Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kolby Solinsky

GET UPDATES FROM Kolby Solinsky
 

Graham James: Coming to a Neighborhood Near You in Two Years

Posted: 03/21/2012 1:07 am

Excuse me if I can't remain at a distance for this one, if I can't quite stay unbiased or "professional," or if I can't quite remain civil.

That's what happens when civility is betrayed, when we can allow a decision like the one by Judge Catherine Carlson yesterday to hand child rapist, pedophile, and sex offender Graham James an essential slap on the wrist (or a high five, depending on how you see it) with a two-year prison sentence.

James's defence attorney is named Even Roitenberg. For his part, Roitenberg actually mouthed these words:

"(Graham James) is, at his heart, not an indecent man by any stretch of the imagination."

Let me tell you something, Evan. We don't have to stretch our imaginations very far to know exactly who Graham James is. We've heard the charges. We know what he did, and we know that he did it repeatedly to multiple youths. But, we'll let you continue, because you're on the cross now and it doesn't sound like you deserve an interruption...

"Hopefully when he is released from custody he'll be able to live a life. I think that's all he wants. I think that's all anybody should want for him."

Wait, really?

Graham James doesn't deserve a lot, or anything, besides a fitting punishment. And, of course, a fitting punishment is not what he got. And, it's hard to even imagine what a fitting punishment would be for a man like this and for crimes like this.

But a two-year sentence for one of Canada's most vile creatures is not only insulting to his victims, but it's scary, it's dangerous, and it's embarrassing for an entire nation -- one which James's victims are a part of.

A two-year sentence for a man as putrid as Graham James is as close as you can come to condoning the actions of other sexual predators in Canada who are living, working, and continuing to commit their heinous acts.

So, no, Evan. Graham James does not deserve a life, and he doesn't deserve to have anybody who wants anything for him. He doesn't deserve socks. He doesn't deserve to be alive, and I have no problem saying that.

And yet, why do I feel so wrong writing this? Why do I feel like I shouldn't even have a voice in this case?

After all, the only ones who deserve a voice are the ones who have been tortured by him, tormented by the memories of what he did to them, and had their lives ruined or severely altered by this man's inhuman mind, body, and hands.

The ones who deserve a voice are his victims.

And, after hearing that their predator received a two-year sentence after what has seemed like an eternity playing ring-around-the-rosy with a gutless justice system, it appears their voices have not been heard.

Because with this sentence, Judge Catherine Carlson has committed a heinous act herself. It's not like Carlson could simply be asked, "What more could you have done to stop it?"

Instead, the question is, "Why have you allowed this man to commit his crimes again? Why have you been lenient to a dragon? Why have you not handed him down the most severe punishment imaginable, or possible?"

It's not, "What could you have done to stop it?" it's "Why didn't you stop it?"

Catherine, you had a chance to serve justice, which I thought was the point of a Justice. And, you failed. You let us all down.

Because, at the end of the day, Graham James is evil. And, at the end of Tuesday, Judge Catherine Carlson essentially said, "That's worth two years."

And so, when we ask ourselves in two years why Graham James is suddenly free again, we can say with confidence, "Because of the hard work of Evan Roitenberg, and the foolish decision of Catherine Carlson."

(*This article was originally posted on White Cover Magazine.)

 

Follow Kolby Solinsky on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KolbySolinsky

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This comment has been removed.
02:18 AM on 03/22/2012
This is an extraordinarily irresponsible column from a not so deep thinker. If you cannot stay dispassionate on this case, which pales in comparison to the Rafferty murder case, you need to quit. Get out of journalism. Quit pandering to the converted.

Pedophiles commit crime because they are abnormal in ONE area of their life - to seek sexual gratification with adolescents. This abnormality then tends to dominate their behaviour. Graham James is hardwired.

Jame's crimes have caused the victims untold pain and suffering from which hopefully they will recover.

But to suggest that Graham James or any other pedophile does not have any redeeming qualities is ludicrous. For you to want to continue to torment Graham James after his release says more about your dysfunctioal bent for vengeance than Brian James.

Your self indulgent fawning to the public outrage and ignorant analysis of why Judge Carlson gave the penatly she did shows how vacuous you are. We can all argue that Judge Carlson's sentence is inadequate, but I suggest you read her judgment and follow her reasoning before sounding off like a petulant child.

