Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Matt Price

GET UPDATES FROM Matt Price
 

Embracing Nexen Deal? Trudeau Prefers Shock Factor to Leadership

Posted: 11/20/2012 12:53 pm

Why do political handlers confuse contrarianism with "substance"?

The Justin Trudeau campaign, keen to put to bed allegations of its candidate being a lightweight, just put out an opinion piece embracing the takeover of Nexen by China's state owned CNOOC.

Unexpected, eh? It must therefore be substantive.

It doesn't help that the federal Liberal Party is still running against Stephan Dion. That whole green thing was a temporary hiccup. Best now to cosy up to the tar sands to prove it.

Don't worry about throwing those Katimavik-style hopes and dreams of the next generation under the bus. They'll need to take cover there anyway as Sandy after Sandy bears down on them, in between droughts, that is.

It also doesn't help that the other "serious" Liberal candidate, Martha Hall Findlay, is also wanting to out-substance Trudeau also with shallow contrarianism. Supply side management? We're against it. Surprise! Now, take us more seriously. And, screw those thousands of Canadian dairy farmers -- it's not like they're part of that middle class we keep talking about representing, right?

And, before this turns into Liberal-bashing, the federal NDP is also at risk of falling into the same trap. By wanting to be seen as pro-trade, they tip-toe around deals cut by the Conservatives to give corporations even more rights to beat back democratically-elected governments at the municipal, provincial, and federal levels instead of calling them out for what they are. When did "pro trade" end up meaning "anti-democracy?" And, when did we become numb to this in our national political discourse?

To progressive politicians of all stripes: being substantive means more than being contrarian and saying the unexpected -- it means levelling with Canadians about the real challenges and opportunities in front of us. For example, it means:

  • Taking our heads out of the sands on climate change. The math is stark, but Canada is blessed with massive untapped renewable energy potential. Let's embrace that so that we can face our kids and grandkids. Yes, this means leaving fossil fuels in the ground.
  • Capping the tar sands where it is. Alberta is already booming and facing growing pains -- who in the heck benefits by doubling and tripling? China maybe, but not Canada. We don't need to expand. Expansion may serve the interests of the oil industry, but not of Canadians. It would be a relief to end the battle that growing this industry means.
  • Making stuff instead of just digging stuff up. Canada is losing hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs and lagging behind on innovation. We already have emerging regional disparities with Ontario and Quebec suffering. We need to stand up to those who want to silence this conversation by name calling.
  • Making trade be about trade, and not new powers for corporations. Why are we giving companies more rights to sue democratically elected bodies for doing what their voters want? This is akin to changing our constitution, only without asking anybody about it first.
  • Not wrapping up your pet agenda by co-opting the Occupy message. Suddenly everyone (or here, or here) is about the 99%, or more softly, the "middle class." This then becomes meaningless as the various parties dress up their usual stuff in this clothing. How about a real debate involving the actual middle class -- including dairy farmers, even -- about what they want to see?

Serious stuff. Substantive, even. Who knows, a real debate about Canada with real options beyond the current narrow bandwidth may open up and engage Canadians in politics again. Goodness knows that what's currently on offer isn't exactly inspiring.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Surprising Justin Trudeau Facts

    With talk of Trudeau making a bid for the Liberal leadership reaching a fever pitch (again), HuffPost takes a look at some surprising facts about Canada's perpetual PM-in-waiting. (CP)

  • 11. Politics On Mother's Side Too

    Trudeau's maternal grandfather <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Sinclair_(politician)" target="_hplink">James Sinclair</a> was a Liberal MP and cabinet minister in Louis St.-Laurent's government in the 1950s. (House of Commons) <em><strong>CORRECTION</strong>: An earlier version of this slide incorrectly said Sinclair was a Progressive Conservative MP.</em>

  • 10. Born In Office

    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Trudeau" target="_hplink">Trudeau was only the second child ever to be born while a parent was prime minister</a>. The first was John A. Macdonald's youngest daughter Margaret Mary Macdonald. Trudeau's younger brothers, Alexandre (Sacha) and Michel were the third and fourth. (CP)

  • 9. Educated Enough?

    Trudeau has a Bachelor of Arts degree from McGill and a Bachelor of Education from UBC. He also studied engineering at the Université de Montréal and environmental geography at McGill, but never finished degrees in those fields.

