It is a sweet victory. President Barack Obama has listened to his people and his better nature and rejected the Keystone Pipeline. In spite of a massive campaign south of the border by the federal and Alberta governments and the energy industry, which included expensive wall-to-wall television ads, common sense has won the day.
The tar sands of Northern Alberta have become a symbol of the destructive side of globalization and a flashpoint in the debate about alternative futures. With their heavy carbon footprint and their destruction of watersheds, the tar sands have become an international symbol of excessive development and the clear reason behind Canada's abandonment of its Kyoto commitment.
The route the pipeline would have taken through the United States on its way to be refined in Texas would have taken it over the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the most important and endangered underground water sources in the world. As ranchers and farmers and communities across whose land the pipeline would have traversed found out about it, they spoke with one voice: Putting the waters that grow the food for America's heartland at risk for the profit of the energy industry is lunacy. The President agreed.
It is important to be clear that the fight against these pipelines is not against the workers of Northern Alberta and their families. They too seek a safe energy future and workplace. And their union, the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, is a clear and progressive voice in the call for a just and sustainable energy future.
The fight against the Keystone and other pipelines is that they represent unparalleled growth in the dirty oil industry, essentially shutting out the search for alternatives. When untold billions are spent in building the delivery system for this industry, the imperative is set to exponentially increase production. Thus we see the big energy and pipeline companies driving energy policy, instead of energy policy being the outcome of an open process of deliberation and consultation between elected officials and citizens. Pure profit is driving energy policy in Canada to our international shame.
Proponents of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline that would "punch a hole in the Rockies" to carry this oil to western ports for Asian export should be put on notice: The powerful coalition of community, environmental, labour and justice groups that came together across the Canada-US border to stop Keystone in its tracks is on the move. Under the leadership of the First Nations people along the pipeline's proposed path, this growing peoples' movement will take great heart from this victory. The Gateway will never be built.
On this day, I think back to that lovely warm September day when a number of us crossed a police barrier on Parliament Hill and were arrested for our opposition to Keystone. I think back to that November day in Washington, when, under the leadership of Bill McKibbon of 350.org and other wonderful American allies, 12,000 of us surrounded the White House and demanded that sanity prevail in the decision about this project. All of us who addressed the crowd that day spoke about the right of future generations to clean air and water and a healthy future on a living planet.
Today that dream seems a little closer.
Matt Price: Dear Tar Sands: It's Not Me, It's You
Enbridge's Pipeline Threatens TransCanada's Keystone XL Plan ...
Enbridge's Oil-Sands Pipeline Gains from Delays to Keystone XL ...
Keystone delay aids Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline plan
Enbridge Pipeline System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Enbridge confident of avoiding Keystone XL woes - The Globe and ...
Keystone XL Pipeline: Obama Administration Announcing It Will Not Go Forward With Controversial Plan
Matt Price: GRAPHIC: Six Degrees of Separation Between Ethical Oil and Conservatives
What I fail to understand is why some people, as in the case of this pipeline, are advocating on the side of potential destruction to very significant water systems. It absolutely makes no sense to risk contamination of this important resource.
Why export raw crude, and the refining jobs, to China or anywhere else ??!!
But, I think you should use your resources to commence and/or promote the transition from The Carbon Economy to The Hydrogen Economy -- its already underway.
Here are some examples.
This pollution free 11.2 MW Fuel Cell Park became operationaÂÂl in South Korea recently and can supply POLLUTION FREE free power to 20K homes just from a 1 acre of land footprint: http://tinÂÂyurl.com/Â6Âskgw9h .
This outfit in the U.S. puts up Hydrogen Gas Plants and sells the Hydrogen Gas, by pipeline, to all of the Gulf Coast Oil Refineries in the U.S. which they use to try and reduce the POLLUTION from their coking processes: http://tinÂÂyurl.com/Â6Âumyf7f .
Mercedes Benz is PRODUCTION READY with their Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric vehicle technology but The Oil Cartel will not install Hydrogen Gas pumps on their lots. Here is one of their cars that drove 33,000 pollution and trouble free kilometers this past summer and was found nudging a "oil jack": http://tinÂÂyurl.com/Â6Ânxrcq2 .
So, there you have it.
You have the Fuel Cell Electric Generation Plant that runs the Hydrogen Production Plant that supplies the Hydrogen gas for the car.
They are far to volitile.
seems they have a 9,600 km in use for decades
You can keep Harper's filthy Tar Sands Oil in Alberta where it belongs.
Do not try to ruin Beautiful British Columbia, like you have already done to Alberta.
http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2012/01/canadas-oil-sands-are-we-exporting.html
Canada's domestic supply of conventional crude has been on the decline since the early 1970s and despite the country's exports of synthetic crude, imports of nearly 800,000 BOPD are required to meet growing consumption.
this battle will never be over--- the oil will be sold someway somehow, sometime
harper has staked the future of canadas economy on it.
I say this because the next time this sort of deal is made it will be done so behind closed doors and there won't be an opportunity to fight against it. If not this issue, then it will be some other ridonkulous efforts to exploit our lands with a get-rich-quick-before-my-term-is-over scheme.
Dr.Jay Cole
listen.to/drjaycole
Our politicians (republicans) are running around saying this project would create 25000+ jobs, now we know this is not true. It is actually a few thousand temporary jobs. Then you have the people here taking it upon themselves to conclude that the oil is passing through the US so it must be ours and we can use it......that is not true also.
There are only a few select elites that will benefit from this pipeline and since they are already millionaires and billionaires I think we shouldn't listen to them. ~ just a thought.....