Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Paul Moist

GET UPDATES FROM Paul Moist
 

Attacks on Unions Hurting All Canadians

Posted: 11/04/11 10:07 AM ET

It takes a baffling level of arrogance to claim to be acting in the best interests of Canadian workers while relentlessly dismissing, belittling, and attacking unionized workers across Canada.

Arrogance, however, is a trait far from rare among Harper Conservatives, who are spending an inordinate amount of time and energy in their barely-worn majority mandate undermining the labour movement, wheat farmers, women's groups, and others.

The most recent targets are over 6,800 flight attendants working for Air Canada. Under the guise of hardly plausible threats to the Canadian economy and the health and safety of air travellers, the Harper Conservative government moved swiftly to undermine the rights of these workers.

The attack on their rights to free collective bargaining and to strike, however, is symptomatic of a larger trait of this federal government. This labour dispute marked another opportunity for the Harper Conservatives to take another swipe at their most feared threat: any voice that opposes their ideological agenda.

While unions are the most recent target, they are far from the first this government has taken aim, nor I doubt the last.

Whether it's labour rights, the long gun registry, the Canadian Wheat Board, approaches to combating crime or illegal drug use -- the list can go on and on and on -- the message from the Harper Conservatives is clear: if you don't agree with us, we will come after you.

On the Insite case, the Supreme Court of Canada, in a unanimous decision, parted ways with the Harper government calling their approach to the safe drug site "arbitrary" and "disproportionate." This isn't the only policy area these words could apply to.

The Harper Conservatives are treating their majority government as a free reign to rule and dictate however they please. Every Canadian should be alarmed at the casual way this government brushes aside the concerns and interests of anyone who doesn't fit into their ideology.

This was clearly shown with the Harper Conservatives choosing to side with Air Canada in not one, but two labour disputes. For the federal government to so blatantly favour a private corporation in labour negotiations once and for all dispels any notion they are concerned with the well-being of wage earners, or any Canadian outside the Bay Street boardrooms.

It is also shown in their immovable defense of corporate tax cuts, their cavalier dismissal of a financial transaction tax, a continued neglect on their part to address the retirement income insecurity crisis, and an insistence on concluding international trade pacts without public discourse or debate.

Of course, the Harper Conservatives claim when corporations do well, jobs are created, the economy grows, and all Canadians will end up better off. There is, however, no evidence to back up this neo-liberal fantasy.

Over the last few decades, the salaries of CEOs have been driven higher and higher, while the wages of their workers grow at an absurdly slower rate. Defined benefit pensions have become increasingly scarce. When once we strived to work hard, save, and build a better life for our families, corporations want us to believe we are lucky to have a job at all -- but don't let that stop you from raking up thousands and thousands in consumer debt.

The myth can't go on forever, and even the most fervent Conservative supporter is bound to ask -- we keep giving corporations every advantage, why isn't it getting any better for me and my family?

Lacking any rational answer, at least one that doesn't betray Bay Street, Harper Conservatives have a long list of ideological scapegoats at the ready.

Circumstance put postal workers and Air Canada employees at the head of the queue, but every other union member in Canada knows they are next. Someone has to take the fall for failing trade policies, corporate irresponsibility, and massive deficits caused by regressive tax schemes.

So ploy after ploy is being used to undermine Canadian labour. Union members, especially public-sector union members, are being offered up as the economic boogiemen, with tired stereotypes being trotted out to portray some Canadian workers as privileged just because they have some small measure of security.

These types of tactics are not fitting of our society. They speak to a reliance on divisive political games that play to the worst fears of Canadians to gain and maintain power. While unions are the present target, union members are far from the only one being harmed by this type of politics. It's lead to a tragic erosion in many's faith in our democratic process, and the mass disenfranchisement of far too many Canadian citizens.

Some are speaking out and trying to find a different way. We have seen and heard it from many participating in the peaceful Occupy movement gatherings. We heard it from 4.5 million voters who helped foster an unprecedented electoral breakthrough for federal New Democrats.

We have heard it this week in Vancouver at the Canadian Union of Public Employees' 25th national convention. The message is loud and clear, and will be heard all the way to Ottawa. There is a better way for Canada, but it will not be found through threats, divisive politics or the rhetoric of fear.

It will come from a sincere desire to put the needs of Canadian workers first, where we build a society where success is not measured in how many Canadians can be dragged down, but on how many can rise up to new heights of security and prosperity for them and their families.

Paul Moist is national president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Canada's largest union with over 615,000 members.

