Canada's baby boomer-run media has been pretending that Quebec's student protests are only about tuition, when that's merely symbolic of the boot the older generation is placing upon the necks of their kids. This misinformation campaign reached its culmination with Maclean's magazine's angrily incorrect cover "Quebec's New Ruling Class: How a group of entitled students went to war and shut down a province. Over $325."
The dollar amount is meant to dismiss the student protestors out of hand -- the actual issue is debt and the austerity measures that fuel it, the 75 percent tuition hike is simply the straw that broke this particular camel's back.
But the keyword here is "entitled." Kinda sounds like something the WWII generation would have sneered at the 60s-era boomers, however this is about more than simply growing up and becoming "The Man."
Canada's census just pegged the baby boom generation at 9.6 million, nearly 30 per cent of the population. They represent 42.4 per cent of working age Canadians, up from 28.6 percent in 1991. They also cast a startling 60 per cent of all election ballots.
And now that they're entering retirement age, they've decided to pay their bills by robbing their children of the, yes, entitlements they themselves have enjoyed.
Despite their radical past, boomers are now the generation running the government, banks, media and corporations -- but rather than an Age of Aquarius we got stuck with an Apocalypse Now. By allowing collusion and deregulation, they created the Great Recession.
So boomer politicians beholden to boomer voters are hiking tuition, slashing education, decreasing Employment Insurance and cutting childcare, none of which have an impact upon them. They're then justifying these cuts with a deficit crisis that is partly created by concurrent tax cutting, including dramatically reducing the corporate tax rate to the lowest in the G7. This benefits only the people, predominantly boomers, who can afford to invest in these corporations and will cost $11.5 billion in lost revenue in 2012-2013 alone.
But where they seem to have overplayed their hand was by forcing Millennials to purchase increasingly expensive post-secondary education that no longer necessarily gets them a job, locking them into a debt spiral many never escape. (The average Canadian university graduate owes $27,000 and outstanding student loans total $20 billion.) All in hopes of one day going into even more mind-boggling debt to "own" a house and then not-retiring because the boomers have knocked over our social security pyramid scheme and overloaded the healthcare system.
But wait, aren't they trying to save Old Age Security at least? Actually, Canada's 2012 budget is pushing eligibility back to 67, but that won't begin until 2023 and will conclude in 2029, at which point the last baby boomers (born in 1964) will have retired. Well played.
Harper could have pushed the eligibility back as of last year, when the first boomers turned 65, but that would risk losing the votes of the country's dominant demographic. It's more politically savvy to punish subsequent (smaller) generations.
And just as they never made the sacrifices of their parents' generations, boomers are now trying to offload sacrifice onto their kids in the form of austerity measures that cut government spending on social programs for the young and the poor while keeping their own intact without paying more taxes, despite being at their peak earning age. And so rather than balancing budgets and reducing deficits fairly, Millennials are waking up the fact they'll be shouldering a disproportionate burden.
This -- not $325 -- is ultimately what sparked Maple Spring and sent Quebec's young people out into the streets where 2,600 of them have been arrested, 700 in a single shameful night last week. Another 84 were taken in yesterday, including two student leaders who had just left the Quebec City negotiations and were promptly rounded up by riot police.
It's also what fueled theOccupy Movement and the Spanish Indignados that inspired it a year ago this month when hundreds of thousands of Spaniards took over public squares. They marked that anniversary recently with more occupations, began a squatter's movement to reclaim thousands of unoccupied buildings whose residents had been evicted and launched a teacher's strike against $4 billion in education cuts.
All month long, hundreds of thousands of young people have faced off against riot police in Frankfurt, Moscow, Paris, Athens, Chicago, New York, Oakland (where they rolled out a tank) and elsewhere. Students have been clashing with cops outside of Quebec, too, with education-based conflicts in Mexico, Chile and England.
Democracy has broken down because the unsympathetic and unprecedented Boomer voting block has made the young feel disenfranchised, driving them to demonstrate in numbers not seen since, well, the 60s. Sure, Obama got elected, but had his hands quickly tied by an austerity-crazed Congress which won't dare touch Medicare or Social Security (at least not yet). And while young people succeeded in making the NDP the official opposition in Canada, it was at the cost of handing Prime Minister Harper a majority government so he could push austerity full bore.
These policies purposefully increase income inequality by reducing social services for the young and poor without increasing tax revenue via the wealthy and corporations. But when that austerity-driven gap reaches its breaking point -- as it did during England's riots last summer -- an underclass of young people who feel like they have no future also have no qualms about burning their towns down.
Nobody of any age group wants to see that happen. The post-Terror era was supposed to be about hope and change -- those signature calling cards of the 60s -- and instead young people today feel hopeless and trapped. And as the Baby Boomers retire en masse while retaining their outsize political influence, it's only going to get worse for everyone else.
But they have one more chance to change the world, to remember their own uprising back in 1968 and to realize that they are now the powers they once protested against. The Boomers can maintain the status quo until the system crushes their kids or they can rediscover their idealism and, as is beginning to happen in Montreal, join them in the streets.
Follow Joshua Ostroff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joshuaostroff
J.J. McCullough: Quebec Protesters Are Putting the Media to Sleep
The austerity agenda is the common enemy here, NOT any particular generation. Blaming the boomers for neocon austerity is like blaming women for Thatcher (I'm showing my age -- you might need to look her up on wikipedia).
