One of the great myths perpetuated by the media is that Israel stands alone, isolated in the international arena, or as the Hamilton Spectator put it in an article published on Israel's Independence Day, "At 64, Israel celebrates, but with fewer friends than before."
According to this narrative, Israel's supposed pariah-like status is the resultant effect of the Jewish state's disinterest in achieving peace with its Palestinian neighbours. Of course, only the inverse is true. As evinced by the 1993 Oslo Accords or other Israeli proposals in 2000 and 2008, Israel has consistently displayed its genuine interest in resolving the outstanding conflict.
Israel's repeated peace overtures have met almost all Palestinian demands for state sovereignty in areas Israel won in the 1967 war, including the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem and close to 98 per cent of the West Bank.
In Facebook terms, Israel's "friend requests" have been ceremoniously rejected by Palestinian Arab leaders since time immemorial, because doing so meant accepting final status agreements, ending the conflict, renouncing future claims and importantly, acknowledging the existence of the Jewish state.
Friendship does have its benefits. Israel's 1979 treaty with Egypt saw it relinquish the Sinai, giving up close to $100 billion in oil reserves. And Israel's 1994 peace accord with Jordan still allows for the transfer of 50 million cubic metres of water on an annual basis.
Israel is situated in a very dangerous neighbourhood and it certainly wouldn't win a popularity contest in the region. Bordered by some nations that don't recognize its existence, Israel is surrounded by enemies who want to wipe it from the map.
Notwithstanding, Israel is well "liked" and it enjoys the support, respect, and admiration of those who share its interests and values. In sharp contrast, isolation is a term more apt for countries like Syria which has massacred over 10,000 of its own people, or Iran, whose atrocious human rights record and destructive pursuit of nuclear weapons has resulted in the country being an outcast in the international community.
According to Israel's Ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, Israel has "excellent relations with the nations of Eastern Europe as well as Greece, India and China; and an unbreakable alliance with America. Many democracies, including Canada, Italy and the Czech Republic stand staunchly with us. Israel has more legations abroad than ever before and recently joined the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which comprises the most globally integrated countries."
On the YnetNews website, Israeli intelligence analyst Nimrod Asulin described Israel's "peripheral policy" of engagement where, "Israel and Cyprus have capitalized on their blooming relations with enhanced economic and security cooperation with regard to recently discovered natural gas reserves in the eastern Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Israel continues to maintain productive ties with Romania and other Balkan countries evident in recent joint-military aerial drills."
According to Asulin,
"Israel is expanding further still by forging relationships in Africa. Since 2011, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other high ranking Israeli officials have been meeting with their counterparts from predominately Christian African nations, including Angola, Burundi, Kenya, Nigeria, South Sudan and Uganda, among others... As tensions have soared between Israel and Iran over the last few months, another stage of Israel's strategy has surfaced -- strengthening ties with Georgia and Azerbaijan."
Israel recently won adulation from the Prime Minister of Albania who proclaimed that the two countries are a "model of co-existence and mutual respect."
Israel also recently secured membership in the executive committee of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) where its members cited Israel's technological and agricultural know-how as just two reasons warranting its inclusion in this UN body. Israel also joined UN Women last year, a UN entity for gender equality and empowerment of women.
On the domestic front here in Canada, members of our municipal, provincial, and federal political parties have proudly declared that they are Israel's B.F.F. (best friends forever).
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has led the way with his stalwart defence of the Jewish state, while our Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird has proudly stated that Canada is Israel's best friend.
Meanwhile, the leader of the official opposition, the NDP's Thomas Mulcair, has been outspoken in his support for Israel, along with Liberal Party leader Bob Rae. When Prime Minister Netanyahu was in Ottawa a couple months ago, Canada's political establishment warmly embraced the Israeli leader who subsequently noted how impressed he was with the sense of kinship between both countries.
Indeed, much of the same is expected next week when Israeli President Shimon Peres arrives here in Canada.
It must be noted that celebrating Israel's Independence doesn't equal a negation or rejection of other communities, nor is it an appropriate time to conjure up an image of conflict or to falsely claim that Israel is being "unfriended."
As Netanyahu proclaimed in a speech marking Yom Ha'atzMaut (Israel's Independence Day), Israel is
"unique in having such passionate friends, Jews and non-Jews alike, for whom the well-being, security, and future of our country is so important. This passionate support, along with Israel's strong army, free economy and dynamic society is the pillar of our national strength and this Independence Day, I want to thank the tens of millions of friends of Israel throughout the world for their unwavering support for the one and only Jewish state."
Had the Spectator's coverage captured the essence in Netanyahu's words and/or focused on the historic revelry where tens of thousands of Canadians celebrated in cities like Hamilton, Montreal, and Toronto to mark Israel's 64th anniversary, the headline might have blared: "At 64, Israel celebrates, and is more popular than ever."
Follow Mike Fegelman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/HonestRepCanada
I have another one proving that Moses was first with ADD - but thats another time - its now 2pm on the Northern Border (and its peaceful for those it may concern) (or be concerned)
Also about the passport thing. All countries do the same not just Israel.
