Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Mark Bourrie

GET UPDATES FROM Mark Bourrie
 

Jack Layton's Got a Great Act, But Have We Seen the Whole Show?

Posted: 05/27/11 09:00 AM ET

It was indeed strange.

There he was. The party leader, reading vacuous comments from three teleprompters, with a wall of MPs behind him as a backdrop.

The MPs cheered at appropriate times as the leader worked his way through the boilerplate. They gave him the obligatory standing ovation and cheered his name.

There was nothing in the speech. It was happy talk. It was just warmed-over air.

The entire speech was made to a wall of TV cameras, not to the MPs, not to what are so cruelly called "ordinary Canadians." And when it was over, the leader was whisked from the room by nervous little men in suits.

This is Jack Layton, the 2011 model.

And this is how Stephen Harper, the most powerful prime minister since the Second World War, will be "opposed." There will be a four-year TV show pitting Layton against Harper. But substance? We haven't seen anything yet.

Maybe we never will.

Jack Layton is acting like a prime minister in waiting, but he is going to be waiting an awfully long time if he thinks he's going to ride the TV waves to power. Layton is going to have to make real policy decisions, work very hard, and somehow draw Canadians' interest back into politics if he is to have any chance of taking on Harper for the top spot or even holding his job as leader of the opposition past 2015.

Layton has always been a showman, an outsider, a second-place man. He did little but disrupt when he was on Toronto's city council. The people of that city chose to elect a complete non-entity to the mayor's office rather than give power to Layton. So Layton came to Ottawa.

Even as a potential kingmaker in three minority parliaments, Layton left as few footprints in Ottawa in the past seven years as he did during those years on Toronto council. Despite all of his talk about changing Ottawa, smart money says he's likely to be a footnote, the answer to a trivia question, in 10 years.

Being opposition leader up against a new majority government is hard. And against Harper, it's going to be extra tough. Here's a guy who just won a majority government after it came out that a senior advisor had taken up with a young ex-hooker and was trying to peddle influence; after being censured by Parliament for beaching the rights of MPs; who told reporters who paid $100,000 apiece to cover the campaign that they could fight among themselves to see who could ask just four questions a day (local reporters got the fifth one).

This is a PM holds himself out as an economist and denied, in 2008, that we were headed into recession. This is the same guy who swore he's never run a deficit.

And he's a prime minister who has no shame in putting three defeated candidates into the Senate, where they join his campaign manager, his former press secretary, and lots of other cronies.
Shame Stephen Harper? Good luck with that, Jack.

Layton gave his speech Tuesday at an orientation session for his caucus. The old Reading Room in the Centre Block was crowded with MPs and their staffers. The NDP caucus does seem like an interesting group of people -- students, actors, tradespeople, young, older, men, women, Native and new Canadians, Anglo and Franco. They might be new blood, but are they capable of scrutinizing the government's annual spending of $240 billion dollars and the work of some 300,000 public servants?

Their staffers seemed even younger than the new MPs, and I'll be very surprised if they have the research and analysis depth to do much more than read the daily papers and craft queries for question period.

And when it comes to assessing major legislation and giving it responsible, informed criticism, good luck with that, kids.

Maybe the country needs a break. Perhaps "old wolf eyes," as one of my press gallery friends calls Harper, will become the Canadian Solon, governing wisely and kindly for the benefit of all. Or maybe he'll just settle all of those scores he's been carrying around in a little black notebook in his jacket pocket.

My bet is on the latter. And I suspect he's not too worried about Jack Layton and his teleprompter full of platitudes. If he did, we would have seen the attack ads by now.

 
It was indeed strange. There he was. The party leader, reading vacuous comments from three teleprompters, with a wall of MPs behind him as a backdrop. The MPs cheered at appropriate times as the le...
It was indeed strange. There he was. The party leader, reading vacuous comments from three teleprompters, with a wall of MPs behind him as a backdrop. The MPs cheered at appropriate times as the le...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:41 PM on 05/29/2011
This column is some good evidence that the $mart money is not always nearly as $mart as it thinks it is.
08:17 AM on 05/29/2011
Impressive: political reporting without a single quotation or reference. Keep the ad hominem flowing, buddy, an argument will be along shortly I'm sure.
06:43 AM on 05/28/2011
the greater actor was steven harper ---the horror show will begin shortly ------

stating with the g8 where he officially signed on as president of CIPAC ----CANADIAN ISRAELI POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
01:53 AM on 05/28/2011
Stay tuned. This column seems like an awful lot of pre-judging. Do I sometimes feel like Layton lacks a bit of substance? Sure. Compared to the other leaders? Not particularly. Even if many of the new NDP MPs and staffers are inexperienced, it's hard to argue that any other party would do a better job of representing the views of left-leaning Canadians. It's not like the Liberals or Bloc were so much better in opposition - Harper DID win the election despite those two parties having most of the opposition seats previously, no?

