Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kolby Solinsky

GET UPDATES FROM Kolby Solinsky
 

It's Time the NHL Makes Visors Mandatory

Posted: 03/06/2013 5:27 pm

------------------------------------------------------------

We get it, hockey people (myself included). We know you like to act tougher than your players' dress code suggests. We know everything is a tradition for you. We know we can't tell you what a good ol' Canadian boy would do. Before you can say anything, just know this: we know.

But, please, please, please... Everybody in the NHL, for the love of whatever imaginary friend in the sky you believe in, WEAR A GODDAMN VISOR!

On Tuesday night, young gun defenceman Marc Staal took a blast to the face. The image -- when slowed down, as it has been -- is disturbing, because the puck hits Staal just above his right face and it looks like his face concaves on itself before he falls to the ice in what can only have been an absurd amount of pain chased with fear.

Fear for his future. Fear for the right now.

Take another look:

------------------------------------------------------------

OK, now, here's what's worse...

In the last two years, several other players have been hit in the eye/forehead/middle of the face (you know, where all the important stuff is?) with a puck.

Two of them aren't playing and their careers are in jeopardy. One of them -- Vancouver's Manny Malhotra -- suffered his injury in March of 2011, then came back and played a full season, and was then shut down after a handful of matches this year.

The other -- Philly's Chris Pronger -- can barely walk around his own house without getting a Jimmy Stewart form of vertigo.

And, let's not forget about Detroit's Steve Yzerman.

All three of those videos are below:

------------------------------------------------------------

Seriously, how dumb is this?

How many more guys have to have this kind of sh*t happen to them before they put aside their pride and their temporary comfort for their long-term safety and just for common sense in general?

On the Canucks, several guys who watched Malhotra either take that rather light deflection to the face and then have his life ruined are still going rogue.

Kevin Bieksa doesn't wear a visor. Raffi Torres (who now plays for Phoenix) doesn't wear a visor. Andrew Alberts doesn't wear a visor, and both he and Bieksa are defencemen, just like Marc Staal and Chris Pronger.

Five players on the Canucks who joined after Malhotra's injury -- but were present when his coach and general manager shut him down for the 2013 NHL season -- still don't wear visors: Zach Kassian, Jason Garrison, Tom Sestito, Cam Barker, and Dale Weise.

(Recently dealt Canuck Aaron Volpatti also doesn't wear one.)

Marc Staal also has two brothers in the NHL -- Jordan and Eric, who both play for Carolina -- and neither of them wear visors.

Now, visor haters will be quick to point out that a puck to the head is a puck to the head... is a puck to the head.

But, take a look at Philadelphia's Sean Couturier. He was hit in the head by a puck in the fall of 2011. He missed a few games with a concussion, but that's it.

Watch that one right here:

Or, how about a far more gruesome one?

Here's Montreal's Josh Gorges taking a clapper to the face. Pretty brutal, right? Yeah, well, he's far better off than Malhotra, Pronger, or (I'm going to assume) Marc Staal.

The puck hits him in the helmet, but his eyes and his future are intact.

Take a look:

------------------------------------------------------------

Fact is, visors don't save you from everything. They're not supposed to. But, they can still save your career. They can save you from something far worse.

As we've seen over and over and over, it's the EYES. It's that part of the face right in the front that has been left completely unprotected and open to obliteration.

Watching those videos above of Malhotra, Pronger, and Yzerman, it becomes just so painfully obvious (pun intended) that those are all completely preventable. Those aren't separated shoulders or broken ankles or even concussions. All of those injuries could be written off as occupational hazards.

But, the eye?

No way, man.

If the NHL continues to ignore this massive epidemic, and if its players are still stupid enough to carry on without sich a simple and basic level of protection... well, then I guess it's only their fault, isn't it?

This article was originally posted on White Cover Magazine.

 

Follow Kolby Solinsky on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WhiteCoverMag

FOLLOW SPORTS
------------------------------------------------------------ We get it, hockey people (myself included). We know you like to act tougher than your players' dress code suggests. We know everything i...
------------------------------------------------------------ We get it, hockey people (myself included). We know you like to act tougher than your players' dress code suggests. We know everything i...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CommunistMold
Maryland > Virginia
02:40 PM on 03/07/2013
Wearing a visor will not guarantee protection for players. If they make it a rule so be it, but I believe it should be up to the players. In my rec league plenty of players still get caught up sometimes in the face even with a visor. These are freak accidents that happen in a contact sport.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
04:32 PM on 03/07/2013
Absolutely, and I did say it wouldn't stop all injuries. Of course it can't, and it can't stop sticks or other players' body parts from touching the bottom half of your face.

