Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matt Price

GET UPDATES FROM Matt Price
 

Christy Clark Must Stand Up to the Tar Sands

Posted: 02/24/2012 7:27 am

British Columbians are getting bullied by the Harper government in Ottawa. It's time our Premier stood up for us.

It's an unprecedented attack on Canadians who care about the future of their kids and the health of the natural environment that makes B.C. so special. No longer content to just renege on our commitments to the world to rein in carbon pollution, the Harper government has now gone on the offensive against Canadians who dare question the expansion of the tar sands and associated pipelines.

Last month, Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver issued an open letter undermining the democratic input of British Columbians registered to speak against Enbridge's tar sands pipeline across Northern B.C., calling such people "radical" and insulting their patriotism by calling them, in essence, un-Canadian.

A federal government memo uncovered through access-to-information found B.C. First Nations and environmentalists on its list of "adversaries," as opposed to oil companies ("allies"). Now, Vic Toews' new anti-terrorism strategy lists environmentalists alongside white supremacists as a possible source of domestic extremism.

And where is Christy Clark during all this? She's either nowhere, desperately trying to sit on the fence as her constituents come under assault, or else she's siding with the bullies.

Just days after former Harper advisor and Enbridge lobbyist Ken Boessenkool became her Chief of Staff, Clark went on CTV to echo Joe Oliver's arguments about "foreign" critics (while of course being silent about the billions of foreign dollars coming from the oil industry). In so doing, she brought into sharp focus that she herself has solicited political donations from Alberta oil companies, hosting a $500-a-plate dinner in the Calgary Petroleum Club -- outside money being paid to influence B.C. politics.

The fact that Clark hasn't entirely sided with her corporate donors on this pipeline is a testament to the fact that she knows a majority of British Columbian voters don't want it. Not only do we know that an oil spill from supertankers plying our sensitive coastline could be almost inevitable, but we are also discovering that this one pipeline will carry as much carbon pollution each year as B.C.'s entire annual emissions. So, while we work hard to do our part to green B.C.'s economy and society, Enbridge wants to entirely cancel out our gains several times over.

Not only is this pipeline a bad idea based on the facts, but now that the Harper government has turned it into a bullying contest means that neither Clark nor any other B.C. elected official can afford to remain on the fence any longer. Even if you are a politician who still somehow doesn't believe scientists when they tell us we have a climate crisis, if you do not stand up for the right of your constituents to express their opinions in the face of state-sanctioned bullying, then you are against democracy itself and do not deserve to be its standard bearer.

Some will say that Clark standing up for British Columbians against Harper like this will hurt her chances because of the political split opening up on the right, but this is a misdiagnosis of her problem. The split is opening up, not because she is governing more to the left than Campbell was, but because she is perceived to be a weaker leader. Strength is not found through photo ops of drinking Tim's coffee at hockey games with Harper, but rather by standing up clearly for your constituents and thereby earning their respect.

This pipeline is not about left and right, but about right and wrong. We need a leader who gets that and who makes the right choice about who to represent. Otherwise, B.C. voters will find somebody else who will.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:27 PM on 02/24/2012
Politics is such a fragile place to work. Speak up against your party and you risk ruining your career. Speak up for your beliefs and you risk losing favour with some in your constituency. Take an opposite view to your corporate donors and they will have long memories. I would not want this job. Still, it seems to me that you should go with your gut and stand up for your beliefs. After all you should have run on those beliefs. If you didn't, you end up as someone's lap dog.

That said, Christy needs to say something. This is her province and the issue is too big to ignore. The longer she is silent on the tar sands issue, the more obvious is it that she is not a strong leader.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:01 PM on 02/24/2012
Its worse than that, she should be defending the inside passage. With the stroke of a pen, a history of prudence is gone.
http://tidalstation.blogspot.com/2012/02/54-north-and-plan-to-nowhere-part-1.html
02:52 PM on 02/24/2012
Quote " Christy Clark Must Stand Up to the Tar Sands "

Or she could do what's right for the BC economy, and support the pipeline.
08:42 PM on 02/24/2012
Well Brinkley4 - the pipeline is only good for the economy until the day it leaks, or an oil tanker founders. One of which is a certainty. The question is only "when".
11:43 PM on 02/24/2012
Pipeline are operated daily throughout North America, and around the world. They are the safest, cheapest, and most environmently friendly way to transport hydrocarbons.