  • 8. Enemies To Friends

    While fathers Brian Mulroney and Pierre Trudeau were rivals, sons Justin and Ben are friends. Mulroney attended Trudeau's wedding to Sophie Grégoire. Grégoire has worked as Quebec correspondent for CTV's eTalk, which is hosted by Mulroney. (CP)

  • 7. Let Them Eat Anything But Cake

    Trudeau didn't have cake at his wedding, with <a href="http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20050606_106678_106678" target="_hplink">Sophie arguing that people never eat it anyway</a>. (Shutterstock)

  • 6. Born On Christmas

    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Trudeau" target="_hplink">Trudeau entered the world on December 25, 1971</a>.

  • 5. Two Tattoos In One

    Trudeau has a large tattoo on his left shoulder. <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/justinpjtrudeau/statuses/179973685136998400" target="_hplink">The planet Earth inside a Haida raven</a>. Trudeau got the globe tattoo when he was 23 and the raven when he turned 40. (Media Ball)

  • 4. Keeping It In The Family

    Trudeau and his wife Sophie have two children, Xavier James (4) and Ella-Grace Margaret (3). Both are partially named after family.<a href="http://www.chatelaine.com/en/article/4970--the-littlest-trudeau" target="_hplink"> Xavier James is named after Trudeau's maternal grandfather James Sinclair</a> (the politician) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophie_Gr%C3%A9goire" target="_hplink">Ella-Grace Margaret is named after Trudeau's mother Margaret and Grace Elliot, Trudeau's paternal grandmother</a>. Xavier also happens to share a birthday with Pierre Elliott Trudeau. (CP)

  • 3. Politician And Actor

    <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0846011/" target="_hplink">Trudeau played Talbot Mercer Papineau</a> in the 2007 CBC miniseries "The Great War."

  • 2. .. And Video Game Star

    <a href="http://arts.nationalpost.com/2011/09/06/in-deus-ex-justin-trudeau-is-the-pm-and-canada-has-a-problem-with-illegal-immigrants-from-the-u-s/" target="_hplink">Trudeau is prime minister in the dystopian future portrayed in the video game Deus Ex: Human Revolution</a>. (CP)

  • 1. Childhood Sweathearts

    Sophie used to visit the Trudeau family home when she was a child. She was a classmate and friend of Trudeau's youngest brother Michel, who died tragically in a B.C. avalanche in 1998. Justin and Sophie made contact again at a fundraiser in 2003 and soon after began dating. <a href="http://www.macleans.ca/canada/national/article.jsp?content=20050606_106678_106678" target="_hplink">Trudeau was so smitten</a> that he declared they would spend the rest of their lives together on the very first date. (CP)


Loading Slideshow...
  • 10. Oil And Gas Accounts For 4.8 Per Cent Of GDP

    The oil and gas industries accounted for around $65 billion of economic activity in Canada annually in recent years, or slightly less than 5 per cent of GDP. Source: <a href="http://www.ceri.ca/docs/2010-10-05CERIOilandGasReport.pdf" target="_hplink">Canada Energy Research Institute</a>

  • 9. Oil Exports Have Grown Tenfold Since 1980

    Canada exported some 12,000 cubic metres of oil per day in 1980. By 2010, that number had grown to 112,000 cubic metres daily. Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=9&SheetID=224" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 8. Refining Didn't Grow At All As Exports Boomed

    Canada refined 300,000 cubic metres daily in 1980; in 2010, that number was slightly down, to 291,000, even though exports of oil had grown tenfold in that time. Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=7&SheetID=104" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 7. 97 Per Cent Of Oil Exports Go To The U.S.

    Despite talk by the federal government that it wants to open Asian markets to Canadian oil, the vast majority of exports still go to the United States -- 97 per cent as of 2009. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 6. Canada Has World's 2nd-Largest Proven Oil Reserves

    Canada's proven reserves of 175 billion barrels of oil -- the vast majority of it trapped in the oil sands -- is the second-largest oil stash in the world, after Saudi Arabia's 267 billion. Source: <a href="http://www.ogj.com/index.html" target="_hplink">Oil & Gas Journal</a>

  • 5. Two-Thirds Of Oil Sands Bitumen Goes To U.S.

    One-third of Canada's oil sands bitumen stays in the country, and is refined into gasoline, heating oil and diesel. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 4. Alberta Is Two-Thirds Of The Industry

    Despite its reputation as the undisputed centre of Canada's oil industry, Alberta accounts for only two-thirds of energy production. British Columbia and Saskatchewan are the second and third-largest producers. Source: <a href="http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/statistics-facts/energy/895" target="_hplink">Natural Resources Canada</a>

  • 3. Alberta Will Reap $1.2 Trillion From Oil Sands

    Alberta' government <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/03/27/alberta-oil-sands-royalties-ceri_n_1382640.html" target="_hplink">will reap $1.2 trillion in royalties from the oil sands over the next 35 years</a>, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute.

