If the National Security Council has a book club, it's probably reading the Gelber Prize shortlist.
The prize, named for a Cold War diplomat who was also a leading scholar in U.S.-British relations, goes each March to the world's best English-language book on International Affairs. The shortlist comes out a month earlier. Every winter, I make a ritual of reading it in one go. And it changes the way I understand the ensuing year's news.
Of course, the big names pop up regularly - Ezra Vogel won in 2012 for his biography of Deng Xiaoping, Lawrence Wright's Looming Tower won in 2007 and Ghost Wars, by Steve Coll, won in 2004. But the shortlist always includes less widely known experts whose views are inevitably fresh to me: Last year's list included David Crist, the Pentagon's Iran man, whose Twilight War described 30 years of shooting war between the U.S. and Iran, and Sarah Paine's Wars of Asia which recasts World War Two around the fulcrum of China's civil war.
Taken together, each year's Gelber shortlist pries open a surprising set of big themes.
Two of this year's five books put the old Cold War back front-and-centre in my world view. Another two focus on the brawling between Allies at the start and end of World War Two, which, it turns out, shaped our current world at least as much as did their united front. And the fifth book pulled my head away from the China-U.S. dynamic long enough to realize that the world may actually revolve around Germany.
I spoke with the five authors of those books -- you can listen to the podcasts after each blurb -- and here's what I learned:
- It's Germany, stupid. While all his colleagues rush to Asia, Cambridge history professor Brendan Simms' book Europe places the "old world" at the centre of global dynamics -- and Germany as the pivot of Europe. Countries as far away as Asia can trace their relations with one another back, in part, to the German "problem": the fact that Europe's heartland wants desperately to be united even though no one else, anywhere, wants the resulting bloc to be very strong.
- America's nuclear arsenal was a lot like the Obamacare website. Once every two and a half days between 1950 and 1968, someone in the U.S. military did something incredibly dumb or dangerous with a nuclear weapon -- including dropping an A-bomb on the Gregg-family driveway in Mars Bluff, South Carolina. That's one of the chilling discoveries in Eric Schlosser's Command and Control. Weapon handlers themselves were seriously brave, and usually very skilled. But they were tooling around with the most complex weapons ever built, bolted to the most complex rockets ever built, all tied together by rotary-dial phones in the days before voice mail. And after all -- to quote the line in Apollo 13 when one more thing goes wrong -- it was a "government operation."
- Kissinger and Nixon did something worse in Bangladesh than they did in Chile -- and it's still messing up American foreign policy. Back in 1971, Pakistan killed and exiled millions of Bangladeshis. Princeton professor Gary Bass has poured through a hoard of unknown White House tapes, tracing every step in America's support for the genocide which happened at the very moment that Pakistan's president was opening Kissinger's secret channel to Mao. The Blood Telegram is named for Archer Blood, the U.S. consul in Dacca, whose staff begged Washington to stop the slaughter... and were ignored. Americans forget about this; Indians, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis don't.
- America wasn't full of isolationists before Pearl Harbour, and FDR wasn't leading the charge to save Britain (quite). Few Americans wanted to fight Hitler in 1939, when FDR started pushing aid to Britain. But within two years the mood had shifted almost completely: Most Americans wanted to do the right thing. FDR, whose Democrats had been skewered in a series of congressional elections, was paralysed. If you lived through the tensions in America before the Iraq War, Lynn Olson paints a familiar scene in Those Angry Days. Complete with surprising heroes -- like Republican presidential candidate Wendell Willkie -- and unwitting villains, like Charles Lindbergh. (There's also a weird picture of a German general and a Japanese colonel, both in full battle dress, enjoying U.S. Army maneuvers near Buffalo in 1939.)
- Bretton Woods. Just that... After many efforts, I think I finally get it now. Of course, I've been throwing the term around for years, without knowing quite what I've been talking about. (And if you were to ask, I'd mumble something about the IMF, a New Hampshire ski resort and currency wars, before trying to change the topic.) Benn Steil takes us inside the 1944 meeting that defined the global regime of floating currencies and more-or-less open trade that we now take for granted. It wasn't an end-of-war "kumbaya" moment either. America set out to grab worldwide economic leadership from bankrupt Britain -- and won, thanks to a scrappy Treasury official who also happened to be a Communist spy. Yes, The Battle of Bretton Woods (as Steil calls his book) was that weird.
