Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Norman Spector

GET UPDATES FROM Norman Spector

For Stephen Harper, it's Not All Smooth Sailing

Posted: 10/01/11 12:30 PM ET

Monday, on the front page of The Hill Times--the weekly newspaper of Parliament Hill -- one read this headline:

"PM could be ensconced in power until 2020, say experts"

The 'expert' turned out to be a political columnist.

And, frankly, the scenario appeared far-fetched -- even to someone like myself who wrote in 2000 that Stephen Harper could one day be prime minister of Canada!

This is not to say that Mr. Harper is not in a strong position -- having brought his united party to a majority in the House of Commons and relegated the Liberals to third party status.

Yet, as has often been observed, a week is a long time in politics...

For one thing, Mr. Harper faces visceral media criticism. That said, measures disliked on the whole by journalists -- abolition of the long-form census for example -- tend to solidify his political base and clearly did not cost him his job in the last election.

Today the government's crime legislation is a matter of some controversy in Ottawa. The reality, however, is that many Canadians feel in their gut that punishment should fit the crime.

Nor do I think criticism of the Conservatives' Middle East policy will matter more in the next election than in the last.

True, that policy is lambasted by former diplomats who continue to press for Canada to side with the Palestinians.

However, Canadians shrugged off our loss of a seat on the UN Security Council -- a matter of deep concern to these former diplomats.

True, Mr. Harper was criticized in the media after the Deauville G8 summit for insisting that the communiqué not refer only to one element of President Obama's speech on the Middle East; viz., the 1967 borders. Rather, according to a report in Le Monde, Mr. Harper insisted that any such language be accompanied by a reference to Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people. Tellingly, that position was adopted last week by the international Quartet in their bid to re-start Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.

Mr Harper was careful at the Deauville G8 not to allow any breach to develop between himself and President Obama, continuing his exemplary handling of Canada-U.S. relations.

Wisely, he's refused to be drawn into U.S. domestic politics, even when pressed -- as in the debate over the president's health care law.

His handling of the Keystone pipeline has been astute -- explaining to Americans through U.S. media that it's in their interest to build the pipeline while reassuring them that Canada will never use the resource politically or as a strategic asset.

At the same time he's made it clear that Alberta's oil sands will be developed one way or another, with its product shipped to Asia if not to the U.S.

Right now, the biggest threat on Mr. Harper's horizon is the state of the economy.

In this regard, it's worth observing that his success at the polls in 2015 depends more on decisions at the upcoming G20 in Cannes than by what was spent on hosting the summits in Canada last year.

In part, Mr. Harper owes his re-election to those summits, which brought home to Canadians the international scale of the problem. But the global economy could get a lot worse between now and the next election and there's no assurance that Canada will be spared, even relatively.

Much will depend on whom the Liberals and NDP choose as their next leaders -- and, in particular, their economic credibility.

But even if everything goes right for one or both of the opposition parties, they still could split the vote again in the next election as they did in the last.

In Quebec, the routing of the Bloc Quebecois and uncertainty about whether the NDP can consolidate its hold, particularly after the passing of Jack Layton, creates an opening for Mr. Harper. As to claims that he's written off Quebec, there's no doubt that the province's political weight in the federation has declined. However, politics will always be a game of addition not subtraction, and no leader of a competitive party would ever write off a province as populous as Quebec.

 

Follow Norman Spector on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@nspector4

Monday, on the front page of The Hill Times--the weekly newspaper of Parliament Hill -- one read this headline: "PM could be ensconced in power until 2020, say experts" The 'expert' turned out to b...
Monday, on the front page of The Hill Times--the weekly newspaper of Parliament Hill -- one read this headline: "PM could be ensconced in power until 2020, say experts" The 'expert' turned out to b...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Skepticat
Supporting skeptical felines everywhere
09:08 PM on 10/02/2011
The chief of staff to a former not well like pm may not be able to provide a very objective view of how his party is perceived by outsiders.
02:58 PM on 10/02/2011
" But the global economy could get a lot worse between now and the next election and there's no assurance that Canada will be spared, even relatively. "

This should read, ...the global economy WILL get a lot worse ... .