Also 'International Law' is not even enforceable the reason NO country would ever agree to it being enforce in the first place since it would violate their sovereignty. If this was the case then Northern Cyprus, Turkey would have moved it settler population out of there years ago but they do not and the far left does not even care
Also Hamas in Gaza would be charged for knowing targeting Civilians with their rocket fire at cities and towns. For some reason even the Palestinian leadership would not even want International law enforced since they would also be targets for the ICC
http://bit.ly/ydWr4n
http://bundlr.com/b/the-palestine-papers
And in addition to the overwhelming evidence in these papers, the video released of Bibi's own admission to sabotaging Oslo accords:
Netanyahu also bragged how he undercut the peace process when he was prime minister during the Clinton administration. "They asked me before the election if I'd honor [the Oslo accords]," he said. "I said I would, but ... I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders. How did we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone. Go argue."
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/tricky-bibi-1.302053
http://wapo.st/c5NzJh
http://youtu.be/JaIQHWfj5f4 (english transcript in description)
http://youtu.be/eeT_KLuCdug (english captions)
"The executive director of HonestReporting Canada is Mike Fegelman and Assistant Director is Paul Agoston. Prominent Canadian Conservative Member of Parliament and Cabinet Minister Peter Kent has served on the board of Honest Reporting Canada. [13]
[edit]"
Enough said, eh?
"He [Peter Kent] was a member of the board of ParticipACTION, the Ontario Cabinet of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights, Honest Reporting Canada"
http://www.ec.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=B6832638-1
But this is your standard response (I've been on the receiving end too!) whenever anything is quoted from wikipedia. Stop posting a useless reply and check the info. If it's no verifiable, fine, post about it but otherwise this kind of reply is not helpful to anyone and it makes you seem pretty dishonest.
As the Palestinians have not been granted statehood, to refer to the Palestinian territories or the Palestinian Authority as "Palestine" is essentially erroneous. Headline writers at the Post have the responsibility to state the facts as neutrally as possible."
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/HonestReporting
http://pediaview.com/openpedia/Honest_Reporting#Honest_Reporting_Canada
Nice. Sorry Mr Fegelman - your own bias does not leave you with any credibility.
As does your association with propaganda organizations.
http://www.hasbarafellowships.org/resources/recommended-speakers
Truly shameful.
http://www.pppl.org/response.html
http://www.rrj.ca/m3502/
http://www.tadamon.ca/post/9941
http://www.thestar.com/opinion/letters/article/992897--battle-over-words-a-distraction
I believe the option you've chosen is "points scoring"? (Much like "Charles the Great")
http://www.scribd.com/doc/53789685/Hasbara-Handbook-Promoting-Israel-on-Campus
The fact is Israel's relations with its neighbors have somewhat worsened - thanks to greater democracy in Turkey and Egypt (whose populations are less supportive of Israel than the military elites), the Turkish flotilla raid, the invasion of Lebanon, etc. That should be cause for concern. Of course it doesn't really matter what Canada does in the grand scheme of things - only the US matters, and the US will continue to allow Israel to impose its will and the status quo for the forseeable future.
My Merets ( very left wing )party would have done no different and neither would have your country.
The fact that its been put into the propaganda machine has smashed the machine to bits - in my opinion
In reality advocates of human rights are on the front lines in many parts of the globe. To assume that only Israel is cast as a villain is rather self-indulgent. However, nothing is as self-indulgent as your propaganda writing Mr. Fegelman. While the state of Israel should proudly recognize their achievements, and there are many - they should also ask way are they hated in the middle east - why are they the only democracy in the Middle East? I can offer a clue: it’s not because they are Jewish. It’s because of the occupation, and their quest for an ethnically pure nation.
Exactly, an "ethnically pure JEWISH nation." The Palestinians, for example, are trying to build an ethnically pure ARAB nation, and no one has a problem with that.
And Israel isn't trying to build an ethnically pure anything.
Thanks for your reply. It is true that most Arab states lack the multicultural flare of most western nations which often takes away from their credibility. However, having said that from the very beginning of the creation of Israel, only those few 64 years ago, Israel has made it clear that they wish to maintain a Jewish identity. Not that there is anything wrong with that. It simply becomes confrontational since there was a large Arab population within its newly created borders. To tell the story that Jews were always there, and ignore the fact that Israel, as we know it today was created not the old fashion way but by design, denies the reality of the conflict. It can be compare to creating a new country for North American's Frist Nations Peoples on the Island of Manhattan today, and refusing to recognize that there is a non-aboriginal presence there now. I believe, Israel should and has a right to exist - but for it to ignore the special compromises that must be made places its own safety in serious conflicts.
I don't see the word "only" in his quote.
And the fact that 99% of the UN's "Human Rights" council's resolutions are against Israel is not an indication of bias. The UN general assembly has passed 65 resolutions condemning Israel and none for Palestinian terrorism. Does any other country have a permanent UN investigator whose only job is demonize it?
Did the Israeli incursion into Gaza in response to 8000 rockets fired at its civilians get more or less press coverage than the displacement of 300,000 and murder of 22,000 Tamils by the Sri Lankan government during the same time period? Were Amnesty International members all over television condemning Sri Lanka?
I am so using that line. Love it!!!