 
It takes a baffling level of arrogance to claim to be acting in the best interests of Canadian workers while relentlessly dismissing, belittling, and attacking unionized workers across Canada. Arrog...
It takes a baffling level of arrogance to claim to be acting in the best interests of Canadian workers while relentlessly dismissing, belittling, and attacking unionized workers across Canada. Arrog...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
03:35 PM on 11/06/2011
All I know is we could double our corporate tax rate and maintain the lowest corporate tax in the industrialized world. Something is wrong there.
11:57 PM on 11/05/2011
If every employer truly cared about the well-being of their employees, we wouldn't need unions. However, since many already very profitable companies will do anything to make even greater profits, employees are at risk.

A company that was concerned about being profitable, as well as concerned about employing Canadians and contributing to the Canadian economy, wouldn't so easily move to another country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
06:25 PM on 11/05/2011
The reason the rich keep getting richer and the middle class and poor keep getting poorer is that the rich know they can divide them by suggesting that half of those people are the REAL problem, and the other half will be dumb enough to believe it if you spend enough money showing them fake evidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
06:17 PM on 11/05/2011
An excellent article. Harper is dangerous to the middle class and workers in general. He's sold his soul to corporate special interests, and doesn't care if Canadian workers are reduced to competing with the Chinese for dangerous, low-paying jobs. He's a conservative, so since he has his - screw everyone else!

He's our George Bush. I can't imagine how much worse it would be if we had a Dick Cheney too!
12:38 PM on 11/05/2011
"Whether it's labour rights, the long gun registry, the Canadian Wheat Board, approaches to combating crime or illegal drug use -- the list can go on and on and on -- the message from the Harper Conservatives is clear: if you don't agree with us, we will come after you."

This comment is not accurate. Everything in it was part of their campaign promises and is part of the reason the conservatives got voted into power. The majority want the end of the long gun registry because it's a collosal waste of money, the majority of farmers want to sell their own product at prices they agree to, and the majority of people want to get tougher on crime and keep criminals locked up longer for violent crimes. They're doing a good job and will get re-elected for their efforts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dclintn648
Conservatism is dread
06:21 PM on 11/05/2011
Your comment is not accurate. The MAJORITY did NOT elect Harper and his cronies. The majority in this country is middle-left and they voted either NDP or Liberal, so their vote was split.

YOU conservatives want those things, and since your representatives are in power, they are SHOVING IT DOWN OUR THROATS. That's not representing the "majority"!
04:29 PM on 11/06/2011
While I agree with the spirit of your comment, the Conservatives were elected under our flawed first-past-the-post system and they are doing exactly what they said they would. Those of us with powers of logic and compassion just have to take it and worry about the next election.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter sfikas
Yia sou
08:12 AM on 11/05/2011
Every worker, unionized or not, owes a lot to the heroic actions of the first unionized men and women who put even their lives on the line, so fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' dignity by management, would benefit all. But behold what's happening now! Since the 1980' unions and their members have been pushed around at will, by the powerful, the elite, and the super rich. At this rate, the essence, the reasons for a Union's existence will evaporate, and it's efficacy will be - is, greatly diminished. I say, it's time to go back in time, and re-learn the lessons of our union pioneers. It's time to drop the begging cups, pick up the megaphones, and protest vigorously, and demonstrate forcefully, that social Justice and fairness at the working place may return.
09:11 PM on 11/04/2011
Obdurate resistance will be required now that they secured a majority.
05:49 PM on 11/04/2011
There are criticisms for both sides. When the unions demand increases in wages which are out of line withe inflation then they are in the wrong. There is no reason why a job should automatically be more valuable just because time has past. The unions take the public hostage to get these rises. On the other hand the Conservatives are too confrontational. Workers need representation, without it their rights would be disregarded. Both parties need to take responsibility but name calling never, ever advances a debate, it only causes resentments which then harden into intransigence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aesops
Appearances often are deceiving
09:15 PM on 11/04/2011
“Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress.”

-Federick Douglass

I hear your principles, and I agree. What I don't agree with is that the situation you speak of is not reality. There is no large union movement in North America anymore that has the kind of strength of the corporate world. The big knock against labour power concentration is that it would increase labour market inefficiency and the efficient movement of labour capital. What we have today is growing unemployement, flat wages, and most importantly weakened social mobility. In a perfect world where labour and business power were dispersed I can see the idea that both sides should talk. But in a case of a large power differential as seen today, talking results in nothing, as there is no incentize to negotiate on the side of the powerful. That differential must be closed for meaningful change in the lives of working class citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LeftyNeoCon
What happens when extreme left and right combine.
03:31 PM on 11/06/2011
The ratio of private sector workers unionzed in America is higher than it is in Canada now. I agree with you in extremes like the TPD. The Toronto Police Department budget is almost 80% salary and benefits. That is ridiculous in my opinion.
03:16 PM on 11/04/2011
I dont disagree with any of the comments already posted,however,I would like to spin in a couple of side points!! Why do we taxpayers still give the oil companies over a billion $$$ a year in susidies(seen their profits lately) Why are bankruptcies still allowed in this country- the cost is staggering to the people . Lastly but not leastly as you look around the world at how some people work and what they are paid name me one wage earner in Canada (private included) that really earns what they make.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
07:28 PM on 11/05/2011
They don't, they write off expenses.
Same as every other business.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:10 PM on 11/04/2011
"Whether it's labour rights, the long gun registry, the Canadian Wheat Board, approaches to combating crime or illegal drug use -- the list can go on and on and on -- the message from the Harper Conservatives is clear: if you don't agree with us, we will come after you."

