Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Worthington

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Worthington
 

Don't Expect Romney-Style Love-In at Democratic Convention

Posted: 09/03/2012 11:44 am

The Democratic party's convention, which starts today in Charlotte, North Carolina, faces a small (or large) obstacle in that the recent Republican convention that wound up last Thursday, looms large.

Whatever plans organizers may have had to snipe at Mitt Romney's celebrated lack of caring for people, his remoteness or robot-like elitism, will likely be modified after the tearful testimonies at the Republican gathering of people whose dying children had been attended to, and befriended, by Romney over the years.

So much of the Republican love-in was positive for Romney, that in some ways Democratic nay-sayers are left with Clint Eastwood's controversial interview with an empty chair that he pretended was occupied by President Barack Obama.

Some view Eastwood's performance as a disaster, others as hilarious. Commentators and Democrats found it undignified and vaguely rude. Personally, I found it mindful of a Bob Newhart dialogue. Funny, accurate and devastating to Obama's image.

While Romney emerged from his convention as a hard-working, dedicated and decent man who has never failed at anything he's undertaken, Obama will have difficulty persuading even supporters that he works hard (few cabinet meetings in 2012, a record number of fundraisers, and plenty of golf).

Bill Clinton will formally nominate Obama, which has touches of irony, since Clinton's popularity outshines Obama's at the moment. Hillary Clinton won't be at the convention, even though she's been the administration's most successful star.

Apparently she's in New Zealand, which has some wondering if she's keeping her distance in case Obama loses in November, and she can move forward to be the candidate in 2016. Doubtful, but with the Clintons you never know.

Michelle Obama is due to speak, which the country will inevitably compare with Ann Romney's loving tribute to Romney. Michelle will likely branch into more substance like improving the diets of fat American kids.

Jimmy Carter is due to speak by video. He isn't attending, which is just as well since he rates high as one of the worst presidents in American history. Highlighting him at the convention would remind Americans that Ronald Reagan had to rescue America's reputation from his inept presidency.

Of a huge number of speakers lined up, most are unknown to Canadians (and Americans too, I'd bet). San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro will be the first Latino keynote speaker at a Democratic convention and will be interesting to see if he'll galvanizing Hispanic voters.

From a distance, it would seem the Democrats are going to have to concentrate on Obama's charm and likeability, because he sure as hell has no record to run on -- another reason why Clint Eastwood's monologue was crushing and embarrassing to Obama-believers.

After next Thursday, the election campaign begins for real, when all the money raised by the two campaigns can start being spent.

Obama is counting on the sort of turn-out he got in 2008 -- but that ain't going to happen this time. Many independents and such who are disillusioned with Obama's four years are more likely not to vote than switch to Romney.

In 2008, North Carolina voted Democrats by a narrow 13,000 votes out of 4.5 million. Odds are that it will be closer this time, with the state possibly returning to the Republican fold. We'll know better as the week progresses.

 
FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
The Democratic party's convention, which starts today in Charlotte, North Carolina, faces a small (or large) obstacle in that the recent Republican convention that wound up last Thursday, looms large.
The Democratic party's convention, which starts today in Charlotte, North Carolina, faces a small (or large) obstacle in that the recent Republican convention that wound up last Thursday, looms large.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:23 PM on 09/04/2012
Obama has “no record” to run on? Yes, it’s not like he stopped a financial crisis that was teetering on dropping us into a depression. It’s not like there’s 4 million new jobs since he took office. It’s not like he saved General Motors (and many of their subsidiary suppliers) when the Republicans (and Romney) wanted to let it go under. It’s not like he authorized a risky raid to kill Osama Bin Laden when George Bush went from getting him “dead or alive” to….meh, it was no longer an issue. It’s not like he pushed through a health care plan to cover tens of millions of previously uninsured Americans. It’s not like he supported the rebels in Libya to overthrow Qaddafi without risking any American lives. And it’s not like he authorized the use of computer viruses to delay the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons, instead of heading to war there. Compare that to his predecessor who started two long-term wars the US that has cost the US dearly in terms of lives, resources and international respect. One might imagine that a founder of a major newspaper might consider some of this before writing an op-ed piece.
02:20 PM on 09/04/2012
As for Hilary Clinton not being at the convention, she’s meeting with the presidents of China, Australia and New Zealand. In other words, she’s working. You know who’s not working and had all the time in the world to attend the Republican convention? George Bush, the great 2-term president that the Republicans didn’t even bother asking to attend the Republican convention. You know who’s also not working and plenty of time to attend? Sarah Palin, last election’s Republican darling. The Republicans are trying their hardest to distance themselves from the very people they’ve promoted in their last election cycles. What does that say about their candidates? Even they can't stand them once they get to know them.
02:19 PM on 09/04/2012
Clint Eastwood’s speech was “accurate”?
He criticized Obama for getting the US into Afghanistan. (That was Bush.) He criticized Obama for not getting the US out of Afghanistan. (This is happening, albeit slowly, and something that democrats criticize him for doing too slowly. Republicans are generally not pushing for a quick withdrawl there. So he’s speaking to the wrong party on this.) He said no lawyer should be president. (Romney’s a lawyer.) For a newspaper man to call this accurate says more about the bias of the newspaperman.
One also can’t help but see irony in the party of Christian conservatives asked a man who has fathered seven kids from five women and asked one of his wives have two abortions and have her tubes tied (according to his wife of 14 years) to represent them.

