To be against bullying is one of those motherhood issues on which everyone agrees, but no one knows how to stop the problem.
The recent suicides of young people who were bullied has vaulted the issue into headlines, but apart from tut-tutting, no remedial solutions are forthcoming.
The Ontario government seems convinced that gays and sexual aspects provoke bullying. Baloney. That's only one aspect of bullying. The McGuinty gang has latched onto the sexual aspects because it is convenient and identifiable.
Despite the media, social and political attention directed at bullying, nothing has emerged that gives any indication that it can be stopped. Because bullying is human nature.
In dealing with bullying, it first should be acknowledged or admitted that bullying has always been with us, and will continue to be with us no matter what steps are taken to curb it. It's part of growing up. Most of us learn to deal with it.
In the old days, fathers used to lecture their sons along the lines that "all bullies are cowards," and the way to handle them is to stand up to them. There is some truth in this bromide, but not much.
It's generally true that bullies seek compliant or vulnerable victims, hence their penchant for picking on gay kids, or small kids, chubby kids, kids who don't fight back, or who have candy that the bully wants. That sort of thing,
Bullying usually occurs out of sight of teachers or parents.
The idea that all bullies are cowards tends to be a myth that kids who stand up to bullies sometimes learn to their regret.
It's fine to impress upon kids that bullying is unacceptable and shameful, but its also a reality that bullies often (maybe usually) don't think of themselves as bullies. They might call it teasing, or joking.
And bullying is not necessarily physical. Someone quick with cruel or hurtful words can be as much a bully as a playground thug. There are bullies in the workplace who would strenuously object if they were categorized as bullies, but that may be exactly what they are with those under their authority.
Right now, Premier McGuinty and others seem to be consulting people of the church for advice on controlling bullying. Why is this, one wonders? I'd argue that a minister, priest, rabbi or mullah has no formula to turn others from the path of bullying. In fact, the church itself can produced bullies of a different kind.
I suspect it shows the desperation, even helplessness, of trying to eliminate bullying. Again, in the past, the bullied kid was encouraged to take a Charles Atlas course on body-building, so as to kick sand in the bully's face. That theme still prevails in differing forms. And for some it works.
The hard truth is that although the hostility and repugnance for bullying is acute at the moment, interest is going to flag and another generation of bullies will surface -- gay/straight rainbow alliances that are the political flavour of the moment are not a solution.
Coping with bullies should hinge on parents and siblings more than on government legislation or religious leaders. Teachers are on the front lines, but sadly they often only recognize the syndrome when it is too late. And far too often, teachers themselves are bullies. But like all bullies, they don't recognize it in themselves.
Shahla Khan Salter: Bullying Knows No Race, Religion, or Sexuality
Yoni Goldstein: Why Is Ontario Funding Catholic Schools?
Josh Bowman: Ten Things I've Learned From Bullies
That Mr. Worthington focuses so much of his disdain on the anti-bullying campaigns towards gays and lesbians says much about his phobias. Suggesting the provincial government latched onto the campaign for convenience purposes is pure spin. And bad spin at that.
Suggesting that society should accept the fact that bullying '...has always been with us, and will continue to be with us no matter what steps are taken to curb it...' is a lip-service cop out.
Mr. Worthington displays his male centric attitudes when he says '...fathers used to lecture their sons...' What, no female bullies? Not even a mention? A line in the article for balance and fairness? Mr. Worthington writes '...in the past, the bullied kid was encouraged to take a Charles Atlas course ...so as to kick sand in the bully's face...' and suggests that this 'theme' of dealing with a bully is still a viable option. Without offering any other options he demonstrates his lack of helpful thinking and reliance on tired, old-man, mediocre bullying solutions.
And, agreed, bullying does not necessarily always take form physically. Sometimes the written word, written from a position of white, heterosexual privilege and biased condescension is bullying.
'...But like all bullies, they don't recognize it in themselves...'
There may have been a few recent notorious cases of that occurring and being publicly exposed via the internet, but I think those are examples of deviations from the norm of teachers being a positive factor in preventing bullying at school. Teachers also might not be experts in behavioural science or conflict resolution, but they definitely have more experience dealing with young people and their interactions on a daily basis than does anyone else. Youth regularly spend at least as much of their waking hours at school as at home, and often they spend more time with their teachers than any other adult including their parents.
I don't know why there seems to be a theme (the bulk of the last paragraph is dedicated to it) in the article of minimizing the important role teachers have in preventing bullying. Maybe it is due to some ideological objection to the educational system being an institutionalized mechanism for shaping society (if that's not it's legitimate purpose, I don't know what else it might be?) and State interference in people's lives, but I don't think the article's treatment of teachers is fair.
The reason most bullying happens out of sight is because the bullies know very well that what they're doing is wrong. If they really believed that what they were doing was just in fun, they would be doing it out in the open where everyone would get the joke. And where such behaviour happens in plain view it is often because someone had taught the bully that what he/she is doing is normal.
Those who view bullying behaviour as "normal" are much the same as those who used to believe that it was a man's right to lay a little correction on his wife and kids with his fists.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201002/workplace-bullying-applying-psychological-torture-work
Absenteeism happens when a target of bullying is too stressed out to go to school or work. Illness from stress alone can develop into chronic pain. Workers are known to take medical leave from their jobs - especially if the person has a chronic illness to begin with.
http://www.ehow.com/info_8217936_consequences-bullying-workplace.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17277427
http://books.google.ca/books?id=dQhz3uFOuaYC&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=bullying+absenteeism&source=bl&ots=GM59laGwFm&sig=SBAPTiYUnFlAnoFckIFpdoWYc90&hl=en&ei=JJTkTo3QJcfo0QHrtNWABg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CE8Q6AEwAzgK#v=onepage&q=bullying%20absenteeism&f=false
http://www.parentingbookmark.com/pages/articleMB04.htm
http://www.stopbullyingsa.com.au/factors.asp
For free abridged books on leadership, ethics, teamwork, motivation, women, bullying and sexual harassment, trade unions, Japanese management, business law, etc., write to maxpin1@hotmail.com.
Maxwell Pinto, Business Consultant and Author
http://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/MaxPinto
This is the kind of bullying which tends to be more acute, which stems from prejudice and ignorance, and which draws the very important distinction between schoolyard name-calling and the kind of brutal harassment that leads kids to kill themselves.
Above all else, why fault anyone for trying to create outlets to ease these prejudices and normalize the differences that are creating them? Is it because you disagree with normalizing differing sexual orientations? That's basically the root of the original prejudice. Visibility works, and it needs to be introduced in schools, especially because many of these children are NOT being taught acceptance at home.
If we left it to parents to pass on their own ignorances to their children and never allowed children to learn a damn thing anywhere else, what a sad state we'd be in.
No word about that