Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Keith Beardsley

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Beardsley
 

NDP Filibuster: The Wrong Political Discipline

Posted: 06/28/11 02:46 PM ET

There are two basic types of political discipline -- internal party discipline and the party's ability to restrain itself from foolish endeavours.

The recent NDP filibuster over the Canada Post back to work legislation puts both types of discipline on display for the NDP.

The NDP did well in managing their rookie MPs, getting everyone into the House when needed, and more importantly had them stick to the same basic speech script. All of their MPs were suitably outraged at those dastardly Conservatives; they proudly announced their solidarity with their union brothers and sisters and told everyone who would listen that they weren't going to be pushed around by Harper and his Conservatives.

Maybe they forgot that empty rhetoric is best saved for the next election some four years from now. Simply put, Canadians wanted their mail and saw the NDP filibuster as obstructive, not constructive.

Why the NDP would pick this hill to die on is anyone's guess. They stood up in support of a union that most Canadians have little use for and by dragging out the process they also succeeded in costing the union's membership addition pay while at the same time angering the voters that just recently sent them to Ottawa.

The NDP is right to be proud of its increased clout in the House, its official Opposition status and the addition of all of its new MPs, but an increased presence in the House doesn't necessarily mean that you have increased your influence at the same time. I think it's fair to say that Jack and company had much more influence when we had a minority government. Perhaps they forgot that all of their election speeches, which focused on making Ottawa work for Canadians, also included non-unionized workers, the general public and small business owners.

An all out filibuster of the type employed by the NDP, is generally a political weapon of last resort that is reserved for crucial debates of national interest, not back to work legislation. One could see it being used for debate on constitutional issues, items such as free trade, dismantling the Wheat Board, major changes to health care or maybe even perimeter security agreements with the United States, and other issues like that.

But having shot their bolt over this particular labour issue, what do they do for an encore?

Are they telling Canadians that they will filibuster every piece of back to work legislation that this Tory government might have to bring in down the road? Just how many voters do they want to alienate?

And while the NDP kept the House of Commons sitting through the June 24 holiday weekend, who in Quebec was listening to them? The very voters they hoped to impress were starting their summer holidays. There were celebrations, festivals and activities all over the province of Quebec where it would have helped to have a federal MP, including federal NDP MPs present.

This filibuster reflects the NDP's lack of experience and lack of discipline at the top. Their rank and file performed well and deserve credit for that, but the key decision-makers at the top need to learn a bit of discipline. Don't always take the bait that the government throws your way and above all pick and choose your battles wisely. There was never any doubt how this one would end and now they have backed themselves solidly into the union corner. They will learn that you can only cry wolf so many times and then the voters will either tune you out or worse still, turn on you.

For the Conservatives they got their legislation through, they ended the Canada Post lockout/strike and they have with the help of the NDP split the House of Commons clearly along ideological lines. Not a bad outcome for Mr Harper and his Conservatives.

Keith Beardsley's political pundit blog can be found at www.atory01.com.


 

Follow Keith Beardsley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Atory01

There are two basic types of political discipline -- internal party discipline and the party's ability to restrain itself from foolish endeavours. The recent NDP filibuster over the Canada Post back ...
There are two basic types of political discipline -- internal party discipline and the party's ability to restrain itself from foolish endeavours. The recent NDP filibuster over the Canada Post back ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:39 AM on 06/29/2011
The author of the article is wrong. Back-to-work legislation IS a constitutional issue (section 2(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms). The Supreme Court of Canada has held that the right to form a union and bargain collectively is a charter-protected right: see Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 391, and more recently Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20.

I am not a union member, but I think unions play a critical part in the health of our democracy. The author may disagree with my opinion in this matter, but to imply that sticking up for the freedom to associate is not worthwhile and that it is foolish to be concerned when the federal government undermines the Charter really grinds my gears.
01:07 AM on 06/29/2011
Right. There are far too many people holding jobs with decent benefits. Wouldn't we all, or at least some us, be better off if there were far fewer? Why can't the NDP understand this?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:34 PM on 06/28/2011
I might have had more sympathy for the unions if Canada Post did not have a legislated monopoly on delivering the mail.

But with such a monopoly comes restricted freedoms, lest the Canadian taxpayer be subject to a shakedown by the postal workers.
07:17 AM on 06/29/2011
You seem confused, how was it a shakedown by postal workers when it was the employer that had locked their employees out? Besides mail isn't a monopoly - people can use couriers or the internet to deliver mail. Canada Post wanted to use economic conditions to play hardball with their employees and Harper threw out the first pitch.

Look around. American governments have been siding with business for years and look at the shape or their economy - it is obviously a losing policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 AM on 06/30/2011
Actually regular mail is a monopoly by law.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:08 PM on 06/28/2011
Sounds like somebody is eager to adopt the US template for economic disaster. As Harper pursues the corporate agenda and unemployment rises, the NDP will shine as the true representatives of working Canadians.
06:40 PM on 06/28/2011
next time mr beardsley ,when you visit the boss to discuss compensation -------call harper -----he will mandate a scale lower than your boss was willing to pay
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
04:15 PM on 06/28/2011
It has been so long that anyone besides DePape opposed the Harper Government, I was cheering.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
03:40 PM on 06/28/2011
I suspect far less of the electorate agrees with you than you fondly believe: collective bargaining rights and the power for ordinary working people is very important. The lockout and the back-to-work legislation are only more lead weights on the wrong side of the scales for the Cons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
02:44 PM on 06/28/2011
I used to believe the NDP were the best option for protecting Canada's social services and serving the best interests of a majority of Canadians. But during the last election, Jack Layton came out twice in support of Quebec's draconian French Language Charter - which has done nothing but harm the Province in general and its Anglophone minority in particular - and the idea that 50% plus 1 would be enough votes to allow Quebec to separate from Canada. This last is in clear and direct violation of the Federal Clarity Act, brought in after the last referendum saw Pequiste "shenanigans" call the validity of the process into question.

That Layton and his gang of newbie MP's are political opportunists no better than the Bloc Quebecois they defeated is clear. They are unfit to be the heirs of Tommy Douglas, and are certainly not the "People's Party".
02:43 PM on 06/28/2011
What a load of bollocks from another right wing flack.
The NDP clearly stated they were delaying the passage of the bill in order to allow the union more time to negotiate a better deal than the one being rammed down their throats by Harpo. They did not die on this hill by a longshot.
Rather, it was an heroic stand to refute the anti-labour agenda from a group of far-right neocon ideologues, currentlhy masquerading as a government.
Well done, one and all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Karmazenuk
Author, Freelance Journalist, Curmudgeon
02:50 PM on 06/28/2011
Except, did the union even ATTEMPT to negotiate during the filibuster?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
Nobody knows the trouble I've been...
03:42 PM on 06/28/2011
BOTH parties have to come to the table. It was obvious from the lockout that Canada Post management had no intention of bargaining in good faith, and that they were colluding with arper to rush precipitately towards back-to-work legislation.
06:42 PM on 06/28/2011
there was no incentive on the part of the employer to negotiate ---the government mandated a wage scale LOWER than the employer was willing to pay ------------
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overt Enigma
YOUR micro bio is empty
03:47 PM on 06/28/2011
While I applaud the NDP for their stand, the filibuster is a weapon of last resort and it was used way to early on an issue of questionable importance. This should have been saved for something more substantial - as much as I disagree with the author's conclusions, I like his arguments.

More importantly, I admire the NDP for their vigilance and know that it won't be the last time they will need to act so passionately.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:11 PM on 06/28/2011
It doesn't have to be saved. It can be used as often as necessary. It is the only resort against a majority government gone rogue.