Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Maude Barlow

GET UPDATES FROM Maude Barlow
 

Enbridge: You're On Notice

Posted: 01/18/2012 8:10 pm

It is a sweet victory. President Barack Obama has listened to his people and his better nature and rejected the Keystone Pipeline. In spite of a massive campaign south of the border by the federal and Alberta governments and the energy industry, which included expensive wall-to-wall television ads, common sense has won the day.

The tar sands of Northern Alberta have become a symbol of the destructive side of globalization and a flashpoint in the debate about alternative futures. With their heavy carbon footprint and their destruction of watersheds, the tar sands have become an international symbol of excessive development and the clear reason behind Canada's abandonment of its Kyoto commitment.

The route the pipeline would have taken through the United States on its way to be refined in Texas would have taken it over the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the most important and endangered underground water sources in the world. As ranchers and farmers and communities across whose land the pipeline would have traversed found out about it, they spoke with one voice: Putting the waters that grow the food for America's heartland at risk for the profit of the energy industry is lunacy. The President agreed.

It is important to be clear that the fight against these pipelines is not against the workers of Northern Alberta and their families. They too seek a safe energy future and workplace. And their union, the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, is a clear and progressive voice in the call for a just and sustainable energy future.

The fight against the Keystone and other pipelines is that they represent unparalleled growth in the dirty oil industry, essentially shutting out the search for alternatives. When untold billions are spent in building the delivery system for this industry, the imperative is set to exponentially increase production. Thus we see the big energy and pipeline companies driving energy policy, instead of energy policy being the outcome of an open process of deliberation and consultation between elected officials and citizens. Pure profit is driving energy policy in Canada to our international shame.

Proponents of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline that would "punch a hole in the Rockies" to carry this oil to western ports for Asian export should be put on notice: The powerful coalition of community, environmental, labour and justice groups that came together across the Canada-US border to stop Keystone in its tracks is on the move. Under the leadership of the First Nations people along the pipeline's proposed path, this growing peoples' movement will take great heart from this victory. The Gateway will never be built.

On this day, I think back to that lovely warm September day when a number of us crossed a police barrier on Parliament Hill and were arrested for our opposition to Keystone. I think back to that November day in Washington, when, under the leadership of Bill McKibbon of 350.org and other wonderful American allies, 12,000 of us surrounded the White House and demanded that sanity prevail in the decision about this project. All of us who addressed the crowd that day spoke about the right of future generations to clean air and water and a healthy future on a living planet.

Today that dream seems a little closer.

 
It is a sweet victory. President Barack Obama has listened to his people and his better nature and rejected the Keystone Pipeline. In spite of a massive campaign south of the border by the federal and...
It is a sweet victory. President Barack Obama has listened to his people and his better nature and rejected the Keystone Pipeline. In spite of a massive campaign south of the border by the federal and...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:57 PM on 01/20/2012
One has to assume that Maude Barlow does not drive a car or heat her home, nor does she ever/ever eat or wear or use anything that has US input. A cabin in the woods, with fresh (Canadian) water nearby and an oil (oops) lamp? Ah, well, it's Maude.
photo
Liz Wilson 2
“a small group can change the world
08:32 AM on 01/29/2012
A frequent error made by commentors such as yourself, Oldsalt, is to assume that someone cannot care for the environment unless you are willing to live like a neanderthal. Clearly, there are not too many (if any) environmentalists that advocating this extreme position.

What I fail to understand is why some people, as in the case of this pipeline, are advocating on the side of potential destruction to very significant water systems. It absolutely makes no sense to risk contamination of this important resource.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:35 PM on 01/20/2012
The big mystery. Why when Canada imports half its oil are we shipping it to China or Texas, Ontario is a local market people!
12:39 AM on 01/23/2012
Exactly. Forcing the oil companies to refine the oil here in Canada would put money in Canadian workers and Canadian suppliers pockets, adding fuel to our domestic economy. We'd have the refined fuel HERE and have FIRST access to it, and, reduce our dependence on foreign suppliers.

Why export raw crude, and the refining jobs, to China or anywhere else ??!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
12:25 AM on 01/20/2012
Well, thanks for your protest efforts.

But, I think you should use your resources to commence and/or promote the transition from The Carbon Economy to The Hydrogen Economy -- its already underway.

Here are some examples.

This pollution free 11.2 MW Fuel Cell Park became operationa­­l in South Korea recently and can supply POLLUTION FREE free power to 20K homes just from a 1 acre of land footprint: http://tin­­yurl.com/­6­skgw9h .

This outfit in the U.S. puts up Hydrogen Gas Plants and sells the Hydrogen Gas, by pipeline, to all of the Gulf Coast Oil Refineries in the U.S. which they use to try and reduce the POLLUTION from their coking processes: http://tin­­yurl.com/­6­umyf7f .

Mercedes Benz is PRODUCTION READY with their Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric vehicle technology but The Oil Cartel will not install Hydrogen Gas pumps on their lots. Here is one of their cars that drove 33,000 pollution and trouble free kilometers this past summer and was found nudging a "oil jack": http://tin­­yurl.com/­6­nxrcq2 .

So, there you have it.