The Lionel Gelber Prize is sponsored by the Lionel Gelber Foundation and the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto.
The winner will be announced on March 31.
ALSO ON HUFFPOST:
I'll be honest, at this point I barely remember this book - but I do know that, despite its awards and accolades, I wasn't a huge fan of its meandering, somewhat nostalgic tone (which just goes to show you, you can't always trust those award-winners).
This was the book that set off the nerdy tone for the year, and it was seriously amazing. Part post-apocalyptic nightmare, part 70s and 80s pop culture geekery, this seriously smart book was so much fun to read, and is recommended to anyone with the slightest inclination towards technology, video games and/or "easter eggs."
An interesting take on love affairs, as read through love letters for a variety of relationships, this was strange and funny, but not amazing.
My first crack at Stephenson, and I have to admit, I got a bit hooked. As far as I understand it, this was less science fiction-y than his other works, but this book (which also fell into my nerdy theme) was sprawling and addictive, moving everywhere from video game fantasy lands to China to B.C. forests. I loved it, but yes, the 1000+ pages constituted an investment.
In a rare foray from fiction, this fantastic book about Israel's entrepreneurial culture (co-written by my old unit head from camp who just now happens to be an advisor for Mitt Romney) was one I kept talking about throughout the year. A really interesting look at a country that gets, well, a rather different perspective when you read about it in the news, I think it's a worthwhile read for anyone interested in business, sociology, and yes, Israel.
I don't even know what to say about this book, except that I have NO idea why it was so popular last year. I read it for my book club, and it was actually painful to get through - I hated almost every character and just resented having to read it at all. If someone can convince me I should feel otherwise, please do.
A book about baseball isn't one I'd expect to love, but this one topped my list this year, thanks to its incredible writing, smartly woven plotlines and likeable characters (despite all odds). Very much recommended.
Yes, I finished the Hunger Games trilogy, and yes, I'm counting each of these as a book. I maintain that the original was actually awesome, and I think it is worthwhile to read all three of them, but the series definitely goes downhill with each book (seriously, what was that ending?). Way darker than I anticipated, and as I think we're all aware, definitely part of the zeitgeist.
I wanted to like this book more than I actually ended up enjoying it, but it's an interesting read about a woman caught in many ways between identities -- her place as a woman in a scientific community, her black family, her white husband, sister of an addict ... the list goes on. Unfortunately, the writing wasn't as compelling as I anticipated and the plot fell slightly flat - though it's possible the plot wasn't the point.
Oh, what a fun, strange book. Siblings -- whose artist parents have, for lack of a better term, fucked them up but good by putting them into their installations throughout their lives -- try to figure out who they are as people.
I don't even feel worthy of writing a review about Joan Didion, except to say that if you haven't read <em>The Year of Magical Thinking</em> yet, do it (even if it will be hard for you, because it's beautiful and sad and amazing), and then read <em>Blue Nights</em>.
This was another one that got a love of critical love that, well, I just couldn't get into. It might have been my mindset when reading it, but this (admittedly gorgeously written) book was more strange and rambling than I expected or enjoyed.
On the other hand, Barnes' book, which won the Man Booker in 2011, was absolutely wonderful and riveting and very, very quick to read. I don't want to write about the plot because I fear I'll give something away, but just know that the writing, the story and the characterizations all come together in this book to leave it with you for a long time.
Sex, corruption and Moscow - this book makes you feel like you have an inside track on understanding Russia in the early 2000s, until you realize that you can't understand a thing about the place unless you were born there. Great twists and turns, truly great storytelling.
Oh man, Murakami. I love your strange, twisted mind and your brilliant storytelling, and for other devotees, I definitely recommend embarking on this weird journey. But I have to say, I think the book was much longer than it needed to be, and that can make it some tough slugging at times.
A short story collection made of some winners and some mehs, with moments of insight that make it all worthwhile, it's a book worthy of reading if only for "Problem in the Hamburger Room."
I know some people hated this book, but I cannot tell you why. Eugenides is a storyteller of the first order, and while he cleverly riffs off Austen and a college campus, this seemingly light novel resonates beyond its first appearance.
I love pretty much everything I've read by Lionel Shriver, and find her books impossible to put down (yes, including The Post-Birthday World) -- and if you ever have the chance to see her in person, do it. But New Republic did not hit the same mark as her past works. Yes, some sentences were so spot on they made me laugh out loud and the political (and cynical) ideals in this book about terrorists and politics were incredibly interesting, but it wasn't the grand slam I've come to expect from her.
