm waiting for western governments to impose gargantuan trade tariffs on China (and India) so that we are not forced to buy their cheap crap (whether made in a green manner or not) and to impose draconian laws requiring multinationals selling TO the western consumer market to pay their local staff the going rates in Toronto, New York and other centres.

I see no reason to emulate, much less trade with, a nation with little respect for laws and even less for human rights.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:53 PM on 12/18/2011
why would they do that after subsidizing all these companies to move to china?
06:00 PM on 12/17/2011
"China is building a new coal fired electrical generation plant a week"
These plants use the latest clean coal technologies. The old polluting plant are being dismantled as they sit on valuable land near or in the urban areas. They are replaced by new ones built to the best industry and environmental practices much further out of urban areas. China has no intention of fouling her own nest.

Yes burning coal will produce CO2. But while you are holding back the building of power generation capacity based on contentious arguments and politicking your shortage of capacity will cause your home utility bills to shoot through the roof.

Do read this article.
China shows its skills with world trade rules.
US Trade Representative Ron Kirk's report to the US Congress warns that China "has not yet fully embraced" key World Trade Organization principles. Yet the evidence suggests China has a more realistic grasp of the rules of the game than we give it credit for - even as its subsidies benefit the West. - Peter Lee. 2011 December 17
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/ML17Cb01.html

[Looking at some of America's trade beefs, however, one gets the impression that the problem is not that China doesn't play by the rules, it is that China knows the rules all too well - and how to stretch them without breaking them.] And the part on the solar panel industry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
08:41 PM on 12/17/2011
PaPaPeng

That's a great link. I quote the last 2 paragraphs;

"After all, as it stands now, China subsidizes (or at least supports through preferential policies) its solar industry. That industry exports 97% of its output to reduce pollution in the developed world. In effect, the Chinese government is subsidizing the commercialization of clean energy in the United States and Europe.

That's something that perhaps should be encouraged, instead of discouraged. And maybe China has a more realistic understanding and appreciation of "the rules of the game" and "how the game should be played" than we give it credit for."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:21 AM on 12/18/2011
No they don't, many of them are old non-combined cycle technology plants.
02:31 PM on 12/17/2011
The difference between Canada and china is the difference btween sense and nonsense. Canadians are actually subsidizing the destruction of the Atabasca and adding to the problem of global warming which has already cause hundreds of thousands of deaths. The Chinese goveernment has an understanding of costs re people and economic. They are leading the world.
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
09:46 PM on 12/17/2011
You are correct in all that you say, pinki! But Harper's concern is about the oil sands and the Keystone pipeline, not us!

And what do we do about that?
06:59 AM on 12/19/2011
and word in the industry Saskatchewan is the next oil sand just give it 2 years
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:22 AM on 12/18/2011
HUH?
What destruction?
Details, from real sources, please.
02:17 PM on 12/17/2011
NDS

This article was very well written.
A great amount of information was provided.
I do hope we (all the world) soon reaches a place
where we have no pollution.
This comment has been removed.
12:14 PM on 12/17/2011
Lets hope that we're not waiting for the Albertasaurus party to do something. Make no mistake, fossil fuel power is hazardous. China is not rhe only place with a problem. "According to studies prepared for the Ontario government, in 2010 the province’s coal-fired electricity generation caused over 150,000 illnesses, 522 emergency room visits, 440 hospital admissions and 316 deaths, in Ontario". A comprehensive study in the US by the Harvard School of Medicine pegged the damage from coal power at ~$345B per year with thousands of deaths. Yet Canada and the US continue to beat the drum for fossil fuels and dodge their responsibilities. Paradoxically, Canadian recent hydroelectric projects have experienced an issue with the release of large quantities of mercury, the benefit of decades of fallout from coal fired power plants. Harper's solution: increase coal exports. Connect the dots: Canadians will die and Peter Kent seems to be okay with that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
01:23 AM on 12/18/2011
How has Harper increased coal exports?
02:52 PM on 12/18/2011
You do realize you won`t get an answer. The poster is just parroting something he read somewhere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
russell merifield
11:36 PM on 12/18/2011
While not necessarily Harper, certainly Canadian coal companies are expanding. Is Canadian demand decreasing?