Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Shaun Francis

GET UPDATES FROM Shaun Francis
 

There Are High Flyers Who Deserve Military Jet Planes

Posted: 09/28/2011 5:38 pm

Who knew amortization could be so lethal? If we've learned any lasting lessons over the past week, it's that accounting hyperbole can do as much damage to our military's reputation as a weapon wielded by an Afghan insurgent. Hyperbole is exactly what's being used by media as they target the Canadian military. What else to call the incorporation of fixed capital costs into accounting that magically inflates a Challenger jet's operating costs from $2,630 per hour, to more than $10,000? While the whole affair seems an unjust media ambush on Defence Minister Peter MacKay and others who have made a lot of sacrifices to serve their country, I'd like to take a moment to defend a man I know well, and a man I admire, General Walter Natynczyk.

Several media stories mentioned that Gen. Walter Natynczyk took one of the planes to a 2010 gala in Toronto for the True Patriot Love Foundation, the organization I lead as chair of the board. The event was portrayed as Natynczyk hobnobbing with the elites. But the truth was that Gen. Natynczyk was there to raise money for his rank-and-file soldiers. He gave a stirring, captivating speech, then worked the room tirelessly, pausing for a photo with anyone who asked and always stopping to thank a soldier or the soldier's family. Thanks in part to Gen. Natynczyk's personal appearances at this fundraiser and others, we were able to raise more than $6 million to send the children of deployed soldiers to summer camp, fund military community centers, renovate homes and cars for our amputees and provide funding to train them for the paralympics.

Since he became the military's top soldier in 2008, Gen. Walt Natynczyk has what must be one of the planet's toughest jobs. Canadians tend to want their leaders to be just like them. We are a nation that flies economy, drinks Tim Hortons and wears khaki and plaid. And we want our leaders to follow our leads -- to wait in the same queues as the rest of us. Think of how hard the Prime Minister's Office works to make Stephen Harper seem like a regular guy. He's someone who drops his kids off at school, whose home at 24 Sussex Drive still doesn't have central air conditioning. We prefer our political leaders to look un-exceptional, even if deep down we want them to act exceptionally.

Natynczyk's situation is, and should be, different. He needs to be a walking paradox -- a warrior and a diplomat, a genius with a common touch, a workaholic who never seems tired. What complicates Gen. Natynczyk's job is the fact that it exists in a political sphere -- that of Ottawa, home to one of the most anti-exceptional cultures of leadership of any Western capital city. That culture has imbued the Challenger affair media cycle from its first sentence, when CTV's Lisa Laflamme decried Gen. Natynczyk's "high-flying travel arrangements." Even Liberal Leader Bob Rae wondered whether the whole thing was overblown -- chalking it up to "politics within politics."

Which is exactly right. Look, politicians run down their opponents all the time. They leave their own friends or subordinates to twist in the wind to further a career or agenda. Last week was Gen. Natynczyk's turn. In the three and a half years that he's led our military, Gen. Natynczyk has distinguished himself in a town where any recognition can be dangerous for a career. The problem isn't whether he was right to use a Challenger jet to join his family for Christmas holidays for the first time in three years. The problem is that Natynczyk's remarkable job performance has made him stand out. And the culture of Ottawa shuns anyone who stands out.

Our antipathy toward excellence is a vestige of our colonial past, and it would behoove us to shake it. We don't celebrate the best among us. Instead, we criticize them as high-flyers, as queue jumpers. Perhaps this national trait once made sense. When Canada was a sleepy resource-rich quadrant of Her Majesty's empire, we kept our heads down, in quiet deference to Britain, our colonial master, and America, our confident and powerful neighbor. But those days are long past. Amid global economic chaos we have emerged as one of the most stable and respected of Western nations. We can compete with anyone. When are we going to stop acting like the nervous colony? When are we going to let the prime minister get his central air?

Tradition suggests Gen. Natynczyk is heading into the final months of his term as Chief of the Defence Staff. He led our Canadian Forces through the successful completion of our combat mission in Afghanistan -- one that elevated Canada's military reputation around the world. We should allow him to bask in the afterglow that follows a job well done. What's troubling about the Natynczyk affair is what it foretells for the Canadian military, already entering a transformative period of cost-cutting proposed to eliminate $1 billion from its annual operating budget. What will be the new era's defining ideology? Apparently, rather than celebrating excellence, we'll return to our old ways of criticizing it. Gen. Natynczyk, and the Canadian Forces, deserve better from the people they've sacrificed so much to protect.

 

Follow Shaun Francis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@shaun_francis

Who knew amortization could be so lethal? If we've learned any lasting lessons over the past week, it's that accounting hyperbole can do as much damage to our military's reputation as a weapon wielded...
Who knew amortization could be so lethal? If we've learned any lasting lessons over the past week, it's that accounting hyperbole can do as much damage to our military's reputation as a weapon wielded...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:46 PM on 10/02/2011
I couldn’t agree less.