Rather than dreaming up a facile and superficial "generation divide", try actually getting out and seeing who is in the streets standing with the student movement. The austerity agenda is the enemy, not anyone's generation!
And they're right. By any reasonable historical standard we live in paradise. The "terrible injustices" listed above by Ostroff are a joke compared to what has been suffered before in Canada, and to what happens everyday in other countries.
Yes, sometimes it's tough finding a job. Yes, housing in some cities is costly. Yes, sometimes the government has to moderate spending. So what? Canada is a free, safe, prosperous, and remarkably generous society that offers immense opportunities, and most people in this world would give their right arm to live here. Ostroff's depiction of it is utterly absurd. He is determined to play the victim and blame those who have provided him with a truly blessed life.
Happy retirement, except without the retired part. Because guess who will have to pay for your services? Youth. And if they are unable to find jobs, YOU will have to pay for those services yourselves or re-enter the work force.
You do realize that, when you retire and you are needing services, your children will be paying for them? And taking care of you. So before you go off on a hate-filled rant about how we feel that you should take care of us and that we are "petulant," you might want to tone down the insults. Show us respect and we will in turn help you later on when you need those services. Otherwise happy retirement, but without the retired part as you will be forced to re-enter the work force or pay for those services yourselves.
I don't know of a single "Boomer" or any other that would intentionally burden the younger generation, thier children and grandchildren or harm them in anyway so they can live it up in retirement. You think student housing options are bad, go have a look what seniors have available, it ain't the Ritz!
Nobody is forcing students to go to university, if you don't like it go somewhere else or do something else with your life. Education is free until you are 18 years old. After that what you do with your life is your choice.
And, as many of the boomers fail to realize because they are too busy spouting out insults at us youth, youth will be paying for your services in retirement. And if they are unable to find work, good luck to you. And happy retirement, except without the retired part as you will either have to pay for those services yourselves or re-enter the work force. So it would be wise to cutback on your insult throwing, youth are not getting the free ride that you think we are getting.
Despite the hardship we saved. Interest was high at first and we did well. This money is available to our kids. Now that my wife and I are both employed, we find ourselves covering all kinds of shortfalls and unexpected expenses for them.
There are all kinds of boomer parents doing the same thing, so the notion that we are putting a "boot on the neck" of the millenials is harsh.
I believe that all education should be free of charge in Canada. I have long supported extending O.H.I.P. et al, to cover all medications; dental care to16 and things like physiotherapy. Years ago, most of us expected this to happen in time.
Before any of this happens, blaming another generation will need to change to engaging one another in honest, sincere discussion. We boomers moved things a huge distance from where they were in the 50's. Women's rights and racism are some things that changed under our watch. We can still help, but it's time for millenials to shoulder the burden of change.
Millenials must commit to voting - elect politicians who represent their concerns. Protesting is fine - voting is what changes things - however
This rhetoric and insults coming from the baby boomers needs to stop, because youth cannot do much more than what they are doing now. And insulting them is not exactly going to inspire them to help you when you need services, so it would be wise to respect this generation of young people.
I certainly agree that the "rhetoric and insults" need to stop and I share you frustration about it. It is entirely unhelpful. However, I'm afraid your attack on those of us who will retire in the next decade falls into these categories.
Two things about older folks. Retired people remain part of the economy as consumers of goods and services. In this regard they continue to create jobs. In fact given our longevity as a generation, we may create more, longer-term jobs than previous generations of seniors. They also care about coming generations. I spend a great deal of time with retired people. Although they may cling to old, conservative values, (old habits and beliefs are hard to change), they want a better world for their children and grandchildren. They are per capita the greatest source of volunteer workers and also the biggest givers to charitable causes.
Also, the young are not the only ones affected by the current high level of unemployment. Ask anyone over 50 what it's like to find work if you are downsized or layed off. Even those with valuable skills and a proven track record are often passed over in favour of younger candidates, (even though age discrimination is illegal).
I don't have any answers to all this, but I know for sure that "rhetoric and insults" won't forge a helpful way forward.
The houses are too expensive. The gas is too expensive. Food prices are going up.
But the jobs just aren't there.
That is why young people are angry.
The boomers had it easy, jobs were abundant. My father made a great living with just a high school education and was able to raise a family, buy a house, and live comfortably. In the 60's and 70's you could go out with a CV and get a job the same day. It's not like that now.
If you want to get people out of the streets, there needs to be more jobs. Job creation needs to be taken seriously. Government corruption (which the Charest government is very guilty of) needs to be eliminated. That money needs to be invested more wisely.
Young people are very well educated now. They are smart enough to realize there is a Sword of Damocles hanging over the concept of traditional middle class life, and that their future will not be as comfortable as their parent's. Unfortunately, it will be hard to make big sweeping changes to our idea of western life if you have the retired 'comfort class' bogging us down. The boomers need to be on board too.
Not even close. Here's a graph.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?id=CANURNAA
Jobs have rarely been easy to come by in Canada, and the boomers on the whole had it much tougher than you. And never mind the high inflation, high interest rates, and high taxes of the 1970s and '80s.
Before you throw at me the unemployment rate during the 80s, I feel the need to remind you of the neoliberalism movement. The conservative governments, that baby boomers voted in? Was it a coincidence that the unemployment rate was so high during the conservative era? I can't help but wonder. But regardless, do you feel that youth should be punished because the unemployment rate is lower now than when you boomers made the poor decision? What happened to taking responsibility for one's actions? Or does wanting those retirement benefits trump whatever responsibility you have?