There is no way to avoid a default by Greece and that could very easily be followed with defaults by Italy, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, and (if they don't soon get their act together) the US.
yer
Stop the Alberta Taliban
12:49 PM on 10/02/2011
there was a vote split. The "majority" didn't vote for him but he won because of the split. This cannot continue. The centre-left need to unite if there is any chance of Canadians being respected. Unfortunately the centre-left parties are too busy digging in. That will be the only metric by which Harper wins or loses. All the other blather doesn't matter.
10:04 AM on 10/02/2011
Spector's "analysis" is laughable. None of the issues he mentioned were important in Harper's majority win and none, with the exception of the economy, will matter in the next election. Harper won by doing two things very well: spending large sums of money discrediting his opponents, and pitching fear to carefully identified groups of gullible voters. It worked and it will keep on working. Our political system was founded at a time when a minimal amount of honour was assumed from all participants. Harper is the first of Canada's leaders to completely jettison this quaint notion. "The end justifies the means" is the only bedrock principle he's shown in his rise to power. The next few years should be quite interesting.
11:15 AM on 10/02/2011
Exactly my argument.

BTW, for anyone interested in the French version of the column, here's a link to it in Le Devoir's Thursday edition

http://www.ledevoir.com/politique/canada/332446/quel-avenir-pour-m-harper
07:35 PM on 10/02/2011
Very funny! Your column is a nasty little piece of partisan slight of hand and you know it. You say the media, on the whole, disagreed with the long form census abolition, and neglect to mention that virtually every expert from every organization with an interest in the data was against it too.

On the tough on crime stance, you state "Today the government's crime legislation is a matter of some controversy in Ottawa. The reality, however, is that many Canadians feel in their gut that punishment should fit the crime." Come on Norman, you know big chunks of the bill are completely unsupportable by evidence, will cost vast sums of taxpayer money and are being passed as the antidote to the fear Harper sells through his focus-grouped political machine.

Best of all, this gem - "True, that (Conservatives' middle east) policy is lambasted by former diplomats who continue to press for Canada to side with the Palestinians. You're a smart guy Norman, so you know full well that what you wrote is intellectually dishonest. To characterize a balanced, nuanced approach to the middle east as siding with the Palestinians is beneath you as a person.

I wish you would use your position and influence to make reasonable arguments in favour of conservative ideals, rather than pedal this manipulative crap. We have a government to do that for us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:32 PM on 10/02/2011
What were the liberals proposing?
03:00 AM on 10/02/2011
Given his persistent cautioning during the last two elections — that elections are "an unnecessary expense" and that elections "threaten economic stability" — what makes you so sure we'll still have elections by then?

Look how quickly and easily the right wing took over the internet, making it virtually impossible to have a political conversation online without being accosted by professionally organized trolls, tasked with interrupting political discourse and applauding the government.

I would like to believe that it is more difficult to fake votes, than it is to fake supporters, HOWEVER, BC’s shaky right wing is hurriedly trying to introduce internet voting in time for the next provincial election.

I can’t imagine any system of voting that would be easier to rig.

If public discourse becomes sufficiently obstructed — between troll interference and the con’s war on public broadcasting — could those in power simply project a deceitful facade of electoral support, and steal an election?

There are a lot of third-world dictatorial practices that no longer look foreign to Canadians, and it would take an oblivious fool, in the throes of a particularly dull-witted day, to rely on these cons to exercise any measure of self-restraint.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
12:38 PM on 10/02/2011
Ahh, Stephen Harper is an evil dictator who is going to give the public back their guns, allow farmers to sell their wheat to whomever they wish, makes the government census forms voluntary, cut the power of the state broadcaster, etc?

Seems odd to accuse someone of being a tyrant when he is making government less intrusive.
02:40 PM on 10/02/2011
If you saw "wheat," "guns" "farmers" and "census forms" in my original post, then there is clearly no point in attempting to communicate with you.

You could literally read ANYTHING into it.

Perhaps you just thought I could do with an example to demonstrate the point of my second paragraph (and possibly the last one, as well)?
03:02 PM on 10/02/2011
Your right CanadaStan, Stephen Harper our great leader will make government less intrusive when finally it has the power to peer into atheist Canadian's homes to see if they are following the authority's rules and the scriptures. When the Conservatives finally get the tools to take people off the streets at whim or recourse we will finally have safe streets despite the Liberals. And finally once we accomplish this we can keep the disorderly atheist opposition from the seat power again and thus stop ruining the return of Jesus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
11:11 PM on 10/01/2011
More bad news for the haters here:

http://www­.vancouver­sun.com/ne­ws/Canada+­best+reput­ation+worl­d+study/54­66035/stor­y.html

"OTTAWA — Canada has the best reputation in the world, says a study measuring public perception­s of 50 countries around the world, released on Tuesday.