If society were to tremble on it's knees everytime technology were used , we'd all still be in the stone age, which, I suspect you might be at ease with. So, off you go !!
The rest of us are happy here .
03:22 AM on 02/25/2012
Doing right for the BC economy would be insuring the people and industry have access to affordable energy. Keyword, affordable. Industry has left and people are struggling just to commute to a job with high energy costs. Please don't drivil with public transit. This is a vast country, not a rather large city.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Creox
Life is too important to take seriously.
02:39 PM on 02/24/2012
The point is that this particular pipeline at this particular time is symbolic of the fossil fuel industries last gasps. Many people rightly see what cannot be ignored any further. All pipelines leak at some point in their existence, all.

Is the risk of a major spill worth this projevt? I say no. Not when we should be exploring alternatives much more strenuously at this time.
02:20 PM on 02/25/2012
Quote "symbolic of the fossil fuel industries last gasps"

Really, you will likely find out, as has proven correct in the past, that the fossil fuels industry will be with us for a very long time. It's proving to be very difficult to replace the convenient ,compact, and concentrated fuel that is hydrocarbons. Alternatives must prove themselves, and so far, they are much inferior , in terms of reliability, price, and convenience. Solar, and wind power must be constantly backed by hydrocarbons.

Good luck !
This comment has been removed.
01:12 PM on 02/24/2012
Mr. Price, by defninition, you are not an independent observer. -- Environmental Consultant.

You state, an spill from an oil tanker, is almost inevitable. Not true, the number of tankers in the world and the actual number of spills with new technology has been quite small. Technology improvements have virtually made spills non existant. However, spills do happen, if the pipeline is built we need to have the best plan in place to minimize the potential damage.

The like of you stating that a spill could cause the loss of 45,000 jobs is so grossly overstated that anyone that quotes that figure does not have a clue.

Why has it been okay for BC to ship there hydrocarbons from North East BC through pipelines across Alberta for years?

Regarding most do not want the pipeline, we all know how views can be changed depending on how the question is asked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBSCanada
They paved Paradise and put up a parking lot!
03:19 AM on 02/25/2012
CanadaBob,

After a careful look at how many tourism jobs, fishery jobs and related jobs factor into BC's scenic, pristine and gorgeous coastline, you will find that far more than 45,000 jobs would be affected by a major oil spill anywhere on the BC coastline. At least half of BC's tourism dollars (well over 1 billion dollars per year - and most of that is paid to small businesses engaged in the tourism or related industries) are earned in and around BC's spectacular coastline.

If you look at the economic impact as well as the environmental impacts of the Exxon Valdez spill and scale it to nowadays, it is easy to see the devastation that was wreaked on that region.

Why should we risk that? So that a handful of oil executives based in Toronto or Calgary can continue to receive extra large bonuses at Christmas?

Are you benefiting from a crude-oil pipeline to Kitimat being approved? Am I? No, none of us will gain sweet dillweed from it. So, again I ask, why support it? Why are you so determined to run the risk?

Please visit my website: http://gatewayoil.net or http://johnbrianshannon.com

Cheers!
photo
The Canadian
Stop Harper
12:56 PM on 02/24/2012
Where is our un-elected Premier Christy Clark? Well, she is much more concerned with looking for a way to legislate BC teachers back to work even though they are not on strike, but just employing work-to-rule tactics, than she is with actually doing anything useful.

You are right, the Harper government is edging closer and closer to declaring environmental protest groups like Greenpeace as terrorists. This isn't paranoia speaking, Here's some links:
https://whyweprotest.net/community/threads/csis-and-rcmp-equate-greenpeace-and-peta-with-terrorists.100311/
http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/computers/blogs/greenpeace-civil-disobedience-is-not-terrorism

Christy Clarke should be very aware of these accusations, since her government has often found environmental groups to be inconvenient. But terrorists? That's a whole different thing.

The 'environmental terrorist' meme is just part of the strategy to crush opposition to Harper in BC and elsewhere. I hope people wake up to this soon, because Christy Clarke will not be there to help. She is just trying to stay really unnoticed and is trying to avoid scandals until the next BC election.
02:24 PM on 02/25/2012
Go !! Gateway Go !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Hatch
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10:55 AM on 02/24/2012
"Vic Toews' new anti-terrorism strategy lists environmentalists alongside white supremacists as a possible source of domestic extremism."

While I do not equate environmentalists with white supremacists, there were actually bombs actually set off on pipelines in BC by anti-corporate/environmental extremist elements. I may not like Vic Toews but this classification is hardly ungrounded.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/story/2011/10/11/bc-encana-bombings-anniversary.html