
Yesterday, I stood in the warm Washington sunshine and joined thousands of peaceful demonstrators as we surrounded the White House in a shout out for climate justice. We were there -- 12,000 of us from all over North America -- to urge President Barack Obama to say no to the highly controversial Keystone XL, a proposed pipeline that would carry bitumen -- the dirtiest oil on earth -- from the tar sands of Northern Alberta over an ancient aquifer and prime farmland to the Texas Gulf Coast for refining. American citizens and communities along the pipeline's path have joined forces with environmentalists, scientists, and First Nations groups on both sides of the border to mount a fierce opposition to the project.
The Canadian government has given the go-ahead for Keystone. The State Department has weighed in with its opinion (in favour), as has the Environmental Protection Agency (opposed). The decision to give TransCanada the go-ahead for its pipeline, or not, rests entirely with President Obama. He is supposed to reveal his decision this month.
Until recently, the common wisdom has been that the president would reluctantly agree to the pipeline because of the demand for domestic jobs and the call for the U.S. to secure more energy supplies here in North America. But the latter argument has been turned on its head with reports that much of the Canadian tar sands oil will actually be exported to Europe after it is refined in the U.S.
And even the president admits that the jobs issue must be weighed against environmental concerns. Last week, he went on Nebraska TV to empathize with the growing opposition in that state to the pipeline: "We don't want, for example, aquifers that are adversely affected." President Obama was referring to the Ogallala Aquifer, a major fossil aquifer already in distress from over pumping that has become a flashpoint for opposition over fears that a spill could irreversibly damage this vital water source. In fact, Nebraska state legislators have recently moved to block the project altogether in their state, a move that would force the re-routing of the pipeline and perhaps result in its cancellation altogether.
The president and the energy industry have clearly noted the sustained opposition in the U.S. and Canada. For two weeks in late August, hundreds of peaceful demonstrators deliberately got arrested in an act of non-violent civil disobedience in front of the White House. And in Canada in late September, close to 200 Canadians, including myself, got arrested for crossing a police barrier on Parliament Hill in a similar protest. The Canadian government has also noticed the increased opposition and has upped the ante with expensive advertising on American television praising the tar sands as a safe and "ethical" energy source for the U.S. Clearly the stakes are growing and the turn-out shows that the opposition to not only Keystone, but the expansion of the tar sands, will not stop growing.
The atmosphere here was joyful, the speeches powerful, the mood hopeful. I addressed the demonstrators and in my remarks, I assured them that the majority of Canadians want a safe energy future and support policies that promote climate justice. I told them about the damage done to the water of Northern Alberta -- damage that will come to Texas and the Great Lakes and other sites in the U.S. as these pipelines spread across their country and ours like a toxic board game of snakes and ladders. I told them about the harm done to the First Nations communities that live downstream from the tar sands. I told them what might happen if there are spills along the route as we have already seen 14 serious spills in the first phase of the project.
I return home now filled with hope. And not just about the possibility of winning this fight. I am filled with hope at the number and diversity of people I met and continue to meet around the world and the coalitions and networks we are building. There may be many differences among us, but we know that the current model of unfettered market growth is killing the planet and crating class warfare unlike anything we have seen in modern times. I am hopeful because I see an articulation of an alternative as we struggle to find a better way of living with one another in harmony and stepping more lightly on this fragile planet that give us life.
Thousands gather outside White House to protest planned oil pipeline
10000 pipeline protesters circle White House
U.S. should secure Keystone Pipeline
Democratic lawmakers pressure Obama administration on both sides of Keystone ...
We need to replace all coal plants with nuclear power and develop technology to synthesize fuels from air, water and nuclear energy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/science/19carb.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/science/19carb.html
TAPS is indeed held in highest regard by the oil industry. In addition to winning API’s “Distinguished Environment and Safety” award for the fifth consecutive year in 2008, TAPS won an API award “reserved for pipeline operators that demonstrate excellence in safety, environment and integrity.” Given the distinction it has achieved, let us hope TAPS significantly outperformed Alaska’s statewide averages in both spill count and spill volume in recent years. During the decade from 1995 to 2005, Alaska documented 732 pipeline spills totaling more than 506,000 gallons over 1,100 miles of crude oil transmission pipe. Including the 800 miles that run from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez but excluding the TAPS bullet hole spill, these pipelines on average leaked ~0.48 barrels per mile per year.
All the land is being reclaimed.
After the oil is cleaned out of it...
Also to the The Council of Canadians: Please STOP saying you speak for all 33 million of us. You do not I wonder why the Conservatives have a majority government in Canada
After he approves it, there will only be one option let to stop it.
Unfortunately, Maude's crew, and in fact most people, are loathe to explore that option.
The political tactic of inflating numbers at a rally/protest is pretty universal, certainly not unique to any given faction.
Environmental issues aside, what's wrong with Canadian resources being refined by Canadian labor?
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/21/keystone-pipeline-hollow-alberta-refining_n_973936.html
www.bit.ly/ksWnN8
Green jobs is a misnomer at any rate.
Jobs that are created by investing in alternative fuels such as wind, solar and geo thermal will definitely create many jobs. The problem is trying to foil the oil industry and get that first foot down on the ground.
The Keystone XL pipeline oil is headed for the Gulf of Mexico to be sold on the world market. It was never intended that the USA would be the intended market for the oil. Because it will feed an increased demand for oil (China) it will likey raise the price of oil for all markets, the US included.