Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Michael D. Nicula

GET UPDATES FROM Michael D. Nicula
 

We're Lucky Harper Wasn't in Charge When the Iraq War Began

Posted: 03/21/2013 7:48 am

The 10 year anniversary of "the war of our generation" has brought back from the shadows the actors of the momentous events of 2003 that dominated the world's political scene. Many of these individuals -- George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, Hans Blix, Saddam Hussein as well as Jean Chretien -- have since made their 'Mea Culpa' to a certain degree. Even our current Prime Minister, has admitted publicly that he was wrong in 2003 when he supported the idea of our military joining the USA into war, and has further confessed that this was not his only big mistake. Despite these public blunders, Stephen Harper's political career has continued largely unfettered by any political consequences. Defying reason, in the last 10 years while the war went on serving as a reminder of Mr. Harper's colossal mistake, he was elected twice!

'Errare humanum est' (To err is human) says an old quote by Seneca. We all make mistakes, every day. Our society has defined clear responsibilities and consequences of our behaviour in order to function; we are subject to fines and penalties of all sorts every time we make mistakes or omissions. We invented the business of insurance to protect ourselves from the consequences of our own mistakes, and we pay for this protection. At the same time, we let the small mistakes slide; "oops, sorry" is enough apology when you fail to hold the door for a second when a stranger approaches, or "I should have listened to you" is enough apology when you leave your young son's raincoat at home despite your spouse telling you otherwise. But if you fail to pay for parking, the city will slap you with a fine, and the consequences grow bigger from there. Harper's costly 'get tough on crime' bills (61 of them, to be exact), and the resultant stresses on our overburdened criminal justice system, would suggest that we are all in favour of holding people accountable for their behaviours.

BLOG CONTINUES AFTER SLIDESHOW


Politicians have a merciless job: they must always take the right position on key issues, even when they are not in charge (and with the knowledge that certain decisions carry with them colossal consequences if or when they do become the person in charge). There should be no room for error when enormous sums of money and the lives of many people are regularly at stake. We would not entrust a commercial pilot license to someone who fails a flight simulator test on more than one occasion; in fact, he or she may be banned from flying a plane for life. Yet we as a nation have handed the Prime Minister job to a man who, if in charge at the time, would have taken the country to war in Iraq! To err is human, yes, but to entrust an individual with vast decision-making power, in the absence of attending consequences for such decisions, is just dangerous.

While as society we are good at policing those politicians who make small mistakes, we fail to hold to account those who commit the big mistakes, especially when the victim is the society as a whole. When a Canadian senator was charged with assault and sexual assault, he was suspended. When a Canadian MP requested reimbursement for a $16 orange juice, the public outrage forced her out of office prompting a costly by-election (on our dime, might I add). But miscalculating the actual cost of the multi-billion dollar fighter jet program was resolved with a mumbled admission, and not even an apology.

Mr. Harper's decision to take Canada to war in 2003 would have cost the nation hundreds of billions of dollars plus hundreds of military deaths. Luckily for Canada, he was not our Prime Minister at the time. Are we comfortable with the fact that the only reason we did not endure the financial and social consequences of war was sheer happenstance? Apparently so, since we as a nation then took the risk to put him in charge. I just hope that he will not make yet another colossal mistake while in power. As we were once lucky that Chretien was our Prime Minister instead of Harper in 2003, we may now be lucky that Obama is the U.S. President instead of McCain, Palin or Romney.

 

Follow Michael D. Nicula on Twitter: www.twitter.com/onlinepartyca

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gustav Hotch
Don't worry...be happy !
04:28 PM on 03/21/2013
But its just as bad now, because Harper wants to buy the F-35 for $ 45 Billions,that more than we would have paid if he had been in charge .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
10:53 AM on 03/22/2013
How can he spend 45billion for the F-35 within the 2013 budget? Has that expenditure been included? I did not hear anything on budget day about military procurement issues. Nothing more about the dysfunctional, second hand "O" Class Submarines, nothing about the Sea King helicopter replacement, nothing about the resupply replacement ships, nothing about the F-18 replacement, nothing about the Buffalo medium patrol aircraft replacement, nothing about the armoured vechicle replacement. Was the budget silent on these matters or was the combined corps press asleep at the switch and failed to tell Canadians what the Conservatives have proposed on all these files? The press did report on DOD cuts and maintenence of existing personnel. I suppose with the name Royal on their name plates the military do not need equipment to do their jobs. I supose the DOD HarperJet will be decked out in Harper livery.I suppose that now that there are no more Afghan fatalities coming home, Harper very generously doubles the grant for funeral expenses of military personnel. Sort of like the Veterans Affairs Department gave the WW2 Merchant Marine sailors veterans benefits after most of them had died of old age or war related injuries. Nice window dressing, eh?
photo
Turdinthepunchbowl
Just say no, to the opiate of the masses.
12:28 PM on 03/21/2013
Harper was wrong for Canada then, and he continues to be wrong for Canada now. His judgment is simply not to be trusted.
photo
GrantS
I'm liberal through and through.
11:31 AM on 03/21/2013
Harper would have rushed to war. He is not wise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greysells2
grey cells matter
10:57 AM on 03/22/2013
Harper is a political tactician. He rushes at anything he thinks will give himself an immediate political advantage over his enemies. He is all about Harper and winning. He is not about Canadians.
10:04 AM on 03/21/2013
I am an absolute Conservative and Harper supporter and I also remember the decision not to join the US in the Iraq war initially villified Canadians south of the border....in the backwards states like Tennessee businesses put up signs telling Canadians they were not welcome but.....that decision was something that all Canadians today should be proud of, and Chretien deserves props for taking the proper stance....Yeah Harper goofed on that one but he wasn't alone......everyone makes mistakes.
photo
GrantS
I'm liberal through and through.
11:36 AM on 03/21/2013
Harper makes many mistakes. But does win power I suppose. Seems like a bad combination to me.
01:27 PM on 03/21/2013
There are mistakes and then there are MISTAKES...
08:05 AM on 03/22/2013
yeah, big mistakes like letting the fiberals ruin ontario's economy
09:48 AM on 03/21/2013
We were lucky. But this is now and we have Harper and that is like torture which keeps getting worse. It is medieval.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
09:00 AM on 03/21/2013
Yeah! We had Chretien instead. He loves pepper spray. He loved using it on Canadian citizens. Would sure put a stop to suicide bombers. By the way, listened to a tape of Hillary Clinton justifying going to war with Iraq when she was but a humble senator. She defended her decision for going to that war because of chemical weapons and nuclear build up. How soon we rewrite history.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502443_162-3996704-502443.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
11:10 AM on 03/21/2013
Why are you changing the subject? No has ever stated that Chretien was perfect. But Harper wanted to join the Iraq war. Does that mean anything to you? Or are you just a Harper Fanboy?
photo
GrantS
I'm liberal through and through.
12:03 PM on 03/21/2013
I'll take the pepper spray in the face myself if it means keeping out of the stupid war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Maria Korovessis Sewell
To decimate is to reduce by one tenth.
08:36 AM on 03/21/2013
Seconded.