But let’s not trifle with little things like details when discussing accuracy. Even if you loved Eastwood’s speech, it wasn’t effective. Eastwood took all the attention away from Romney on the biggest night of the campaign. Everyone was talking about Eastwood; no one was talking about Romney.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:29 AM on 09/04/2012
"While Romney emerged from his convention as a hard-working, dedicated and decent man who has never failed at anything he's undertaken"...oh COME ON! Says you Worthington.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Colin Speth
A Claymore for your thoughts
09:38 PM on 09/03/2012
That's ok Peter my grandparent's don't like black people either. Now get off my lawn.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:30 AM on 09/04/2012
Fanned and faved!
09:24 PM on 09/03/2012
Dripping with antipathy toward Obama. This article should have a disclaimer at the top: the convention hasn't happened yet, so the following depends entirely on malicious innuendo. Many slurs are included. Further disclaimer: the author loves Mitt and is voting for him.

Why not just say so at the top?
07:55 PM on 09/03/2012
Speaking of delusions of democracy, name 6 things that everybody seems to think are leftwing but haven't done squat for leftwing folks in several decades.

Hint: They could be Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, the Democrats, the NDP and the CBC.

Collect all six and send your answer to The Work Farce.
You could win a 1970 mint edition of The Georgia Straight.
07:46 PM on 09/03/2012
One wonders why anyone in Canada cares. But even if they do, so few Americans cared to watch this purported "love-in" that it lost in the ratings to a reality show about a six year old beauty queen. Even more to the point, an article for Fox News, the Republican propaganda channel, could not take the barrage of lies anymore and openly attacked the VP nominee for spewing one huge whopper after another. When Fox is firing away at the Republican candidate for Vice President, that is not any kind of "love-in" one would want to participate in.
Really, it is obvious yet again that Worthington knows as much about American politics as I know about Quantum Physics - basically nothing at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:12 PM on 09/03/2012
"One of the left’s favorite attacks on the Republican Party is that it is the party of old white people, devoid of diversity and probably racist.

If you were watching MSNBC’s coverage of the Republican National Convention in Tampa on Tuesday night, you might believe those assertions, since missing from the coverage was nearly every ethnic minority that spoke during Tuesday’s festivities.
In lieu of airing speeches from former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, a black American; Mia Love, a black candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Utah; and Texas senatorial hopeful Ted Cruz, a Latino American, MSNBC opted to show commentary anchored by Rachel Maddow from Rev. Al Sharpton, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews,.."

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/28/msnbc-abandons-gop-convention-during-every-speech-by-a-minority/#ixzz25Rmq9RFq

There were more of course, the black woman cabinet minister in Mitt's administration was full of praise for him, so of course the liberal media can't show that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
07:22 PM on 09/03/2012
According to this link: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-falsely-accused-of-purposely-omitting-minority-republican-speeches/

...except for Artur Davis FOX NEWS aired approximately the same coverage of the GOP's minority speeches.

It takes more than the GOP cherry-picking a few minorities to stand up and say good things about Romney, it takes good policies to win over minorities.

And that's where Romney and Ryan fail on all counts.

Turning Medicare into a voucher program to pay for more tax cuts for the rich is an abomination.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
05:41 PM on 09/03/2012
Darn, Peter, you really have to read Maurice Strong's book; Where On Earth Are We Going and learn how politics is run in North America.

He wrote the book in the first person and he tells you, on page 99 of his convening a meeting in the Laurentians in the late 60's for the purpose of spawning the next generation of political leadership in Canada. The lawyers assembled at that meeting were named Trudeau, Davis, Lougheed, Blakeney, Ryan and others.

Strong was David Rockefeller's agent, amongst others (Desmarais & Sharpe), in Canada, controlling its politics.

Surely you remember the photo in the Globe and Mail of Rockefeller shaking Chretien's hand after running that armed encampment called "The Summit of the America's".

