Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Laforet

GET UPDATES FROM John Laforet
 

Let's try that Ontario Election Again, Shall We?

Posted: 04/17/2012 4:45 pm

If there was ever a time to have an election it is right now, before the proposed provincial budget for 2012 passes the legislature. Ontario's last election was light on policy and heavy on platitudes from all sides. The Liberals engineered a platform designed to preserve enough seats to cling to power for another term, while the PCs struggled to portray Tim Hudak as a Premier, not opposition leader, in waiting.

The NDP made impressive gains, but Andrea Horwath is really only now beginning to demonstrate strong leadership and an ability to make what appear to be principled decisions.

During the last campaign, each party leader promised Ontario's best days lay ahead, while only the PCs offered any cuts as part of a plan to address the deficit and get Ontario's economic house back in order. The NDP didn't run on tax increases, but now seem prepared to publicly take a position that is in keeping with their party's worldview. Good on Horwath for doing that.

Each is a valid option to reining in a deficit. Dalton McGuinty certainly didn't run on savaging collective bargaining rights, fighting with teachers, doctors and anyone else who earns their living in the public service. Nor did the Premier run on building casinos in Liberal bastions like downtown Toronto or downtown Ottawa. Each of these is a big departure from the limited, tentative mandate Ontarians offered the Premier and are worthy of public debate and ultimately allowing Ontarians to decide what is best.

McGuinty's election platform called for expanding, publicly subsidized transportation (Go Transit), not selling off or closing vital public transportation to communities that need it (Ontario Northland).

The Liberal's position that Ontario doesn't need an election right now, arguing the province just had one, doesn't consider what we know now that we didn't know then.

At the time of the last election, the Auditor's damning report on the Liberal's mismanagement of billions of dollars was still under wraps. The involvement of key party members in the ORGNE scandal had not broken and Don Drummond's slash and burn approach to balancing the books was not complete.

Now that the public has access to all of these things, and both the Liberals and NDP have joined the PCs in offering distinct variations of how they would handle Ontario's finances for the coming year and into the future -- we've got a real reason to go to the polls. Hudak's PCs have been largely absent from the public budget debate, in large part due to their early decision to vote against the budget, but in doing so, are responsible for putting the NDP in a place where they had to develop some tangible economic positions of their own and Ontario is better for it.

Let's have an election this spring and let Ontarians decide not simply who they trust to govern, but also whose plan for Ontario's finances they believe will serve our future best.

Fixed elections seem like a good idea, until they become tools to allow a governing party to avoid disclosing their true plans until it's too late for voters to say or do anything about it. This isn't the first time McGuinty has run on spending and turned to cuts within months of claiming power -- but this is the first time the NDP and PCs are in a position to do something about it.

For the sake of our province, let's hope the opposition gives all Ontarians an opportunity to vote on how best to handle Ontario's economic recovery, now that all the facts are available.

Regardless of whose plan you think is best, is there any reason to deny Ontarians, in whose name the government spends and in whose great-grandchildren's names this Premier assigns debt, the opportunity to chart the course they want our government to take?

 

Follow John Laforet on Twitter: www.twitter.com/laforet

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Awake-and-Sing
named after a great play written by Clifford Odets
07:04 PM on 04/24/2012
Maybe what Ontario wanted WAS minority government where whatever passed would need to have a deal from at least two parties.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:07 PM on 04/22/2012
Another election is a waste of time and tax payers money . We do not need another election. I have lived in Ontario all my life and for the must part I have never seen two Political Parties agree about anything. You change the government now in Ontario . Who every the new Party is will have compounded the problems ; that the former Party had. Nothing will get done with a new government in Ontario. But Im almost sure this new Party will want to spend some money ; or take care of the Party, solidarity with in the Party. May even vote them selfs a raise . The whole process is a waste of tax payers money . Buy the time a new Party gets organized Ontario will be a little deeper in debt . But who cares when you are a Party . The Party Ideology is just that : we are the ruling Party and we will do what we think is right ; even if it is wrong for Ontario.
11:33 AM on 04/19/2012
With Hudak as the opposition, an election is pointless. The vote will be split between the left and further left.
10:15 AM on 04/18/2012
I think we are stuck with the current party leadership through one more election regardless and McGuinty isn't getting the job done here. If we had an election right now it would be the election we SHOULD have had last time with real serious budgetary issues being discussed. A minority government can only exist as long as the leader can get the job done and McGuinty couldn't even get the job done when he had majority.

