Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Keith Beardsley

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Beardsley
 

Bev Oda Screwed Up -- But Who Let Her?

Posted: 09/10/2012 7:04 am

It has been reported that then minister for CIDA, Bev Oda, was charged a penalty fee of $250 US in 2010 for smoking in her hotel room in Washington. Rather than pay this penalty herself it is reported that she inexcusably expensed the penalty amount to her department. In other words we the taxpayer paid this penalty fee.

It certainly explains why she switched hotels in London to one that allowed smoking. I know Oda eventually repaid this amount when her expenses came under review, a review I expect that was ordered by PMO, but seriously folks how on earth was the minister allowed to claim this expense in the first place?

What the hell is going on over there? Not only was that expense outrageous, but it added to a long string of poor behaviour, all of which was carried out at the taxpayers' expense. Ministers are supposed to set an example, they are supposed to lead by example. I had to deal with a couple of Bev's previous indiscretions involving the use of limousines and it always shocked me that a minister couldn't see that this was wrong.

Ministers don't act alone. They have staff to both offer advice and at the same time protect them from follies such as this one. Ministerial staff serve as a check on a minister. Ministerial expense forms should at the very least be reviewed and be signed off by the chief of staff. In many cases there will be another assistant who reviews them once they are handed in and processes them for the chief of staff. Didn't anyone question this expense claim? Didn't anyone question her other limousine and hotel expenses?

I can remember when we went after David Dingwall for expensing a package of gum. Remember our slogan "entitled to their entitlements?" Well expensing your smoking penalty ranks right up there with that one.

The Conservatives will have a problem if their chief of staffs are either too weak or too inexperienced to sit down with their minister and read them the riot act. You don't want "yes men" in that position. You want experienced staffers who are not afraid to go head to head with a minister on an issue or on their travel expenses, or on an inappropriate expense claim such as this one.

No minister is perfect. Minister's make mistakes, many of them unknowingly. These mistakes are the food that opposition parties feed on and invariably they become the subject of Question Period attacks. When these type of issues surface the government is left with a black eye. Considering Oda's previous issues with her expense claims one would think they would be scrutinized carefully. Who was taking care of business and going through her expense claims before they were submitted to the department?

Smoking in your hotel room and then charging the penalty fee to the taxpayer! It does leave one shaking their head in amazement at the stupidity you come across in politics.

 

Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01

FOLLOW CANADA
It has been reported that then minister for CIDA, Bev Oda, was charged a penalty fee of $250 US in 2010 for smoking in her hotel room in Washington. Rather than pay this penalty h...
It has been reported that then minister for CIDA, Bev Oda, was charged a penalty fee of $250 US in 2010 for smoking in her hotel room in Washington. Rather than pay this penalty h...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:55 PM on 09/12/2012
Bev Oda, like all conservatives, believes she is inherently better than everybody.
Seamus OMalley
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
05:36 AM on 09/12/2012
The only person responsible for Bev Oda's actions is Bev Oda.
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
I float, therefore I am
12:39 AM on 09/11/2012
She sure didn't waste any taxpayer's money on expensive hairstylists; nice bowl cut Moe.
11:55 PM on 09/10/2012
"... their chief of staffs ... "??

Really???
10:44 PM on 09/10/2012
In the scheme of things this is so trivial. The Harper government has cost Canadians their reputation as peacekeepers, freedom of the press, debate in the house of Commons, integrity by such as Mr. Toews who seduced his children's baby sitter and got her pregnant although he was minister of family Values. We have robocalls, destruction of the census, the long gun registry, channelling fifty million to Tony Clement so he could build gazebos, a fake lake worth a million dollars, kettling peaceful protesters. The list goes on and on and Harper continues to destroy everything wonderful that was the Canada he took over.
10:20 PM on 09/10/2012
to me it s irresponsible that an adult especially an mp,not be able to abide by the rules. honestly does she really need supervision. how old is she,?3? i ve travelled alone many places, and if i m stuck in a non smoking room,i go outside to smoke.and as hard as it can be and upsetting also,you have to abide by the rules.and it s not even travel for work.so imagine when you are representing the gov t of a country.and your salary is paid by people s taxes. bev grow up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ochaye
03:17 PM on 09/10/2012
Conservatives aspire to being elites. Oda was merely practicing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:32 PM on 09/10/2012
This blame the assistant or chief of staff for Bev Oda's behaviour doesn't pass the sniff test! Assistants can be firedif they don't please the boss! Bev Oda has proven time & again she does whatever she pleases - limos everywhere, smoking in non-smoking hotel rooms, $16.00 orange juice! The rules don't apply to her - she is a politician with POWER & she is going the USE it & ABUSE it! Newly elected politicians have some sort of orientation / welcome to government - perhaps this needs to include clear directions about not abusing expense accounts & tax-payers money!
12:50 PM on 09/10/2012
I have found when employees stretch the rules of common sense in their expense claims, it is a signal to watch them as they usually (but not all the time) also try to take advantage in other areas, me first rather than a team player, trust, time off, benefits, ect.

