THE CANADIAN PRESS
Steve Russell via Getty Images
Reviewing a pipeline's impact on demand for oil will be a first for Canada.
Lester Lefkowitz via Getty Images
I have now realized that most economists operate under a very different concept of the nature of atmospheric carbon then ecologists like myself. Their paradigm turns any and all carbon into a market commodity to be manipulated by price and economic tools. They don't share the ecologist's concern that such a simplistic model can lead to truly dangerous and perverse public policy.
Carbon emissions from power generation are down 40 per cent.
Laguna Design via Getty Images
Vancouver is close behind.
When people think about innovations that could help reduce greenhouse gases and avoid what they imagine will be catastrophic climate change in a few decades, they usually think about things like solar power, wind power, and electric cars. But the future of reducing emissions isn't just from renewable energy, but better use of oil energy as well.
There is a lot to consider as we approach October's federal election. But most of all, we're frightened about the potential devastation of the Earth itself. This federal election is especially important because Canada's next Prime Minister will represent us at the 21st UN Framework on Climate Change Conference of Parties (COP21) in Paris at the end of this year -- barely one month after our new government is chosen.
Gregor Schuster via Getty Images
OTTAWA - Opposition critics and energy experts are questioning Prime Minister Stephen Harper's contention that Canada can't move to curb greenhouse gas emissions from the oil and gas sector without Am...
Bloomberg via Getty Images
There's no doubt that electric cars are hot. From the beginning of 2012 to the beginning of 2014, the number of them on the road around the world quadrupled from 100,000 to 400,000. When you look at the numbers, though, it turns out that subsidizing electric cars is an extremely inefficient way of curbing GHGs. In other words, it costs a lot to reduce a little.
Flickr: That Angela
What does this mean for Canada? First and foremost, it means a reinvigorated green crusade for renewables, which can only harm Canada's economy, as we showed when Ontario took this path. In addition, the green movement will likely use this agreement to push for other harmful policies such as a national carbon tax. The U.S.-China agreement will also reinvigorate green opposition to Canadian fossil-fuel production of all sorts: the no coal, no gas, and especially the no oil sands people will be using the new announcement as a cudgel with which to demonize anyone who opposes them.
EDMONTON - A controversial coal-fired power plant in Alberta has received final approval without a requirement to lower its greenhouse gas emissions.Others in the province operate under such restricti...