I disagree with trivializing Canadians’ desire to be represented by exceptional people.

I disagree with redefining 'exceptional' to mean ANYTHING superficial, let alone quantifying it based on creature-comforts.

The bling does NOT make the man.

In my opinion, parroting widely rejected, soul-sickening war-propaganda — which boasts that Canada’s involvement in overthrowing Afghanistan’s government, in favour of a UNOCAL employee who deals in torture, “elevated Canada’s military reputation around the world” — does not glorify the war; it disgraces the parrot.

In my opinion, describing a major proponent of that massively deadly, incalculably injurious intrusion, as “the best among us” is blanket-libel, and I find it deeply offensive.

Sacrificing countless people’s lives, or their physical integrity and/or mental health, is incalculably damaging to humanity.

War’s inevitable damage is impossible to repair: It should NEVER be frivolously engaged in, advocated and celebrated.

What isn’t gone forever, costs far more time, money and effort to rebuild than it does to destroy: Not just for the token few who see any benefit from Natynczyk’s select appearances.

I don’t know whether it was “sycophantic” or “bootlicking” that resulted in the censorship of my original comment, but in my opinion, that comment was grossly understated, so (despite how insulting I find it when someone discards my voice and my time) I have expanded on it.
08:54 PM on 10/02/2011
FURTHERMORE:

In my opinion, lauding a man who plays a key role in the indiscriminate promotion of war — simply for making APPEARANCES amongst a few of the countless people who bear the enormous cost of war — is inexcusable.

In my opinion, portraying his appearance at a benefit in heroic terms (fawning over his willingness to stay all the way to the end and marveling at his willingness to have pictures taken) is sickening on its face, but when one takes into account the fact that that benefit would not be necessary if not for people like Natynczyk, then it becomes truly repulsive.

You can’t even quantify how many lifetimes worth of potential were completely discarded for it, let alone what purpose any of those lives would have been put to, if they had not been interrupted by the deadly indifference of people in power, who shrug off those losses with the word, “regrettable.”

Only a fool would thoughtlessly presume that this war has produced anything that justifies its cost.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
arcsong
David Archer Toronto based Composer, Guitarist
12:20 PM on 09/29/2011
In case I was not clear enough I will add this: If these are your concerns Mr. Francis, then advocate for a permanent solution to the problem instead of defending wasteful transportation of your heroes to your charity dinners while you romanticize and fetishize military service.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:59 PM on 09/28/2011
Please don't try to lead us down the path of militarism.

http://truepatriotlovefoundation.com/landing-page/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
arcsong
David Archer Toronto based Composer, Guitarist
08:23 PM on 09/28/2011
If there are legitimate reasons for additional financial/social support for military members and their families - as I'm sure there are - then I suggest we advocate for inclusion of such expenses in our National Defense budget.

If these financial/social needs require the amounts indicated in the article and more - and the help of people like General Natynczyk to raise these funds - then it is also important enough to be covered by general revenues. Others will probably have something to say about this, but I think many and maybe most Canadians would see the wisdom of ensuring the well being of those who serve the country in this manner.

I have no doubt some outside funds will always be needed and appreciated, but leaving such vital issues to the well meaning but capricious ways of charity is a gross dereliction of responsibility.

In regard to the use of the Challenger jets, General Natynczyk - in my view - should use military transportation as needed to fulfill his mandate safely and efficiently - no more and no less.

David Archer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
08:03 PM on 09/28/2011
this sort of metntality "those below dont question institutions and obey" are dangerous. some people like this author seem to means we cant question the legitimacy of an institution. is it doing what canadians want it and is it successful if it is? the answer to both these questions is no b. who says this man stands out? there are possibly 100 men in the wings just as qualified. \\ notice how he somehow ties in giving the elite some normal with national pride? as if to say if you agree with the first part which of course who would not want to see our country rise, you have to agree with the second. this man truly is a devious talented writer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kristopher Leang
training to take down the elite
07:56 PM on 09/28/2011
notice how he says "served" using military terminology to heighten the conservative wardrums pressure? congratulations a partisan elite got to go to of the military went to. get it their own looking after their own as good as the cause sounds. the issue is with the other 1 million he didnt raise and spent.

we dont want our leaders "like us" in any of the shallow consumerists examples the author mention. despite the mediasattempts to paint herper as the everyman, a kind of canadian version of putins enforced "personality". actually being a caring compassionate human being to our own citizens and other countries is far more significant than the shallow things the author mentioned. hence why 62% of canadians voted against him

What they term "politics in politics" is know as fiscal responsibility to the middle class. things like the senates 90 million dollar budget(4500 20,000$ paying jobs in middle class terms), senseless marijuana laws (50% of canadian drug charges not to mention incarceration, court, police costs ect) the list of senseless hypocritical and logical and not scientifically supported elite policy is ridiculous in canada and the us.
this article is so dripping with propaganda you page are sticking together.