Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
Peter Worthington

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Worthington
 

Sorry, your Service for our Country does not Entitle You to Citizenship

Posted: 04/14/2012 12:00 am

Maybe you and a few million other Canadians thought the issue of "Lost Canadians" had been resolved.

You know, war brides and children (born in and out of wedlock to Canadian soldiers in WWII) who discovered years later -- after a lifetime of paying taxes, working productively, finding out on retirement -- or when applying for passports -- that through bureaucratic glitches, they were not Canadian citizens.

Supposedly, these and other citizenship lapses had been corrected by the Harper government and an all-party Parliamentary vote.

If you think this -- think again. Think again.

Take the case of Jackie Scott, who was born out of wedlock in England in 1945. Her father, a Canadian soldier (born in Canada in 1911), married her mother in 1948 who became a naturalized Canadian after the family came to our country.

Jackie Scott went to school, worked, married, had a daughter and now has grandkids -- all of whom are as Canadian as maple syrup.

But because Jackie had not lived in Canada for five years prior to the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1947 (remember she was born in 1945!), she didn't qualify as a "Canadian."

Subsequent laws sought to correct this foolish oversight, but in one of the strangest rulings imaginable, today's Citizenship and Immigration department -- over the signature of one Stella Holiday, Citizenship Analyst -- insists Jacqueline Scott is not Canadian.

Her reasoning? In letter she bluntly (and categorically) says: "At the time you were born in 1945, neither of your parents was a Canadian citizen."

Oh? Remember, the father was born here, was a Canadian soldier, was wounded for his country, and is now viewed as a non-Canadian!

Stella Holiday's letter continues: "Before 1947, persons born in Canada, such as your father, were considered British subjects [...] Canadian citizenship only gained legal recognition when the former Act came into force on January 1, 1947. Therefore you are not described as a citizen."

In other words, the 100,000 Canadian soldiers who stormed Vimy Ridge and won the first and greatest battle of World War I, were not Canadians, according to today's Citizenship and Immigration.

Nor were nearly a million men in uniform in World War Two. And the 100,000-plus who died in Canada's wars are not considered "Canadian" by the Citizenship department.

In 1946, then-Prime Minister Mackenzie King stood on a dock in Halifax and welcomed war brides and their children as "Canada's newest citizens." His greeting has an ironic ring today.

I guess Prime Minister Stephen Harper was out to lunch when he recently paid tribute to the Canadian Corps on the 95th anniversary of the Vimy Ridge: "Their remarkable victory helped create a new and stronger sense of Canadian identity here at home."

In an anthology compiled by the late Pierre Berton, my father, who earned a Military Medal and bar at Vimy, wrote: "Before Vimy Ridge I never felt I was Canadian, but after Vimy Ridge I never felt anything but a Canadian."

How dare this bureaucrat from Citizenship and Immigration say that no one born in Canada prior to the 1947 Act was "legally" a Canadian citizen.

Don Chapman lost Canadian citizenship as a kid when his dad moved to work in the U.S. As the founder of "Lost Canadians," Chapman not only regained his citizenship, but rescued unknown thousands of others who'd been unwittingly deprived of theirs. Chapman's persistence forced the government to change laws that deprived so many.

Canada broke with Britain in 1867 when the British North America Act declared Canada an independent country. We have been self-governed ever since. Of course we have links with Britain, but we are masters in our own house -- except for the bureaucratic lapses that still exist.

It behooves the Prime Minister, if Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney won't act, to cut the red tape and recognize Jackie Scott as a legitimate Canadian, and not scurry for cover and pretended ignorance.

Scott now lives in the U.S. and discovered she was not considered Canadian in 2005 when her application for a passport was rejected.

The Conservatives sought to correct the citizenship when they were the Opposition. Now that they're the government, they have other priorities.

Shame on all of them.

 
Maybe you and a few million other Canadians thought the issue of "Lost Canadians" had been resolved. You know, war brides and children (born in and out of wedlock to Canadian soldiers in WWI...
Maybe you and a few million other Canadians thought the issue of "Lost Canadians" had been resolved. You know, war brides and children (born in and out of wedlock to Canadian soldiers in WWI...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeanMartin
Everything in moderation.
04:27 PM on 04/19/2012
Eh, pesky old people gonna die anyway, right, Stevie?

