Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Laforet

GET UPDATES FROM John Laforet
 

Don't Let the Hotheads Prevail In Quebec

Posted: 09/02/2012 7:01 pm

Say what you will about Jean Charest. All Canadians who value national unity owe him a debt of gratitude for nine years of relative quiet on the separation front. What could unfold in la belle province post-Charest, poses a threat to Canada as we know it. With public opinion polls showing that Parti Québécois Leader Pauline Marois poised to form government in Tuesday's Election, the threat is very real.

There is little doubt Quebec would benefit from a change in government, but what is concerning about elections in Quebec is that unlike any other province in Confederation, the fate of our country as we know it is always at risk.

There has been a concerted effort to convince Quebeckers that their place is within Canada and it is disheartening to see PQ leader Pauline Marois speak openly of her plans to create conditions for winning a referendum that it is clear a majority of Quebeckers don't want.

What the PQ fails to understand is that the continual sparring with the federal government and defiant support of secession, regardless of a demonstrated lack of public support for separation, creates an unstable environment for investors, who are in a position to strengthen the quality of life for all residents of Quebec.

Aspects of the PQ platform include regressive legislation on the display of religious symbols by non-Christian civil servants, barring non-french speaking citizens from seeking, and by extension, holding elected office in addition to a series of policies designed to artificially maintain a Francophone majority in Montreal.

Having been around politics for some time, it amazes me that someone can seek public office, and potentially win, on a platform centered on kicking the sleeping dog and in doing so, creating a crisis the majority would prefer to avoid.

Quebec has negotiated a unique place for itself within Canada and have gained broad recognition of the notion of Quebeckers constituting a distinct society and 'nation' within a united Canada. While it would be hard to imagine these and other recognitions as satisfying the deep seeded desire for some in Quebec to be a sovereign state, it is beneath anyone seeking to lead any government to purposely create strife as a means to a political end.

Tuesday night, Quebeckers will chose their candidates for the National Assembly and in doing so, will choose our fate as a united country. Here is to hoping cooler heads prevail and a government dedicated to maintaining the calm we've enjoyed over the last number of years, is elected.

 

Follow John Laforet on Twitter: www.twitter.com/laforet

FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fluffyevil
09:12 AM on 09/04/2012
Ignoring the roughly $180 billion debt the province has now and the $170 billion that their share of the national debt would be, /have they really looked at the border issue?
Underneath Labrador are a lot of anglophone communities. There are more north of Ottawa on the Quebec side of the river. I find it hard to believe that these areas and others would agree to separate along with the rest of Quebec. These areas would remain as the province of Quebec in Canada. You know, the one that was given Ruperts' Land, the northern two thirds of present day Quebec, AS a province of Canada.
That's quite the can of worms you're holding. Are you sure you want to open it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
05:54 PM on 09/03/2012
I like your use of the term "mutiny" .Treason would have worked too.I wonder how the U.S. would deal with something like this !
04:43 PM on 09/03/2012
The PQ leadership needs to be thankful they are living in Canada.

In plenty of other countries I can think of, talk of a mutiny to form a new state would be met with death squads. Headless bodies would be floating along nearby rivers.

In Canada you can freely babble about anything you want. A separate Quebec will never happen.
01:14 AM on 09/04/2012
You're thinking about rebellion and not separation. In most recent cases, separation actually decreases the violence. Think of the Balkans...
photo
sacer
Perfidious parrot.
02:19 PM on 09/03/2012
I am surprised that this poorly written piece by Mr. John "Chicken Little" Laforet was published. The word "concerning" is not a noun, and you use the word "succession" when you really meant to write "secession," which is not the same thing at all. Perhaps HuffPost needs new proofreaders. But more grave than the poor writing is the general tone in which this piece is written. Mr. Laforet wants us to believe that Canadian national unity is at stake, but the evidence does not bear this out. Mme. Marois will not be calling a referendum any time soon, because the Quebec electorate has no interest in one. Her posturing about Quebec sovereignty is a tactic intended to retain the vote of the fringe extremists, who now have another sovereignist party to support. If the PQ can rally a large enough number of votes for a majority government, they will still have to contend with the low popular support for another referendum. So, revile the PQ all you want, but what is certain is that they are smart enough to realize that another failed referendum will mean the end of the sovereignty project once and for all.
07:27 PM on 09/03/2012
Concerning can actually be used as a noun.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/concerning
photo
sacer
Perfidious parrot.
03:19 PM on 09/04/2012
I stand corrected. However, it is still used incorrectly in this column. You will notice that the entry in dictionary.reference.com  provides no instance of the particular usage that we see here.
01:07 PM on 09/03/2012
What is the upside for Quebec to seperate? They recieve over $7 Billion per year in equalization payments. They have a whole country that participates in bilinquilism. They have had many Prime Ministers, more than any other province. They have unequal representation in House of Commons and the Senate. If they left and had to take their 25% share of the national debt and combined it with their current debt they would owe $360 Billion. Who would finance this debt let and their continuing deficits? What would their currency be worth? Much has changed since the last referendum. Much of the Canadian population, especially Western Canadians, would not object to Quebec leaving, what would the upside be - saving $7 Billion per year in equalization payments which could help to paydown Canada's national debt, hundreds of million of dollars saved yearly in pensions to ex-Quebec federal servants and equal representation in pariliment and the senate for all provinces? The Canadian dollar is largely stable because of the resources in Western Canada. If it did lose some of its value that could be a positive. The old saying 'Be careful what you ask for because you just might get it' might be good advise to the PQ. I do not they represent the majority of people in Quebec and it would be sad to lose this multiculture experience the Pierre Trudeau, a Quebecor, envisioned as a country which is a reality in most of Canada today.
Anthropocan
Je est un Autre.
12:31 PM on 09/03/2012
We should have a government that will keep Quebec stable for investors... The same argument was used to support just about every U.S.-backed dictatorship. Investors aren't looking to improve our quality of life: they'll do everything they can to make sure it doesn't go up, because that's what's more profitable. I'm not saying we shouldn't be encouraging investment in enterprises from within Quebec. I just think the government should not be at the service of investors because of the assumption that private investment will lead to an increase in quality of life. Please note that I'm not a PQ supporter (as if the fact that I'm writing this in English didn't give it away...).
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
John Laforet
03:16 PM on 09/03/2012
I fundamentally disagree with your viewpoint on the impact investors play on a society. Job creation improves the quality of life for those who find new or better employment. The taxes they and their employer pay improve the government's financial picture. Investment isn't all branch plants or exploitative resource plays.

