Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Conrad Black
Kathryn Marshall

GET UPDATES FROM Kathryn Marshall
 

John D. Rockefeller Rolls Over in Grave as Heirs Attack Canadian Oil

Posted: 02/ 5/2012 11:58 pm

The name Rockefeller has a special place in cultural lore. Over the years its been linked to everything from American ingenuity and industriousness to unbridled greed; from unimaginable wealth to unrivaled philanthropic work. But one thing the Rockefeller name's never really been associated with is anti-business activism. How could it?

John. D. Rockefeller was the most successful American businessman of all time. Scratch that: he was probably the most successful businessman anywhere of all time. With a sprawling oil and industrial empire, his net worth peaked at an astonishing $700 billion in today's dollars. No entrepreneur has ever made as much. Not even close. Bill Gates is worth, by comparison, $59 billion. Warren Buffett: $39 billion. Rockefeller's monopoly over American business was so dominant and powerful that the U.S. government stepped in and actually made him break it up and sell it off.

But his fortune lives on, and today, believe it or not, his heirs are spending it attacking business. That's easy for them: they already have their wealth. They don't need the opportunities and prosperity that a robust business climate brings. You know how it goes: A developer is someone who wants to build a house in the woods. An environmentalist is someone who already has a house in the woods.

The Rockefeller heirs already have their houses, likely lots of them, and yachts, and planes, and fleets of luxury automobiles -- and so, naturally, they've decided to become environmentalists. Not just your average bicycle-riding, toilet-paper composting, solar-powered-shower environmentalists. That would require that they be the ones making sacrifices. Instead, they've got a network of eco-lobbyists to fight against Canadian businesses. It seems they want us to be the ones making the sacrifices to make them feel less guilty about being heirs to a billion-dollar oil fortune.

In 2008, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund called together a gaggle of Canadian charities -- groups, remember, that are supported by our government through special tax-break subsidies -- to plan a coordinated attack on Canada's oil industry. We know about it not because these groups have let us in on their plans. They're never as transparent as the publicly-traded, heavily regulated oil companies they've devoted themselves to attacking. We know about it because someone leaked a 48-page PowerPoint presentation from the meeting.

Watch as Ezra Levant, author of Ethical Oil, reveals the PowerPoint on his SunTV show, The Source, here and here.

Thanks to work from Vancouver researcher Vivian Krause, as well as the OurDecision.ca awareness campaign launched in January by EthicalOil.org, and the increased willingness lately of the Prime Minister and the Natural Resource Minister to speak out, Canadians have in the last few weeks woken up to the reality that foreign groups are using their power and wealth to infiltrate and hijack our regulatory processes using front groups here in Canada. But the Rockefeller Brothers meeting shows that this has been the plan for years. And a well-funded plan, at that: The New York strategists would spend tens of millions of dollars to fund their attack on Canadian industry.

The presentation makes no bones about what the groups were colluding to do: "Stop" pipeline and refinery development connected to the oil sands; to impose a "moratorium" on oil sands production; to "leverage" the controversy over Canada's oil sands to lobby for changes in government policy; to "raise the financial risks" by making it increasingly perilous for investors to put capital into Canadian industry, and for banks to back it; and to instigate lawsuits, not over any specific, legitimate legal grievance, but as a nuisance to deliberately mess up and slow down industry plans. If Canadians discovered a document outlining the Chinese government's secret plans to freeze our economic development by funding nuisance lawsuits and scaring off investors, it would be an international incident. When American foreign billionaires plan to do it, anti-oil charities line up to get a piece of the cash.

The presentation is a call to arms, and so, naturally, it drips with propaganda. It exaggerates the environmental impact of our oil development. It ignores the strict regulation and laws that require companies to return whatever land they disturb in Alberta back to their natural state. It calls Canadian oil a "globally significant threat," as if we were Iran producing nuclear weapons with our oil revenues, and not, in reality, using it to fund schools and hospitals and social programs for people in need.

But all that wild spin and fabrication was hardly necessary. Eric Swanson from the Dogwood Initiative, who took $60,000 in foreign money (but not from Rockefeller) in exchange for bogging down the public hearings into the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, designed to take oil from Alberta to B.C., admits he'll take money from anybody who's willing to pay him. (Sources for money here, here and here). The Rockefellers didn't need to convince Swanson (who was not at the meeting), or the lobbyists gathered at that New York meeting, to attack Canada's industry and economy. They just needed to start writing some big, fat cheques. And that's exactly what they've been doing, buying influence that harms Canada's economy since 2008. Four years after the Rockefeller Brothers fund launched their plot that harms Canada, it's about time that Canadians woke up to the threat.

 

Follow Kathryn Marshall on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KVMarshall

 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:33 AM on 02/29/2012
You discredit the entrepreneurial genius of John D. Rockefeller. He made his fortune at the turn of the century when oil was the future. If alive today John D. would not be betting on the past (i.e., oil) but on how he envisioned energy of the future. My bet is that he would be investing in nuclear energy, geothermal energy and renewables. He certainly wouldn't be sucked in by the snake oil lavished in the Huff by Ethical Oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
There's still time to change the road you're on...
09:11 PM on 02/08/2012
How many pieces of silver did they give you for selling out your country; and our world?
07:58 PM on 02/08/2012
I'd have more sympathy except your Canadian oil company wants to put that filthy tar sands pipeline across MY country (USA). Put it across Canada and pollute your own country.
04:40 AM on 02/16/2012
We dont want it either but respect your sentiment.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
03:54 AM on 02/07/2012
John D. Rockefeller was one of the most corrupt businessmen of his time(and thats sayng something during the period of the robber barons) specializing in monopolies and anti competative trust.

