Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Worthington

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Worthington
 

I Wouldn't Follow This "Star" Reporter Into Battle

Posted: 05/04/2012 7:49 am

Maybe it's just me, but I think everyone relishes stories where reporters confront politicians -- and even more so when politicians challenge reporters.

That's one of the entertaining things about having Rob Ford as Toronto's mayor. One is never sure when there'll be an outburst. Keeps us media types on our toes.

We've got another one underway at the moment -- the Toronto Star's City Hall reporter, Daniel Dale, caught snooping behind Mayor Ford's home, supposedly checking public land that Ford wants to buy to accommodate a privacy fence around his property.

A neighbour told Ford of the "prowler," and the mayor charged out, ready for battle. Most of us in the news business can identify with the Star reporter. Most have been in similar situations, most of us have survived. Reporters often "cross the line" in small ways in pursuit of a story.

Just what the "story" was, in this case, is open to question.

Photographing a proposed fence area at 7.30 p.m. with a Blackberry seems odd, even for the Star. The Sun would have photographed the area in daylight with a real camera. But different things for different folks.

Personally, I pay little heed to the mayor's bellyaching about lines being crossed and his wanting to protect his family from peeping toms or intrusive journalists. Such intrusions are a hazard of his job. Even Mary Walsh ambushing him is ho-hum stuff.

What really disturbed me ("disturbed" isn't the right word, "embarrassed" would be better), is the behaviour of the reporter as quoted in stories about the incident.

In Ford's account, Dale was screaming "Help! Help! Help!" as the mayor rushed at him, and the reporter threw his phone and recorder on the ground and ran like hell.

Even in Dale's own account, published in the Star, he says "I began pleading with him as loud as I could," and admits "I became more frightened than I can remember; after two or three attempts to dart away, I threw my phone and my recorder down on the grass, yelled that he could take them, and ran."

Gracious! I guess they don't make reporters like they used to. And this guy has just won a National Newspaper Award! Maybe next year he'll expect another for the way he stood up to an angry mayor.

I recall the Sun's Joe Warmington ambushing then-Premier Mike Harris on a golf course and being scolded. Warmington's about as sensitive as a bulldozer, and stood his ground. Harris eventually apologized for his outburst.

The Star may even remember when Sun reporter Peter Young walked into their newsroom and said the city editor wanted a photo they'd taken in a hostage stand-off. He failed to mention that it was the Sun city editor who wanted the photo. We returned the purloined photo and gave Young a bonus for initiative.

When confronted, journalists don't usually yell for help, drop their camera and recorder, and run away. Maybe when facing a mob in Somalia, but not when a Toronto mayor catches you snooping. Unless you're a Star guy, that is. Star icons like Bob Reguly, Jocko Thomas and Ray Timson must be rolling in their graves.

I'm often teased at the Sun for my fixation on Jack Russell terriers who, to me, have the characteristic of good reporters. They are curious, fearless, and persistent. They rise to any challenge and seldom run away.

Maybe a new breed of reporters exists today -- King Charles Spaniel types: timid,
subservient, fearful, and apologetic.

The mayor says he's thinking of laying charges. Nonsense. He won't and he shouldn't. The unfortunate reporter's been scared enough already.

We await with interest the mayor's next bout with an "investigative" reporter.

 
FOLLOW CANADA
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Ian Llangan
Your Invisible Sky Friend Is Morally Abhorrent
02:08 AM on 05/05/2012
(1) "Reporters often "cross the line" in small ways in pursuit of a story." Except in this case absolutely NO lines were crossed by the reporter. He was on public property, pursuing a story (for which he had a 10 pm deadline to file) that was VERY MUCH in the public interest.

(2) "The mayor says he's thinking of laying charges. Nonsense. He won't and he shouldn't." Whatever the Mayor says, the pressing of charges is not his decision, it lays solely in the hands of the police. And they IMMEDIATELY declined to do so.

I could go on and on because, Mr. Worthington, your commentary on this issue is filled with a series of chiselling inaccuracies that are curiously, consistently, stubbornly and in no agreement with the facts and designed to promote your particular slant on this story. For the record, I would not follow you into battle either Mr. Worthington, because it would seem you are obtusely unable or unwilling to read the map leading to the battlefield.
11:45 PM on 05/04/2012
It is saddening to see the attention this story has got, the most pathetic stories of the day, about a mayor of the biggest city chasing down a reporter as if it was Tom and Jerry movie.

What would the rest of Canada and the rest of the world think of us?

I would have to pretend that I am not from Toronto anymore to avoid shame and embarrassment.

I could not believe the amount of time this story has occupied including the waste of our essential police resources which is meant to save lives and maintain safety and order.

The mayor has certainly over reacted especially since the visit did not take place in the middle of the night and also since he had already recognized the reporter after seeing him.

It was an incident that has been blown out of proportion by our honourable mayor who is not a fan of the Toronto Star, as he mentioned many times.

The mayor ought to calm down, take a vacation and learn to cope with the media including those he does not like.

Anger management should also be something he should consider.

The incident was very trivial. Mr. Mayor could have diffused the situation right after recognizing the young reporter.

There was no need to make it the news of the day or to sound the alarms as if the world was coming to an end, at a time when we already have enough issues to deal with.
04:12 PM on 05/04/2012
I think the media are scraping the bottom of the barrel for news stories, so that we end up with garbage about the mayor's fence. Who really cares. This was never a worthy news story in the first place until the photographer got caught in the act of invading the mayor's privacy.
11:29 PM on 05/04/2012
He was on public land.
08:54 AM on 05/05/2012
I you stand on a public sidewalk and aim a camera at someone's house and take pictures, you are still invading someone's privacy. The fact that you are on public land does not give you the right to snoop at night behind someone's house. This is just a case of poor judgement especially as there was no real story newsworthy story here in the first place.
12:41 PM on 05/04/2012
Everyone knows you don't just use a cellphone to snap pictures ofa lot beside someones house. Thas for amatures.
What you do is hire a private detective to hack thier messege services and then pay off the police to cover it up. THAT'S how a real man does his reporting.
11:51 AM on 05/04/2012
Touche Mr. Worthington!

Present company excluded, of course, but the following is a blurb from a blog I wrote in 2009...
“All the while the newspapers are giving each other in-house awards and high-fives for their journalistic excellence while the scribes are fantasizing that they just finished covering the front line of WW2 with their, "Dog bites Man" stories. Please excuse me now, I think I have made myself sick to my stomach.”

I can’t tell you where the blog is for fear of being accused of Blog-flogging, but many of your sentiments are reflected there.
Remember the Fountainhead, “We don’t read Wynand?” I don’t read Torstar, because of reporters, the likes of Dale Daniel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
YankeeCanuck
dog
05:51 PM on 05/05/2012
Bitter, much.
07:45 PM on 05/06/2012
Much bitter now, thank you for asking.