I want my son to question everything and Christopher Hitchens died recently (Dec.15).
First, about Christopher Hitchens: I'm weirdly sad. Maybe because I've just started to love him (I'm a late Hitchens bloomer), or maybe because I thought his last columns in Vanity Fair on his "living dyingly" were so poignant, considering he had some big questions and challenges for the laws of universe and god (not being great). When else but during death does one turn to god and religion? He -- as far as we know now -- hadn't, wouldn't: "I shall continue to write polemics against religious delusions, at least until it's hello darkness my old friend," Hitchens wrote in the last year of his life.
He is dead and I'm grateful that he was such a strong voice (even after he lost his own), making those who don't believe -- or at least question -- feel represented in this religion-crazed world.
I want my son to at least question (see how I did that?). I know that with my partner and I as parents, he won't start frothing at the mouth at the mention of god, a higher power, Jesus or Muhammad for a while, but naturally he will come of age when he'll try to rebel and perhaps he will even come home wearing a white robe, pockets full of rosaries and his head full of conviction that our lack of conviction is a sure work of evil. Or maybe not. Maybe he'll let his mind consider other possibilities that will bring his life meaning and will make him a good human being no matter which side of god he ends up on.
Religion is the mother of touchy subjects and it's one I've never really cared to argue against or about because I find arguing about it somewhat pointless in general. Grown-ups usually have their minds made up about it one way or another, so either you're (pun intended) preaching to the converted, or talking to an unholy wall. I'm curious as to what will happen when it (religion, god) will be brought up by a child, my child specifically, who with his fresh mind will be seeking ways to form his own opinions.
I'm sure it will come up sooner or later (we live in a Portugese neighbourhood and if that doesn't tell you anything, you should say a couple of Hail Marys for good measure). I will probably tell him that I was born into a Catholic faith and that I was baptized and that, yes, there was a point in my life when I obsessed over god being really mad at me because I said a swear word. I will tell him these things because he'll need to know where I'm coming from when I tell him to question religion and even god. I want to influence him, but I want him to have a mind of his own. I want to tell him that it's bad to blindly buy into dogma, but at the same time I don't want him to feel like I'm prohibiting him from developing his beliefs. My only lesson would be to question everything because you should always, always be curious and work your mind in all the bendable ways possible. (Yes, even allow it to consider god, if god happens to appear to it one day after bouts of atheism -- just make sure it's never the god that makes you scared, unforgiving and closed-minded.)
And speaking of fear, I've given my son's baptism some thought. I'm shocked that his Polish grandmother (my Ma) hasn't kidnapped him yet to get him dunked in holy water, though there are moments when I think, darkly, that she had, like my friend's mother who took my friend's daughter to have her secretly baptized. I could see my mother doing the same because she often worries about god being upset over this and that, and her church finding out, too. I'm not blaming her at all for being this way -- that's how she was raised. And so, I too have grown up being told that I would be doomed for eternity had I not gotten dunked in the said holy water and I've had this belief so ingrained in me that there are moments now when I still wonder if I'm damaging my son's heavenly future by not getting him that particular ticket to salvation. I will look at my partner (a hardcore atheist who was baptized to please his grandmother) with wild eyes once in a while and say, "Maybe we should get him baptized?" My partner looks back at me and we both shake our heads and remind ourselves that the child -- when he's all grown-up -- can make that decision for himself, especially if that will make him feel better about life. I'm sure I won't be too impressed if he does show up in a white robe with rosaries in his pocket and if he does, we will probably try to exorcise each other -- him with a Bible, me with Hitchens on the opposite side -- but I want my son to know that his faith or lack thereof should never come from being afraid.
Hitchens didn't let himself be scared by death into buying into something that brought him no comfort even when there was fear of the unknown. But he's been kind, even when talking about people who wanted to pray for him (Sept. 20 was "Everybody Pray for Hitchens Day") to bring him salvation: "I don't mean to be churlish about any kind intentions, but when September 20 comes, please do not trouble deaf heaven with your bootless cries," he wrote. "Unless, of course, it makes you feel better."
Originally published on they don't tell you.
Follow Jowita Bydlowska on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JowitaBydlowska
I believe that there is such a thing as Evil in this world. Examples are manifest. That Evil can exist implies that Good does as well. That's enough 'proof' for me.
Much Evil exists because of religion, not in spite of it.
As his parent it would be irresponsible to lie.
The most recent one I heard was that if we had proof ... everyone would believe, and heaven wouldn't be a special place, since everyone would be there.
Coz like, yeah, how could you appreciate heaven without the satisfaction of thinking about those who didn't make it into your eternal club?
I also like - "without a decision based on faith, heaven would be full of automatons".
Which, makes me wonder, when a believer loses an infant ... do they think that the infant won't be enjoying heaven as much because it wasn't old enough to "choose" it by faith?
Keep this in mind when you even think of sending a child into the lions den called the church.
With Science people fly to the moon and with religion, they fly into buildings.
Simply apply the Socrates method to it when the child asks, and encourage them to do like-wise. If they grasp the concept, they'll become atheists overnight.
Are you fluent in Polish?
Just answer his questions as best you can!
If he asks to go to church with a friend let him.
You will be amazed and what a loving and gentle creature you will raise without all the fire, brimstone nails and crosses.
As for religion, I don't understand why we always blame the tool and not its user. Religion causes extremism and wars, the earth doesn't have enough resources, politics is divisive, and so on. Maybe people are abusing and misusing these things to further their personal agendas. I remember a president not too long ago who launched a war based on lies in the name of democracy and freedom, and he was not the first. I doubt anyone here would condemn democracy or freedom as evil things that drive people to extremes. And yet that is what many thoughtless people do with religion. That religion can be manipulated to validate someone's desire to steal/discriminate/rape/kill/wage war is not new. But why blame religion, why not blame the individual who is trying to pervert it?
I'm sorry if you were raised on a faith that you feel was flawed, silly, or incomplete. But to abandon religion altogether because your parents' didn't work out for you, that's like abandoning reading because you read some bad books. I think it would be healthier to raise your child in a religion,
As far as religion vs the individuals misusing it, their ability to misuse it so effectively is a direct result of the misguided power people give it in their lives. It is a perfectly logical conclusion to judge a religion by its followers and their actions. There's nothing else we can tangibly measure.
It is like saying people that don't believe in "big foot" have "daddy issues". It is a complete non seqitur, and an ad hominem. You are projecting.
What's wrong with truth, facts and science?
You can teach philosophy, even Jesus' teaching of the Golden Rule, without the supernatural.
Imagine.
It's easy if you try.