The Democratic party's convention, which starts today in Charlotte, North Carolina, faces a small (or large) obstacle in that the recent Republican convention that wound up last Thursday, looms large.
Whatever plans organizers may have had to snipe at Mitt Romney's celebrated lack of caring for people, his remoteness or robot-like elitism, will likely be modified after the tearful testimonies at the Republican gathering of people whose dying children had been attended to, and befriended, by Romney over the years.
So much of the Republican love-in was positive for Romney, that in some ways Democratic nay-sayers are left with Clint Eastwood's controversial interview with an empty chair that he pretended was occupied by President Barack Obama.
Some view Eastwood's performance as a disaster, others as hilarious. Commentators and Democrats found it undignified and vaguely rude. Personally, I found it mindful of a Bob Newhart dialogue. Funny, accurate and devastating to Obama's image.
While Romney emerged from his convention as a hard-working, dedicated and decent man who has never failed at anything he's undertaken, Obama will have difficulty persuading even supporters that he works hard (few cabinet meetings in 2012, a record number of fundraisers, and plenty of golf).
Bill Clinton will formally nominate Obama, which has touches of irony, since Clinton's popularity outshines Obama's at the moment. Hillary Clinton won't be at the convention, even though she's been the administration's most successful star.
Apparently she's in New Zealand, which has some wondering if she's keeping her distance in case Obama loses in November, and she can move forward to be the candidate in 2016. Doubtful, but with the Clintons you never know.
Michelle Obama is due to speak, which the country will inevitably compare with Ann Romney's loving tribute to Romney. Michelle will likely branch into more substance like improving the diets of fat American kids.
Jimmy Carter is due to speak by video. He isn't attending, which is just as well since he rates high as one of the worst presidents in American history. Highlighting him at the convention would remind Americans that Ronald Reagan had to rescue America's reputation from his inept presidency.
Of a huge number of speakers lined up, most are unknown to Canadians (and Americans too, I'd bet). San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro will be the first Latino keynote speaker at a Democratic convention and will be interesting to see if he'll galvanizing Hispanic voters.
From a distance, it would seem the Democrats are going to have to concentrate on Obama's charm and likeability, because he sure as hell has no record to run on -- another reason why Clint Eastwood's monologue was crushing and embarrassing to Obama-believers.
After next Thursday, the election campaign begins for real, when all the money raised by the two campaigns can start being spent.
Obama is counting on the sort of turn-out he got in 2008 -- but that ain't going to happen this time. Many independents and such who are disillusioned with Obama's four years are more likely not to vote than switch to Romney.
In 2008, North Carolina voted Democrats by a narrow 13,000 votes out of 4.5 million. Odds are that it will be closer this time, with the state possibly returning to the Republican fold. We'll know better as the week progresses.
Richard (RJ) Eskow: Will the Democrats Speak for the People?
He criticized Obama for getting the US into Afghanistan. (That was Bush.) He criticized Obama for not getting the US out of Afghanistan. (This is happening, albeit slowly, and something that democrats criticize him for doing too slowly. Republicans are generally not pushing for a quick withdrawl there. So he’s speaking to the wrong party on this.) He said no lawyer should be president. (Romney’s a lawyer.) For a newspaper man to call this accurate says more about the bias of the newspaperman.
One also can’t help but see irony in the party of Christian conservatives asked a man who has fathered seven kids from five women and asked one of his wives have two abortions and have her tubes tied (according to his wife of 14 years) to represent them.
But let’s not trifle with little things like details when discussing accuracy. Even if you loved Eastwood’s speech, it wasn’t effective. Eastwood took all the attention away from Romney on the biggest night of the campaign. Everyone was talking about Eastwood; no one was talking about Romney.
Why not just say so at the top?
Hint: They could be Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, the Democrats, the NDP and the CBC.
Collect all six and send your answer to The Work Farce.
You could win a 1970 mint edition of The Georgia Straight.
