A national conversation on housing is underway. This is, in part, thanks to the federal Bill C-400 calling for a national housing strategy, which was debated at second reading in the House of Commons last week. Canada currently has no such strategy and no coherent plan to address homelessness, leaving thousands of people housing insecure or homeless. Homelessness in a wealthy nation like Canada is not only unreasonable, but hard to fathom considering that cost-effective solutions are within reach.
A home is not a partisan issue. It is a basic human need, and a fundamental right. International treaties that Canada has ratified, such as those protecting the rights of persons with disabilities and children, state that all people have a right to adequate housing -- regardless of age, ethnicity, or political affiliation. Housing goes far beyond politics, it is a human right.
Some suggest that current federal and provincial housing programs are sufficient, but that response does not address the persistence of homelessness and housing insecurity facing almost 400,000 people in Canada. Canada has an incessant housing problem that will only be addressed through targeted pro-active measures across the country.
BLOG CONTINUES AFTER SLIDESHOW
The government's own calculations estimate that $1 spent on housing equals $1.40 benefit to the economy. Recent costs of homelessness are pegged at $4.5 billion annually -- a figure that includes the direct costs of emergency services (such as shelters), and indirect costs such as the related strain on the health care and criminal justice systems. It is estimated that it costs approximately $100,000 in services and programs for every homeless person. It would cost considerably less to house these same individuals and provide them with the services they need.
All levels of government are spending to cope with a situation that would be cheaper to address head-on.
Strategies with targets and timelines have proved successful. Consider the At Home/Chez Soi project which saw $110 million investment from the federal government. The project took a "housing first" approach, which recognizes that homeless individuals need housing before their other social needs can be addressed. Adequate housing offers consistency that lays the foundation for a more stable life. Focusing specifically on persons with psycho-social disabilities who are homeless, participants in the program were housed 73 per cent of the time, versus 30 per cent for individuals not given shelter. This lead to substantial cost savings, "for every dollar that is spent on Housing First for these participants, $1.54 is saved through the reduction in other shelter, health and justice services."
Alberta is another success story. In 2009 a provincial plan to end homelessness established a road map for how homelessness will be substantially improved and addressed by 2018. The Alberta plan brings together a number of stakeholders, recognizing that addressing homelessness is a community effort. So far, the project has housed over 5,900 people, stabilized families, and led to dramatic savings in both the health care and justice costs.
Having a coordinated plan works, but it requires all stakeholders and levels of government. The federal government agrees. In May, 2012, federal MP Réjean Genest put forward a motion on housing and homelessness that received unanimous support from the House of Commons. The motion stated that the federal government should, "(a) keep with Canada's obligation to respect, protect and fulfil the right to housing under the UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; (b) support efforts by Canadian municipalities to combat homelessness; and (c) adopt measures to expand the stock of affordable rental housing, with a view to providing economic benefits to local housing construction businesses."
Homelessness and inadequate housing is a solvable problem for a rich democracy like Canada. Putting in motion a framework for a national plan would allow Canada to uphold its human rights obligations and is a sound first step. Federal leadership is the only way to have a coordinated strategy across the country that ensures all the necessary stakeholders are at the table.
Follow Megan Yarema on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@CWP_CSP
Just shows how democracy is deteriorating from decade to decade as the huge multinational corporations have taken power away from governments and governments have taken power away from the people.
this is what Franklin wrote of the meaning of the proverbial rhyme (in his famous Poor Richard's Almanac):
And again, he adviseth to circumspection and care, even in the smallest matters, because sometimes a little neglect may breed great mischief; adding, for want of a nail the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost, and for want of a horse the rider was lost, being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for want of care about a horse-shoe nail.
No human right is too sacred to politicize and economize; no cost in treasure and human lives is spared to create economic terrorism in the entire workforce.
These days God, country, church, family and police are not sufficient social controls on the work force. Now a deliberately created housing crisis and homelessness act as deterrents against folks who might want to change jobs, quit their minimum wage jobs, or demand decent wages.
Housing insecurity is endemic. Millions of Canadians are only one or two paychecks away from homelessness. For an egregious economy run on fear and greed, that's worth billions in deterrence.
We certainly need to get every citizen into a shelter & off the streets. Low rental & geared to income units are the route to go.
There also needs to be strong & enforceable conditions, without which all we do is create dependencies. We have enough citizens across the country who have become 100% dependant on government to support & provide for them. That dependency aspect must be removed since it only perpetuates the problem to the point we are breading new generations of Canadian's fully dependant on government.
There will always be some on full government support, such as those with debilitating mental health issues & physical disabilities. For the majority the focus needs to turn to getting them off government support mechanisms. Those that are capable need to be forced into education & then jobs to get them off the system of dependency.
I have no problem with helping people in need, but there must be conditions placed on that help.
_____________________
How much "force" is appropriate and what kind of "force". They did that in Communist China.
The powers that be consider the lives of the homeless and the costs of providing their social services as a very cost effective scare tactic to frighten the entire workforce into obedient submission to low wages.
The way decent democratic folks fight back is to demand more affordable housing, adequate welfare rates, higher corporate taxes so that governments can provide subsidized housing, rent controls that make it illegal for landlords to raise rents during a recession and when the unemployment rates go above 6%, and remind governments that adequate housing was declared a human right by the UN in 1949.
As it is, subsidized housing programs are a punishment, taking 5 to 10 years of soaring rents and cost of living to be accomodated in some little place.
This punitive system, along with the punitive employment search system, is deliberate policy. Only the people can demand a better system that serves people, not vice versa.
After all, most Canadians are only one or two paychecks away from homelessness.
They either get an education so they can enter the workforce or assistance is cut off.