James victims all got the chance to give victim impact statements in court & go on national TV to express their outrage is their exercising their victims rights, that is their voice.

But as a member of the media who is unable to objectively untangle the real issues in this case from your frothing mouth of revenge in the heat of emotion is a disgrace
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
01:13 PM on 03/22/2012
I think you're forgetting that there are different kinds of journalism or commentary, and that the two of those aren't always the same. Different jobs and platforms call for different kinds of analysis. I'm not talking about Romney or Obama, or religion, or something that's extremely contentious. I'm talking about a criminal of the worst kind, in my opinion.

Please read this for what it is, and I can promise you that when I do feature story, or an interview, or anything that requires objectivity, that I pledge to be completely unbiased for the sake of that story. In this case, and on this format, I thought it would be wrong.

For example, Bob Costas's neutral interview of Jerry Sandusky was brilliant, but take a look at the context of that interview. If Costas had been honest and angry, the interview would have suffered, and the entire story around Jerry Sandusky would have suffered, as well. It would have been tainted.

This is a column, or an opinion piece. It's not meant to be objective, as I stated at the beginning, and as I had to state several times throughout. It's about a child rapist, and we're all entitled to our opinions, so I thank you for sharing yours.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kolby Solinsky
01:14 PM on 03/22/2012
At the same time, I find it hard to take your criticism for all that you intended it to be, because you have torn apart my critiques of a man by calling me "vacuous" and "a petulant child" and "dysfunctional" and describing this as coming from a "frothing mouth of revenge." Your word choice is terrific, but I don't find that any more mature or less insulting than anything I've written.

At the same time, I never called out for revenge. I simply tried to put in words how indescribable this case is, and how sickening Graham James's crimes are. I found his lawyer's defense extremely insulting, and I found the Judge's words, quotes and reasoning – which, I guarantee you, I did read over and over – to be, as you said, "inadequate."

I'm very glad you took the time to comment and to voice your opinion, as well, but I think calling what I wrote "a disgrace" is quite harsh.
08:26 PM on 03/21/2012
Madam Justice A. Lori Douglas is the Associate Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Family Division) There were 30 sexually explicit photos of Madam Douglas, showing her naked in various forms of bondage, in chains, with sex toys and performing oral sex that her husband posted on the internet. She is still a judge. So we have to question what standards Manitoba has for who is a judge. Catherine Carlson clearly does not meet any kind of standard but for different reasons. Having judgement and being a judge don't necessarily go hand in hand.
07:50 PM on 03/21/2012
Clearly those who reside in the justice system, those such as Catherine carlson, have lost complete touch with reality and the will of the people they serve. The legal community continues to do itself a disservice by looking for loopholes, justifying that which cannot be justified and and trying to impregnate the minds of everyday people with idiotic notions such as those espoused by Roitenberg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FredSanders
I Have An F- Rating From The NRA
04:46 PM on 03/21/2012
Not the foolish decision of a Judge as much as the foolish analysis of a decision not even read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FredSanders
I Have An F- Rating From The NRA
04:45 PM on 03/21/2012
Anger as an excuse for a call for revenge. "Deep thinker" Mr. Solinski is not. A deep thinker would have thought to have read the entire decision, and understood it, before the Call For Revenge.
Revenge has no place in law but has a cozy front row page seating in the so-called world of "journalism".
Be thankful bloggers are not commenting on the skills and results of your surgeon.
04:33 PM on 03/21/2012
I too share your disgust at this judge "adding insult to injury" to the victims; and the his lawyer's comment: "(Graham James) is, at his heart, not an indecent man by any stretch of the imagination"-- is a flat out lie. James is the definition of indecent. A decent man does not rape the children he has been entrusted to care for...not on my planet. Where is the sanity? Our legal system has failed us all, and it seems it is being run by those who lack moral conscience.
12:47 PM on 03/21/2012
I guess we can say thank you to a certain Mr. Trudeau...

- In 1971 Solicitor General Jean-Pierre Goyer, announced in the House of Commons, that the Trudeau Liberal Government had decided to emphasis the rehabilitation of criminals, rather than the protection of society
http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/csc-scc/report-rapport/rfcsng-ccra-eng.aspx
12:41 PM on 03/21/2012
Its a good thing he did not download a song or two...then he would have really been punished!