The Reputation Institute study measures the trust, esteem, admiration and good feelings the public holds towards 50 countries, as well as perception­s of peoples' quality of life, safety and attention to the environmen­t.

Results from 42,000 respondent­s worldwide ranked Sweden next, followed by Australia, Switzerlan­d and New Zealand, the reputation management firm said. "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
02:20 AM on 10/02/2011
Your point? Don't tell me you believe everything these biased (either way) propagandists release. All these think tank institutes have a different bias, or agenda. None of them are to listened too without a grain of salt. Tomorrow another one will be released showing the opposite, or some such. Its just propaganda.
cdnman
Still a free spirit...
07:15 PM on 10/02/2011
Steve...very true.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
04:10 PM on 10/02/2011
Note that the countries mentioned have similiar policies to Canada which in fact Harper is trying to change. Harper and "attention to the environment". Give me a break.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
08:34 PM on 10/01/2011
I would just once like Huffpost to explain to us what criteria it uses for moderating comments. It seems to be a crap shoot. I've even seen them moderate a comment that merely says you agree with someone else's comment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
09:19 PM on 10/01/2011
It's based on emotion, not logic.
After all, this is a liberal site....
10:22 PM on 10/01/2011
By based on emotion you must be referring to conservatism. These are the guys (Mr. Harper and Co.) that want to be tough on crime when it is dropping and get closer to the British monarchy - when nobody ever voted for the monarchy.
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
04:03 PM on 10/02/2011
Whole they are at it, perhaps they can explain the overabundance of right wing pundits and Central Canadian media on this site. Do they not know that there are also very credible liberal pundits as well as media outside the Sounthern Ontario beltway?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
08:26 PM on 10/01/2011
The writer lists single measures or policies none of which by themselves hurt Harper in the election. What is going to happen though is this government will die a death by a thousand cuts. That is to say, now that Harper is unleashed he will enact measure after measure each of which will annoy some part of the electorate and the cumulative effect will be that in 4 years everyone, with the exception of his most radical base, will be fed up to here. He can't help himself. To Harper legislation is addictive and even though he knows it will eventually lead to his party's demise, he wont be able to stop himself until it's too late.
07:48 PM on 10/01/2011
"Much will depend on whom the Liberals and NDP choose as their next leaders." Yes, that is probably the key. I am convinced that an effective Liberal leader in the last election would now be PM -- at least in a minority government. A charismatic Liberal leader could quite plausibly have won a majority, and could still do so in 2015. Very few Canadians -- even 'conservatives' -- actually 'like' Stephen Harper, and with many good reasons. They just need a good reason or good alternative to reject him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:24 PM on 10/01/2011
Who's Stephen Harper?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlietuna11
04:25 PM on 10/01/2011
bush lite...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
08:36 PM on 10/01/2011
He's someone who has many demons who tell him there are so many people he has to "get" and so little time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matt Blanc
11:45 AM on 10/01/2011
I find it interesting that the Canadian press doesn't seem to dig into the misuse of funds more than it does. And the attitude of Canadians that elections are just a waste of money, even when they aren't particularly happy about who's in office. In fact, everything seems sort of 'damped down' here as compared to the US. Of course down there it's a shouting match between insane factions all of the time, which isn't getting much done or giving anyone confidence in the US's ability to get itself together. But given the crucial needs of Canadians for economic growth and the importance of maintaining and improving education and healthcare, I would expect more 'heat' that there is.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlietuna11
04:29 PM on 10/01/2011
before harper , it was often said of canadians,( there like americans, only nicer.)after harpers term that may not be the case anymore..
BritishColumbian
American/Canadian liberal
04:08 PM on 10/02/2011
Canadians are really not like Americans as witnessed by almost every aspect of our economic policy, social programs, form of gov't, and stances on public policy like gay marriage, gun control, lack of capital punishment...the list goes on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stanschurman
08:31 PM on 10/01/2011
Canada is second only to the US in having an incurious media. We have more news analysis than the US (that wouldn't be hard), but compared to the press and television in other countries we're woefully inadequate in holding the government's feet to the fire.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
10:43 PM on 10/01/2011
Probably because the Canadian liberal media waste so much time on fake stories like Wafergate, which even if it had been true was a non story...