  • 2. Canadian Oil Consumption Has Stayed Flat

    Thanks to improvements in energy efficiency, and a weakening of the country's manufacturing base, oil consumption in Canada has had virtually no net change in 30 years. Consumption went from 287,000 cubic metres daily in 1980 to 260,000 cubic metres daily in 2010. Source: Source: <a href="http://membernet.capp.ca/SHB/Sheet.asp?SectionID=6&SheetID=99" target="_hplink">Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers</a>

  • 1. 250,000 Jobs.. Plus Many More?

    The National Energy Board says oil and gas employs 257,000 people in Canada, not including gas station employees. And the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers says the oil sands alone <a href="http://www.capp.ca/aboutUs/mediaCentre/NewsReleases/Pages/OilsandsaCanadianjobcreator.aspx" target="_hplink">will grow from 75,000 jobs to 905,000 jobs by 2035</a> -- assuming, of course, the price of oil holds up.

 
FOLLOW CANADA ALBERTA
Why do political handlers confuse contrarianism with "substance"? The Justin Trudeau campaign, keen to put to bed allegations of its candidate being a lightweight, just put out an opinion piece embra...
Why do political handlers confuse contrarianism with "substance"? The Justin Trudeau campaign, keen to put to bed allegations of its candidate being a lightweight, just put out an opinion piece embra...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
09:09 PM on 11/23/2012
So all of a sudden this author thinks that Alberta is going to close up the TarHole? Trudeau is making the right decision about Nexen but I am sure he wouldn't sell out provincial voters to do it like Harper is. Maybe, just maybe he would reflect on how Iceland dealt with their debt and just tell the Chinese to screw off with the guts of that agreement, and we can still save our integrity. Young blood may not have preconceived notions but virility might make the day, and it probably will.
08:09 AM on 11/23/2012
Well he didn't come out in favour of FIPA, right? So why can't selling Nexen to another country be a good idea? In their own words: "Nexen has three principal businesses: conventional oil and gas, oil sands and shale gas." Maybe Trudeau intends to make life difficult for oil companies and would rather have the cash than to have to bail out Nexen and continue to pay for the environmental consequences of their actions?
07:00 AM on 11/21/2012
It is so refreshing to see commentary on these issues that does not bend to the economic growth model. We need to start looking to develop micro economies that focus on clean energy, environmental standards, local infrastructure and long hard look at our trade policies. How much of the global trade is helping Canadians today? Who is it serving? I feel too many of our tax dollars, resources and energy are going into the pockets of multi-national corporations and their share holders. We need to work on developing clean and innovative industries that offer meaningful and sustainable employment for Canadians. I haven't heard this from Justin Trudeau or any of his ilk. We need politicians like Mr. Price.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Nuggets
Just keep on keepin' on..
11:29 PM on 11/20/2012
So what's he looking at in this picture?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
04:26 PM on 11/21/2012
Your post inquiring as to what he's looking at.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Nuggets
Just keep on keepin' on..
04:16 PM on 11/25/2012
Wow...that's actually kind of mind bending...Borges like.
08:51 PM on 11/20/2012
Mr. Price has it exactly right. The looming battle is between those that recognize limits and understand the status quo path cannot be sustained. It is simple math. Politicians like J.Trudeau continue to try to cater to the bay street boys who prosper at the peril of future generations. At some point a political leader will get it - the future will not be like the past and efforts to pretend it will be will only lead to further disruptions. J.Trudeau is a disappointment.
photo
mxd89
I'm a bit sick of labels these days.
07:36 PM on 11/20/2012
There is too much money being thrown at politicians of ALL stripes for them to resist the will of large corporations and special interest groups. Their plan is to burn oil until the day we choke to death.
photo
AcunningDisguise
magnus gigas caput
06:32 PM on 11/20/2012
Not shocked as this is the first bit of policy he's offered. Disappointed he's yet another who turns his back on Canada I wanted to support him.