A novel disguised as short stories, or a slew of interwoven plotlines - whichever way you look at Krause's book, it is a simply wonderful, at times heartbreaking read that reveals some universal truths about relationships through time and space. I adored this one.
What can I say? I read this on the beach in Italy, and it’s a relatively simple mystery – so if you’re into that sort of thing, totally go for it.
I entered into this one with a bit of snobbery, assuming a fictional autobiography about Hemingway's first wife couldn't be nearly as interesting as a book about Hemingway himself -- but I was so wrong. It's somewhat fluffy, to be sure, but it holds up to a lot of history and gives a glimpse at that magical time in Paris when Hemingway, Gertrude Stein, the Fitzgeralds and so many more literary icons competed and learned from each other -- basically an English major's (or Woody Allen's) dream era.
More historical fiction, this time of the "epic" sort, but I fell head over heels for Follett's 'Century Trilogy' and I'm not ashamed to admit it. (Well, I'm a little ashamed, but I'm admitting it.) What I probably shouldn't admit is that I understood more about World War I after reading this book than I ever had before, and I'm apparently a sucker for sagas that cross continents and families and tie them together.
Last year, my Patchett was State of Wonder, and this year it was Bel Canto, and omigod, I love this author. If you haven't read Bel Canto yet, please do, even if you think you have no interest in opera, or terrorists, or hostage situations, or how they all might come together. It's funny and smart and surprising and so worth it.
As one of Toronto's biggest proponents, I love to read books about my city, or by authors from my city - but this short story collection? I'm sorry, but I found it almost unreadable, and that's all I really have to say about it.
I was waiting for all the books about the stock market crash to start coming out, and this one - about a rich New York family facing down a Madoff-esque scenario, is good, if not great. Definitely addictive, either way.
This book has been described as Black Swan in a novel, and while that is kind of a simplistic way to look at it, it's also pretty accurate, especially if you loved the movie. I personally loved this book, its insider take on the ballet world, the madness contained within it, and the treacherous relationships faced by siblings who compete and work together on a daily basis.
I've been watching a lot of Breaking Bad as of late (for the first time), and for whatever reason, this book now reminds me of Walt and Skyler's relationship - take from that what you will. For those who don't watch the show (or just, you know, want an actual description of the book), a couple's fraught relationship gets put even more to the test on a weekend gambling trip to Niagara Falls. It's tense, but beautiful.
I didn't love every story in this work, but the title one was amazing (and the best), and Englander's writing alone is worth reading this for.
Definitely fewer food books on this list than in years past, and this one, to be honest, definitely didn't make up for what was missing. An interesting read on the restaurant industry at times, the ultimately seriously unsympathetic narrator/autobiographer made this book more of a vanity project than a good read.
Part science fiction/apocalyptic novel, part coming of age story, I think this was actually my favourite book of the year. What happens when the earth's rotation changes and days get longer? How does society fall apart - or some together? And how the hell did Walker write a 10-year-old narrator who is perceptive and interesting, without falling into unrealistic Dawson's Creek territory? So very great.
Like I said, I love me some Toronto. And with Heti's accolades coming from no less a truly hip source than Lena Dunham, this book seemed more than worthy of a perusal. While not completely amazing in every way, Heti's bohemian life and superb insights make for great moments of reading to be sure.
What? So I read the 'adult' sequel to the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants books, and I totally liked it. I'm not too much of a book snob to admit that. Look, if you liked the movies and/or books, you'll like this, and you'll be surprised (like I was) how invested you get in it.
For some reason, I completely forgot about this book until I was writing this list, but I shouldn't have, because this book is awesome. Surprising and sad and well-written, it's composed of the journals of a woman who is gone - but wants to make sure she's remembered in full. If you're in a book club, I think this would be a good one to hit up.
Sadly, not as good as The Shadow of the Wind (the original in this series), but I felt compelled to finish it up. Still solid writing and an intriguing plot, if only to know where it all finishes.
More gorgeously written short stories, Watkins' collection is great, if a bit hard to read. Her writing makes it mostly worthwhile, but hopefully without sounding too dramatic, I did find some of the dark - and stark - imagery almost too much too bear.
