There's an old joke that goes: How do you get 20 Canadians out of a swimming pool? You shout, "Hey you Canadians, get out of the swimming pool."
We're generally an obedient lot, except while on skates, so what gives with the plan of a group of Canadians to block Warren Buffett's coal trains near Vancouver this Saturday?
Most of us watched the Al Gore movie on climate change, told pollsters we were concerned about it, and then went back to business as usual.
It's not that we stopped believing in the fact of it -- although there are a handful of reality-challenged columnists who still embarrass themselves on this front -- but rather that we haven't created the structures that build our emotional investment in it.
As KC Golden says, each of us participates in an "ecosystem of denial" where we get confirmation of our own failure to change from the fact that those around us are doing the same -- it becomes a vicious cycle. We therefore bury the reality of climate change to some distant part of our brain where it festers, giving us anxiety similar to a person who knows she has a life- threatening ailment, but refuses to go to the doctor.
Part of this vicious cycle is people thinking, 'if climate change was so serious, then those in the know would be lighting their hair on fire, and they're not, so it can't be.'
How many climate scientists have we heard couching their message in calm, measured tones, so as to appear credible? How many environmentalists have we heard talking only about light bulbs, so as to appear reasonable?
This is why it's such a big deal that Marc Jaccard will be standing in front of the coal trains too. He's a Simon Fraser University professor used to walking in the hallways of power, consulting to governments and industry alike.
In his words, he feels "absolutely sick" about taking this kind of action, but says, "I am in a world now where there isn't any place for sane analysis." Note the use of words relating to sickness and sanity: a microcosm for the psychology of our society as a whole.
It is these kinds of actions that begin to break down our ecosystem of denial and instead create a "culture of responsibility" where we are shown the seriousness of our shared predicament through the seemingly dramatic actions of people around us, including those like Jaccard.
We have already been treated to a chorus of calling those who want clean energy instead of fossil fuels "radical," by the oil ideologues in Ottawa, and I expect we'll hear much more of that. The evidence, though, clearly shows that those who promote coal and oil are in fact undermining the necessary conditions for prosperous human life on this planet, quite possibly the most radical and irresponsible act ever.
Those on the train tracks and those standing up for alternatives to the tar sands -- given what we now know, this is what's "responsible" in today's world.
Jeff Biggers: Stopping Coal in Its Tracks: Will Historic Actions This Week Launch Summer Uprising?
Warren Buffett warned of BNSF coal train blockade by B.C. activists ...
Bill Tieleman: Billionaires back Occupy Vancouver and Occupy Wall ...
Have a coffee at Tim Horton's and check for yourself.
"A sudden awakening in a decade by governments and the people to the dangers of climate change will be too late; the global climate system will have shifted course and the future will have been taken out of our hands. In such times we have moral obligations other than obedience to the law. We feel we owe obedience to a higher law even though we have to accept the consequences of disobeying the ones in the statute books. It is for this reason that those who engage in civil disobedience are usually the most law-abiding citizens - those who have most regard for the social interest and the keenest understanding of the democratic process."
So, no we do not have to obey the laws if the laws are damaging our world, but we do have to take responsibility for breaking them.
Chicken Little didnt want to scam billions of dollars and he did not break the law.
The emperor has no clothes, Global Warming is a giant scam to steal money and many of the greens are just sucking up some of the billions. The green is the money
Yes we do, however more people living on earth than ever before, producing more food than ever before, people didnt think this planet would support 100 million. Human ingenuity is amazing. Once we get to 100 billion people, it may feel cramped, but no more than today, also it seems that people like to live in cities around the modern conveniences, there is so much rural land available.
I would be willing to bet you live in a city and use the modern conveniences. Likely you even have a computer
btw ... i marked your comment as favorite. oops hit wrong button. sorry
Which makes it civil war.
Is this really what you want? Environmentalists should remember that the rule of law is an ally, not an incumbrance. They degrade and ignore the law at their peril, for it gives their foes free rein.
What's good for the goose...