Please feel free to insert an eye roll here.
03:54 PM on 04/19/2012
Excellent piece. Not sure why no reference, but Don Chapman's original Vimy Ridge piece is here
http://www.vancouverobserver.com/politics/opinion/2012/04/09/vimy-ridge-anniversary-soldiers-who-died-canada-were-not-canadian

Jackie Scott's rejection letter story from January: http://www.vancouverobserver.com/world/lost-canadians/2012/01/28/daughter-canadian-war-veteran-jackie-scott-denied-citizenship-canada
photo
Felix99
Born to be mild!!!!
09:08 PM on 04/14/2012
Because, Peter, until 1947 there was no such think as a Canadian. We were all British Subjects, as you shouldwell know. Two of our daughters born in Germany when I was on duty there in the 60s were fine until after 9/11 and suddenly their registration as Canadians was no good, and they had to go through the hassle of becoming Canadians before they could get a passport. Fortunatey the passport people were very good about all this and were of immense help to us.
photo
straightuptalker
What ever happened to common sense?
05:52 PM on 04/14/2012
If ever anyone deserved citizenship to Canada, it should be granted to soldiers born there, enlisted or volunteered to serve from there, and returned to live in his country with his family. She's nit-picking an old beaurocratic, antiquated law that no longer applies, which should have been stricken from the books. A pox on that woman, Stella; for even bringing up the issue, denying the WWII Vet's offspring the right to citizenship in the country he proudly served, and defended.
photo
albertarick
These are questions for wise men with skinny arms
04:59 PM on 04/14/2012
Sucks when its someone you sympathize with, doesn't it Mr. Worthington? Immigration rule fairness will always be a matter of perpective. It may be time to rethink your support of a neo conservative ruling class that will keep pushing for more exclusionary policies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Francmon
Homo homini lupus
04:30 PM on 04/14/2012
This is not the first time we hear about armed forces veterans not being treated with the respect we owe them for putting their lives on the block to defend Canadian ideals and way of life. In the case of returning WW2 soldiers who had children born in Europe, this lack of respect reaches an outrageous limit which we should not even be close to. It's embarrassing and I hope Harper finds a way to correct the damage done to these brave Canadians and their descendants.
03:25 PM on 04/14/2012
I am only being slightly absurd when I suggest that, given the unique and ever-narrowing Harperite interpretation of what is a 'true Canadian', they may want someday to legally re-define a 'Canadian' as only those legal Canadian citizens alive or born after Feb. 6, 2006 -- the ascension to power of Stephen J. Harper.
photo
Another Pesky Canadian
Talk - action = 0
10:39 PM on 04/14/2012
Look for them to eventually add "must be a current and paid-up member of the Conservative Party" to the list of qualifications.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djelimon17
what's this thing for?
12:33 PM on 04/14/2012
Outrageous!
11:17 AM on 04/14/2012
Canadian immigration laws were rewritten sometime around 1947 to target the illegitimate children fathered by soldiers outside of Canada in WW2. Specifically, restrictive criteria for receiving citizenship required being born of a Canadian mother in wedlock. This law was changed in the 1970s because it was clearly discriminatory and offensive. However, the act was not made retroactive, and did not apply to children born earlier.
10:15 AM on 04/14/2012
Stop the presses! Wait just a minute here. Peter Worthington criticizing the Conservative Government of Canada? Say it ain't so Peter. Aren't they your tribe? Aren't the tough talking hard liner Harperites your kinda people? Don't go all soft on us now Peter. Lord save us from the idiocy of Worthington's right wing crankery.
09:14 AM on 04/14/2012
Not often I approve of comments and columns by Peter Worthington, but I do vote for this one.

I cannot understand the governments position. It is certainly beyond the pale. We allow people from God knows where to emigrate to this country and become citizens, but deny citizenship to those who fought for this country, and in many instances put their lives on the line, is nothing less than sheer lunacy. Ideology run amok!
06:28 AM on 04/14/2012
Is there anything government does well? I find this an outrage .
01:02 AM on 04/14/2012
This is the consequence of the Government of Canada eliminating almost all the training dollars to the front line people and allowing them to interpret the law however they want without the training.

That is the source of most of the red tape. The rest is just approval levels on every piece of correspondence. Meaning that the hierarchy pulls out a thesaurus and frets over synonyms for endless hours. If Kafka knew that all you had to do was cut the training budget, he would have laughed.