In the world of education, these days Finland is like a rock star. Finnish experts are all over the media, describing the "Finnish education miracle" and suggesting that other countries copy their practices.
Just the other day, for example, Pasi Salsberg (a big education cheese in Finland) was on CBC's "Sunday Edition" with Michael Enright, claiming that Finland is at the top of international rankings and suggesting that other countries follow Finland's example.
There's just one problem with this picture. The trouble is -- Finland didn't do all that well on the recent trends in international Math and Science study.
• In Gr. 4 math, Finland scored the same as Florida -- well ahead of any Canadian provinces to be sure, but still miles behind Singapore, Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan, as well as a couple of others.
• In G. 8 math, Finland scored in the middle of the pack -- worse than Quebec, for example -- and absolutely skunked by -- wait for it -- Korea, Singapore Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Japan.
• In Gr. 4 science, Finland did very well, but still trailed Korea and Singapore.
• In Gr. 8 science, Singapore left all the other countries in the dust. As well as being trounced by Singapore, Finland was beaten by Massachusetts, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and Minnesota. Alberta did almost as well as Finland.
When it comes to math and science, the Asian tigers (Singapore, Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Japan) are head and shoulders above the other countries.
• In Gr. 4 reading, Finland was neck and neck with the leaders -- Hong Kong, Florida, Russia, and Singapore. Japan and Korea did not participate.
No one disputes that Finnish children are very good readers; however, there are a couple of non-educational reasons that may have contributed to their success.
For one thing, Finnish spelling is very regular -- with every sound almost always being represented by its own designated letter. It's as if Finns need to read only sentences like the following:
Secondly, most Finnish children watch a lot of Swedish TV, a language they can't understand. Although the programs for very young children are dubbed into Finnish, the programs for older children are sub-titled in Finnish, meaning the children have to be good readers if they are to enjoy their TV shows. Thus they get a lot of extra reading practice.
By way of contrast, English spelling is highly irregular, and most English-speaking children need very skillful teaching if they are to become fluent readers. Try teaching kids to read the following sentence, with its seven difference pronunciations of 'ough'.
The bottom line is: what happens in Canadian Grade 1 classes really matters. But what happens in Finnish Grade 1 classes is far less critical. The success of Finnish kids on reading tests may not have all that much to do with Finnish schools.
All of which begs the question: why is so much fuss being made about the Finnish education system? Why are Canadian educators not interested in learning more about what the Asian tigers are doing?
The answer has got to be that Canadian educators like what is happening in Finland but don't like what is happening in Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.
Canadian educators like to point to Finland, which pays its teachers a lot and doesn't have many private schools.
Canadian educators don't like to point to the Asian tigers, which use direct instruction and drill and large classes and sequential curricula.
If Canadian educators were truly interested in high student achievement, they would stop making pilgrimages to Finland and start packing their bags for the countries that are producing far superior results - Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.
We could give children a regular spelling to begin with, in Parallel Texts. My pilot experiments hav shown that taking out the unnecessary difficulties helps migrants, the disadvantaged, and dislexic.
Experiment!
Trial a back page of a publication with Parallel Text in updated spelling without traps next to the same text in normal spelling, altho learners need not use it.
The greatest source of spelling traps are the letters in words surplus to representation of meaning or pronunciation. http://home.vicnet.net.au/~ozideas/spelling.htm#word.
An easier spelling for the 'crib' drops 6% of surplus letters and changes 3% of misleading letters in everyday text, apart from 35 common irregular words which make 12% of text - ALL ALMOST ALWAYS AMONG AS COME SOME COULD SHOULD WOULD HALF KNOW OF OFF ONE ONLY ONCE OTHER PULL PUSH PUT THEY THEIR TWO AS WAS WHAT WANT WHO WHY, and word-endings -ION/-TION/-SION.
I would willingly help make the transliterations.
'Removing unnecessary difficulties in English spelling, while leaving the basic appearance of English printt.' English Today, 107, vol 27, No 3. Sept 2011, pp 62-67 http://journals.cambridge.org/repo_A839oLF6
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~ozideas/spelling.htm
http://www.ozreadandspell.com.au/ A half hour cartoon overvew.