Regular readers of this space will note (perhaps with relief) that of late I've not dwelled on the Republican primaries in the U.S.
That's because there's not an awful lot one can say.
Apart from journalistic and punditry speculation, the race to be the GOP presidential candidate is effectively over, with no one likely to oust Mitt Romney for the job.
Apart from Romney winning the recent primaries (Maryland, Wisconsin and Washington D.C.), what was significant is that most Republicans and independents agree that the only one who has even a chance at beating Barack Obama in an election is Romney.
As well as exit polls showing 80 per cent of those questioned believe this, perhaps the most telling evidence is that in "open" primaries (that is, primaries not restricted to registered Republicans but open to independents and Democrats), "Liberals," or Democrats, have overwhelmingly voted for Rick Santorum as GOP candidate.
The reason: Obama would chew Santorum to pieces in a presidential campaign, focusing on his religious zeal, his intense conservatism, his dislike of compromise and his pious, self-righteous demeanor. Scary to some.
The above may also have contributed to him losing his Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2006 by the largest margin by which an incumbent senator has ever been defeated.
Small wonder Democrats would like to face him, now that Newt Gingrich has been reduced to asterisk status in the campaign.
What seems to have happened in recent weeks is a realization across America that if one doesn't like what Obama is thrusting on the nation, the only alternative is Romney.
This stuff that Romney doesn't "relate" to ordinary people is a smokescreen. What presidential candidate is mindful of ordinary folk? They're all millionaires. But some smile more convincingly than others.
Jack Kennedy was rich, but down-to-earth and his wealth wasn't resented. So Romney has two Cadillacs (American built). So what?
For some, who have difficulty seeing a reason to re-elect Obama, Romney's appealing virtue is that he's not a Washington insider -- not part of the Beltway cabal who exist on taxpayers' money.
He's an outsider, who made his money in the private sector, who has proved competence in saving companies, who rescued the Salt Lake City Olympics, who has created jobs, and has no apparent baggage in his personal life.
Amazingly (to some, if not to me), he's a Mormon whose appeal reaches religious fundamentalists and will reign in Tea Partiers. Maybe.
Back to Obama. The concern about him and his administration is that it hasn't accomplished much. Much? Heck, it hasn't achieved anything except a massive debt for the decades, and a health scheme that no one seems to like or can afford, and which the Supreme Court is wrestling with at the moment.
Obamacare barely passed the Democrat-loaded House of Representatives by seven votes. As much as we Canadians might think it makes sense, Americans think otherwise. An insurmountable debt and a health plan that most don't want, are Obama's most memorable achievements.
They are tailor-made for Romney to campaign against.
Anyway, it's all academic now. Even if Santorum should win in Pennsylvania's primary (he won't -- he'll be clobbered in his home state) and in Texas, he's done like toast.
Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm: Mitt Romney Is a Hollow Man
Romney has problem in that he cannot articulate anything even vaguely like empathy for anyone making less than he does which leaves people either holding their noses to vote for him or simply voting for the other guy.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/20/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-he-didnt-inherit-money-his-parent/
You will see that he spent his days out of college prosthelitizing...and somehow this paid for an apartment, a car, and enough money that they felt they did not have to work. By the time his dad died and he officially inherited wealth, he was already a rich man. How did this happen, preaching? Does preaching pay big bucks? Nope, but his dad funded his adventures until he started working for the evil Bain Capital. destroying jobs one company at a time. So while he gave away his official inheritence to BYU, he had already scored tons of money from his family in the decade prior to his fathers death. That is where most of us see him as a silver-spooned kid who was given everything to start...and used it to destroy other people's jobs instead of creating new ones. Way to go Mitt...after all, he does LOVE firing people. Keep defending him, I love it.
Yeah. Right. Good luck with that.
(P.S. Come on Worthington, "reign in" - a Freudian slip if ever there were on for the 'royal' Romeyfeller.)
it has nothing to do with Romney not being perceived as being far enough to the right for the die-hards that vote in primaries... You might be well-travelled, but please... you aren't an American and your agenda is somewhat suspect at best.
"Appeal" is nothing more than a marketing trick using the same techinques that multinationals use to sell us toothpaste or soap powder.
Where we we disagree is that this toxic form of 'business as usual' is anything like okay.
Judging by the GOP candidates this round, it seems the broth is getting pretty thin in the soup of front men, that can actually pass as modern humans, for this radical ideology.
That pretty much sums up Romney right there.
Go play some shuffle board old man.
The ones that provide a tiny handful of ultra high-paying jobs and a massive number of minimum-wage serf jobs are vital to the economy, and will be protected forever.
The only Americans Mitt Romney identifies with are the wealthiest 1%.
He has absolutely no clue what is going on with the remaining 99% and the reality is he doesn't care one bit. If you look a clips of his statements this is crystal clear. He openly says that he doesn't care about the poor and that he considers hard working Americans losing everything collateral damage when it comes to billionaires making money.