Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Jowita Bydlowska
 

Reading Is Hard! (In Defence of Real Books)

Posted: 11/09/11 01:03 PM ET

There's a video going around of a baby who's using the hand gestures you'd use on an iPad when leafing through a magazine. This video kind of pissed me off. Or not the video, but rather the father's commentary: the baby doesn't understand how a magazine works because she's so used to an iPad!

Bitch, please. The baby doesn't understand how pages work because you've never showed her a book before. Sure you showed her an iPad and got her to tap on apps and slobber all over the screen and perhaps you even read her some digital pages, but what you haven't done is show her a real, old-fashioned book. How does a one-year-old not know how to turn pages?

This is the part where I tell you about my genius son who's been read to since he was an infant and who's got shelves of books and who loves to be read to and who can now (at two-years-old) actually sit quietly for a long time flipping pages and "read" to himself, and how wonderful it is and how proud it makes me feel to see him do that. There. Done. Told you that.

But what I really want to say is that nothing replaces reading books with your kid -- not just because it's about appreciating this "outdated" art form (of print), but because reading with kids is one of those activities that's fulfilling for all parties involved. There's the story, the pictures, the satisfying physical activity of turning pages (instead of skating with your fingertips on the capricious iPad screen) and also the fact that you have to sit side by side and enjoy each other's physical presence. This -- combined with the parent telling the story, the child's ability to ask questions, and even the parent not worrying about the toddler breaking the goddamned book when he/she throws it during a tantrum -- this is what makes reading books one of those unique bonds between a kid and a parent.

With an iPad children's book you have many options. The pages turn for you. The characters talk to you. You can shake the tablet to make the characters fall or flip, like in the iPad Alice in Wonderland. You can have your book in 3-D, you can tap a button to have an automated mom or dad read to you (parents can record their own voice), you can make characters dance on a page -- none of which is possible with a real book. It's not only super easy and super extra fun, it's also perfect for the mind that doesn't want to make too much effort. And it removes that major connection -- I mean, why would I want to read to my toddler if I can just click a button on a screen and have a perfectly pronounced recording do the job? ( Eventually we'll all just fall into the habit of clicking buttons on everything because it's easier. At the end of our lives we'll click one big button to go and [bleep] ourselves for good.)

Every night after a bath, either my partner or I will read to the toddler. Some weeks we read the same six books over and over (per the toddler's request). It's kind of boring for us. No, sometimes, it's mind-crushingly boring. (Really? You want to read Duckie Doesn't Wear Diapers again? FML.) Often, I think how I'd prefer to watch TV instead, or shove an iPad at the toddler; plug him right into a reading app so he'll leave me the hell alone. But listen, there's nothing better than to have that warm little body sit next to you, helping you turn the pages as he whispers parts of the story and asks about the characters. And, as you put the book away, he'll rush to the shelf to grab another book and, with his big round eyes staring and his pointing finger waving at you, he'll say, "One more, mommy. One more book, peas."

Originally published on they don't tell you.

 

Follow Jowita Bydlowska on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JowitaBydlowska

There's a video going around of a baby who's using the hand gestures you'd use on an iPad when leafing through a magazine. This video kind of pissed me off. Or not the video, but rather the father's c...
There's a video going around of a baby who's using the hand gestures you'd use on an iPad when leafing through a magazine. This video kind of pissed me off. Or not the video, but rather the father's c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:04 PM on 11/11/2011
When you touch a written word on a written page, you're touching what Shakespeare touched, what Austen touched, what Tolstoy touched.

That's a connection, too.
01:55 PM on 11/10/2011
It is a sticky situation. All of your arguments for keeping old school books around are wonderful. Ipads are like the new tv, where lazy parents plop them down with it so they don't have to actually interact with the child. BUT, on the other hand, at least it is a book that they are being shoved in front of and not a video game or a television. Though, like you said, it hampers the development of imagination to have the characters on the screen instead of in your head. I plan to read to my children, I don't even own an ipad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
08:01 AM on 11/10/2011
Reading is not turning a page in a book. Reading is the act of stringing together letters into words, words into sentences, and sentences into paragraphs, or stanzas, or acts in a play. Reading is interpreting the beauty of these structures and creations to be moved, or educated, or enlightened about the human condition in all of its horror and wonder.

This experiment, this journey through human emotion, can be accomplished whether reading from an "old fashioned book," or reading the same work on an e-reader or tablet.

And you call yourself a novelist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Spike5
Let's go forward, not back to an imaginary past
08:21 AM on 11/10/2011
I've sometimes found that listening to a book (unabridged version only, of course) is a more powerful experience. As a fast reader, I have a tendency to skim. When you are hearing it, you hear every word just as the author intended.

Of course, you may find yourself pushing the rewind button if your mind wanders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
08:26 AM on 11/10/2011
I completely forgot about listening to books. Just as great a way to experience literature.

