Newly appointed U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry will meet on Friday with his Canadian counterpart, Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird. In any such bilateral meeting, it is paramount that each participant trust the words of his counterpart. After all, when it comes to the world of diplomacy, where wars are settled and treaties are signed, there's little more than words and trust.
As a former employee in Canada's Foreign Affairs I have attended many bilateral meetings with foreign dignitaries. If I were advising Kerry, I would suggest one question he should ask of John Baird to see if he is an honest broker.
The question is: "Is Canada committed to confronting climate change?"
John Kerry is, and has been for a long time, a vocal leader on the issue of climate change. Sources inside his former Senate office have told me Kerry regularly expresses his commitment to act on climate change and understands the imperative of curbing water and air pollution to safeguard the economy.
Canadian Minister John Baird has a very different stance towards the climate change challenge, preferring to express contempt for proposals to implement market-based solutions to Canada's soaring greenhouse gas emissions. For example, just last year Baird told Parliament that the Harper government disbanded the National Roundtable on Energy and Environment because they did not like the Roundtable's recommendation that Canada adopt a tax on carbon.
"Why should taxpayers have to pay for more than 10 reports promoting a carbon tax, something that the people of Canada have repeatedly rejected? It should agree with Canadians. It should agree with the government. No discussion of a carbon tax that would kill and hurt Canadian families," Baird stated in Parliamentary debate.
For the record, polls consistently show that the majority of Canadians are in favour of a tax on carbon pollution. Even many of the companies operating in the tar sands are calling for a carbon tax.
When it comes to the issue of climate change, Kerry and Baird are diametrically opposed. If Baird is honest with Kerry he should explain to the freshly minted Secretary of State the rationale for the Canadian government's backtracking on international commitments to address climate change. Perhaps he can also explain why his party is currently running a national attack ad campaign against the Opposition party for proposing a carbon tax.
On the other hand, perhaps Baird will instead try to steer the conversation to what the Harper government considers a much more important and dire issue: President Obama's approval of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline that would pump millions of barrels of Canadian tar sands crude to U.S. refineries to largely serve an overseas market.
The Alberta tar sands is considered one of the dirtiest and most carbon intensive industrial projects on the planet. A barrel of oil derived from bitumen produces three to four times more carbon emissions than a conventional barrel of oil.
Kerry, being the savvy diplomat he is, could (and hopefully will) point out to Baird, that any conversation about the fate of the Keystone XL pipeline is intrinsically tied to Canada evolving its postion on climate change. If Canada is serious about aligning with the U.S. on climate policy, as Stephen Harper has expressed, then Baird should be fully briefed and ready to cooperate based on President Obama's stated commitment to tackle climate change in his second term.
In his inaugural address two weeks ago President Obama said:
"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations."
The Keystone XL pipeline poses a key test for President Obama's commitment to fulfill his promise on climate action. Encouraging rapid expansion of Canada's tar sands operations is irreconcilable with aggressive efforts to curb climate change pollution in North America.
If Minister Baird is honest with his counterpart, he will admit as much to Secretary Kerry. Anything less than honesty on Baird's part will start Canada's relationship off with the new Secretary of State very poorly. It is a tough position for Baird to be in, but it is one created by the Minister and the Conservative government itself.
Follow Kevin Grandia on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kgrandia
Thus I highly recommend a documentary, ( the same year that Al Gores video came out for which he won a nobel prize for) which is a debate in itself for another time. This video is called
A CRUDE AWAKENING.
Again, I cannot stress how well done this documetry is!!
Now that he had to sell his shares in various pipeline companies, including the Keystone XL line I am sure he is.
PRICELESS!
No go freeze in the dark as you would want all Canadians to do, or go back to your vacation in the South.
Change is the only constant in the universe, by these largely urban climate experts don't understand this.
We are a long ways yet from this kind of economic realization on the part of the international community. I would say almost every region will squirm if accountability started to matter.
You might wish to re-check Kerry's environmental record!
When Rice withdrew from her nomination, Kerry immediately unloaded his $750,000/$40,000 worth of shares in SUNCOR and CENOVAS respectively.
And, the media never checked if he simply transferred them to his "rich" wife or if she holds stock in oilsands corporations!
Baird will be thanking Kerry for the rapid seal-off of this U.S. Securities and Exchange insider trading investigation ahead of the CNOOC take-over of NEXEN; http://bit.ly/14GIZw0 , where millions were made from insider info.
It would be unfortunate had that investigation led back to Harper's China Panda Bear trip!
Baird's "only" talking point for this meeting will be to discuss the U.S. Military's current "String-of-Pearls" strategy in the South China Sea in an attempt to prevent China from gaining access to those 100 billion barrels of oil in those offshore oil fields around the Spratly and Paracel Islands.
The U.S. supports Vietnam's territorial claim to those islands while China thinks its theirs and have put naval warships in the area at this time.
If China gets that oil, then the oilsands has lost its market!
So, climate matters, nor the current emergence of the Hydrogen Economy, will be on their meeting agenda for neither of these two could distinguish a hydrogen fuel cell stack from a microwave oven!
Kerry has a huge Yacht that he tried to not pay taxes on Baird doesnt have a boat
Kerry also has 5 or 6 mansion Baird, I dont know
Kerry talks the talk, but doesnt walk it, the whole GW scam is a convenient talking point to him.
Baird at least talks his walk.
The pipeline will not go ahead, it serves many many interests in the US to stop it, one is Warren Buffet, as the owner of Burlington Northern he is happy if it is never completed(oil ships by train), as well Saudia Arabia and George Soros, have a huge influence in the US, they dont want it either