My prediction - NDP finally wins a majority, not under Jack but under "Vegas girl" Brosseau in 2020 ;)
10:29 PM on 05/27/2011
I knew very little about this columnist and still don't. The writer seems to be awestricken by Stephen Harper while he peppers the column with what are really insults about Jack Layton. The negative points made about Harper are well known and fresh in the minds of all - couldn't be left out of an article about Harper. No mention though that this is the biggest control freak of a PM we've ever had. A PM who needs all exposure to the public screened by his hacks so only Conservatives can ask questions? This man is a hard right wing Neocon - look at his history. Mr Layton has a real tough job but he is up to it - always has been.
04:02 PM on 05/27/2011
Oh, please! You are trying to blame Jack Layton for "leaving few footprints" during the minority government years? The fact is we had a cowardly opposition Liberal caucus who either abstained, or absented themselves because the Tories continued to threatened to call confidence votes. That is why Jack Layton pointed out Ignatieff's absentee record and said if he wanted a promotion, he better show up for the job. We also had a strong BQ caucus, so all Harper had to do is get the support of any one of the parties. Now the BQ representation is down by over 90% and the Liberals got their just deserts for their weakness by losing 60% of their seats. The fact is the Liberals have rolled over for the Tories so many times, their was an effective Tory/Liberal coalition anyway
02:57 PM on 05/27/2011
I disagree with your hate-on for Jack Layton. He has managed to up the NDP vote in every election and is the only politician willing to put himself out there for Canadians. Harper is out for The Corporation and globalization and strengthening his dictatorship. To bad there is such a strong self-interest vote out there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paladine
11:36 AM on 05/27/2011
Why all the hate on Jack? As frightening as it is, Harper having so much power is not Laytons fault; let's remember, 60% of Canadians did NOT vote for Harper. The left splits the vote and the egos involved with the NDP and Liberals will ensure it remains that way. EVERYONE wants power. Canada loses.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 05/27/2011
"This is a PM holds himself out as an economist and denied, in 2008, that we were headed into recession."

Do you have a link for that? Given that recessions are near impossible to predict even for the best of economists, and that Canada has no control over such things anyway, I can't see Harper saying such a thing.
11:01 AM on 05/27/2011
An earlier commenter claimed:
"This is a PM holds himself out as an economist and denied, in 2008, that we were headed into recession.­"

BlackRabbit asked:
"Do you have a link for that? Given that recessions are near impossible to predict even for the best of economists­, and that Canada has no control over such things anyway, I can't see Harper saying such a thing."

Actually, I'm pretty sure that Flaherty claimed that there wouldn't be a recession in 2008. But, given that Harper didn't refute Flaherty's assertion, and given that even the most senior of Harper's ministers don't get away with saying anything which contradicts Harper's beliefs, I think it's safe to assume that Harper would have said it, if Flaherty hadn't said it first. You can search for the Flaherty link yourself, I can't be bothered.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 PM on 05/27/2011
The only thing I could find is this:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2008/11/24/flaherty.html

where Flaherty said in November 2008 that Canada was not yet in recession but the economy was fast losing speed. Quite different than Harper denying that the we were headed into recession.

If that's the provenance of the statement then Bourrie would have done better to leave it out.
03:13 PM on 05/27/2011
Harper did not want to do any stimulus spending-the other guys made him do it. Cons today still love to point this out when talk of the budget deficit comes up.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtrobert
10:19 AM on 05/27/2011
Harper won ONLY because of the lack of a credible opposition. If Layton manages to convince people that he is credible in his new role as the leader of a major party, Harper might have more to fear than you seem to think. Let's not forget that with a majority, Harper is highly likely to overreach and attempt to turn Canada into the U.S. outright (his ultimate dream). That will lead to his downfall.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:28 PM on 05/27/2011
So he won because the opposition wasn't strong enough? Isn't that pretty much true for any election win?

Ignatieff was only a lame duck in hindsight. Going into the election he was a brilliant and accomplished scholar who was set to lead Canada into the 21'st century.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jesse Wright
04:09 PM on 05/27/2011
I wouldn't necessarily say that it was all hindsight. The Liberal party should have known better - Harper's team had been running smack ads for years before the election - they should have seen it coming but didn't is maybe how it should be rephrased. Is he a brilliant and accomplished scholar - yeah, but that doesn't matter to most Canadians when confronted with how he fled to the states.
02:01 PM on 05/27/2011
Puhleeezzee turn Canada into US give me a break Komarade...........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtrobert
04:27 PM on 05/29/2011
absolutely: Harper's image of Canada is as a US-light. His religious views, which drive his entire political outlook, are straight out of the Bible belt. His closest allies are south of the border. He has regular contacts with bigwigs in the Republican Party, and has been linked to the Christian Fasicist in the Family Fellowship. So sorry, I stand by my statement: Harper does not like Canada, and he won't stop until he's voted out, or has successfully given the keys of the country over to our American Overlords.

And calling me Komrade (you may want to learn how to spell the word) is not an argument.