What a great book to release in an Olympic year. The author of Little Bee definitely knows how to tell a story, and this tale of two very different racing cyclists - who just happen to be best friends/each other's biggest competition - weaves together the drama of the Games with life's complications very nicely.
Another non-fiction book that I loved, this one was about the inner workings of the CBC (admittedly, from one definitely biased perspective) was interesting in ways I didn't even imagine (yes, even as someone who works in the media). Definitely recommended if you care about the CBC, the media, and even Canada. (Hey, maybe I should be reading more non-fiction ...)
I already 'fessed up to loving this trilogy, so I'll just say that this was equally as compelling as The Fall of Giants, if a bit more frustrating with the limitations on how World War II was described (perhaps because I knew more about the history in this case).
Another theme I saw in my books this year was a huge number of teenage girl protagonists, which either means (a) more adult authors are taking that tack or (b) I'm reverting to adolescence, which is entirely possible. But Dare Me, a book about teenagers and bullying and cheerleaders -- all in ways you don't really expect -- is fantastically insidious.
Another World War II book, but a different take on the usual story, with a wealthy German family getting dragged down to commoner depths during the war, and the Irish maid who's there to tell all about it. A good read, but not knock-my-socks-off incredible.
Like I said - a lot of teenage female protagonists. But this book goes so far beyond your usual teenage stuff -- delving into AIDS, art, the strange relationships we find ourselves in that we can't define -- that it seems an injustice to define it that way. Fantastic.
You know those super proper wealthy families that must have a pack of lies hiding in their closets? Well, Seating Arrangements takes those people, puts them in a house for a week leading up to a wedding, and lets those secrets rip, in a very satisfying manner. Well-written, well-crafted, well worth it.
Man, I read a lot of good books at the end of the year. This one is weird and kind of occult-y, relying on the reader`s leap of belief when it comes to matters of the mind. That`s right up my alley, so I loved this tale of `psychic revenge` that works on both the literal and metaphorical levels.
So many people (read: critics) loved this book. I did not. It`s not terrible -- it`s certainly an interesting look at, say, doing business and specifically doing business in Saudi Arabia, as well as an upper-middle-aged man`s reflections on life, but it didn`t have the depth and interest I`ve come to associate with Eggers.
Say it with me: female teenage protagonists. A good book, but not a great one, this had a similar tone to Dare Me in that it focused on bullying and cliques and all that stuff that Glee turns into musical numbers so well, but with a dark, magical edge that, for whatever reason, didn't entirely resonate with me.
Combining elements of medicine, journalism and mental health, this autobiography is spell-binding in its "this could happen to you" storyline and prose. I can`t even imagine how difficult it must have been to write, but Callahan does a mostly great job of telling her story of everyone`s worst nightmare: losing your mind without any reason at all, until the doctors can finally figure it all out.
Haunting and beautiful, this novel felt at times like it was struggling with a couple of different storylines: one that told of the after-college life, another that dealt primarily with relationships gone sour. But the one focused on the title character is obviously the one to watch, so don`t let the other detract you - if you focus on Sophie, it makes for an incredible read.
This is a weird and wonderful book that takes a definite science fiction approach to writing - so if you`re into that sort of thing (my comparison would be Gary Shteyngart, though Vonnegut has been bandied about as well), read this lovely little book.
Yes, it`s the book of the year, and yes, I completely adored it. I loved the writing, I loved the concept, I loved the plot twists, I loved the characters, and I love the author for putting it all together so well. Short synopsis? It's supposedly a mystery novel about a man who may or may not have killed his wife, but it's really about relationships and how they can deterioriate, and manipulations, and how all our actions have a reaction. (Did I mention I'm watching a lot of Breaking Bad right now?)
Another one that topped many 'best of' lists for the year, and it certainly was a sweet book, but ... not amazing. A man goes out to mail a letter to a woman he hasn't spoken to in 20 years, and decides instead to walk it to her, 500 miles (or some other huge distance) away. I'm pretty alone in this opinion, but it felt predictable (even if the plot isn't the point) and a bit sentimental. Call me horrible, I can take it.
A man turns his father into a computer, then tries to figure out their relationship .... would be a super simplistic way of describing this book. And that would be an interesting book, but the actual one is even better, because it involves cults and washed up computer geniuses and ex-wives and a whole other bunch of fun. With elements of superficial fun and moments of real thought, this was a great book to end the year.
Follow Robert Steiner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/munkjournalism