Further, I did not suggest anyone should govern exclusively for investors, but that the PQ should not be going out of their way to scare off investment on the verge for forming government, particularly by pursuing unpopular policies.
05:00 PM on 09/03/2012
Investors do not create jobs. Demand creates jobs. Smokestack chasing is the lowest form of development strategy and is unbecoming of any developed jurisdiction.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Torontosaurous
06:40 AM on 09/04/2012
Investors would probably like to see a repeal of bill 101.
12:15 PM on 09/03/2012
Charest deserves no thanks. He was extremely lucky to stay in power as long as he did, his government was mostly extremely unpopular, only the PQ's mistake in selecting Andre Boisclair to be leader gave him second life.
12:13 PM on 09/03/2012
Better the PQ than Bachand's Cultural Revolution which would be deepened by the way under the CAQ.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:04 PM on 09/03/2012
Tell you the truth I believe this one is up to the people of Quebec. All the moaning and teeth gnashing in the rest of the country doesn't count.

Quebecers have to decide what they want. Good luck to them. Hope they choose wisely.
12:49 PM on 09/03/2012
agreed!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MoonJoy
My micro-bio is empty.
11:32 AM on 09/03/2012
Erm... Christians would also be affected by the legislation on religious symbols display. The so-called Charter of Secularism is meant to avoid ALL public religious displays, including Christian ones.
Just saying.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:47 PM on 09/03/2012
You are incorrect. Christian public workers would be allowed to wear crosses. Muslims would not be allowed to wear head coverings. Jews would not be allowed to wear the yarmulke. Just saying.
06:04 PM on 09/03/2012
Indeed, and this is precisely what is so disturbing about Marois and her double standards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
10:49 AM on 09/03/2012
SHHH! Rational thought does NOT belong in Quebec politics!
10:23 AM on 09/03/2012
When analyzing risk, never forget the probability.

The Canadian media like to talk about separatism and scare up the fear of another referendum, something that is highly unlikely and unpopular this election cycle in Quebec itself. The probability is slim to none that there will be a referendum in the next 5-10 years, even with the PQ forming a majority government. Those saying otherwise are simply fear mongering.

Intolerance, condescension, insults and fear mongering from the ROC have a much bigger chance of pushing Quebec away from Canada and break up the country,

Most are thinking about short term, highly probable, challenges when casting their ballot on Tuesday. The citizens of Quebec have some real and pressing problems to deal with in the immediate future: corruption charges, civil unrest, favoritism and double standards, a massive debt, rising cost of healthcare, and a badly thought out northern plan that needs to be tweaked.

And we also have Jean Charest to thank for that.
12:06 PM on 09/03/2012
Unfortunately, while most francophone Quebecers are going to vote for the short-term goals you list, the result will be electing a government that will work hard to inflame tensions, both with the ROC and with its minorities, and who knows where that may lead.

Most outside of Montreal will not be affected by those tensions, will be barely affected, particularly if they don't know enough English to be aware of the feelings of those minorities, but those of us in Montreal will, and dread it.
04:17 PM on 09/03/2012
Then vote CAQ... The unconditionnal blind support the PLQ has received in the last decades in Montreal is the foundation of their entitlement attitude: they never pay for their excesses.
There is now another party wich fall within the "not-sovereignist" category. Give the PLQ a good kick in the teeth and you'll see things start to change... finally.