So...Boston Bruins' goalie Tim Thomas chose not to visit the White House with the rest of the team to be feted by President Barack Obama for winning the Stanley Cup. Horrors!
So what?
Now there's now a hullabaloo over his decision -- even to the point where team management has discussed suspending Thomas for skipping a team event.
There's a laugh!
I can hear the managers of the New York Rangers and Philadelphia Flyers -- even our beloved Maple Leafs -- saying: "Yeah, how dare Thomas skip the White House! Suspend him, please, maybe for the rest of the season!"
Can you imagine the uproar among Boston fans for even considering the foolishness of suspending the best goalie in hockey, winner of the Vezina Trophy last year, for a personal choice that has nothing to do with his professional life, which is hockey?
Apparently Thomas is the only American on the Bruins team -- and he's pretty conservative. He has the temerity to think that Obama has been something of a disaster as president. In Thomas' own words: "The federal government has grown out of control, threatening the rights, liberties, and property of the people."
Well, for the information of those who are upset at Thomas' decision, a hell of a lot of Americans feel the same way -- maybe 51 per cent of the country.
This is evidenced by polls that show more Americans think Obama is doing a lousy job than those who think he's doing a good job as Prez.
In other times, in other circumstances, Thomas' decision to skip the White House meeting would be acclaimed as a gesture of principle.
Remember, we boycotted the 1980 Moscow Olympics on a point of principle -- to register disapproval of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? For many, it was a personal choice and a matter of conscience.
So it seems to be with Tim Thomas, who has the grit to put his money where his mouth is, knowing that his decision will be criticized by some. As a conservative, he knows his own mind. And has guts.
Even knowing this, he was probably startled to learn that Dave Hodge, usually a sensible hockey commentator, twittered that Thomas' three kids are named Kiley, Kelsey, and Keegan -- KKK, implying that this somehow indicates support for the Ku Klux Klan.
Can you believe it? Hodge didn't spell out the Klan by name, but the implication is clear. To paraphrase Newt Gingrich in the South Carolina debate, Hodge's KKK allegation verges on "despicable, destructive, vicious, and negative."
Such a tweet is beyond stupid -- it's silly.
On a personal level, my respect for Tim Thomas is considerable. He has strong feelings and beliefs (which in the case of Obama I tend to share), and the easy thing would have been to just go along with the White House visit and bite his lip.
That's not Thomas' way -- not in hockey nor in political beliefs.
As for the "team event" he skipped, does anyone think that gaggle of Canadians, Russians, and whoever make up the team, give a damn if Thomas chose not to attend? These guys are hockey players, not leftwing zealots seeking to advance socialism.
I await, with interest, what Don Cherry has to say about the controversy.
On second thought, maybe Tim Thomas' indiscretion warrants a suspension on Tuesday, March 6. That's the next time the Bruins play the Leafs.
Tim Thomas the latest athlete to snub Obama - Sports Blog - CBS ...
Bruins MVP Tim Thomas skips Obama White House event; why he ...
Tim Thomas on Obama snub: 'Not about politics or party' but 'right as ...
Tim Thomas picked wrong time to make statement - ESPN Boston
This is not the soviet union ! you cannot send him to siberia. He is a free man and has a right to do what he wants and is not breaking any laws.
There's a lot of handwringing going on, but to little consequence. Notably, the Bruins have reiterated that they do not intend to suspend Thomas. Most of the consternation is probably motivated by America's cultish fanboi-ism when it comes to the presidency, mixed with a touch of Nobody Dislikes the President Who Isn't a Racist, and maybe a dollop of Take One For The Team too.
That last sentiment is the only one that's even remotely reasonable -- if your team is to be a prop at a political event, then you should be too. But given the commentary from the team, there's no indication that was an issue at all.
Personally, I agree with his sentiment and I have no qualms whatsoever about Thomas' decision. And I'm a Sabres fan.
I'm sure that if we go over his contract there's nothing saying he was obligated to go,
It is a far cry from some people who are always Yapping and Complaining and when Push comes to Shove... these penny store Big Mouths are never to be found.
If Tim Thomas doesn't want to go to the White House, he doesn't have to go to the White House. It's nobody's business but his own.
If his employer tells him to be an a high-profile event, important to his employer, and he doesn't show up out of pique, it is the employer's right to discipline him.
Maybe this will help: His employers are called "the owners", and Tim is called "the goalie".
I'm surprised you of all people don't like capitalism, but that's the way it works.
Talent doesn't run the world, money does.
Who wants to hear the opinions of one of the least politically aware citizens of Ontario? Seriously, I don't know how the people at the CBC put up with that guy. Does anyone in Canada get paid that much for being so consistently wrong on issues?
Some people think the Bruins run the NHL disciplinary office, but I've never heard of anyone saying they are a branch of government. They can suspend his sorry self if they please (I just don't agree that they should).
If you watch his game play closely as I have I was a fan he is a hot head and it's got him and the team on the hot seat.
Garanteed his game will suffer.
He will be a bench warming Bush leager.
A real man would of expressed himself in person to the pres.
Cherry won't say anything special on this.He is too wi m p y on that stuff.
Personally I could care less if Thomas attended the White House Bruin celebration. It's his prerogative and he has to live with the ramifications of his decision.
But what I find a little peculiar is how Thomas, in the except I posted above, says this "was not about politics" -- when it clearly was and is.
I'm a Liberal so I don't agree with Thomas or Mr. Worthington on virtually anything -- but I'd have a tad more respect for Thomas if he had not tried to disguise the real motives behind his actions.
Because my guess is, if John McCain was President, Thomas would be there with bells on.