And here is a highly despised U.S. V/P; http://bit.ly/Ktq0i5 , talking to his real boss at The Pratt House. Note the gloating at the end as it is important. And yes, Pratt's 4000+ membership base of Wealthy and Corporate elites operate the U.S. political scene from the outside.

And here is Harpo's inaugural talk at Pratt; http://bit.ly/KVJnNI . Note the Bilderberg member who introduced him as Rockefeller is the cornerstone member in that interlocked organization as well.

Pratt does not care who WINS as both are controlled from this single powerful organization and either will follow the Pratt's "Corporate State" agenda perfectly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Toogee
2G or not 2G?
05:25 PM on 09/03/2012
'Don't Expect Romney-Style Love-In at Democratic Convention'

Because the RNC convention was SO NOT filled with love for him! That had to be the most lackluster reception to an nomination acceptance speech in the history of political conventions. Mr. Worthington, you MUST have been observing that convention through rose colored glasses! And the emperor (Romney) wore no clothes!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:06 PM on 09/03/2012
If you watched the liberal media you can be forgiven for believing that.
However the black gentleman who introduced Obama at the Dem convention in 2008 spoke at the GOP convention, but the liberal media didn't cover that.
The same way they didn't cover the black liberal woman who was a cabinet minister in Romney administration and who positively bubble with praise and admiration for him.
The liberal media cut that speech out as well.
There were more, if you go to Youtube you can see all the speeches that the MSM hid from you.
Don't be afraid, it's only the truth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Toogee
2G or not 2G?
06:25 PM on 09/03/2012
Or was the GOP hiding them? Prime-time coverage every night here in the good ole US of A. Live! Sans ANY exuberance from the convention participants!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Schmunk
08:20 PM on 09/03/2012
Hard to believe you are actually a conservative and not a rather poorly disguised plant looking to discredit your own ideaology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Schmunk
05:03 PM on 09/03/2012
I thought the chair was the star of the convention as it was the only thing offering support without an agenda based on hate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dennis Schmunk
04:52 PM on 09/03/2012
Having attended some love-ins/ be-ins back in the day; I can assure you that Romneys style of leading this traditional republican hate fest where peanuts are thrown at black CNN camera women (along with taunts of this is the way we feed animals) bears no resemblence to and is not deserving of the label love-in, what-so-ever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:07 PM on 09/03/2012
Proof please.
Like real proof, not the BS from the liberal media.
08:13 PM on 09/03/2012
I see little peter has a new troll.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
04:09 PM on 09/03/2012
Peter sees what he wants to see. The Republican convention was full of lies, distortions and falsehoods. That is the only way the CONS are going to beat Obama is that enough people fall the usual Conservative BS. AGAIN! When are people going to learn? Didn't 8 years of Bush teach anyone anything?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CanadaStan
Cogito ergo spud, I think, therefore I yam
06:09 PM on 09/03/2012
Oh there were lies and distortions alright, the liberal media cut the speeches of the minorities who praised Mitt.

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/28/msnbc-abandons-gop-convention-during-every-speech-by-a-minority/

"One of the left’s favorite attacks on the Republican Party is that it is the party of old white people, devoid of diversity and probably racist.

If you were watching MSNBC’s coverage of the Republican National Convention in Tampa on Tuesday night, you might believe those assertions, since missing from the coverage was nearly every ethnic minority that spoke during Tuesday’s festivities."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tokenblackman
10:54 PM on 09/03/2012
Republican party i has used minorities as scape goats to gin up votes from scared old white guys. Ever heard of the Southern Strategy that the Republican head of the RNC Ken Mehlman apologized for in 2005. Or the vote fraud laws, or the Dream Act, or Same Sex marriage or a woman's right to choose. Notice that the only demographic that the Republicans never attack. Grumpy old white men.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:35 AM on 09/04/2012
Stop hating and start thinking.
03:26 PM on 09/03/2012
Romney a "hardworking, decent man"? Then why won't he release his tax returns and show Americans what his real tax rate is, and how many millions he has stashed in offshore accounts or in Swiss bank accounts. As a young man, Romney inherited a $20 million trust fund from his daddy, who was CEO of GM (back when GM was actually profitable.) He has no idea how working people have to struggle and budget to make a living.
As for Obama's supposed lack of accomplishment, well he passed an improved Medicare law, which is more than the Republicans would ever do. And the Republicans -- Romney's party, remember? -- blocked Obama at every turn, no matter how good the legislation, just out of pure partisan nastiness. So don't blame Obama for a nasty progress-blocking opposition. And Romney? He'll do anything to get elected,so he wouldn't dare rein in the right-wing nasties in his own party. So we can expect more progress-blocking paralysis from the GOP for years to come.