So my question, other than Oda's expense claims what else did she screw the taxpayer for? Did she set such a poor example for her department that the entire department was corrupted in their attitude?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:42 PM on 09/10/2012
I agree with Mr. Beardsley wholeheartedly. Regardless of the party in power politicians are politicians. They don't spend years learning the ins and outs of Treasury Boards travel policies. Their staff do. They don't get down in the weeds and learn everything about every issue, they are given a one page briefing note and asked to decide.

I am sure there are bullying ministers but they can be turned out by their party or the electorate. Only the politicians have power to do something about staffers who fail to perform, and I suspect they are afraid to because the first step to job security would be to have something on the boss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Selene Cusping
Annoying MRM & radical feminists forever
12:38 PM on 09/10/2012
Oh, I can't wait until she dies of lung disease and her family sues the Canadian Government for "allowing" her to smoke in her "workplace". There are laws against this to guard people's health, and her employers (the Canadian people) allowed her to continue on, regardless. In fact, we paid for the privilege of letting her do this. All this adds up to an ugly liability suit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Selene Cusping
Annoying MRM & radical feminists forever
05:54 PM on 09/10/2012
I didn't mean "I can't wait" in the way that "I hope she dies" : that wasn't my intention at all. I just mean, that "I can anticipate that when she dies..."
11:58 AM on 09/10/2012
Simply put, this woman is uncouth!
11:39 AM on 09/10/2012
I wouk ask Mr. Beardley, what about the principle of personal responsibility that political conservatives are often laying special claim to? Why question staffers' performance in regard to their superior's repeated ethical violation? Is it reasonable to expect a subordinate, no matter how senior, to continually question and oppose a Minister's decisions as to a matter that involves the Minister's behavior and ethics? With Oda, the improper expenses were well-known for years to be an ongoing problem. Given that, if the Minister couldn't be expected to conduct herself appropriately, how is her ministerial performance, regarding improper behaviour or lack of transparency and accountability or anything like that, the responsibility of anyone other than her superior, the Prime Minister who put her in her position?
11:29 AM on 09/10/2012
Maybe they were scared of her. Could she have had them fired?
11:27 AM on 09/10/2012
The Tory way...it is always somebody else's fault.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:56 AM on 09/10/2012
Except that Bev Oda admitted in the House of Commons of wrong doing, repaid costs that she wrongly expensed, and subsequently quit / was pushed out of cabinet.

Which is called taking responsibility.
05:34 PM on 09/10/2012
Absolute B.S. She tried to keep her wrongdoings hidden as much and as long as possible, only acknowledged and made amends for them once others discovered them and they created public outrage, and then she continued her self-admitted improper behaviour, and only retired once she was able to have taxpayers continue to fund her financial future by serving just long enough to be eligible for an M.P. pension. That's not accountability by any reasonable standard. It's like a child when caught with her hand in the cookie jar after having eaten cookies she knows shouldn't have, owning up to it, putting back the cookie she got caught with, then sneaking more, again getting caught and owning up and giving back what she couldn't get away with, and stopping only when threatened with going to bed with no dinner, having already eaten herself full of dessert.
10:26 PM on 09/10/2012
all parties and gov t reps. in your private life you can do what you want, but in public life especially when an elected member, you have to be beyond reproach.you have to remember you are serving and representing the people that elected you.