Ontario could save money, increase public safety and create jobs if it closes the Pickering Nuclear Station when its operating licence expires on Aug. 31, 2018. Yet, the Liberal government has approved plans to extend Pickering's operating life to 2024.
Pickering is already 15 years past its best before date. It's the fourth oldest nuclear station in North America and the seventh oldest nuclear station in the world. Given its age, it is not surprising that Pickering is one of the most unreliable and poorest performing nuclear plants in North America. Or that is has the highest operating costs of any nuclear station in North America.
Best before dates are important -- not only for the milk you drink but also for the nuclear plant you live by. Pickering is surrounded by over 2.2 million people who live within the 30-kilometre high-risk zone. The Liberals are rolling the dice on a nuclear station that is surrounded by more people than any nuclear plant in North America.
While it is possible to eat food past its best before date -- my kids complain about my inability to waste dated food -- it might not be such a great idea to gamble with the best before date of one of the largest nuclear stations in the world. This doesn't pass the sniff test.
While Kathleen Wynne chooses to gamble on Pickering, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is calling for the closure of Indian Point nuclear station north of New York City. It's Number 2 on the nuclear population list. Governor Cuomo is putting safety first.
The Liberals argue that extending Pickering beyond its best before date is necessary to keep the lights on. Although I support utilizing nuclear facilities until their end of life date, the Liberal argument for Pickering simply doesn't add up.
The Liberals seem more interested in making the nuclear lobby happy than in making smart energy choices for the people of Ontario.
Ontario is currently selling excess electricity at a loss. Ontario's total electricity exports (22.6 billion kWh) exceeded the total output of the Pickering Nuclear Station (22.6 billion kWh) in 2015. Ontario's peak hour demand for electricity has declined by 17 per cent in the past decade.
Even if electricity demand goes up because of the Ontario's efforts to electrify the transportation system, Ontario can purchase electricity from other sources at a lower cost.
We live next door to the world's fourth largest producer of water power -- Quebec. Quebec has a large and growing supply of water power available for export. On average, Quebec water power sells at one third the price of power from Pickering. Why not use this low cost source of clean power to meet possible increases in demand and to cover gaps from the anticipated temporary shut down of the Darlington Nuclear Station?
Ontario can also do more to stretch our energy dollars by investing in energy efficiency measures. The cheapest source of energy is the energy we save. According to the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), large industrial energy efficiency programs save electricity at an average cost of 1.5 cents per kWh. Residential, commercial and small industrial energy efficiency programs save electricity at an average cost of 3.5 cents per kWh -- far below OPG's estimate cost of power from Pickering of around nine cents per kWh.
The Liberals seem more interested in making the nuclear lobby happy than in making smart energy choices for the people of Ontario. And while I understand why the nuclear lobby would fight to protect jobs at Pickering, I believe the Liberal government has a responsibility to make energy decisions that benefit all the people of Ontario even if it means cancelling their $100,000 dinners with the premier.
Moreover, what if we could convert operating jobs at Pickering into jobs decommissioning Pickering--making the area safer for residents while establishing Ontario's expertise in the decommissioning of nuclear plants. Doing this would create 16,000 person years of employment according to a study by Torrie Smith Associates. This could establish Ontario's global expertise in decommissioning nuclear plants. With a number of nuclear plants around the world reaching their best before dates, Ontario nuclear workers could benefit from becoming the global experts in shutting down nuclear plants.
The Liberals have a choice to make -- give the nuclear lobby what it wants or provide the people of Ontario with an affordable, clean electricity supply; a supply that doesn't include an old and aging Pickering Nuclear Station that is well past its best before date.
Follow HuffPost Canada Blogs on Facebook
MORE ON HUFFPOST:
Highlight of 2015 - “Alberta is going to move away from coal and towards clean power,” said Premier Rachael Notley at the announcement of Alberta's Climate Leadership Plan in November. Photo Dave Cournoyer daveberta.ca
Highlight of 2015 - Catherine McKenna, Canada's new Minister of Environment and Climate Change has pledged to invest in green energy research and green infrastructure and completely changed Canada's posture from antagonist to leadership at the Paris climate talks in December. Source: National Observer/McKenna’s website
Highlight of 2015 - Saskatchewan Premier Brad surprised many when he committed his province to getting 50 per cent of its electricity from renewable energy, primarily wind power by 2030 before the Paris climate talks. This is the Cowessess Enercon wind turbine near Regina, Saskatchewan. Photo David Dodge, greenenergyfutures.ca
The Cowessess First Nation partnered with the Saskatchewan Research Council to build a wind/energy storage project east of Regina, Saskatchewan. The results show combining batteries with wind power can smooth out energy delivery significantly. Photo David Dodge, greenenergyfutures.ca
The Cowessess Wind Energy Storage Project used Saft’s Intensium® Max, a ready-to-install containerized lithium ion battery solution system at the megawatt scale in their research on energy storage with the Saskatchewan Research Council. As energy storage comes down in price it will revolutionize how we produce and use energy. Photo David Dodge, greenenergyfutures.ca
Ryan Jansen of the Saskatchewan Research Council research shows batteries can increase a wind turbine's capacity factor significantly, allowing grid operators to incorporate more wind turbines. Photo David Dodge, greenenergyfutures.ca
Highlight of 2015 - Edmonton's mayor Don Iveson installs a solar module. In 2015 Edmonton unanimously passed it's Energy Transition Strategy that seeks to reduce emissions by 35%, reduce individual energy use by 25% and get 10% of our electricity from local renewable energy sources by 2035. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Highlight of 2015 - To heat its planned green community called Blatchford, Edmonton is looking at using district geo-exchange heating and heat exchange in the sewage system, just like they do at the False Creek Energy Centre perched under the Cambie Bridge in Vancouver. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Exhaust stacks in the shape of a hand at the False Creek Energy Centre district heating facility in Vancouver. Heat exchangers take heat out of the Vancouver sewer system to heat a dozen buildings in the False Creek area. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Highlight of 2015 - Mayor Gregor Robertson of Vancouver announced his city wants to be powered by 100% renewable energy by 2050. The announcement is part of a growing movement around the world. Photo David Dodge, GreenEnergyFutures.ca
Follow Mike Schreiner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MikeSchreiner