If Hudak fails to reach at least minority government status he should be replaced.
If McGuinty doesn't turn it into a functioning majority of by gaining seats, he should be replaced.
If Horwath doesn't make significant gains she too should go.

A conservative minority would at least be a change of pace but possibly not much more functional than the current situation.
A conservative majority may well only exist in Hudak's fantasies. It might be possible the next time around with a different leader.

On the other hand here, we might actually see Ontario provincial politics teaching Liberals and NDPers how to work together in a coalition/alliance of some sort. Yes I know this is a true fantasy land where we would actually have two viable alternative governments rather than 17 shades of dysfunctional grey.
11:36 AM on 04/18/2012
I agree that we would get to have the election we should have had if we go to the polls over this budget. The reality is the Premier sought a very different mandate than the one he is trying to implement now, in a minority parliament no less. Going to the polls and having the party leaders sell Ontarians on their path to economic salvation is a good thing for all Ontarians regardless of who you voted for.
09:44 AM on 04/18/2012
So basically your column amounts to: you don't like the result of the last election (especially the part about keeping renewable energy!) and therefore you want a new election seven months later. Based on your logic it shouldn't matter whether we have a minority or a majority government, we should have an election every time we have information about an important issue that wasn't available before the election. Maybe we should have a federal election now that the Tories are proposing to gut environmental protections and now that we know the whole story of how they fudged the numbers (putting it kindly) on the F-35's?
11:38 AM on 04/18/2012
Where do I say I did not like the last election result, make any reference to renewable energy? Further, I did article why it does matter that this is a minority government -- the Liberals have a very weak mandate, and it was a mandate to do something very different then they are proposing now.

The rest of your argument is about federal politics and totally irrelevant to what is happening in Ontario today.

Why are you afraid of an election about Ontario's economic future? I have no idea who would win but would be satisfied whatever happened, was happening with a mandate.
02:10 PM on 04/18/2012
Do you really expect us to believe that your well-documented opposition to renewable energy, as well as your dislike for this government, has nothing to do with your call for an election? I'm sorry but no amount of spin can hide a fact that is so blatantly obvious. My point about the federal government is where do you draw the line? Your logic has nothing to do with the size of the mandate but rather the fact that the Liberals are (according to you) doing things they had not revealed during the election and/or there is new information available now that justifies an election. By that logic, you should be calling for a federal election as well. We didn't have the damning auditor general's report about the F-35's, we didn't know then that the Conservatives intended on dismantling environmental protections. It's been almost a year since the federal election- don't you think the people have a right to decide these matters?
09:38 AM on 04/18/2012
Personally I do not think Ontario should spend millions on another election until we have 3 new candidates to choose from. Does it really make sense to spend money unnecessarily for an election over a budget that is about cost cutting? Couldn't that money be used better elsewhere?
11:39 AM on 04/18/2012
It does make sense because an election allows Ontarians to decide what course they would like to take, which is a decision they were deprived during the last campaign. Fewer than 50% of people voted and elected a minority government with a very different mandate than what is now being proposed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
06:28 PM on 04/18/2012
Well John, I'm sure you realize that there just isn't going to be an election any time soon. Liberals and NDP wil work this out once both sides finish with their 'posturing' stage. I might add that if an election were to be brought on so early by either Tory or NDP intransigence the voters would no doubt vote in a new majority government; a Liberal one.
08:14 AM on 04/19/2012
....so, holding another election will cause more tired taxpayers to turn out and vote this time?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlWaterloo
09:34 AM on 04/18/2012
Be careful what you ask for. Hudak is such a dud he may do worse than last time.
11:40 AM on 04/18/2012
I don't recall suggesting anywhere in this article that Tim Hudak is the way to go. That said, this election would at least allow Ontarians to chart their own course, and would be an outcome we should all be able to accept.
07:44 AM on 04/18/2012
All three of the parties are useless with no actual vision, however in order to keep Hudak out, I'd most likely vote Liberal. So no, lets not go to another election.
03:30 PM on 04/18/2012
Your personal political preferences shouldn't impact whether you believe in a fair, democratic process. Suggesting your fear that the will of the majority (or plurality) is different then yours and therefore those voices should not be heard, is telling.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Angus12
06:49 AM on 04/18/2012
Unfortunately Horwath is going to fold like a cheap suit. With an apparent merger of the Ontario Power Authority and the Independent Electricity System Operator, an option that Horwarth has offered up as a possibility of her supporting the budget. She's all but given her word to Premier Dad that she will support the budget. Ontario is toast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
05:29 AM on 04/18/2012
We can't keep having elections in Ontario till PCs like the result. Stupidly disruptive and costly.
11:42 AM on 04/18/2012
This isn't about the PCs, it is about democracy. Governments are elected with mandates. McGuinty ran on sunshine and rainbows and is now on a slash and burn mission. Ontarians have a right to decide if that is OK. Government serve the people, and it is our right as citizens to set the terms of reference for what and how that happens. We didn't have that opportunity in the fall.