How dare the conservatives implement the very platform they ran on in the last election!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aesops
Appearances often are deceiving
09:05 PM on 11/04/2011
That's a fair point.
12:53 PM on 11/05/2011
I agree with you blackrabbit and I am patiently waiting for Mr. Harper to fullfill his promise of getting rid of or having an elected senate.
05:24 PM on 11/05/2011
Don't hold your breath pinnsy. I'm still waiting for him to opt out of the "Gold plated pension plan."
02:28 PM on 11/04/2011
It would be interesting know how much government employees cost this country with their outrageous demands and lackluster performance and the only reason they get away with it is because of their union. Taking sick days,sick or not, just because they can. Grieving every single move management makes and the list goes on. There are multiple levels of governmental management required just to wade through the crap that public employees come up with. This is costing us a fortune. Go to work, earn your pay and if you don't like it go somewhere else. Perhaps you could climb up the ol' union ladder and really start making some money. Once you get to the top you could run for Jack's old job.
01:48 PM on 11/04/2011
maybe if unions would stop defending workers with poor working ethic... maybe the government (and the people who elect them) would have a different view on unions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
02:34 PM on 11/04/2011
I see, so people who have what you call "a poor work ethic" should starve in the streets. Right? What a stupid comment. Maybe you should be asking why some people have a "poor work ethic".
Then you might be headed in the right direction. And once you discover the answer to that, you might have a different view on government and the people who elect them.
03:31 PM on 11/04/2011
Here we go... the hyperbole... the poor misunderstood unionized employe would starve on the street...

-

Maybe I am a cruel and remorseless guy... but if you
- Show up drunk
- Contently show up late
- Don't show
- Do a crappy job

I really don't see why an employer ought to pay you $35/h... and why the unions should try to protect you...

Just saying.
05:30 PM on 11/05/2011
A union is required by law to represent all it's members without prejudice. Even the bad ones. If they don't, they could be open to a lawsuit.
All these bad workers were hired by the company and served a probationary period before becoming union members.
It's up to the company to use progressive discipline on bad workers until they either clean up their act or are terminated.
Most companies I have worked for were usually too lazy to go after bad employees but preferred to hide them away on a job where they could do less damage.
01:24 PM on 11/04/2011
No Mr. Moist, the federal government's view on labor disputes, is to firstly consider the effects on Canadians of these conflicts. Unlike unions , such as yours , which expects all Canadians, through taxation, to support the gold plated pensions of your members, while the public's own incomes have stagnated , for decades. Sort of "Robin Hood" in reverse.
Your previous support for the Gaza Flotilla, and condemnation of Israel, begs the question of your union's intellectual and financial interference in international affairs., with no mandate from your membership. Curbs on union power, far from hurting Canadians, is an economic necessity, and a real step forward.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aesops
Appearances often are deceiving
09:05 PM on 11/04/2011
I think you have to be careful about implying causality in the case of stagnating wages. That is not unions' fault. Today the number of people in unions is a fraction of the number in the 20th century. If unions were the cause of wage stagnation, then decreasing their membership substantially should have had some effect and it hasn't. I would further argue that to assume that the government's primary interest is the Canadian people, which are a large and disparate group, is unlikely. More likely is that organized business interests are a key constituency of the government as they are far more organized than the Canadian population.
09:21 PM on 11/05/2011
I don't share your cynicism regarding government motives, however, union featherbedding is one reason jobs move overseas, and , of course, globalization tends to incentivise businesses to migrate to where wages are lower. In this case, union tactics tends to ensure their own eventual demise.
jimbo57
ni dieu ni maitre
10:27 AM on 11/05/2011
Once again, people making over $250 K inciting people making less than $25 K to hate on people who are making $50 K 'cuz they're "elitist". No, DON'T organize and try and get a better deal for YOURSELF. End collective bargaining and bring everybody down to your level, because your rich master tells you that anything else would be *gasp* "class warfare".
09:16 PM on 11/05/2011
You have no idea who you are talking to. There are many ordinary Canadians who believe that unions have outlived their usfulness. I happen to be one of them. It's got nothing to do with class warfare, just a difference in how one views the world.
01:24 PM on 11/04/2011
Many Canadians do not understand the important contributions that Labour Unions make on our quality of life.