You have the Fuel Cell Electric Generation Plant that runs the Hydrogen Production Plant that supplies the Hydrogen gas for the car.
dumocraps
My Screenname gets right to the point
04:20 PM on 01/19/2012
Reduce our nations dependence on Hydrocarbon based fuels. Require all Liberals to use their party's mascot when picking up their Government handouts.
04:18 PM on 01/19/2012
What kind of a dream world does Maude Barlow occupy ? President Obama's rejection of the Keystone Pipeline was not motivated by his "better nature" . It was motivated by base political considerations.. She seems to forget that Barack Obama was a Senator in the most corrupt state jurisdiction , in the US. It was rejected in order to maintain the support of the left wing environmental political base. Once the election is over, Keystone will be approved instanteously. Enbridge was encouraged to resubmit the application.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:57 PM on 01/19/2012
lets not kid ourselves people, this is nothing but political postering. obama is a smart man, his team is intelligent, they would never approve of him putting this project through right before the election. he would lose his far left support and thus, his oval office. like it or not, this oil will be sold some where. money always rules politics and subsequently life in the western world.
11:30 AM on 01/19/2012
I don't understand why we are not pressuring these oil companies to build a refinery and process the oil here. It would create jobs and make the delivery process much less risky.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Warren Yuill
Jesus Built My Hot-Rod
01:07 PM on 01/19/2012
Its just too dangerous to ship refined petroleum products that far in a pipeline.
They are far to volitile.
02:10 PM on 01/19/2012
What if the pipeline went closer to the border of the US and s/w alberta. Could you not refine it there and then use tanker trucks to move it to the US and Vancouver?
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
03:38 PM on 01/20/2012
http://www.magellanlp.com/
seems they have a 9,600 km in use for decades
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BCPATRIOT
British Columbia
09:47 AM on 01/19/2012
We do not want your PIPELINE or your DIRTY OIL in British Columbia,

You can keep Harper's filthy Tar Sands Oil in Alberta where it belongs.

Do not try to ruin Beautiful British Columbia, like you have already done to Alberta.
09:47 AM on 01/19/2012
Well argued. Can you run for office?
07:51 AM on 01/19/2012
People B4 Profits ! Bravo.
12:59 PM on 01/19/2012
What does that even mean?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norma Ward
07:23 AM on 01/19/2012
Here is an article outlining why Canada should reconsider its position on exporting oil sands synthetic crude:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadas-oil-sands-are-we-exporting.html

Canada's domestic supply of conventional crude has been on the decline since the early 1970s and despite the country's exports of synthetic crude, imports of nearly 800,000 BOPD are required to meet growing consumption.
12:12 AM on 01/19/2012
Go Maude! What a great day for all of us and for the planet. love, Margie K, Montana
12:04 AM on 01/19/2012
there is way too much money now invested in HARPER NATIONAL PARK aka tar sands ----

this battle will never be over--- the oil will be sold someway somehow, sometime

harper has staked the future of canadas economy on it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:11 PM on 01/19/2012
gotta tell ya, i first came on this site and posted comments just to annoy and stir the pot. ive seen some stuff from you and although i dont think we would ever become friends, i do enjoy your posts. lets keep up the battle, it keeps me amussed while im slow drilling on my rig. this site cracks me up ! love it.
11:57 PM on 01/18/2012
Can we just for a second set aside all of the content of this issue, and think for a second... Does anyone else find it strange that we as a people are constantly at battle with our own governments and their stupid money-making ideas? I mean honestly, when will this stop? When will these positions be taken up by smart people? How many more fights will there have to be before the populace says enough is enough? I think we should find a way, by voting, or by other means, to put someone in charge who has the skills and morals to lead our great nation to a prosperous, economic and at the same time green destination.
I say this because the next time this sort of deal is made it will be done so behind closed doors and there won't be an opportunity to fight against it. If not this issue, then it will be some other ridonkulous efforts to exploit our lands with a get-rich-quick-before-my-term-is-over scheme.

Dr.Jay Cole
listen.to/drjaycole
Seamus OMalley
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
08:40 AM on 01/19/2012
Is a 'smart person' defined as someone who thinks and believes and feels the exact way that you do?
11:30 AM on 01/19/2012
there'll always be an opportunity to fight against it - may not be pretty, but...
11:49 PM on 01/18/2012
Listened to his people? More like his base which he needs to rile up to fundraise for his re-election. A majority of Americans polled as recently as two weeks ago want the pipeline construction. If Obama was listening to his people he would have approved it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
canuckistaneh
Science!
01:42 AM on 01/19/2012
Are these the same people that elected George dubya Bush twice? If they are then Obama made the correct decision.
09:15 AM on 01/19/2012
Whatever. Let's just not pretend Obama was 'listening to his people' means anything other than his base. The American public want the pipeline and the thousands of jobs it will bring.
09:02 AM on 01/19/2012
People in the US were for this project before, I stress before, the facts came out.

Our politicians (republicans) are running around saying this project would create 25000+ jobs, now we know this is not true. It is actually a few thousand temporary jobs. Then you have the people here taking it upon themselves to conclude that the oil is passing through the US so it must be ours and we can use it......that is not true also.

There are only a few select elites that will benefit from this pipeline and since they are already millionaires and billionaires I think we shouldn't listen to them. ~ just a thought.....
01:00 PM on 01/19/2012
If the 'facts came out' in the last week after the last poll I've read which says a majority of Americans want the pipeline, than ok I'd love to see this poll.