I often listen to books on iPod when traveling.
01:56 PM on 11/10/2011
I am the opposite. I find it easier to go back and reread a passage than t rewind every time my mind wanders. My mind wanders a lot but my eyes stay glued to the written word.
12:50 AM on 11/10/2011
Switch off the imagination and switch on an iPad children's book. I love reading and to deny anyone the opportunity of that experience will make society a worse place. You can do Maths with calculators but to actually know how and why a certain formula works is more satisfying than tapping the keys on a calculator. Deep understanding comes when the mind is stretched and challenged: too many things today make things easier and thereby sacrifice knowledge.
01:35 AM on 11/10/2011
Reading on an iPad is not comparable to doing math on a calculator. Children do not achieve "deep understanding" by turning pages. While I might agree that when reading to a child, a bookshelf full of physical books can be part of the experience, once they are reading on their own it doesn't matter if they never touch an actual book again, imho.
01:58 PM on 11/10/2011
One of the first things a guest does when they come to my place is scan my bookshelves to see what I read. You just can't have that experience with ebooks. I'm sure some do, but I've never went to a friends house and asked to look at what they have on their ereader, but I will scan their shelves. Books can act as an icebreaker as well as providing the experience of reading it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pixeloid
Reality has a liberal bias.
09:44 PM on 11/09/2011
It's agree that it's much better to get kids to actually read instead of simply consuming a multimedia experience. However, for adults, it's strictly a matter of preference. I used to read a lot, but that kind of stopped when I moved to a new country; it was too difficult to find books in English, and I simply didn't have the storage space. Now, I'm starting to read again, thanks to electronic versions that I can read on my mobile device.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:29 PM on 11/09/2011
I think electronic books remove a lot of creativity as well. My 4yr old has both real and electronic books, and often I find her flipping through the pages of real books and making up her own words to go along with the pictures. She doesn't do that with the electronic books because the pictures move and the characters talk, sometimes I think they might as well be television shows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
08:02 AM on 11/10/2011
If you read a Shakespeare play on an e-reader, or in a bound volume, how is the experience any different?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:55 PM on 11/10/2011
I have no idea. I've never read my 4yr old Shakespeare before. But as the author says, kids books on e-readers now read to the child (as well as do the voices), so you are certainly missing out on ability to give the characters your own unique personality each time you read. Many of them also have moving pictures, which again limits your visual creativity for how the characters act and behave.
I think the author is referring mostly to children's story books.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Scarbrough
middle of the roader fanatique
06:17 PM on 11/09/2011
Probably hasn't ever seen a buggy whip either
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 PM on 11/09/2011
Because buggy whips are so mind-developing ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
themightyabealrd
screw the real world-I'm an artist!
06:18 PM on 11/09/2011
Your little boy sounds like my friend's granddaughter. At age two, she'd let me read to her, then she would take the book from me. For the next minute or two, she would turn the pages and describe the action and characters on each page...her own style of 'pre-reading'. Can't do that with an electronic device!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
luvs2eat
What fresh hell is this?
06:04 PM on 11/09/2011
I love books... their smell, their weight on my hiked up knees in bed, the crack of the spine when opening a new one, sharing them w/ friends, touching beautiful illustrations in the kid's books.

And then I remember the summer I lugged around a 5-pound hardcover copy of Lonesome Dove in a backpack.

I'll keep and prefer my books. I'll show my grandkids all the kid's books I've saved. But I'll be happy to have an e-reader for times when lugging a heavy hardcover isn't convenient. Plus, I'm psyched to read or reread all the free classic lit books and out of print books available on e-readers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:35 PM on 11/09/2011
My buddy could not get his son to touch a book, but now the kid (age 8) loves to read on the iPad. It is a remarkable learning tool, not just a toy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinjinpinti
"I used to be disgusted, now I'm just amused."
05:08 PM on 11/09/2011
Thank you. For all of my nearly 70 years books have been my most prized companions. Someone recently tried to sell me on the kindle thingy, and though I'm sure it has its allure for some, I could never give up the feel and smell of a good book nor the exciting hunt for that elusive next tome, nor the dear, small ritual I must perform at the start of a good read, the perusal of the different reviews, the savoring of the writers' photos and info notes. I do not believe loneliness is possible with a well stocked bookcase and a stack of music CDs.
02:02 PM on 11/10/2011
When I move my books are coming with me. If I have to downsize there are at least two shelves in my bookcase that will not be touched. I have had the copy of the first book I ever read with me my entire life and it has traveled the country with me. You just can't have that connection with an ebook. Sure, I'll read on an ereader eventually, but I want my children to have that connection with a favorite book that I have.
04:48 PM on 11/09/2011
Thank you!
04:26 PM on 11/09/2011
"I tell you about my genius son who's been read to since he was an infant and who's got shelves of books and who loves to be read to and who can now (at two-years-old) actually sit quietly for a long time flipping pages and "read" to himself, and how wonderful it is and how proud it makes me feel to see him do that."

You sound like a real parent, not someone who blames the schools and teachers or everyone else. I predict that you child will do well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DamonIcke
Boognish Disciple
03:42 PM on 11/09/2011
I prefer books. You don't need an electrical outlet to charge up paper. Having to depend on electricity to read is ridiculous. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing e-readers need to be shut off during air travel. If you misplace it or it's damaged, there goes your library. As a Stephen King fan, I'm more than a little annoyed by his e-reader exclusive material. I thought watching movies on your phone was ridiculous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dallas Dunlap
06:49 AM on 11/10/2011
With Amazon, your library is stored in the "cloud" and you can reload it to another device. I'm not sure about B&N Nook but it's probably the same way. Otherwise, ebooks can be stored on your computer as well as your mobile.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:36 PM on 11/09/2011
I love printed books but I also think anything that will get a kid to read is wonderful. I started my reading life with horror (thank you Mr. King) and I honestly believe I would never have picked up a book at all if it were not for that genre. I have since gone on to read many a none horror title.

My point is, the important thing is the connection, just like the idea of a parent reading to their child, it's the connection between the writer and the reader and it doesn't matter how that gets into your brain.

You make a lot of great points, it's a good article.