Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Behrens

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Behrens
 

We Canadians Aren't Always Nice

Posted: 01/27/2012 11:58 am

New Yorkers, we are among you -- we Canadians -- though you are usually unaware. Unless, perhaps, it's the season of Stanley Cup Finals -- usually a torpid June week in Manhattan -- and you notice loud, polite groups of us in neighbourhood bars, cheering on our Vancouver Canucks, Montreal Canadiens, Toronto Maple Leafs, Ottawa Senators, or our freshly-minted Winnipeg Jets, against one or another team of hireling Canadians decked out in the garish jerseys of some sunbelt city where ice has never been produced by natural means.

By the way, what do you say to six drunk Canadian defencemen to persuade them to quietly exit the hotel's hot tub?

Try, "Can you get out of the hot tub now, please?" Works every time. Do not forget the "please."

Oh, we are nice. We weren't always. "Canadian gangsters" may seem an oxymoron, but in the days of your prohibition, squads of us made serious moola and some gunplay while pouring our excellent rye whiskey over the border into backwoods Vermont then down the spout of U.S. Route 7, to be shaken or stirred in the highball glasses of Gatsbyesque Manhattan. In fact, Fitzgerald hinted that Jay Gatsby himself was likely one of our cross-border affiliates.

New York City has always been a mecca for us. Back in 1892 the Times was waspishly editorializing (p4, column 4, June 6, 1892) on the dastardly threat posed by emigrating French Canadians ("It is next to impossible to penetrate this mass of protected and secluded humanity with modern ideas or to induce them to interest themselves in democratic institutions and methods of government.") And Joseph Mitchell's 1949 New Yorker piece, "The Mohawks in High Steel" noticed the Caughnawaga Mohawks -- their reservation is across the river from Montreal -- colonizing the North Gowanus neighbourhood, in Brooklyn, where saloons stocked Canadian cigarettes and Molson ale, and a local pastor was struggling to learn the Iroquois language.

These days, your rulers in the White House and Congress wrestle with the evils of importing another nasty Canadian liquid -- oil squeezed from the Alberta tar sands -- through another, possibly violent, delivery system.

Instead of competitive fedora'd gunsels from the Plateau Mont-Royal hustling truckloads of illicit booze through the New England night, and tommy-gunning each other on the approaches to Rutland, this time it's TransCanada's Keystone project threatening spillage and spoilage of precious ecozones in Nebraska on the course of its long run from Alberta ("Where?") to the Gulf Coast.

Well, we Canadians do recognize a business opportunity, and your addiction to high old times -- always cut with pure grains of zealous Puritan rectitude -- usually allows us to deliver our goods, or ourselves, and at a premium, once the hot air cools. You may not want us, but given your insatiable appetites and addictions, America, you're probably going to need us.

 
New Yorkers, we are among you -- we Canadians -- though you are usually unaware. Unless, perhaps, it's the season of Stanley Cup Finals -- usually a torpid June week in Manhattan -- and you notice lou...
New Yorkers, we are among you -- we Canadians -- though you are usually unaware. Unless, perhaps, it's the season of Stanley Cup Finals -- usually a torpid June week in Manhattan -- and you notice lou...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:52 PM on 01/29/2012
Nasty Canadians, offering Americans first dibs on a reliable and secure energy supply that doesn't prop up tyrannical regimes, and might even prevent Americans from getting enmeshed in far-off wars, thereby saving American lives.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:06 PM on 01/28/2012
They're drinking our milkshake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tampajohn
plan your work work your plan
04:23 PM on 01/28/2012
Step 1 ---As I understand it the sludge will get piped to refineries on the Gulf . Step2 Exported to Europe and we dump the waste "where ever" . Good for America or just the OIL BARONS ?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
12:45 AM on 01/29/2012
FF. the world gets the oil, Canada and the Chinese company that owns the tars sand, really look it up, get the profits, and we get the ecological costs.
11:56 PM on 01/27/2012
Fortunately America will not need canadian oil. It has been slow off the mark but it is finally coming to gris with thehigh cost of oil. Americans actually prefer to have clean water and food to eat than gas guzzling cars and buildings and houses which let the heat out faster than the furnace can burn the oil. Fracking isn't a solution either. What is a solution is efficiencies. And America has the culture that creates. So it will create ever more efficient windmills and ever more efficient machines and ever more efficient solar panels. Americans love mone and they hate paying for junk so they will embrace the new technologies they will create to make it easy for them to reduce oil consumption to virtually nothing. Canada puts billions of tax dollars into subsidizing oil and with holds money for public transport. Obama just announced no more tax subsidies for oil. I guess Canadians are the loses. They have destroyed a massive amount of pristine and vital forest and a massive river and will have no market for the tar they dig up. Even China is going green.
10:25 AM on 01/29/2012
I partially agree-- we will increase efficiency and decrease the use of fossil energy but we will still need oil for awhile.
Canada will get it's money from the tar sands. It will also pay the price.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
09:30 PM on 01/27/2012
Interesting twist. But we Americans must not cease to look at our own self-interest. We must protect our land from predation of Canada's voracious drive to be a big oil power, including pushing the Keystone XL to transport oil abroad while putting even more ecological strain on our country than we have already.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:52 PM on 01/29/2012
Yes, much better to maintain Saudi Arabia and Venzuela as big oil powers.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
10:43 PM on 01/29/2012
Much better still to start using the oil we now have to build the renewable technologies that an overheated planet needs. Why wait till we completely run out of the last filthy bit of tar sand before we begin to turn the page?