Do we have any Politicians that aren't bent?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:46 PM on 11/21/2012
Supporting one deal that impacts 3% of Canada's oil sands is not turning his back on Canada... He made clear that he supports alternative energy and wants to invest in infrastructure and innovation as well. The oil sands aren't going anywhere, and the sooner we accept that reality and see it as a boon rather than a burden we will be able to work on other options without the constant bickering... There can be a way to save manufacturing, invest in alternative energy and the environment while also allowing the oil industry to continue boosting our economy
06:30 PM on 11/20/2012
I don t know that this is a shock tactic at all. More like a simply play. He s talking to the kingmakers now, and he needs support. I guess I agree with most of the later points in your article though, except for the last one. The Occupy message is suprememly important. There is no such thing as trickle down economics, there never was. Why are things only bad when it is bad for the middle class? There s another whole class there which no party (orange is pretty red these days in my opinion) which seems to care about that. Justin is quite simply not talking to you or me at all.He s talking literally to the top 10 percent of people.
06:26 PM on 11/20/2012
Well said Mr. Price. The positions of our current "opposition" parties in the House of Commons are, as you point out, bizarre and unrepresentative of the majority of Canadians. Somehow Mulcair and the NDP have allowed Harper and his trained seals (aka MPs) to vilify him on a carbon tax, which he doesn't support, instead of taking an aggressive and well articulated stand on the need to address climate change. Only Elizabeth May seems to have a clue about how to deal with the Harper govt. I had certainly hoped for better from Mr Trudeau, but alas it seems I'm going to be disappointed in the Liberal party yet again.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colpy
05:26 PM on 11/20/2012
As a Conservative, all I can say is Heh Heh Heh
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
04:25 PM on 11/21/2012
If only that was all you could type.

I tease colpy. Happy U.S. Thanksgiving.
04:15 PM on 11/20/2012
If you would care to read the positions of Findlay and Trudeau on those policies you mentioned, you would realize they were supporting them for substantive reasons - they weren't just stating those positions to be contrarian. Try not to unfairly characterize their policies just to prove a point that wasn't there to make.
photo
AcunningDisguise
magnus gigas caput
06:33 PM on 11/20/2012
Substantive or not they offer Canada wholesale and Canadians get no say in the matter.

I won't support anyone who is OK with China telling us what to do.
09:14 PM on 11/20/2012
Who is they?

And of course Canadians get a say in the matter. The people deciding these issues are elected officials. Having a referendum on every issue faced by the government would reduce our democracy to an absurdity.

And since when is China telling us what to do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sgillhoolley
Occupy the discussion.
02:33 PM on 11/20/2012
All the more reason for progressives to vote for the NDP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
01:59 PM on 11/20/2012
Speak for yourself. I find Trudeau truly inspiring after seeing him twice and keeping up with his news, even this new revelation about CNOOC.

You say we should cap the oil sands at current levels?! That's just insanity. Let's just create a government mandate stating that all oil sand production must stay the same. Even the NDP couldn't speak openly about that one!

Who says we can't have both?! An investment in innovation and domestic infrastructure to spur growth for a dwindling manufacturing sector while also allowing for the continued growth of oil production. We could do one better and start refining oil domestically as well. I'm all for renewable energy, but this played out idea that oil production needs to stop in order to prevent the end of the world is just unrealistic and hyperbole... There is much that Harper is doing to threaten my generation's well-being, such as cuts to OAS and environmental research & regulations, but the oil sands alone are not the real threat we're worried about.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:52 AM on 11/23/2012
To prevent a temperature increase of 2 degree C, we need to increase the global carbon balance by no more than ~600 Gt. The oil sands has ~300 Gt of carbon in it alone. Known reserves currently licensed by oil companies (but not yet pumped), represent about ~2600 Gt of carbon. If we care about climate change, we can't have both. We need to keep 80% of the oil in the ground--oil that companies have on their balance sheets, buy, sell, and trade against--just to stay in the game.

If the current trajectory is maintained and we hit a 4 degree C increase by end of century, the type of program cuts you're talking about will be the least of our worries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProgressiveCDN
A Progressive Moderate
03:32 PM on 11/23/2012
I'd like to agree with you, but it's really hard to look at oil production in Canada and say that us stopping our production (while the rest of the world rolls on) will prevent this sharp increase in global temperatures... Like I say, I'm all for alternative energy and investing in those markets but to stifle a successful private industry that requires no further investment in the name of environmentalism seems counter-productive. That decreases the tax base, which then hits the investments we have to make for new energy sources. If anything we should remove subsidies for these oil barrons and tax them reasonably (not to mention the Albertan government ignoring royalties for decades)... I still think a balanced approach is possible.

Also, worst case scenario is still not doomsday it's just an intangible effect that will likely result in parts of land falling to the ocean... Humans adapt.