The federal election is only three months away, and I think it's good to know where all the parties stand on mandatory labelling of genetically modified foods and ingredients.
The NDP have been clear about their position. NDP MP Murray Rankin, health critic for the opposition is very supportive of mandatory GMO labelling, so much so, that he introduced a motion (M-480) to label GMOs. Elizabeth May and the Green Party support Minister Rankin's motion. Both parties are committed to full transparency in food labelling.
The Conservatives have also been clear in their position, as they have consistently ignored consumer demand for GMO labelling during their term in office. After meeting with our Minister of Health, Rona Ambrose, and the follow up meeting with scientists from Health Canada, their position became even clearer -- they aren't interested in labelling GMOs!
In fact, our Minister of Agriculture, Jerry Ritz is clearly opposed to giving Canadians the Right to Know what's in our food. In the September 22, 2014 issue of The Hill Times Ritz said, "Mandatory GM labelling is an ill-informed, ideologically-driven proposal that would increase red-tape on businesses, decimate Canadian farmers, and drastically increase costs for Canadian consumers." It's funny, none of these problems occurred in the 60+ countries around the world that have mandatory GMO labelling. I wonder where Mr. Ritz gets his information from... Monsanto?
So, where do the Liberals stand on this issue? I wanted to find that out for myself, so on July 19, I attended a Liberal town hall meeting in Markham, Ont. and asked that question directly to Justin Trudeau. He responded: "The Liberal Party believes in giving consumers the most information we possibly can about what they're purchasing...That's a principle we absolutely support."
I'm hopeful that this means he supports mandatory GMO labelling, but he didn't come right out and say it. He kind of skirted around the issue and didn't specifically address GMOs, so at this point, I'm still not clear where they stand. Have a listen to the video and decide for yourself .
Polls show that about 90 per cent of Canadians want GMOs labelled. We want the right to know what's in our food, and the freedom to choose what we eat. Unfortunately, Monsanto and Big Food have spent big bucks in North America in the past few years to make sure that GMO ingredients such as corn, high fructose corn syrup, canola, vegetable oil, soy, sugar from sugar beets, and the soon to be introduced Arctic apple, are never labelled.
Unfortunately, we've learned over the past few years with GMO labelling initiatives in the U.S., and the recent passing by U.S. Congress of bill H.R. 1599, a bill to block labelling of GMOs (dubbed the DARK Act -- Deny Americans the Right to Know), that corporate greed and political corruption, transcend all political party affiliations. I thought politicians were elected to represent the people, not corporations!
I know where the NDP, the Green Party and the Conservatives stand, but unfortunately, I'm still not sure about the Liberals. If we want corporate transparency, freedom of choice, and the right to know what's in our food, we have to demand answers from our politicians about their position on GMO labeling, and hold them accountable.
Here's how you can help! Attend an all candidate's meeting in your area, and ask the question like I did! If enough people ask, they'll know that this is important to Canadians, and that their chances of getting elected will depend on where they stand on this issue! Together, we can make GMO labelling an election issue. Now is the time!MORE ON HUFFPOST:
This one has some obvious benefits: researches have been able to engineer a breed of corn that can survive long periods of water deprivation. A couple different varieties are on the market and already in use, and the one sold by Monsanto, called DroughtGard, added the same gene that bacteria use to continue growing in cold environments. Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock Click Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the World
Late blight has long been the bane of potato farmers’ existence; the fungus-like pathogen was responsible for the Irish potato harvest being decimated in the 1800s. Ireland’s agricultural agency, Teagasc, has been hard at work developing a potato that’s been genetically modified to resist blight, and once it’s tested and approved, it could do away with the plague that destroys about a fifth of the world’s annual potato harvest. Photo Credit: Liquidlibrary/ Thinkstock
Papaya ringspot virus has historically seriously lowered yields of papaya crops, and throughout the 1990s researchers worked to develop a cultivar that was resistant to it. In 1999 the first virus-resistant papayas were grown in Hawaii (they elicit an immune-like response to the virus), and today they’re approved for consumption in both the U.S. and Canada. Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock Click Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the World
The Bt bacteria has also been effectively worked into the DNA of eggplant, which sees up to 40 percent of yearly crop loss due to a pest called the “fruit and shoot borer.” The natural insecticide has been found to be non-toxic to fish, chickens, rabbits, goats, rats, and cattle. Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock
The second GE crop to be cleared by U.S. regulators (after papaya), a breed of squash called Freedom II was engineered to be resistant to two viruses. Today six varieties of virus-resistant squash and zucchini are being sold in the U.S. Click Here to see More of the GMO Foods That Could Save the World Photo Credit: iStockPhoto/ Thinkstock
Follow Rachel Parent on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RachelsNews