Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Keith Beardsley

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Beardsley
 

Of Course Harper Isn't Going to Meet the Premiers. Would You?

Posted: 08/02/2012 12:12 pm

I see the premiers are upset that Prime Minister Harper not only didn't attend their latest Council of the Federation meeting, but his spokesperson has stated that he will not be attending their next session on the economy which will be in Halifax next November.

Why are people surprised by his decision? After the way the premiers ambushed then Prime Minister Paul Martin back in September 2004, is it any wonder that Harper is leery about exposing himself and the country to that type of gang up? While the premiers were able to hold Martin for ransom and force him to cough up some $41 billion dollars for health care, they left a sour impression with anyone who was following that meeting's progress.

While the Liberals would try to turn this capitulation to their advantage over the years, it was just that a capitulation by a Prime Minister to the provinces who had seized control of the agenda at that meeting. Why should Harper risk a similar fate?

We can almost certainly guarantee that if the Prime Minister went to the November meeting each and every premier would find plenty of opportunities to go in front of the media to castigate the Prime Minister on a long list of issues, each demanding their moment in the media spotlight. In turn the Prime Minister would then be forced to respond to their attacks during his media availability. Certainly that is not the best way to have reasonable well-thought out discussions on the economy or on any other issue for that matter.

Harper has met 74 times since 2010 with individual premiers. For those individuals who have been fortunate to attend both these large scale sessions and individual ones with premiers, you always accomplish a lot more when it is one-on-one. Your discussions tend to be much more frank, more open and more detailed than is possible in front of a wall of cameras.

Harper has made the correct decision on this one. But now in order to stifle the inevitable criticism that will arise around his refusal to attend next November, he needs to get out there and between now and next November make sure that he meets each and every premier to discuss the economy and other issues that concern them.

 

Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
I see the premiers are upset that Prime Minister Harper not only didn't attend their latest Council of the Federation meeting, but his spokesperson has stated that he will not be attending their next ...
I see the premiers are upset that Prime Minister Harper not only didn't attend their latest Council of the Federation meeting, but his spokesperson has stated that he will not be attending their next ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leanne McKenzie
You can't make this sh*t up.
09:29 AM on 08/04/2012
He should do it because that is what responsible leaders do. And if he is afraid, then he knows he has reason to be.

Harper is one of the scummiest PM's ever. Making announcements about CPP when in another country. Leaving things until Friday of a long weekend so people won't have access.

Those actions are not actions of a responsible man, never mind a leader.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
12:38 AM on 08/04/2012
Divide and conquer has always been the Conservative way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:08 PM on 08/03/2012
The Lyin' King does dally with mere mortals. Nor does he seek council with anyone but himself, which is why he has losing streak in the courts a yard long.
07:47 PM on 08/03/2012
With the comments I have read here about this subject, I am still perplexed at how Harper was able to get his majority. I wonder if voter suppression had anything to do with it... nah, couldn't be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Douglas Sinclair
sufferin' succotash!
05:15 PM on 08/04/2012
Just thinking the same thing Rod. How's he ever gonna get the next majority avoiding the Premiers (sorry, except one on one)? Wouldn't a reasonable approach be for him to invite them to Ottawa (please, not the cottage at Meech Lake) where he could at least consult? Without any big pre-set agenda? Not democratic maybe (sarcasm intended).

P.S. is there an emoticon for sarcasm, anyone?
07:44 PM on 08/03/2012
Since our Prime Minister thinks the Provinces should have all the power, how will that happen unless he meets with the Premiers and works out the power sharing that is needed... unless now that he has all the power that a majority provides he now doesn't want to share that power. To me. this seems more likely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:46 PM on 08/03/2012
The Premiers work for the people of Canada and represent their interests. The Prime Minister works for the people of Canada and represents their interests. It would seem to be that, considering that they have so much in common, it would make sense for them to meet regularly to discuss things that are relevant to the people they represent. Frankly, this seems like an outright abdication of a critical duty that the Prime Minister ought to be performing, and if it is for the reason that the author here is claiming, then his reason for abdication is nothing but rank cowardice.
12:20 PM on 08/03/2012
Typical gutless conservative. Last I checked the PM was supposed to represent all of Canada and was supposed to be a leader. THAT is why he should "risk" meeting with the premiers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
10:34 AM on 08/03/2012
All the comments I've read on here perfectly illustrate the authors point.

As does this:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/07/27/andrew-coyne-a-beginners-guide-to-understanding-premier-speak/

Here's an idea. If you want your province to be run better and prosper try electing premiers with half a brain instead of blaming a federal government that has no mandate over provincial affairs. Ontario, I'm looking at you.
10:24 AM on 08/03/2012
Why should he go? It's his damn job. It's his job to listen to the concerns of the individuals (which he has), but also the groups. If he's too precious and breakable and tender to be able to stand infront of our premiers and deal with them telling him what needs to be done (and what he's done wrong) then why is this man capable of leading the whole country?

Pathetic. I'm ashamed someone is actually saying we shouldn't pressure the man LEADING OUR COUNTRY because it's not fair to do so.
09:15 AM on 08/03/2012
keith,you belong in harpo's govt along with all the other stooges'nuff said
09:13 AM on 08/03/2012
keith,you belong in harpo's stooges govt 'nuff said
09:12 AM on 08/03/2012
"While the premiers were able to hold Martin for ransom and force him to cough up some $41 billion dollars for health care, they left a sour impression with anyone who was following that meeting's progress."

Really? really? Trying to get the feds to help with health care costs is holding them ransom? How are we going to get anywhere with this kind of rhetoric? The harper government seems to be promoting some very hateful rhetoric when dealing with anything they don't want to deal with. What happened to civil debate?

The premiers are dealing with many troubles downloaded on them by the feds, how are they supposed to get anywhere with this government even refusing to discuss a national plan?
08:44 AM on 08/03/2012
"Of course Harper isn't going to meet the premiers. Would you?" absolutely I would. A reasonable person, willing to work with others, would have little to fear. It's called 'leadership'.
08:44 AM on 08/03/2012
Bio"Deputy Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Stephen Harper. He also served as the head of research for the Progressive Conservative Party and was a senior adviser in the Office of the Leader of the Opposition"

He certainly has a bias, not that I disagree from his point of view, Harper has nothing to gain by attending the meeting, lots to lose, and the meeting is likely more productive(if that is possible with 10 different provinces) without him
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skookum1
truth can't be bought, but lies sure can be sold..
04:45 AM on 08/03/2012
"reasonable well-thought out discussions on the economy or on any other issue for that matter" isn't something that Harper has established any kind of reputation for in all his years in office or before...more like "brow-beating, bullying and distorted strumpery".

Please disclose any financial and personal relations between you, your agency, the Harper Government and/or the Conservative Party, Mr Beardsley. Not that we don't already know, but we'd like to know t he details. What do you get for being such an unrepentant apologist for the Man Who Made Himself King?