Really, it is obvious yet again that Worthington knows as much about American politics as I know about Quantum Physics - basically nothing at all.
If you were watching MSNBC’s coverage of the Republican National Convention in Tampa on Tuesday night, you might believe those assertions, since missing from the coverage was nearly every ethnic minority that spoke during Tuesday’s festivities.
In lieu of airing speeches from former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis, a black American; Mia Love, a black candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives from Utah; and Texas senatorial hopeful Ted Cruz, a Latino American, MSNBC opted to show commentary anchored by Rachel Maddow from Rev. Al Sharpton, Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews,.."
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/28/msnbc-abandons-gop-convention-during-every-speech-by-a-minority/#ixzz25Rmq9RFq
There were more of course, the black woman cabinet minister in Mitt's administration was full of praise for him, so of course the liberal media can't show that.
...except for Artur Davis FOX NEWS aired approximately the same coverage of the GOP's minority speeches.
It takes more than the GOP cherry-picking a few minorities to stand up and say good things about Romney, it takes good policies to win over minorities.
And that's where Romney and Ryan fail on all counts.
Turning Medicare into a voucher program to pay for more tax cuts for the rich is an abomination.
He wrote the book in the first person and he tells you, on page 99 of his convening a meeting in the Laurentians in the late 60's for the purpose of spawning the next generation of political leadership in Canada. The lawyers assembled at that meeting were named Trudeau, Davis, Lougheed, Blakeney, Ryan and others.
Strong was David Rockefeller's agent, amongst others (Desmarais & Sharpe), in Canada, controlling its politics.
Surely you remember the photo in the Globe and Mail of Rockefeller shaking Chretien's hand after running that armed encampment called "The Summit of the America's".
And here is a highly despised U.S. V/P; http://bit.ly/Ktq0i5 , talking to his real boss at The Pratt House. Note the gloating at the end as it is important. And yes, Pratt's 4000+ membership base of Wealthy and Corporate elites operate the U.S. political scene from the outside.
And here is Harpo's inaugural talk at Pratt; http://bit.ly/KVJnNI . Note the Bilderberg member who introduced him as Rockefeller is the cornerstone member in that interlocked organization as well.
Pratt does not care who WINS as both are controlled from this single powerful organization and either will follow the Pratt's "Corporate State" agenda perfectly.
Because the RNC convention was SO NOT filled with love for him! That had to be the most lackluster reception to an nomination acceptance speech in the history of political conventions. Mr. Worthington, you MUST have been observing that convention through rose colored glasses! And the emperor (Romney) wore no clothes!
However the black gentleman who introduced Obama at the Dem convention in 2008 spoke at the GOP convention, but the liberal media didn't cover that.
The same way they didn't cover the black liberal woman who was a cabinet minister in Romney administration and who positively bubble with praise and admiration for him.
The liberal media cut that speech out as well.
There were more, if you go to Youtube you can see all the speeches that the MSM hid from you.
Don't be afraid, it's only the truth.
Like real proof, not the BS from the liberal media.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/28/msnbc-abandons-gop-convention-during-every-speech-by-a-minority/
"One of the left’s favorite attacks on the Republican Party is that it is the party of old white people, devoid of diversity and probably racist.
If you were watching MSNBC’s coverage of the Republican National Convention in Tampa on Tuesday night, you might believe those assertions, since missing from the coverage was nearly every ethnic minority that spoke during Tuesday’s festivities."
As for Obama's supposed lack of accomplishment, well he passed an improved Medicare law, which is more than the Republicans would ever do. And the Republicans -- Romney's party, remember? -- blocked Obama at every turn, no matter how good the legislation, just out of pure partisan nastiness. So don't blame Obama for a nasty progress-blocking opposition. And Romney? He'll do anything to get elected,so he wouldn't dare rein in the right-wing nasties in his own party. So we can expect more progress-blocking paralysis from the GOP for years to come.