Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Hot on the Blog
Raffi Cavoukian
GET UPDATES FROM Senator Mobina Jaffer
 

Above All, Bill C-31 Hurts Children

Posted: 06/29/2012 4:54 pm

On Wednesday June 27 Bill C-31: Protecting Canada's Immigration Act was cleared through the Senate by a vote of 52-33, leaving a stain on our country's immigration and refugee protection system, a system that we as Canadians could once be proud of.

With the passage of this bill, several principles which have defined us as Canadians for decades have now been compromised. Principles of justice, compassion, and tolerance that are all integral components of the Canadian identity have been overlooked and our world's most vulnerable populations will now have to pay the price.

When my family and I sought refuge in Canada 40 years ago we were consumed with feelings of desperation and fear. Although we were uncertain about what the future had in store, as a mother my primary concern was always for my son. Although my heart goes out to all refugees, as I can identify with their hardships, as a mother my sole concern is always for the children whose lives get turned upside down as a result of political, cultural and religious turmoil that they are often too young to understand.

During the Senate's study of Bill C-31 I drew attention to the way this bill unfairly targeted children, violating not only our constitution but also our international obligations.

For example, Bill C-31 gives the minister the power to impose penalties on designated foreign nationals who arrive as a group, such as mandatory unreviewable detention for six months, which would place 16- and 17-year-old children in jail-like detention centers. In addition, there will be a five year prohibition on applying for permanent resident status, even if a person has succeeded in becoming a convention refugee, leaving them with no possibility of reuniting with family for at least five years.

This is contrary to section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees the right to life, liberty and security as well as section 10 which states that an individual is guaranteed the right to prompt review of detention and section 9 which guarantees an individual the right not to be arbitrarily detained.

Furthermore, Canada is a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and has made a commitment to always ensure that civil, political, economic, social, health and cultural rights are protected. Under this convention a child is considered to be any individual who is under the age of 18.

Bill C-31 violates Article 37 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which states:

No child shall be deprived of his or her liberty unlawfully or arbitrarily. The arrest, detention or imprisonment of a child shall be in conformity with the law and shall be used only as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time...


These are not optional requirements. These are obligations to which Canada has committed under the most widely ratified human rights treaty in the world. These are requirements set out by our very own constitution. This is not a debate about public spending or about ideological preference. This is about protecting the world's most vulnerable population: our children.

I am deeply saddened to report that the amendments I introduced in the Senate that set out to ensure that 16 and 17 year old children were not placed in jail-like detention centers were not adopted by my colleagues in upper chamber.

The passage of Bill C-31 marked another sad day for Canadians. The Senate of Canada has been given the mandate to protect the interests of provinces, regions and minorities as well as to provide a sober second thought. Unfortunately, as Bill C-31 has gone on to receive royal assent and become law, it has become clear that we have failed to do just this.

 

Follow Senator Mobina Jaffer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@senjaffer

FOLLOW CANADA POLITICS
On Wednesday June 27 Bill C-31: Protecting Canada's Immigration Act was cleared through the Senate by a vote of 52-33, leaving a stain on our country's immigration and refugee protection system, a sys...
On Wednesday June 27 Bill C-31: Protecting Canada's Immigration Act was cleared through the Senate by a vote of 52-33, leaving a stain on our country's immigration and refugee protection system, a sys...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:23 PM on 07/16/2012
Mobina, you are not being realistic. Bill C-31 is something we unfortunately now require. Why leave a system that is completely open to abuse and regularly taken advantage of. Canada is not the social net of the world. The system had to be changed solely because of the way it was used (read abused) by the majority of its applicants. If we wanted to we could cut it off completely. We have absolutely no responsiblity to take anyone in from outside Canada. None. UN article 37...that is funny, give me a break...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
10:21 AM on 07/01/2012
16 and 17 year olds are not children. Many such "children" lied about their ages so that they could fight in the two World Wars. Many of those "children" died to protect your Liberal ideals and your huge Senatirial perks and pensions. Be thankful for what those "children" did for you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
10:30 AM on 07/01/2012
Do you ever post anything on here that comes close to resembling a logical, well-thought-out argument?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
12:22 PM on 07/01/2012
So you are the only intellectually reasoned person who posts on this site, are you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robertmiller252
10:13 AM on 07/01/2012
16 and 17 year olds are not children. Don't believe that? Then ask the many late teens who lied to join the armed forces in the two World Wars and in many cases gave their lives so you could spout your Liberal ideas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DirkNeptune
I love raspberry pie, damn it.
08:06 AM on 07/01/2012
I agree with you 100% Senator Jaffer.

The Conservatives harsh, dispassionate version of Canada is not the Canada I know and love.

Hopefully in 2015 we can rid ourselves of Harper and his lackeys once and for all. The next three years aren't going go be pretty.
10:51 AM on 06/30/2012
The world has changed in the 40 years since you and your family arrived. The population of the world has exploded and resulted in increased poverty , war and all other misfortunes. The number of people who are trying to get into Canada has also exploded. The result is an always increasing cost to look after these people.
I will ask you how does a country of 35 million pay to look after the 1.5 Billion refuges in the world but I don't I'd get a realistic answer . I am a self employed contractor and over the past five years I have cumulatively paid a quarter of a million dollars in personal income tax. You on the other hand live off the public purse so your view of where money comes from might be like that of my kids when they were small ; " you don't have to go to work to get money -you get it from the ATM".
Explain where Canada can get extra funding ( read Billions ),to support unbridled deluge of refuges without putting more on the backs of the working taxpayers.
Then , Senator Jaffer your position may seem more tenable to blue collar sops like myself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:18 PM on 06/30/2012
Realism - Canada does not have to take care of 1.5 billion refugees.

If you want a realistic answer than join the real world...
09:56 AM on 07/01/2012
1. no one is asking Canada to look after 1.5 billion refugees, so your point is pointless.
2.If you have paid a quarter of a million in income tax, then you have a significant income. paying your fair share is part of your responsibility as a citizen, you benefit from the Country's infrastructure, it has allowed you many resources which enable you to be profitable
3. when the corporations and the wealthy paid their fair share of taxes, as they used to, there was lots of money for government services, it has only been since the government has changed their priorities to tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations, to corporate welfare, and to the military that there is no longer money for services that Canadians value.