Also - I question how Ontario having an election is disruptive or can be considered costly? That sounds pretty bad, are all elections not a good idea then?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
01:28 PM on 04/18/2012
I don't think it sounds at all bad to suggest that elections held months apart create undue costs and distraction- furthermore, it's a leap to conclude from that statement a belief that elections are not a good idea.

I did not perceive McGuinty's message to have been one of sunshine and rainbows during the last election; rather it was more a message of continuity in uncertain times. Besides which, Hudak's daft campaign had more to do with the election outcome - not up for another round, and I suspect very many Ontarians feel the same fatigue. Does not make us pro-tyranny, just means we're tired.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
06:35 PM on 04/18/2012
'Governments are elected with mandates. McGuinty ran on sunshine and rainbows and is now on a slash and burn mission.'
I believe that's a bit of an overstatement, John. McGuinty is walking a tightrope and handling things with a certain amount of pragmatism. One budget and six months into this term is no time to suddenly pull the plug and send the province's finances into further chaos. I might just be able to get behind what you're saying, say, a year or so from now. If there is no discernible progress by that time, perhaps another election should be seriously considered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike vdB
Get involved, always question, don't just exist.
10:08 PM on 04/17/2012
So what happens if the Tories and the NDP trigger an election for personal and political gain and the Liberals come out on top? With a majority perhaps? Will you continue to sing this same tune? The NDP demands may seem a little outrageous but at least they are contributing their part in this minority govt. Mr. Hudak would rather show he cannot contribute and just takes his marbles and goes home. Do I want someone like that representing me as Premier? I don't think so.
11:53 PM on 04/17/2012
First - your question is based on a faulty premise. An election over this budget would not be for personal gain, but to allow Ontarians to weigh in on our financial future. I will continue 'singing this same tune' as all I am suggesting is that Ontarians deserve the right to shape their province's destiny and the significant changes any of the three parties would make to balance the budget should only happen after that party has won a mandate to make the changes they seek.

McGuinty doesn't have that mandate yet, and neither does anyone else.

How are the NDP demands any more outrageous than the Liberals? In fact, I see both the NDP and PCs positions as being considerable more bearable on a number of fronts.

Hudak did contribute - check your facts. He was the first to offer a solution to Ontario's deficit, met with the Premier prior to the budget and made recommendations then. McGuinty chose to reject Hudak's advice. The Premier chose not to play marbles with Hudak.
10:20 AM on 04/18/2012
In that case the PC party gets new leadership and possibly the NDP too. In addition the Liberal majority government would have a strong mandate coming from an election fought on real solid issues rather than on rhetoric and fluffy talking points.

McGuinty wanted no contributions from anyone outside his bubble. Not even from his own highly paid consultant. He doesn't live in the real world and its only because Hudak failed to get the job done that McGuinty still has a job. It is really unfortunate that after his dismal performance that Hudak got to keep his job.
09:52 PM on 04/17/2012
Well I couldn't agree with you more. It doesn't seem to matter where you sit in this political spectrum this present Liberal goverment just doesn't seem to get it. It wouldn't surprise me at all if we are in far worse shape than the Drummond Report outlined, however I don't think pulling potentially 60,000 jobs away from the SLOTS horseracing program is the way to go either, already the border tracks of Sarnia, Windsor & Fort Erie are being effected, horse breeders have already had their matings cancelled for this 2012 breeding season and where are the the slot attendants & food & beverage folks going to work now, what happens to the grooms, jockeys, hotwalkers, trainers, backsmiths , vets and countless others when the tracks close up because anyone left with any gambling dollars has gone to Ontario Place to become a mindless one armed bandit operator, in a City who voted this idea down years ago, that's why Woodbine & the like (16 other tracks) got the slots and thats exactly where they should stay.
Did the guvvy ever try to figure out how much coin they could pull in with a $10.00/$ 20.00 user fee everytime we go to quack & make the healthcare system more efficient or have a road fund licence for all these less than 49 cc motorized bikes, there are harmless ways to raise money without ripping out the heart of the racing industry that contributes over 1 Billion dollars in revenue.