The problem, though, is we see more and more guys suffer serious -- career-ending, in the case of Malhotra and Pronger, it seems -- injuries because they're taking PUCKS to the head, and often to the eyes and face.

Above, I outlined the Gorges and Couturier cases. Both players were injured, yes, but they came back in a matter of games.

It's a physical sport, so you're never going to stop all injuries, but to not even take the most obvious precautions? That's just foolish, man.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CommunistMold
Maryland > Virginia
09:27 PM on 03/07/2013
I know it sounds silly but it's almost a right of passage when you get to the level in hockey that you can take out your ear pieces, facemask, and visor. Like I said, if it becomes a rule I will support it. With that being said, if my son made it to the pros and decided to not wear a visor....I would be ok with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bujudunton
Everyone is entitled to my opinion
09:30 AM on 03/07/2013
The problem with not wearing equipment or not wearing it properly is in most contact sports. How many times have you turned on an NFL game and a wide receiver or running back has decided against wearing knee pads, thigh pads or a tailbone pad? most of the pros don't even wear mouthguards!

In the end it will always be the players decision on what equipment he wears, but the problem I have is the millions of kids playing these sports, looking up to these guys, deciding that if the pros don't need the protection why should I?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Meerkatx
06:43 AM on 03/07/2013
Honestly the face cages you see in college and womens games should be mandatory. The visor just causes players to complain that it fogs up and impedes their vision.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
12:36 PM on 03/07/2013
I agree partially, although I also think they complain about the fog and their vision because that's their excuse for not wearing one. Meanwhile, Crosby, Iginla, Ovechin, Malkin, and the Sedin Twins seem to be able to find the net just fine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
great, green, globs of greasy grimey GOPerspeak.
09:31 PM on 03/06/2013
Take away any compensation for lost time, injury or disability that could be recovered by a player who is hurt by something that a visor could have prevented. It's not mandatory to wear a visor just costly if you don't. It won't take long for all players to wear visors.
This comment has been removed.
08:48 PM on 03/06/2013
These guys are paid millions, if they want to go out and get killed just to prove they are tough let them go. According to Don Cherry the Ottawa player who got a cut tendon didn't have his skate guards on properly or he wouldn't have got the injury.

Only thing the league should do, is if you get injured and equippment is not proper, they loos pay for the games they miss
11:59 PM on 03/06/2013
Yeah, they are paid millions, because they generate millions in revenue. The Flyers are going to lose money because Chris Pronger isn't playing this season. All the more reason for them to wear face protection.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CommunistMold
Maryland > Virginia
02:42 PM on 03/07/2013
Philly fans will still go to games even without him.
07:23 PM on 03/06/2013
I used to play without a visor, many years ago. Then Bryan Bradley lost his eye and before my next game I bought a half-cage. It was harder to see clearly, but not by much. I'm glad I did, I got a stick in the mask a few games later. And that was in a men's league, much, much, much slower and less dangerous than the NHL.

Jarome Iginla scores and plays tough with a visor. Most of the top 20 scorers wear visors. Most of the young players coming in now wear visors, continuing on from junior or college.

It's only a matter of time before it's considered stupid not to wear one. If anyone went without a helmet now (if that were allowed), they'd be considered foolish. Same thing will happen with visors.

It should happen faster, though. What does a player like Marc Staal, who isn't an enforcer, have to prove in terms of toughness by not wearing one?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
12:43 PM on 03/07/2013
Agreed completely. I can't add anything to that, and I think (obviously) you adjust to using the visor (or even a cage) after a game or so.
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
I float like a butterfly but stink like the GOP
05:57 PM on 03/06/2013
That will make punching someone in the face much harder. I don't see your logic.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
07:44 PM on 03/06/2013
Going by your username and photo, I'm going to guess that was sarcasm?

But, yes, you're physically right.
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
I float like a butterfly but stink like the GOP
11:11 PM on 03/06/2013
Yes.