Readers of the Globe and Mail no doubt noticed Margaret Wente's column of last week which argued that most green job schemes are failures. To be sure, she has cobbled together a list of facts and examples that support her position. However, these facts are not representative of the bigger picture. Rather, they are the exceptions to the rule and, contrary to Ms. Wente's assertion, green jobs have been created the world over.
For example, according to a recent study from the Renewable Energy Policy Network, over 3.5 million people are now employed in renewable energy worldwide. China's renewable energy industries employ over half a million people, and Germany, the country our feed-in tariff is modeled after, now boasts over 370,000 renewable energy jobs.
And green energy isn't the only success story. The non-partisan Brookings Institution recently reported that the U.S. clean economy, which encompasses more than just renewable energy, employs some 2.7 million people, and it far outperformed the rest of the economy during the recession. Indeed, the report's author described the pace of growth as "torrid."
Ontario's program has also successfully created green jobs. Thanks to the Feed-in Tariff, and its domestic content requirements that stipulate that a percentage of any wind or solar project must be sourced from Ontario, 40 or so firms have announced their intention to set up manufacturing facilities in the province. Many are already in production. Plus, there are thousands of people busily installing solar panels and erecting wind turbine across the province, and many more in related businesses such as sales, engineering, and permitting.
In the face of this evidence, it seems odd that green jobs continue to come under attack. But we're nearing an election and, unfortunately, it appears that green energy and the associated green jobs have become a wedge issue.
Despite reports which show that green energy is not the reason hydro bills have increased, and others that demonstrate that embracing renewable energy will save ratepayers money over the medium to long term, despite reports from firms such as Ernst and Young and Deutsche Bank which find that Feed-in Tariffs deliver renewable energy at lower costs than other schemes, the Conservative Party of Ontario has vowed to cancel the province's program.
In Europe, renewable energy and the green economy are not partisan issues. Instead, they are embraced by right- and left-wing alike, even during these times of financial restraint. Why? Because renewable energy is a win-win proposition -- good for our environment and our economy.
Ontario should look more closely at Europe, and continue to follow the lead of the world's manufacturing economies, such as Germany and China, who understand that this environmental imperative is also an economic opportunity. And we should be wary of those who would have us embrace the status quo- or worse, go backward.
Follow Keith Brooks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/keithdbrooks
Environmental Jobs, Green Jobs, Eco Internships | WorkCabin ...
Ontario Green Jobs (OntarioGreenJob) on Twitter
Ontario PC pledge threatens local green jobs
Canada News: Green jobs keeping Ontario afloat in tough economic ...
McGuinty energizes Ontario campaign with promise of green jobs ...
You can not pay $2 for $1 worth of goods, the inefficiencies and fraud get to you, watch Germany this winter with the higher energy demands, they will have trouble.
NO thanks, I don't think we should follow China on anything. Environment Please.
And Ontario's sole sourced contract with Samsung of Korea is going to pay them 80 cent$ a KWH for solar juice from the just recent 5 cent$ a KWH for 1/3 of Ontario's Grid.
Our Hydro has gone up to the current 10 cent$ a KWH at peek times because of the Free Mandated Smart Meter giveaway.
Ontario's Schools will not be able to afford to turn on the lights like out in BC last year when the Schools could not afford to turn on the heat because of the New BC Carbon Tax.
But as stated, it's gov't subsidies not the worth of the product that's keeping them going. And there's always the NIMBY effect. As far as electric cars go, until they can guarantee a) easy access for recharge b) longer life for batteries and c) reduced cost of said batteries, the average family won't buy in. Who can afford to replace a half dozen batteries at a few thousand dollars a pop every 5 or so years? The issue isn't are green jobs good or more environmentally friendly, it's who's going to foot the bill for the conversion.
Margaret Wente has a long sordid history of disengenous writing, right-wing smear attacks, right-wing propaganda pieces and right-wing rhetoric that belongs on the bottom of the bird cage.
Margaret Wente lost any serious credibility a long time ago. The only reason to read her is to keep up with what the latest trash of the 'right' is spewing.
gas fired power plants were supposed to be the dream for cheap elkectricity ------until the cost rose from 2$ to over 7$-------
the sun does not raise its rates and there is no transmission company in between
One reads about huge and terrible sweatshops, and of course, a highly repressive government in China, but not in Germany. Yet Germans still make stuff, and, as far as I can tell, have a comparatively high standard of living. How have they been doing so?