What he wanted he took and if you did not give it, you disappeared! He owned our government lock stock and barrel at all levels and only Teddy Roosevelt had the balls to take him on...... .which got him thrown out of the Repub Party.

"Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today." --

Theodore Roosevelt


It was Rockefeller and his fellow robber barons that Teddy was specifically referring to. Calling a muderer and a theif a business man who subverted and almost ended our democracy is absurd...


Glad to see his following generations trying to make up for how all that money was made. Saluting rockfeller is like saluting a mafia god father.


Now please run along with your propaganda... Ethical oil..lol!


Regards
11:43 PM on 02/06/2012
Tell me what is "ethical" about selling oil to an authoritarian human rights abusing regime in China? I thought the folks at "ethicalOil" were all about supporting human rights around the world.
11:33 AM on 02/07/2012
"Ethical" refers to the producer, not the consumer. If Canada was to limit it's oil sales exclusively to "ethical" consumers, there would be no market for it's oil, period. !
11:39 PM on 02/12/2012
What is ethical about the Chinese producers owned by a communist police state?
08:03 PM on 02/06/2012
After the Ludlow massacre, the Rockefeller Foundation hired W.M. Mackenzie King to patch things up.
He was on their payroll for many years, and very, very well paid for his "advice".
John D. Rockefeller. Jr. gave King a gift of $100k in stock, upon his retirement as Canadian P.M.

Foreign influence?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastkid
07:20 PM on 02/06/2012
Care for a laugh? Check out the ethical oil website and click on a few of the headshots of the supposed facebook friends of ethical oil.

Yep. No possibility any of these profiles are made up just to be fb friends with ethical oil....

I especially like 'Jack Kitimat' who's only apparent interests and groups appear to be belonging to the ethical oil fb page. Ironic that 'Jack Kitimat' has a photo of a pelican as their profile.... There seem to be many other folks who were have created a fb profile for the sole purpose of belonging to the ethical oil fb group. Hmmmmm.....
09:33 PM on 02/06/2012
Noooooo! Not Jack Kitimat!
Tooo funny. Probably Ezra's new handle.
06:04 PM on 02/06/2012
It is ironic that the ungratful heirs of John D. Rockefeller , are now waging war on the very industry responsible for their ill used gains.

Note to future billionaires : Place your assets in a trust that leaves children a modest amount, with the balance used to fund whatever the billionaire feels strongly about, in perpetuity.
11:37 PM on 02/12/2012
One cannot rule from the grave.
01:58 PM on 02/06/2012
Kathryn Marshall, personal friend of Harper says "Eric Swanson from the Dogwood Initiative, who took $60,000 in foreign money" while eth oil takes foreign money. Whats with the blatant hypocrisy?

Too bad Canada couldnt embrace the inevitable green solar energy technology now rather than after weve destroyed the environment for our children.
photo
Jay from Ottawa
sovereignty sale, 1.3T OBO
01:20 PM on 02/06/2012
Nothing about how Canadian tax payers are picking up the tab for Chinese oilsand operations in Canada. Also uses the term "heavily regulated oil companies" at a time when we're debating the ethics of letting the oil industry monitor itself.
11:46 AM on 02/06/2012
Why even run this corporate disinformation?
10:40 PM on 02/06/2012
Maybe we should ask "How much is Big Oil paying to get this corporate disinformation posted?"
11:30 PM on 02/06/2012
I am sure the only reason that it's run is because it's provided free of charge.
11:45 AM on 02/06/2012
the people at EthicalOil.org must have been delighted that the editorial board at huff post would begin posting Kathryn Marshall's columns. Kathryn Marshall is dishonest as an Ethical Oil representative who refuses to reveal how EthicalOil.org is funded while, at the same time, raising this very issue of funding to oppose the other side. This begs the question: why keep her on? Such dishonesty and blatant propaganda do not contribute to healthy debate. For example, let's suppose that Marshall succeeds and the debate is shifted to the funding of environmental groups from abroad and the focus on who financially backs EthicalOil.org fades. This would be a direct result of disinformation presented by the Huffington Post.
11:35 AM on 02/06/2012
Based on the comments here, Kathryn "Enbridge" Marshall is doing a fine promoting the anti tar sands movement. Keep up the good work shill. Lobbyists are not journalists.
11:31 AM on 02/06/2012
" They're never as transparent as the publicly-traded, heavily regulated oil companies..."

What rubbish. You have no right to comment on transparency until you answer a simple question posted to you by thousands now. Is "Ethical" Oil funded by Enbridge? Your refusal to answer leads me to believe you are nothing more than an Enbridge shill.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
11:12 AM on 02/06/2012
ethicaloil.org loses any crediblity until they reveal their donor list including the names of what they claim are Canadians and Canadian companies. The public has the right to know which of these "Canadian" companies are actually foreign owned pr controlled to temper the organization and their spokesman"s criticism of the "foreign funded" environmentalists.